logo
"Drastic": Karti Chidambaram Questions If Stray Dog Order Can Be Implemented

"Drastic": Karti Chidambaram Questions If Stray Dog Order Can Be Implemented

NDTVa day ago
New Delhi:
The Supreme Court order to send stray dogs to special shelters will be difficult to implement because there is neither funds allocation nor manpower to round up the strays, Congress's Karti Chidambaram told NDTV today.
"I understand it (the top court's order) is drastic. Perhaps it can't be implemented in the short time frame. And, but the reason the Supreme Court has given this order is because the policies until now have failed," Mr Chidambaram said.
"Whether this drastic order can be actually implemented by the Delhi government, that the Delhi government has to answer for it. But at least this has now triggered a debate. Every stakeholder has come out," he added.
Amid a rising wave of dog attacks on children and the elderly people, the top court had ordered yesterday that all strays be shifted to shelters equipped with infrastructure and attendants knowledgeable about dogs. It has sparked a huge debate, with all sectiions of society -- Bollywood to political leaders speaking up. Social media is buzzing and animal activists and dog lovers have hit the streets.
"We are not doing this for us, it is for the public interest. So, no sentiments of any nature should be involved," said a bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan, terming the stray dog menace in Delhi-NCR as "extremely grim".
"For the time being, forget the rules," the court said, declaring that strict action will be taken against any individual or organisation barring the picking up of strays.
"Have you seen the classic 'Good, Bad and the Ugly' - when you want to shoot, shoot, don't talk. It is not the time to talk but act. All these so-called animal lovers, will they be able to bring back those children who have given their lives?" the court had said.
The court has ordered that dog shelters be created to accommodate around 5,000 stray dogs, and sufficient personnel deployed to sterilise and immunise the canines. The court has given eight weeks for this.
"We can't have 6 crore street dogs roaming about in a free state in the streets of India. That's not acceptable," Mr Chidambaram said, pointing out that in no developed country there is a street dog issue "which is also a health and safety issue".
"My point is, dogs can't be in a free roaming state. I think that people must be encouraged to adopt dogs. All dogs must have a collar... or perhaps have a chip. They must be vaccinated, they must be neutered and they must be in private spaces and not public spaces," he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Lawless city': Trump seeks to extend federal control of Washington DC police
‘Lawless city': Trump seeks to extend federal control of Washington DC police

Hindustan Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘Lawless city': Trump seeks to extend federal control of Washington DC police

United States President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he would ask the Republicans in the US Congress to extend the federal control of Washington city's police force beyond thirty days. Trump deployed 800 National Guard personnel to Washington, after the White House ordered federal forces to take over the city's police department and reduce the crime rate. (Getty Images via AFP) This comes a day after the US President activated National Guard troops, assuming control of Washington, DC's police department, after announcing a 'criminal emergency' in the US capital. Trump further said that any congressional action could also serve as a model for other cities in the US, while not elaborating on how the takeover of Washington's metropolitan police department could be replicated. The US President has, in the past, threatened to expand federal control to Democratic-run cities like Chicago, while claiming that these had failed to address crimes. Trump took federal control of Washington police under the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, a federal law which allows the president to do so for up to 30 days under an emergency situation. Also Read | Trump's Washington takeover targets homeless encampments: All you need to know The White House needs approval from both the House and Senate to extend the takeover of the police department. Deployment of National Guard troops Trump deployed 800 National Guard personnel to Washington, after the White House ordered federal forces to take over the city's police department and reduce the crime rate. While announcing the decision, the US President alleged that the Capital had become a 'lawless city'. The deployment was done under the 1973 Home Rule Act, which permits the president to commandeer the city's police force for up to 30 days during an emergency. Trump is the first president to use Section 740 of the law to take over the city's police force. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt had, on Tuesday, said that the administration would 'reevaluate and reassess and make further decisions' after the period ends. Leavitt also said that about 850 law enforcement officers had been deployed in Washington on Monday, adding that these officers carried out 23 arrests overnight.

Andhra Congress Leader Slams Jagan Reddy Over "Chandrababu Naidu-Rahul Gandhi Hotline" Remarks
Andhra Congress Leader Slams Jagan Reddy Over "Chandrababu Naidu-Rahul Gandhi Hotline" Remarks

NDTV

time19 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Andhra Congress Leader Slams Jagan Reddy Over "Chandrababu Naidu-Rahul Gandhi Hotline" Remarks

