logo
Trump targets Harvard over antisemitism claims, threatens to pull all federal funding

Trump targets Harvard over antisemitism claims, threatens to pull all federal funding

Malay Mail12 hours ago
WASHINGTON, July 1 — US President Donald Trump's administration said on Monday that an investigation had concluded Harvard University violated federal civil rights law for failing to address harassment of Jewish and Israeli students, though critics and some faculty say such probes are a pretext to assert federal control over schools.
The announcement could lay the groundwork for further action against the school, which has already seen billions of dollars in grant money frozen by the administration as part of a broader campaign against Harvard and other universities across the country.
Universities have said Trump's actions threaten academic freedom and free speech, as well as critical scientific research.
The Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Civil Rights accused Harvard of 'deliberate indifference' toward discrimination against Jewish and Israeli students, according to a notice from the administration.
The department outlined a series of harassment incidents and faulted Harvard's response for being 'too little, too late.'
'Failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources,' lawyers for the administration wrote in a separate letter to Harvard President Alan Garber that was viewed by Reuters. The result of the probe was first reported by the Wall Street Journal.
In a statement, Harvard said it had taken 'substantive, proactive steps' to address antisemitism on campus, including updating its disciplinary processes and expanding training on antisemitism.
'Harvard is far from indifferent on this issue and strongly disagrees with the government's findings,' the school said.
Monday's letter is the latest in a multi-pronged assault that Trump has waged against Harvard, the nation's oldest and wealthiest university, after it rejected sweeping demands to alter its operations.
The administration has frozen some US$2.5 billion (RM10.5 billion) in federal grant money to Harvard, moved to block it from enrolling international students and threatened to remove its tax-exempt status. Harvard has filed lawsuits challenging those moves.
In addition to targeted funding freezes at specific schools, the administration's cutbacks at agencies such as the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health have also resulted in terminated grants to research universities.
The president has taken particular aim at Harvard and Columbia, two of the nation's most prominent universities.
Earlier this year, the administration said it had terminated grants and contracts to Columbia University worth US$400 million, accusing the school of not protecting students from antisemitic harassment during massive campus protests against the Israel-Gaza war, which included some Jewish organisers.
Civil rights groups in response have said the contract cancellations lacked due process and were an unconstitutional punishment for protected speech.
However, Columbia agreed to negotiate with the administration over demands that the school tighten its protest rules.
The school's interim president, Katrina Armstrong, stepped down days later.
In May, the Trump administration concluded that Columbia had violated civil rights law by failing to address antisemitism, just as it did on Monday regarding Harvard.
Earlier this month, Trump's Department of Education said Columbia had failed to meet accreditation standards by allegedly failing to protect Jewish students from harassment.
Other schools have also become targets for the pressure campaign.
On Friday, the president of the University of Virginia, James Ryan, resigned under pressure from the Trump administration over the school's diversity, equity and inclusion policies.
Last week, the Trump administration announced it would investigate hiring practices at the massive University of California system — which enrols nearly 300,000 students — to examine whether they run afoul of anti-discrimination law. — Reuters
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Majority of Finns prefer to shift away from U.S. products, investment: survey
Majority of Finns prefer to shift away from U.S. products, investment: survey

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Majority of Finns prefer to shift away from U.S. products, investment: survey

HELSINKI, July 1 (Xinhua) -- A recent survey conducted by Finnish financial services group LahiTapiola reveals that two out of three Finns now prefer to purchase products and services from Europe rather than the United States. The shift is largely attributed to U.S. President Donald Trump's unpredictable trade policies. According to the survey results released Tuesday, 66 percent of respondents said Trump's policies have made them more inclined to favor European goods and services. Only 16 percent disagreed, while 18 percent remained undecided. The findings also show that 56 percent of Finns believe that avoiding investments in U.S. companies is a responsible value-based choice. Among those who currently hold investments, that figure rises slightly to 59 percent. The accompanying press release cites growing concern over the negative impact of Trump's policies on Europe, particularly regarding economic stability and security, as the main driver behind this shift away from U.S. goods and investments. Beyond economic and political concerns, many Finns expressed frustration with Trump's communication style. The survey indicated that his rhetoric and behavior have fostered an emotional resistance toward American products. This sentiment appears to extend beyond Finland. The press release mentioned Tesla as a notable example, pointing out that its sales have been hit hard. According to the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association, registrations of new Tesla vehicles in EU countries dropped by more than 45 percent between January and May 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. Heikki Urpelainen, portfolio manager at LahiTapiola Asset Management, noted that escalating trade restrictions are making the United States a less attractive export market. In response, European companies are increasingly lowering prices and focusing on domestic sales. While this trend may provide short-term advantages for some European firms, Urpelainen warned that the broader impact of Trump's tariffs is detrimental to European exporters overall. The survey, conducted in April 2025, collected responses from 1,100 Finnish residents aged 18 and older.

