Global investment decline may worsen due to tariffs, UN trade agency warns
GENEVA: Global foreign direct investment fell for the second consecutive year in 2024, with fears this year could be even worse as trade tensions rock investor confidence, the United Nations agency for trade and development said in a report published on Thursday.
Foreign Direct Investment transactions, which do not include several European conduit economies, declined by 11 per cent, indicating a significant reduction in actual productive investment activity, according to UNCTAD.
Geopolitical tensions and trade fragmentation contributed to lower investment last year as they created uncertainty, which UNCTAD Secretary-General Rebeca Grynspan described as a "poison" for investor confidence.
"We are even more worried about the picture in 2025...We already feel that investment is halted...Tariffs are affecting growth," Grynspan told Reuters, with short-term risk management being prioritised over long-term investment.
UNCTAD said its outlook for international investment in 2025 was negative due to trade tensions. Early data for the first quarter of 2025 shows record low deal and project activity.
When several European conduit economies - which act as intermediary hubs where investments temporarily pass through before reaching their final destinations - are included, the data showed that FDI increased by 4 per cent to US$1.5 trillion.
However, UNCTAD noted that this figure masks the reality that much of this investment is merely passing through these jurisdictions and was not productive.
"We see a very worrying tendency...Investment that has a real impact on jobs and infrastructure is going down," she said.
Developed economies suffered a sharp drop in investment, with a 58 per cent decrease in Europe. North America, however, observed a 23 per cent increase in FDI, led by the US, while countries in Southeast Asia reached the second-highest level of FDI on record with a 10 per cent rise, representing US$225 billion.
Though capital inflows in developing countries were broadly stable, UNCTAD observed that capital was not being injected into crucial job-creating sectors such as infrastructure, energy and technology.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Italy, pressed to boost defence spending, lashes at 'stupid' EU rules
Italy's Minister of Economy and Finance Giancarlo Giorgetti attends a press conference during the G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors' Meeting in Stresa, Italy May 24, 2024. REUTERS/Massimo Pinca/File Photo ROME (Reuters) -European Union budget rules are "stupid and senseless" and need to be changed to allow member states to boost defence spending as recommended by Brussels, Italian Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti said on Thursday. The EU Commission has introduced flexibility clauses to allow more investment in security, but Giorgetti said their current form penalises countries such as Italy, which are under a so-called EU infringement procedure for their excessive deficits. "It is essential to find ways to bring these rules up to date with the crisis we are experiencing so that they do not seem stupid and senseless," the minister said in a statement issued by his staff on the sidelines of a meeting with euro zone peers in Luxembourg. The title of the statement was blunter, saying Giorgetti called for changes to "stupid and senseless rules". Brussels has proposed allowing member states to raise defence spending by 1.5% of gross domestic product each year for four years without any disciplinary steps that would normally kick in once a deficit is more than 3% of GDP. The plan came amid growing pressure in Europe to boost military spending to deter a potential attack from Russia and become less dependent on the United States. Highly-indebted Italy is set this year to meet the NATO defence target of 2% of GDP through a series of accounting changes, but an alliance summit next week is expected to raise the goal to 5% of GDP. Giorgetti said that, under the Commission's scheme, member states not subject to the EU's excessive deficit procedure would be allowed to use the extra leeway on defence without breaching budget rules, even if their deficits rise above the 3% of GDP ceiling. However, "member states already in the infringement procedure cannot use the same flexibility," he added. In this situation Italy is reluctant to use the EU flexibility clause because it would prevent it from lowering its deficit to 2.8% of GDP in 2026 from 3.4% last year, as planned. "Italy is committed to a timely exit from the infringement procedure and accepting the invitation to increase defence spending would forever prevent this," Giorgetti said. Rome is also wary of any move that could harm its improving reputation on financial markets, two government officials said. Last month, credit ratings agency Moody's upgraded Italy's outlook to "positive" after rival S&P Global raised the country's rating to "BBB+" from "BBB." Italy's preferred option would be the issuance of common EU debt to finance higher defence spending, one of the officials said, but such a plan would require support from the other bloc members. (Editing by Alvise Armellini and Gavin Jones)
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Antimony shortage after China's export curbs leaves battery makers sweating
When China restricts exports of a key mineral, sometimes the pain is sudden and even crippling — enough to spur a major outcry almost immediately. Other times, it takes longer to be felt. For the world's makers of lead-acid batteries, China's restrictions on critical mineral antimony that were put in place late last year have become a major headache — one that their customers also now have as sky-high procurement costs are passed on. "We consider it a national emergency," said Steve Christensen, executive director at the United States-based Responsible Battery Coalition, whose members include battery maker Clarios, Honda and FedEx. He noted the key role batteries played in industry and civilian life, how antimony was used in military equipment, as well as the surge in spot prices. Antimony now costs more than US$60,000 per tonne, having more than quadrupled over the past year. "There are no quick solutions... We were completely caught off guard collectively, as an industry," he said. China likely produced 60 per cent of all antimony supply in 2024, according to the US Geological Survey. Much of antimony mined in other countries is also sent to China for processing. Beijing added the mineral to its export control list last September, requiring companies to gain licences for each overseas antimony deal. It then followed up in December with an outright ban on shipments to the US — an action seen as retaliatory after Washington further restricted exports of advanced semiconductors to Chinese