Avoid interfering in other Takhts' affairs, SGPC House urges Akal Takht
The resolution, tabled by SGPC president Harjinder Singh Dhami, was adopted during a special session of the SGPC's general house — often referred to as the Sikh parliament — held at Teja Singh Samundri Hall, its headquarters within the Golden Temple complex. The gathering, which was attended by nearly 100 members, discussed the dignity and reverence of the Takhts and unanimously passed the resolution urging the jathedars to uphold the traditional honour, authority and spiritual significance of these highest Sikh institutions.
The resolution reads, '…No interference should occur in local matters of the other Takhts without consultation. If such matters arise, decisions should only be made after thorough discussion involving the respective Takht's jathedar. In the absence of consensus, no hasty decisions should be taken. Except in urgent situations, meetings of the Panj Singh Sahiban (Sikh clergy) should be announced a few days in advance (at Akal Takht). If a jathedar from a Takht is unable to attend, a Singh Sahib from Sri Harmandir Sahib (Golden Temple) may be included as per the resolution passed by Akal Takht Sahib on November 19, 2003.'
The resolution, presented by SGPC president Harjinder Singh Dhami, emphasised that the Takhts are the supreme institutions of the Sikh Panth that provide religious, spiritual, moral and panthic leadership in accordance with Sikh history, Gurbani and Gurmat (Guru's wisdom) traditions. While each Takht has its own historical and regional significance, the resolution stressed that all five Takhts operate under a uniform gurmat maryada (Sikh code of conduct).
'While all five Takhts are important in their own right, the panth collectively recognises the supremacy of the Akal Takht Sahib. Panthic-level decisions are deliberated and finalised by the Panj Singh Sahiban at the Akal Takht Sahib, while the other Takhts may address local issues as per the Sikh protocol,' the resolution read further.
The meeting also condemned several developments, including granting parole to Dera Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim.
Three members — executive committee member Jaswant Singh Purain, former president Jagir Kaur and former general secretary Kiranjot Kaur — from the opposition camp blamed political interference for hurting Takht's honour. SGPC chief Dhami was left red-faced when Jagir Kaur lambasted the SAD (Badal camp)-associated ruling camp for removing Takht jathedars 'unceremoniously' and appointing new jathedars in alleged violation of maryada. She questioned the SGPC's role in these developments. In presence of Golden Temple head granthi Giani Raghbir Singh who was also removed as Akal Takht jathedar recently, she said, 'Character assassination was carried out during their (jathedars') removal. One of the removed jathedars, Giani Raghbir Singh, is sitting with us here. Was he not ours? You (SGPC chief) are not using your power. Don't give your pen to somebody else'.
Purain said, 'Inquiry of former Takht Damdama Sahib jathedar Giani Harpreet Singh was the prerogative of Akal Takht, but it was conducted by SGPC members associated with a political party. Now, deciding about granting a nod to the Akal Takht panel to organise a meeting to elect SAD president at Teja Singh Samundri Hall is the prerogative of the SGPC, but it is writing to the Akal Takht to decide about it. It is ridiculous.'
Akal Takht acting jathedar and Takht Kesgarh Sahib jathedar Giani Kuldeep Singh Gargaj and Takht Damdama Sahib jathedar Baba Tek Singh Dhanaula skipped the meeting to evade any kind of opposition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
SP Leader Sparks Outrage By Linking Uttarakhand Floods To Bulldozer Action On Religious Sites
Samajwadi Party leader ST Hasan has ignited a major political controversy by drawing connections between the devastating flash floods in Uttarakhand and the government's bulldozer operations targeting religious structures in the state. His inflammatory comments have triggered widespread condemnation across party lines, with critics accusing him of exploiting natural disasters for political gain and spreading communal discord. The contentious remarks emerged in response to the catastrophic cloudburst incident in Uttarakashi that resulted in five fatalities. Hasan's attempt to correlate the natural calamity with demolition activities against places of worship has been met with fierce backlash from various political quarters, including both ruling and opposition parties who have denounced the statement as inappropriate and divisive. Congress Member of Parliament Imran Masood delivered a particularly harsh rebuke, describing such statements as the product of mental instability. He emphasized that individuals making such inflammatory remarks should fear divine retribution and avoid spreading hatred through their words. His criticism reflects the broader political consensus against using natural disasters as fodder for communal polarization. Despite facing intense criticism from multiple directions, Hasan has remained steadfast in defending his controversial position. He expanded his argument beyond the immediate incident, claiming that various natural calamities are occurring due to severe ecosystem damage and indiscriminate deforestation practices. The SP leader argued that regardless of religious affiliation—whether Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, or Christian—all believers share faith in a divine creator, and consequently, places of worship including mosques, dargahs, and temples should remain protected from bulldozer operations. While acknowledging that authorities might evacuate such structures if necessary, he insisted they should be allowed to remain standing. The backlash against Hasan's statements has been particularly severe from the Bharatiya Janata Party leadership. Uttar Pradesh minister Danish Azad Ansari condemned the remarks as completely inappropriate, arguing that mocking such tragic events does not suit leaders of the Samajwadi Party. He criticized what he perceived as an attempt to score political points even during tragic circumstances, calling upon SP leadership to demonstrate greater sensitivity toward human suffering. BJP spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari launched an even more scathing attack, accusing Hasan of deliberately communalizing what should be treated as a natural tragedy. He alleged that the former SP parliamentarian was insulting Hindu communities while simultaneously downplaying the genuine suffering of Uttarkashi's Dharali village residents who bore the brunt of the