
Many migrant workers from Bihar unaware of voter list revision: Survey
The survey found that around 90% of migrant workers whom the group interviewed were unaware of SIR.
'Despite the procedures in place and clarifications and safeguards from exclusions being hastily announced, the testimonies of migrant workers illustrate low levels of confidence in the process… A large fraction of workers questioned the necessity of the SIR and expressed a strong preference for the older process of using Aadhaar or existing voter IDs,' the group observed in its report.
The survey found that 68% of workers whom the group interviewed– both within Bihar and outside – lacked accurate information about the documents needed for SIR verification. Regarding official house visits, 53% said someone had visited, 23% said no official had come, while 24% were unsure.
Of those who reported visits, 29% said officials collected one of the documents from the EC's prescribed list. Another 45% said Aadhaar or voter ID cards were taken along with the enumeration form (EF), even though neither was part of the EC's 11 indicative documents for the exercise.
Launched on June 24, the ECI described the SIR as long overdue, since the last revision in Bihar was conducted in 2003. The poll body said the drive aimed to remove bogus entries and update the rolls. Opposition parties, however, questioned its timing ahead of the state assembly polls and claimed it could 'disenfranchise lakhs of poor voters who cannot produce the requisite documents required to be submitted along with the enumeration forms.'
A key point of contention was the EC directive invalidating Aadhaar, ration cards and voter IDs as supporting documents. On July 10, the Supreme Court asked the EC to consider them for the process. But in its July 21 affidavit, the EC argued it could not accept them because Aadhaar is 'merely a proof of identity; there are a large number of fake ration cards in circulation; and relying on existing voter identity cards would render the special drive (conducted under Article 326 of the Constitution) futile.'
The draft rolls will be published on August 1, with the final list expected on September 30 after corrections.
The SWAN survey noted that 35% of respondents lacked any of the SIR's 11 prescribed documents. In contrast, 96% held Aadhaar cards, 84% voter IDs, 69% PAN cards and 64% ration cards.
'Among those who have at least one of the 11 documents mandated in the SIR, 46% have a matriculation or university-approved certificate, half have a caste certificate, 30% have a domicile certificate and about 39% have a birth certificate. One sees that those who have one of these documents tend to have a few other documents too,' the report said.
Although an online EF submission portal was made available for migrants outside Bihar, the report found that 75% had never heard of it and fewer than 1% had submitted forms online.
As per ECI guidelines, individuals not on the 2003 rolls must prove their eligibility. However, the survey found that 81% of respondents turned 18 after 2003 and already possess voter IDs. Yet, one in three lacked any SIR-listed document.
Many expressed concern over losing voting rights due to document gaps and procedural confusion. The report flagged rising apprehensions, misinformation and the absence of sufficient outreach.
It also noted a limited representation of women's voices. One respondent shared struggles in meeting shifting documentation demands.
'Notwithstanding the impracticality of such a hasty exercise, the interaction with the migrant workers leads us to believe that the SIR exercise will disenfranchise millions of people in Bihar. This further pushes us to suggest that the SIR exercise must be revoked without further delay,' the group said.
'Once the verified voter lists based on the SIR are published, a systemic public verification must be undertaken with due attention to the inclusion and experience of marginalised groups. Many of these migrant workers are amongst those who are most likely to be excluded and the current safeguards are simply not enough.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
19 minutes ago
- India Today
Six years after Article 370: What would statehood change for J&K?