Amaravati: AICC in-charge for Andhra Pradesh Manickam Tagore on Wednesday hit back at former Chief Minister and YSR Congress Party president Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy after he alleged that Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi is in touch with Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu through hotline. The Congress MP said that the people of Andhra Pradesh know that Chandrababu Naidu, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, Jagan and Deputy Chief Minister Pawan Kalyan are together. Tagore also told Jagan that Rahul Gandhi has not surrendered to Modi and Shah like him. He dared Jagan to join the Congress party's fight against 'vote chori'. He said instead of appreciating Rahul Gandhi for the fight to protect democracy, Jagan gave his own imaginary stories. At a press conference in Amaravti on Wednesday, Jagan ruled out support to the Congress party's fight against 'vote chori'. Questioning the silence of Rahul Gandhi on the 'vote chori' issue raised by YSRCP after last year's elections, Jagan alleged that Chandrababu Naidu was in touch with Rahul Gandhi through Telangana Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy. "Why didn't join us when we raised a similar issue after the 2024 elections, where there was a variation of 12 percent between the votes polled and counted," asked Jagan Mohan Reddy. The YSRCP chief also questioned Rahul Gandhi's silence on what he called the corruption of TDP-led coalition government. "Congress spokesperson Manickam Tagore criticizes only me, as Chandrababu Naidu is in touch with Rahul Gandhi through a hotline, or else how can he show a blind eye on the corruption of the coalition government with the mushrooming of belt shops, permit rooms, and selling liquor at more than MRP," he asked. In a video statement posted on 'X', Manickam Tagore said Rahul Gandhi was not fighting for Congress alone but he was fighting for democracy. "He has surrendered to (Amit) Shah and he is not afraid of Modi like Jagan. We are fighting the battle against HM Shah and PM Modi to protect India's democratic rights," the Congress MP said. He alleged that in 39 to 48 Lok Sabha constituencies, Amit Shah organised manipulation with the Election Commissioners He said Rahul Gandhi was embarking on yatra in Bihar on the issue of SIR to protect people's right to vote. "Jagan must have minimum courtesy to acknowledge and appreciate work of Rahul Gandhi instead of finding fault and giving his own imaginary stories about Babu and other stories," he said. Tagore said if Jagan has guts to fight against Modi and Shah, he should join the march to be led by state Congress president Y. S. Sharmila on August 14 in Vijayawada. Meanwhile, Andhra Pradesh minister and Telugu Desam Party (TDP) general secretary also reacted to Jagan's remark saying their only true 'hotline' is with the people of Andhra Pradesh. "Forget your 'vote chori' excuses - you were voted out because people were tired of your 'note chori' in scam after scam. You know exactly what I'm talking about," posted Lokesh, who is son of Chandrababu Naidu. Your baseless attempts to mislead will fail. Our double-engine sarkar is here to deliver, and under the leadership of Narendra Modi and Chandrababu Naidu, Andhra Pradesh will rise to number one again, he added.

Rahul Gandhi's lawyer fears ‘harm to Congress leader', later makes U-turn
Rahul Gandhi's lawyer fears ‘harm to Congress leader', later makes U-turn

Indian Express

time34 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Rahul Gandhi's lawyer fears ‘harm to Congress leader', later makes U-turn

THE LAWYER representing Congress leader Rahul Gandhi in the criminal defamation case filed by Satyaki Savarkar, the grandnephew of Hindutva ideologue V D Savarkar, on Wednesday submitted a pursis in the Pune court hearing the case, but later made a U-turn, saying he had filed the application without consulting Rahul. The pursis stated that there was 'substantial apprehension that Rahul Gandhi may face harm' in light of his current political stand and Satyeki's 'lineage from Nathuram Godse'. On Wednesday, lawyer Milind Pawar, who is representing Rahul, filed the pursis, which is a formal written submission placed before court. Pawar had earlier said the court had admitted the pursis after he filed it in the afternoon. 'Rahul Gandhi has condemned the present government by raising the slogan 'Vote Chor Sarkar'. He has produced documentary evidence alleging serious electoral irregularities, directly implicating the Election Commission in actions which, by their very nature, provoke hostility from those whose political power and ideological interests stand challenged. The apprehension of harm to Rahul Gandhi is neither abstract nor unfounded. In light of the documented history of violent and anti-constitutional tendencies linked to the complainant's lineage, and considering the prevailing political climate, there exists a clear, reasonable, and substantial apprehension that Rahul Gandhi may face harm, wrongful implication, or other forms of targeting by persons subscribing to the ideology of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar,' it stated. 'Prudence demands that this apprehension be placed on record at this stage. The complainant himself has asserted descent from the associates of Mahatma Gandhi's assassins. In view of the grave history associated with such lineage, the defence harbours a genuine and reasonable apprehension that history must not be permitted to repeat itself,' it stated. However, in the evening, Pawar issued a press statement, 'The pursis dated August 13 was filed by me in the court without instructions from the client. The contents of the pursis were drafted by me without consulting my client Rahul Gandhi. My client has taken strong exception to filing of this pursis and has expressed his disagreement with the contents. I shall file a formal application tomorrow for withdrawal of the said pursis before the court.' When contacted earlier after the pursis was filed, Satyaki Savarkar had said, 'The statements made by defence in the pursis are completely baseless and appalling. They have claimed apprehension of harm to Rahul Gandhi which is baseless because he has been exempted from physically attending the proceedings. The defence has been filing such frivolous applications and pursis every now and then and are trying to delay the entire case.' Meanwhile on Wednesday Satyaki Savarkar's lawyer Sangram Kolhatkar moved the court seeking action against Rahul alleging he had committed perjury. 'In the past, all relevant documents have been duly provided to the advocate representing the accused, who has acknowledged the receipt. Despite this, the accused is now falsely claiming that no such material was received. This is a clear attempt to mislead the court. We therefore urge the court, in the strongest terms, to initiate appropriate action against the accused for this deliberate misrepresentation and committing perjury,' Kolhatkar said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store