cloudburst disaster. Bhandari's criticism highlighted what he characterized as the Samajwadi Party's tendency to view even death and disaster through the lens of Hindu-Muslim divisions. The controversy has exposed deeper fault lines in Indian political discourse, particularly regarding the intersection of environmental issues, religious sensitivities, and political opportunism. While Hasan's concerns about deforestation and ecosystem damage reflect legitimate environmental issues that contribute to natural disasters, his decision to link these concerns with religious demolitions has been widely perceived as crossing acceptable boundaries of political commentary. Environmental experts and disaster management specialists have long warned that uncontrolled development, deforestation, and climate change are increasing the frequency and severity of natural disasters in mountainous regions like Uttarakhand. However, the scientific consensus focuses on these measurable factors rather than drawing connections to religious or political activities unrelated to environmental degradation. The timing of Hasan's remarks has also contributed to the intensity of the backlash, coming as rescue operations were still underway and families were grieving their losses. Political analysts note that exploiting human tragedy for partisan purposes typically generates negative public reaction across ideological lines, as demonstrated by the cross-party condemnation of his statements. The incident reflects broader challenges facing Indian politics, where natural disasters and national tragedies sometimes become vehicles for advancing partisan agendas rather than opportunities for unified response and genuine problem-solving. The controversy surrounding Hasan's remarks illustrates how quickly legitimate policy discussions about environmental protection and religious rights can be overshadowed by inflammatory rhetoric that prioritizes political scoring over constructive dialogue. The widespread rejection of Hasan's comments by leaders across the political spectrum suggests that there remain certain boundaries in Indian political discourse that are considered inviolable, particularly when it comes to exploiting human suffering for electoral or ideological advantage. However, the incident also highlights ongoing tensions between secular governance and religious sensitivities that continue to influence political debates in contemporary India.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
SP leader ST Hasan blames ‘bulldozer action' for Uttarakhand floods, sparks row
Samajwadi Party leader ST Hasan has sparked a row with his remarks linking flash floods in Uttarakhand to the bulldozer action against religious sites in the state. The remark has received backlash from several parties, including the BJP and the opposition, calling out the SP leader for 'spreading hate'. Samajwadi Party leader ST Hasan also said that deforestation and damage to ecosystem are also reasons behind such natural calamities. (Screengrab/X/@ANI) The SP leader's remark came in response to the couldburst in Uttarakashi, which left five people dead. Responding to Hasan's remark, Congress' Member of Parliament Imran Masoor said such remarks are made by 'mentally disturbed' people. "Mentally disturbed people make such statements. They should fear Allah. They should not say things that spread hatred," Masood told ANI. What ST Hasan said SP leader ST Hasan drew a parallel to the natural calamity in Uttarakhand to the bulldozer action on religious structures. He also pointed out to deforestation and damage to the ecosystem, leading to the disaster. Even after receiving backlash, Hasan has stood by his remarks. 'It is not just cloud bursts. There are other natural calamities occurring. The reason for this is that our ecosystem has been badly damaged. Our forests are being cut down indiscriminately. Secondly, we all believe in our creator, whether we are Hindu, Muslim, Sikh or places where the Almighty is worshipped, whether it is a mosque, dargah or temple, bulldozers should not be run on them. You may get them vacated, but let them remain standing,' he told ANI. Backlash on ST Hasan's remarks Bharatiya Janata Party leader and Uttar Pradesh minister Danish Azad Ansari also reacted to Hasan's remarks and said that tragedies such as the one that struck Uttarakhand should not be mocked. He added that leaders of the Samajwadi Party should be a little 'sensitive'. "Mocking such a tragedy doesn't suit the leaders of SP. Even in such a tragic incident, they are conspiring to score politically. This is not appropriate at all. SP leaders should be a little sensitive," the UP minister said. BJP's spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari also accused Hasan of communalising a 'natural tragedy' and that for Samajwadi Party, 'even death & disaster are filtered through Hindu–Muslim lenses.' 'Former SP MP ST Hasan communalises a natural tragedy — insults Hindus & downplays the suffering of Uttarkashi's Dharali villagers after the cloudburst,' he wrote in a post on X. 'Shame on Samajwadi Party!' he added. (With inputs from ANI)
Hindustan Times
7 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Punjab: Akal Takht panel changes venue for delegate meet
The Akal Takht-appointed panel on Saturday decided to organise the delegate meeting of the breakaway camp of the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) to elect a parallel president of the party at Gurdwara Burj Akali Phoola Singh in Amritsar, citing that the SGPC did not allow them to install Guru Granth Sahib at Bhai Gurdas Hall, the original venue. The SGPC had allotted Bhai Gurdas Hall in the vicinity of Golden Temple for holding the meeting on August 11. (HT Photo) The SGPC had allotted Bhai Gurdas Hall in the vicinity of Golden Temple for holding the meeting on August 11. After reviewing the arrangements at the hall for the meeting, senior Akali leaders said they were surprised when the manager of Darbar Sahib announced that during the delegate session, the installation of Guru Granth Sahib will not be permitted. One of the panel members Bibi Satwant Kaur expressed astonishment over the incident. She said it was unimaginable and inconceivable that a General Session could be held without the presence of Guru Granth Sahib. When contacted, Golden Temple manager Bhagwant Singh Dhangeda said, 'Keeping religious traditions in mind, Darbar Sahib considers it inappropriate to perform the ceremonial installation of Guru Granth Sahib at political events.' Earlier, the panel was enraged over not being permitted to conduct the meeting at Teja Singh Samundri hall at the SGPC headquarters.
