Made in China 2025: 4 questions on the country's manufacturing upgrade 10 years on
Advertisement
In the
latest China Future Tech webinar , South China Morning Post technology editor Zhou Xin, Political Economy Editor Jasmine Wang, Science News Editor Stephen Chen and Political Economy Correspondent Ralph Jennings discussed major questions surrounding the ambitious plan as it concludes this year, and what to expect from China's policymakers ahead of their gathering in Beijing in early March.
What has China achieved under 'Made in China 2025'?
When China's State Council issued the policy in May 2015, calling it the country's first 10-year action plan focusing on promoting manufacturing, China still stood at the low end of the global value chain, producing mostly cheap goods. Most cars on Chinese roads were made by Western carmakers, and both the hardware and software of computers and mobile phones were largely designed in the US.
Amid global pushback, the Chinese government has publicly downplayed the 'Made in China 2025' agenda in recent years, but it has still led to profound changes in the domestic economy. Electric vehicles from local brands are popular among Chinese consumers, and the China-made C919 passenger plane has begun to serve some of the busiest routes.
While China still lags in areas such as high-end semiconductors and aerospace, a Post analysis in April last year found that the country has
achieved about 86 per cent of its goals
What role did the government play in China's progress in technology and manufacturing?
The government's support measures came through a combination of top-down policy support, fiscal support in the form of tax rebates, resource allocation for basic research and fostering talent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Standard
an hour ago
- The Standard
ASEAN Film Festival 2025 brings Southeast Asian Flair to Hong Kong screens
Further Collaboration with the ASEAN Market -- Hong Kong as a Hub for High-Quality Projects along the Belt and Road
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong developer Road King defaults after creditors reject debt amendments
Road King Infrastructure suspended US$22.6 million in interest payments and will defer distributions of US$56.5 million on perpetual securities, making it the first Hong Kong-based developer to default on bond payments since China's property crisis began in 2021. Advertisement The firm failed to win enough creditor consent for debt amendments aimed at easing short-term cash strain and missed interest payments on two notes due in July, it said in a filing with the Hong Kong stock exchange on Thursday. The company said it would suspend all principal and interest on its offshore bank debt, notes and perpetual securities 'to ensure fair and equitable treatment of all offshore creditors'. The developer had US$1.51 billion in offshore debts, which included bank loans and notes, plus US$890.5 million in perpetual securities. It will suspend payments on US$22.62 million in interest, with deferred distribution on the perpetual securities amounting to US$56.46 million. The decision could prompt creditors to demand quicker repayment or take other actions, though the company said it had not received any such notices. Road King would 'explore a holistic solution' to address its current challenges, but did not intend to use proceeds from asset sales to repurchase its notes and perpetual securities. Instead, it would use such proceeds to fund a broader restructuring. The company said it aimed to discuss restructuring terms with a small group of creditors, starting with the bondholders who provided feedback on earlier proposals. It also welcomed discussions and constructive dialogue with other creditors, it added.
HKFP
3 hours ago
- HKFP
‘Despicable': Beijing's office slams 2024 US report on ‘significant human rights issues' in Hong Kong
The Chinese foreign ministry office in Hong Kong has expressed its 'firm opposition' to a US report that found 'significant human rights issues' in the city last year. The US State Department's 2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, published on Tuesday, contained 'fabricated false claims' about the human rights and rule-of-law situation in Hong Kong, the Commissioner's Office of China's Foreign Ministry in Hong Kong said in a statement on Wednesday evening. The US report highlighted the passage of the homegrown Safeguarding National Security Ordinance – better known as Article 23 – in March 2024. The US Department of State said it had broadened the scope and definition of sedition offences and granted Hong Kong authorities 'much wider scope to detain and arrest individuals for political purposes.' The report also cited 'arbitrary arrest and detention' and 'transnational repression against individuals outside of Hong Kong.' It found 'serious restrictions' on free speech, pointing to the first round of Article 23 arrests, which involved jailed Tiananmen crackdown activist Chow Hang-tung and those who managed her social media pages. It added that the operating space for independent media 'shrank further' last year, citing visa denials faced by foreign journalists in recent years, as well as the first sedition case ruling involving the media, when a Hong Kong court convicted and jailed former editors of the defunct Stand News in August. In response, the Chinese foreign ministry office in Hong Kong said the crackdown on activities endangering national security was a 'legitimate measure' and trials in the city were 'impartial.' The US was 'rehashing' cases involving 'anti-China, destabilising forces in Hong Kong' and openly supporting them, the spokesperson said. They urged the US to stop interfering in Hong Kong's affairs and to respect China's sovereignty and the city's rule of law. 'This fully exposes the US's politicisation and instrumentalisation of human rights issues, as well as its sinister attempt to use Hong Kong to contain China's development — an act that is despicable,' the Commissioner's Office statement read. Separate from the 2020 Beijing-enacted security law, the homegrown Safeguarding National Security Ordinance targets treason, insurrection, sabotage, external interference, sedition, theft of state secrets and espionage. It allows for pre-charge detention of up to 16 days, and suspects' access to lawyers may be restricted, with penalties involving up to life in prison. Article 23 was shelved in 2003 amid mass protests, remaining taboo for years. But, on March 23, 2024, it was enacted having been fast-tracked and unanimously approved at the city's opposition-free legislature. The law has been criticised by rights NGOs, Western states and the UN as vague, broad and 'regressive.' Authorities, however, cited perceived foreign interference and a constitutional duty to 'close loopholes' after the 2019 protests and unrest.
