logo
Major row dividing the coalition over income for artists

Major row dividing the coalition over income for artists

Extra.ie​11-07-2025
A major row is simmering in the Coalition over plans to abolish a scheme that provides a guaranteed income for artists.
Extra.ie understands that the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform (DPER), led by Fianna Fáil's Jack Chambers, and the Department of Culture, led by Fine Gael's Patrick O'Donovan, are at loggerheads over plans to scrap the Basic Income for the Arts (BIA) pilot scheme.
Under the scheme, initiated by former arts minister Catherine Martin, of the Green Party, the State pays €325 a week to around 2,000 artists to address the financial instability faced by many working in the sector. Successful applicants were notified in September 2022 and the pilot runs over three years from 2022 to 2025. Media Minister Catherine Martin was first told of a potential golden handshake to RTÉ's head of content Jim Jennings at the end of May.
Extra has learned, however, that the scheme barely escaped the budgetary knife during a DPER review of spending in the Culture Department. As part of the build-up to the revamped National Development Plan (NDP) and Budget 2026 – which the Government has warned will be a difficult one – DPER have been reviewing the spending of all departments. One minister noted: 'It is like a home invasion.
They [the DPER] are going through everywhere like a dose of salts; a lot of ministers are feeling very bruised.' This is especially the case within the Department of Culture, where sources told Extra: 'The artists scheme barely survived; the minister had a battle to get a six-month extension.'
One senior figure noted: 'The DPER accountants were not impressed. They were using phrases like 'strong reservations' on any future schemes.'
A departmental source added: 'The suggestion was made was that it was a measure that doesn't need repeating. Pic: Gareth Chaney/Collins Photos
'That's civil service speak for taking the scheme to the vets to be put down.'
The DPER accountants are believed to have met stern resistance from Minister O'Donovan.
One Government figure noted: 'The minister has strong personal views on this: he will not accept losing a penny or a single artist. The minister will react very vigorously to any attempts to trim this scheme.' They added: 'There has been significant research into the operation of this project. There is a comprehensive report. All artists were, as part of the process, questioned over its impact.'
One furious senior Fine Gael figure lambasted the move, noting: 'It's politically stupid. You would think we would have far better things to be doing than taking on a few starving artists.' They warned the Government is 'kicking over a whole series of hornets nests' to save money for the budget, alluding to the ongoing row over whether to scrap a €1,000 reduction in student fees that was introduced as a cost-ofliving measure. Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers. Pic: Fran Veale
Another Fine Gael source warned: 'Jack [Chambers] would want to be very careful.
'Culture is a small department but sometimes in these matters it's not the size of the dog in the fight, but rather the size of the fight in the dog that matters, and Patrick likes fighting.' They warned that the Fine Gael TD for Limerick County would not 'tolerate any incursions like this on his patch'.
Another Fine Gael source noted: 'It is a classic example of Fianna Fáil knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing.
'All these words by Micheál Martin and others about the value of and pride in Irish culture sound very hollow. Pic: Shutterstock
'Pride has to eat, you know.'
Responding to queries on the issue, the Department of Public Expenditure said: 'Any matters relating to decisions for Budget 2026, including the below mentioned scheme, will be considered as part of the normal budgetary process.'
Given the perceived success of the scheme, Culture Minister Mr O'Donovan received some criticism when he announced a short six-month extension of the current arrangements.
Labour arts spokesperson Rob O'Donoghue sharply criticised the scenario where artists had been left with a 'six-month Sword of Damocles hanging over their heads'. Pic: Shutterstock
Mr O'Donovan has already signalled that he expects a full renewal of the scheme in Budget 2026, noting at the announcement of the six-month extension of the current scheme: 'I intend to bring proposals for a successor scheme to Cabinet as part of Budget 2026.'
He added: 'The extension I am announcing today will provide time to finalise the research programme and to undertake stakeholder engagement, which will provide the Government with a comprehensive evidence base upon which to base future policy decisions about the Basic Income for the Arts (BIA).'
Mr O'Donovan added that evidence collected to date indicates 'the BIA payment is having a consistent positive impact across almost all indicators'. Cairn Community Games ambassador Jack Woolley with children Helena Casey and Joseph Farrell at the launch of Cairn Community Games in the Gate Theatre. Pic: Julien Behal
He said artists in receipt of the support are typically able to 'devote more time to their art, produce more pieces of work, experience a boost to their wellbeing through greater life satisfaction, experience reduced anxiety, and are protected from the precariousness of incomes in the sector to a greater degree than those who are not receiving the support'.
The Basic Income for the Arts pilot scheme was launched in 2022 with two funding streams: one for newly qualified artists and one for more established ones. Some 2,000 eligible applicants were chosen through random selection, having met the criteria. No means test was applied to applicants.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Relief for the industry or a blow to public health: Mixed reaction to delayed health warnings on alcohol
Relief for the industry or a blow to public health: Mixed reaction to delayed health warnings on alcohol

Irish Examiner

time44 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Relief for the industry or a blow to public health: Mixed reaction to delayed health warnings on alcohol