Road to Middle East peace runs through Teheran and Tel Aviv
Road to Middle East peace runs through Teheran and Tel Aviv

New Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Road to Middle East peace runs through Teheran and Tel Aviv

IRAN stands at the crossroads of history for resisting Israel and the United States that went all out to destroy the Islamic republic's uranium enrichment facilities. With or without nuclear weapons, Teheran can be a force for equilibrium and stability — not just in the Middle East, but across the Eurasian heartland. In hindsight, everything was going well with Iran's nuclear programme until US President Donald Trump decided to dump the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on May 8, 2018. Technically speaking, the US withdrawal from JPOA removed Iran from its obligations and expedited its "breakout time" — the time it would take for Iran to produce enough weapon-grade uranium for a nuclear bomb. By the morning of June 22, when all hell broke loose over the Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan uranium processing sites, Iran had the capacity to enrich uranium to 60 per cent purity, short of the 90 per cent that Israel feared. Incidentally, Israel has nuclear bombs at Dimona that could blow the entire region into pieces, and yet Tel Aviv is fearful of Teheran that has no nuclear bombs? After the US strikes, Trump triumphantly declared that the facilities "were totally and completely obliterated". His assessment was later downplayed by Central Intelligence Agency director John Ratcliffe. The killing of Iran's top nuclear scientists and generals may set back the process for a few years. However, it is unlikely to undermine its technical capacity to weaponise the knowledge, if it wishes to. The current Iran-Israel conflict is no longer based on ideological schisms or differences. Instead, the once-dominant Arab-Israeli conflict has given way to a more complex, dangerous and region-defining rivalry between Iran and Israel — one that reflects shifting alliances, strategic ambition and a new geopolitical architecture in the Middle East. This new fault line is less about identity or religion, and more about regional hegemony, deterrence, and resistance to unilateralism, territorial domination and land grabbing. Lastly, Israel's genocide policy in Gaza is a stark warning to other countries that they, too, could face the same fate if they dare challenge the nuclear state of Israel openly. Israel is a formidable military power and can respond to Iranian attacks — but without the US, it faces high strategic and operational risk. While US involvement provides the margin between military resilience and regional catastrophe, the response from Iran touched the very heart of Middle Eastern geopolitics in that states, however weak they are perceived to be, will stand up to regional bullies, a lesson that Tel Aviv should heed. The recent "12-day war" shows clearly that the Iran-Israel rivalry cannot be managed through bombs and diplomacy alone. What the Middle East needs to prevent further clashes involving the big powers is a new collective security dialogue and an acknowledgement that Iran, with a population of 90 million and sophisticated homegrown hypersonic missile technology, is a force to reckon with. Besides, it controls the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic choke point, through which some 20 million barrels of oil go through daily. Israel's true survival lies not in bombs, walls or foreign guarantees but in reconciliation, restraint and regional trust. Its security comes not from controlling land or stockpiling weapons — it comes from genuine coexistence with neighbours based on mutual respect, shared dignity and resilience. The road to Middle East peace no longer runs through Cairo, Riyadh or Amman — it now runs through Teheran and Tel Aviv. Thus, the Arab-Israeli conflict is no longer the story. The Iran-Israel confrontation is.

Children dying in S. Sudan after US aid cuts: NGO
Children dying in S. Sudan after US aid cuts: NGO

The Sun

time5 hours ago

  • The Sun

Children dying in S. Sudan after US aid cuts: NGO

NAIROBI: The impact of US aid cuts has already taken a toll in South Sudan and children are dying, Action Against Hunger told AFP on Tuesday. The east African nation has remained deeply poor and unstable since independence in 2011 and is massively dependent on international aid despite its oil wealth. It is among the countries facing shortfalls following US President Donald Trump's decision to slash funding for the US Agency for International Development (USAID), which had provided over 40 percent of global humanitarian aid. On Tuesday, the British Lancet journal projected that the cuts to USAID could lead to more than 14 million deaths by 2030, including over 4.5 million children under the age of five. 'I think it's not just a fear. It's already a reality. We're already having some mortality rates coming in,' said Denish Ogen Rwot, Action Against Hunger's communication and advocacy lead in South Sudan. 'Already we are having children die,' he added. The international NGO works across South Sudan, including in the increasingly violent Jonglei state, providing food and supplies. Rwot estimated they had lost 30 percent of their funding due to the USAID cuts. 'That means now we'll have facilities without food... and how do we work without these supplies?,' he asked. Rwot recently visited northern Warrap state, near the border with Sudan -- itself enduring a civil war -- describing how the warehouses there were 'very empty'. 'They're still registering people, but there is no food for them,' he said. It comes a day after the World Food Programme (WFP) warned that acute malnutrition rates among refugee children in South Sudan -- fleeing the war in Sudan -- had 'already breached emergency thresholds'. Action Against Hunger has been forced to reduce its staffing in the country from 300 to 86, further impacting its ability to respond during a crisis. 'We are running on sheer faith,' Rwot said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store