companies. China's global exports of antimony are now just a third of levels seen this time last year. Christensen said US companies were hugely reliant on China for their supply of antimony and buyers were increasingly having to procure from an emerging "grey market", where sellers that had stocked up on the material were charging extremely high prices. China's restrictions on antimony precede its controls on rare earths and rare earth magnets that were imposed in response to US President Donald Trump's tariffs and do not appear to have been discussed in last week's efforts to stabilise a truce in trade tensions between the two countries. Last week's talks between China and the US also did not include any agreement on specialised rare earths such as samarium needed for military applications. Lead-acid batteries, commonly found in petrol-engine vehicles, are mostly used to start the engine and to power low-voltage instruments. They are also used as sources of backup power in various industries and to store excess energy generated by solar and wind systems. Antimony is also essential to military equipment such as night vision goggles, navigation systems and ammunition. Overall antimony demand is some 230,000 to 240,000 tonnes a year with lead-acid batteries accounting for about a third of that, according to consultancy Project Blue. While many battery makers may have access to antimony-lead alloy from recycled materials, Project Blue estimates they collectively need around 10,000 tonnes a year of higher purity antimony to top up the alloy to reach the right battery properties. Securing that additional portion could be challenging. Project Blue director Nils Backeberg said there was enough antimony outside China to satisfy non-Chinese demand but buyers needed to compete with Chinese purchasers such as the country's huge solar industry, and China's smelters were able to offer better terms. "With antimony prices at nearly five times normal market conditions, the cost becomes a factor and with supply limited on the Western market, a shortage is being felt," he said. For now, it seems that battery makers' antimony woes have not yet led to cuts in output. One source at an Indian battery maker said antimony represented only a small cost of a battery and price increases were being passed onto customers, but any more price rises could spell trouble. "If the price does increase further, everyone (in the industry) will be vulnerable," said the source. In a sign that profits are being affected, India's Exide Industries blamed high prices for antimony when it logged smaller-than-expected income for its fourth quarter. Christensen said policymakers should treat the issue as one of national security, arguing that Western countries had become "overly reliant on a single geopolitical adversary for minerals foundational to both national defence and civilian life".
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Oil tanker market signals more energy disruption ahead
While global energy markets are not yet pricing in worst-case scenarios for the Israel-Iran war, oil tanker rates are providing a good real-time gauge of the escalating risks. Geopolitical risk has spiked following Israel's surprise bombardment of the Islamic republic last Friday and Iran's retaliatory ballistic missile strikes, leading to a rally in global energy prices, with Brent crude rising eight per cent to roughly US$75 a barrel. But markets and investors now appear to be in a holding pattern as the conflict unfolds, with possible scenarios spanning everything from an imminent ceasefire and strengthened nuclear deal to a joint United States-Israel effort to destroy Iran's nuclear programme and potentially bring about regime change. For oil markets, the central risk remains the blocking or disruption of maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman through which one-fifth of the world's oil and gas consumption flows. Iranian strikes on energy infrastructure in Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates — both US allies — would represent another major escalation. Current oil prices suggest the market is still largely discounting such extreme scenarios, but trends in the oil tanker market show that oil shipping activity is being impacted even without direct action by Teheran. The benchmark daily rate for a "very large crude carrier" (VLCC) moving oil from the Middle East to China has risen by 40 per cent since June 13, reflecting the higher risk premium tanker owners are now charging to move through the strait. LSEG shipping market analysts anticipate further rate increases in the coming days. Tanker rates in other regions have also risen. For example, VLCC rates between West Africa and China have also jumped by over 40 per cent since Friday. This is partly due to an expectation that crude buyers will seek to secure supplies from regions outside the Middle East in order to reduce the risk of disruption to their refining or trading operations. In another sign of the conflict's indirect impact on shipping, Qatar's national energy company instructed liquefied natural gas and oil tankers to stay outside Hormuz and to enter the Gulf only the day before loading, Reuters reported. While no physical attacks have occurred in Hormuz, tensions in the Gulf were heightened on Tuesday after two oil tankers collided and caught fire near the Strait of Hormuz. One of the tankers, the Front Eagle, which was destined for China, was loaded with two million barrels of Iraqi crude oil, according to monitoring service The exact cause of the collision, which resulted in no injuries or spills, is still unclear. But it coincided with a surge in electronic interference among commercial ship navigation systems in recent days around Hormuz and the wider Gulf. This electronic disruption was affecting vessels' ability to accurately transmit positional data via automated identification systems (AIS), which posed operational and navigational challenges for maritime traffic, said the US-led Joint Maritime Information Centre in an advisory. The source of the interference, known as jamming, was unclear. LSEG analysts said more than 260 vessels in the Gulf had their AIS positions corrupted at one point in recent days, as they appeared to be "sailing" on the land around the South Pars Central Power Plant in southern Iran. Similar incidents have been recorded in other parts of the world in the past. For example, signal disruptions affecting AIS and GPS signals rose sharply in the Baltic Sea following Moscow's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The physical oil market, where real-world trade activity overlaps with political and military activity, can often help investors assess risk levels at moments of heightened geopolitical tension. Amid the current fog of war, the tanker market in the Middle East is flashing warning lights.