There was a mixed reaction to the Government confirming it would delay putting health warnings on alcohol products, from 'breathing space for a sector under pressure' to 'a blow for public health in Ireland'. At Cabinet on Tuesday, ministers heard that the introduction of health warnings on alcohol labels was being delayed by two years after concerns were raised about the impact of their implementation in the current global trading environment. It comes against the backdrop of fears for Irish business from US trade tariffs propagated by President Donald Trump, with Fine Gael ministers in particular such as Paschal Donohoe and Peter Burke raising concerns in recent months. Part of the landmark Public Health Alcohol Bill, which has seen the introduction of minimum unit pricing and advertising curbs, the measure will now proceed next year as planned but at a 'more appropriate time', Cabinet heard. Ibec organisation Drinks Ireland welcomed the move and said it provided 'much-needed relief' for drinks producers in this country. 'Our members are currently contending with major trade uncertainty, new tariffs on product entering our most important export market, the US, and threats of further tariff escalation,' it said. 'In these uncertain times, companies must be as competitive as possible to survive in international markets. This means tackling regulatory burden and reducing costs for producers.' It claimed that commentary that the now-deferred changes would not impact exports, as the labelling requirement would only have applied here, was 'misguided and disingenuous'. 'The introduction of supplementary requirements uniquely for the Irish market would have placed additional pressure on all companies operating here, and this would of course be more pronounced for SMEs,' it added. The move was also welcomed by the Irish Whiskey Association, which called it a 'reprieve' as some members would have seen packaging and labelling costs increase by over 35%. Meanwhile, Alcohol Action Ireland said it was disappointed by the Government's decision and said the measure was aimed at informing consumers about the health risks that come with alcohol consumption. 'It's not just that the government is allowing its own groundbreaking legislation to be undermined by the very industry it is designed to regulate,' its CEO Sheila Gilheany said. This delay will have real-life consequences that will be felt by ordinary Irish people every day. Labels are crucial to efforts to reduce incidences of cancer, liver disease, and foetal alcohol spectrum disorder in Ireland and indeed to change the conversation about this product which is heavily marketed as risk-free and essential to everyday living.' Ms Gilheany added that the step-by-step approach to implementing aspects of the Public Health Alcohol Bill has been slow and allowed a space where misinformation has flourished. She also criticised the failure to date to introduce stricter curbs for advertising allowed by the law, which would restrict the content of such adverts to 'facts, stripping out the industry myths which are used to recklessly promote alcohol consumption'.

Will the Government's big projects survive the next downturn?
Will the Government's big projects survive the next downturn?

Irish Times

time44 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Will the Government's big projects survive the next downturn?

The Government's updated National Development Plan (NDP) proposes to spend a vast sum of money on capital infrastructure. But beyond three 'mega projects' there is little detail and the vagueness of the document has led to some skepticism. In part one of today's Inside Politics podcast, Pat Leahy joins Hugh Linehan to discuss the NDP and whether the Government's promise to prioritise infrastructure could survive a major economic shock - the kind created by heavy US tariffs, for example, They then look at the Summer Economic Statement, also revealed this week, which shows there will not be much wriggle room in this year's Budget. In part two, back to the NDP and what it says about the Government's plan for the development of transportation infrastructure. Dublin's proposed MetroLink is one of the three mega projects identified, but there is €20 billion earmarked for other unidentified projects. Where should it go? How much will be spent on new roads, and what are the implications for carbon emissions? And what about public transport projects outside Dublin? Professor Brian Caulfield talks to Hugh and Pat. READ MORE Brian Caulfield is a Professor in Transportation in the Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering at Trinity College Dublin.

Louth set to benefit from record €275 billion national development plan
Louth set to benefit from record €275 billion national development plan

Irish Independent

timean hour ago

  • Irish Independent

Louth set to benefit from record €275 billion national development plan

Unveiled this week, the NDP outlines €275 billion in investment through 2035, with €102 billion allocated for the next five years, €34 billion more than previously planned. Speaking following the announcement, Fine Gael TD Paula Butterly described the plan as 'a once-in-a-generation opportunity to deliver real and lasting improvements for people in Louth.' 'This investment will allow us to build more homes, deliver better schools and healthcare facilities, improve public transport, and upgrade critical utilities like water and energy infrastructure,' she said. 'It's about laying the foundations for strong, vibrant communities throughout Drogheda, Dundalk, and across Mid and South Louth.' She confirmed that key projects already being prioritised include the Drogheda Port Access Northern Cross Route (PANCR), the Ardee Bypass, a new North/Mid Louth Train Station, and strategic investment in ports and utilities. Meanwhile, Fianna Fáil TD Erin McGreehan welcomed the plan, noting: 'The NDP is about improving everyday life. Helping people find a home, cutting down on long commutes, and making sure every child can access the right kind of education.' Deputy McGreehan said her focus now is securing delivery for Louth: 'In Louth, we need to see real delivery on key projects like the Ardee Bypass, the reopening of Dunleer Train Station, and the construction of a new athletic track in Dundalk. These developments are essential for supporting growth and improving quality of life across the county.' She added: 'I've raised these priorities directly with the Minister, and I'll keep pushing to secure funding between now and Budget Day. Louth must get its fair share of this record investment.' Deputy Butterly echoed the sentiment, saying she would work closely over the summer with Tánaiste Simon Harris and Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe to keep Louth's priorities at the top of the agenda for Budget 2026. Both TDs stressed the importance of long-term planning. 'This is a once-in-a-generation chance to reshape Ireland's infrastructure and secure our future,' said Deputy McGreehan. 'By focusing on water, energy, and transport, we're preparing the ground for 300,000 new homes by 2030.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store