Six years after the abrogation of Article 370 and the reorganisation of the state of Jammu and Kashmir into two separate Union Territories—Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh—there is now a strong political push to restore July 20, J&K's Chief Minister Omar Abdullah called for restoring statehood. 'We're not asking for something that is not our due. Statehood is a right; it was promised to the people,' he Central government had also assured the Supreme Court during the hearing on petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370 that restoration of statehood will be done expeditiously. Under the Constitution, India is a 'Union of States', and the powers of a State and a Union territory under the federal system are clearly DID THE SUPREME COURT SAY?In 2023, while passing its verdict, the Supreme Court noted that the Parliament under the Constitution has admitted and established new States in article 3 of the Constitution would legally allow the Parliament to 'extinguish' the status of a State in the manner that was done by reorganising J&K into two Union territories was left open by the five-judge bench, however, noted that 'states under the Indian Constitution have their own independent constitutional existence.'The Supreme Court had agreed not to go into the issue of legal validity of the J&K Reorganisation Act 2019, after the Solicitor General for the Union of India told the court that 'statehood will be restored to Jammu and Kashmir and that its status as a Union territory is temporary.'The Court in its verdict noted that the Solicitor General had clarified that 'the status of the Union Territory of Ladakh will not be affected by the restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir.'The Court in its verdict had directed that 'Restoration of statehood shall take place at the earliest and as soon as possible.' It has, however, been nearly 2 years since the Sc is also a petition pending before the Supreme Court of India, likely to be heard on August 8, seeking restoration of statehood to J&K. The petition has argued that delay in restoration of statehood is 'gravely affecting the rights of the inhabitants of Jammu andKashmir and also violating the basic structure of federalism.'WHAT DOES STATEHOOD MEAN UNDER THE CONSTITUTION?States are the foundational units of India's federal structure. According to a paper by former Law Commission member P.M. Bakshi, 'The essence of federalism lies in the sharing of legal sovereignty by the Union and the federating units.'advertisementDemarcation of legislative power between the Center and the states also helps in defining the boundaries of the executive power shared by the two, as usually the legislative power controls the powers of the Executive legislatures have exclusive powers over subjects enumerated in List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution and concurrent powers over those enumerated in List powers of the legislature include authorisation of all expenditure, taxation and borrowing by the state legislatures, apart from exercising the usual power of financial control, use all normal parliamentary devices like questions, discussions, debates, adjournments and no-confidence motions and resolutions to keep a watch over day-to-day work of the executive. They also have their committees on estimates and public accounts to ensure that grants sanctioned by legislature are properly a state, the Governor also has limited powers to interfere with governance and ordinarily acts only on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. In a UT, the situation is different, as the LG has expanded powers of discretion and there are restrictions on the subjects which are under control of the legislature and executive IS THE CURRENT STATUS OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR?Under Article 239 of the Constitution, Union Territories are administrated by the President acting to such extent, as he thinks fit, through an Administrator appointed by him. Currently, the role of the Administrator of J&K and Ladakh is held by the Lieutenant Governor (LG).At present, following the J&K Reorganisation, the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh have limited powers to legislate and the Reorganisation Act, the UT of J&K has been included under Article 239A of the Constitution, which means that the UT has a legislative Assembly with 107 seats that are filled by direct UT of Ladakh is directly administered by the President, which means that it does not have an elected Assembly, and the Parliament of India passes any laws and monitors the administration of the the parliament under these provisions can introduce changes to the powers of the UT legislature, the J&K Reorganisation Act has granted extensive powers to the LG. Which means that, effectively, the Home Minister of India has control over the Police and bureaucratic apparatus in both union to Section 36 relating to Financial Bills in the Reorganisation Act 2019, no Bill or amendment shall be introduced in the Legislative Assembly without the recommendation of the Lieutenant Governor, if such a Bill deals with amendment of the law of any financial obligation taken or to be incurred by the legislature of the Union Territory, among other provision has had wide significance as virtually every policy decision may give rise to a financial obligation for the Union Territory. This has also raised points of conflict between the elected government and the amending the rules framed under the Reorganisation Act, the Center in 2024 had also vested more powers to the for taking decisions on police, officers of all-India services such as the IAS and the IPS, and giving sanction for prosecution in various MHA further said that all decisions regarding the appointment of advocate general and other law officers, besides matters related to the anti-corruption bureau, will also be taken by the Act also provides that the decision taken by the Lieutenant Governor in his discretion will be final and the validity of any action taken by the Lieutenant Governor will not be questioned on the grounds of whether he should have acted in his discretion or WILL CHANGE ONCE STATEHOOD IS RESTORED?All limitations on the power and authority of the elected government and legislature will be removed once statehood is the Reorganisation Act, the J&K Legislature has the power to pass laws on the subjects mentioned in the Concurrent list of the Constitution as well as on any subject in the State List 'except the subjects mentioned at entries 1 and 2, namely 'Public Order' and 'Police' respectively'Once statehood is restored to J&K, the power to control the police forces in the state and regulate 'public order'- would go back to the elected Assembly and the elected Government of the extensive discretion and powers granted to the LG, as the administrator representing the President, will also be removed, with the powers to control the police, law and order, transfer postings of bureaucrats and anti-corruption branches going back to the elected both the Solicitor General (in the Supreme Court) and the Union Home Minister (in Parliament) have clarified that Ladakh will remain a separate Union Territory even after J&K regains statehood.- Ends


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
EC losing credibility over SIR: Thirumavalavan
Trichy: VCK president and Chidambaram MP Thol Thirumavalavan on Monday accused the Election Commission of acting in a biased manner in connection with the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, claiming its credibility is eroding and raising suspicions of collusion with the BJP-led government. Speaking to reporters at a press conference in Trichy, he questioned why the Union government was unwilling to allow a discussion on the SIR in Parliament. "There is a possibility that this process will be implemented not just in Tamil Nadu but across the country. The Election Commission's biased approach is undemocratic and alarming," he said. The VCK leader further alleged that the SIR was a backdoor attempt to implement the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). "Voters are being forced to prove their citizenship to remain on the electoral roll. This is dangerous," he said. Thirumavalavan also announced protests on August 9 and 11 demanding legislation against caste-based killings. "Though the Union government has shown no intent to act, state governments, too, have the power to introduce such laws. Tamil Nadu should take the lead," he said. He also accused the state police of failing to implement the Supreme Court's directions on preventive measures in such cases, and urged the state government to act decisively and set a precedent for others.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Lok Sabha nod to bill to provide reservation to STs in Goa assembly amid din over Bihar SIR
New Delhi, The Lok Sabha on Tuesday passed a bill to provide reservation to Scheduled Tribes in the Goa assembly, even as opposition protests demanding a discussion on the revision of Bihar electoral rolls continued unabated. Lok Sabha nod to bill to provide reservation to STs in Goa assembly amid din over Bihar SIR Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal moved 'The Readjustment of Representation of Scheduled Tribes in Assembly Constituencies of the State of Goa Bill, 2025' for consideration and passage amid din in the House. The legislation was passed by a voice vote. Meghwal said over the previous sessions, some amount of discussion on the draft law has already taken place. After his opening remarks outlining the features of the bill, it was passed without further discussion. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said on Monday that the government will be compelled to push for Parliament's approval for its legislative agenda if the Opposition continues to obstruct its smooth functioning with protests. Incidentally, the bill was introduced in the Lower House on this day in 2024 and has been pending since then. This is the first bill to be passed by the Lok Sabha in the ongoing Monsoon session, which has seen disruptions by the Opposition on various issues, including the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. After the passage of the bill, Sandhya Ray, who was in the chair, adjourned the proceedings for the day as protests by Opposition MPs continued unabated. According to the bill, the population of the Scheduled Tribes has increased considerably in Goa as per the 2011 census vis-a-vis the 2001 census figures. It noted that a "peculiar situation" has arisen in the state, wherein the population of the STs vis-a-vis the population of the SCs is considerably higher according to the Primary Census Abstract, 2011 for Goa. The total population was 14,58,545; the population of SCs was 25,449, and the population of STs was 1,49,275. "But no seats are reserved for the STs and they are unable to avail the constitutional benefit of reservation..." As of now, no seat in the 40-member Goa assembly is reserved for the ST community, while one seat is reserved for Scheduled Castes. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.