DEI with a hard ‘ER': How the anti-DEI movement in tech is having a chokehold on Black economic progress
OPINION: The question isn't whether DEI initiatives are necessary—the data screams that they are. The real question is: Why are some folks so scared of a level playing field?Even though Black people aren't the primary beneficiaries of so-called DEI policies, we are the target of campaigns to dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion. Let that sink in. We live in a country that is so steeped in anti-Blackness that the masses are upset at the thought of 'equity' for Black people. Enough so that they will hurt other groups to keep us in our place. When they say 'DEI,' I hear the 'n—-r' loud and clear.
These DEI lawsuits, executive orders, and outcries flooding our headlines? They're not about 'discrimination against white people' or 'merit-based decisions.' They're about maintaining the chokehold on Black economic progress. As someone who's moved through elite spaces as a lawyer, founded and sold a successful tech company, and now leads a venture fund, I know tech is the new frontier for wealth creation. They know it too, which is why the anti-DEI movement is so focused on tech.
And it's not just Elon Musk. Tech bros have cultivated a false myth of meritocracy in the tech, venture, and startup spaces because it makes them feel good to explain their success in these terms instead of being steeped in the same white privilege that slave-holding ancestors leveraged to build extractive wealth (which they also claimed was accumulated by 'pulling themselves up by the bootstraps').
For example, Peter Thiel, the founder of PayPal, said at an event last year, 'If you think of the woke DEI whole coalition as a combination of true laborers and useful idiots, and, you know, from the capitalists or people who are in some corrupt racket, that's probably a far more powerful coalition.' Would you be surprised to learn that Peter Thiel was born in West Germany, lived in apartheid South Africa as a child, and then went on to Stanford University and law school? Like Musk, who is South African, the ideas they are espousing aren't stemming from a commitment to talent and meritocracy over everything else. It's a deep-seated belief in white superiority, such that any advancement of Black people (and pathways that facilitate that advancement) is intolerable.
Here are tweets from Paul Graham, co-founder of the pre-eminent Y Combinator startup accelerator:
Are these folks really out here pretending that Black founders getting 0.4% of ALL venture capital funding is somehow…too much? When I founded my first startup in 2019, I saw firsthand how the deck is stacked against Black entrepreneurs. I never raised venture capital for that company, but I successfully bootstrapped it to acquisition, selling it to Sean 'Diddy' Combs in 2021.
'But what about merit?' they cry, while conveniently ignoring how Black-founded companies consistently deliver higher median returns compared to their white-founded counterparts. A Boston Consulting Group study found that businesses founded by Black entrepreneurs generated about $1.4 trillion in revenue and created approximately 4 million jobs. Yet here we are, watching lawsuits trying to shut down the few funds explicitly working to close this gap. Data has shown that when minority startups are funded, we actually have better outcomes. Of course, those are not the meritocracy numbers that the mainstream chooses to focus on right now.
While manufactured outrage machines are suing Black-focused venture funds for 'discrimination,' the actual discrimination happening in venture capital is astronomical. The same people clutching their pearls about DEI initiatives are real quiet about how Black founders received less than half a percent of the $288 billion in venture capital deployed in 2023. They're silent about how Black women founders got just 0.123% of venture capital funding between 2021 and 2023. Because that's what they think is natural, based on what they believe we deserve and also what our abilities are. It's why 'DEI' is the go-to when they see us excelling—they cannot fathom that Black people have the merit that they stress so much when they scream meritocracy.
This isn't about protecting anyone's rights. This is about protecting white privilege's monopoly on capital. When I founded Fictive Ventures, focusing on both Black founders and investors, it wasn't because we wanted to exclude anyone. It was because the existing system has been excluding us since forever, and we're done waiting for permission to build wealth in our communities.
These attacks on DEI initiatives aren't happening in a vacuum. They're happening right as Black Americans are finally gaining a foothold in corporate America, right as we're building our own tables instead of begging for seats at theirs. The timing isn't coincidental – it's tactical. Why was Fearless Fund, which invests in women of color, sued for racial discrimination, but the Female Founders Fund, led by a white woman, was not sued for gender discrimination?
'But shouldn't everything be colorblind?'
Wealth in America has never been colorblind. Not when billions in wealth were accumulated by working and leveraging enslaved Black people. Not when Black families have about $0.13 for every dollar of wealth held by white families. Not when redlining's effects still impact Black homeownership. And certainly not in venture capital, where Black entrepreneurs are still fighting to get crumbs from a hundreds-of-billion-dollar table.
What we're seeing now is an all-out offensive to maintain the status quo by people who see racial equity as a threat to their privilege. The question isn't whether DEI initiatives are necessary – the data screams that they are. The real question is: Why are some folks so scared of a level playing field? It's because they don't want us 'DEIs' to have anything.
We'll take it anyway.
Khadijah A. Robinson has led an impressive career as a lawyer, entrepreneur, innovator, and investor. In 2019, Khadijah started The Nile List, an online discovery platform for Black-owned e-commerce brands. In 2021, The Nile List was acquired by Combs Enterprises and Empower Global, and Khadijah served as CEO of Empower Global for 2 years, leading all fundraising, operations, and development. Khadijah consults and coaches with a wide range of entrepreneurs personally and as the Entrepreneur-in-Residence for Black Ambition. She served as the Chief Operating Officer for The Majira Project, a business accelerator, backed by Boston Consulting Group, for underrepresented founders. She currently leads the LIFT Incubator program for STEM startups in Atlanta with the Center for Black Entrepreneurship in addition to serving as a General Partner at Fictive Ventures, the first venture fund focused on early stage Black led startups as well as Black investors.
More must-reads:
They want to erase us — But our history, our stories, our resilience can't be erased
We must resurrect the true ideals of Dr. King this MLK Day as we inaugurate a new president
Michelle Obama is every Black woman who wanted to say 'no' and not give a damn afterward
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FLASHBACK: Musk accused Trump, GOP leaders of not wanting to cut spending — here's where they said they would
Elon Musk's fiery feud with President Donald Trump spilled onto the top Republicans in Congress, where the tech billionaire questioned if their zeal to cut spending had disappeared. Musk launched into a social media assault this week against Trump's "big, beautiful bill," and accused Republicans of crafting a "disgusting abomination" full of wasteful spending. What started as a rant against the bill turned into pointed attacks against Trump, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. 'He's Not A Big Factor': Trump's Senate Allies Dismiss Elon Musk's Calls To 'Kill The Bill' The tech billionaire and former head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) lamented the bill as not cutting deep enough into Washington's spending addiction. The House GOP's offering, which is now being modified in the Senate, set a goal of $1.5 trillion in spending cuts. Musk set a benchmark of finding $2 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse to slash with his DOGE initiative, but fell far short, hitting only $160 billion in his four-month stint as a special government employee. Read On The Fox News App Elon Musk Warpath Against Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Rattles House Gop Still, he came with receipts, questioning whether Trump, Thune and Johnson were actually committed to making deep cuts. Below are moments from the campaign trail and recent months compiled by Fox News Digital where the trio affirmed their commitment to putting a dent in the nation's nearly $37 trillion debt. A common theme for Trump during his 2024 presidential campaign was to go after the Biden administration, and his opponent, former Vice President Kamala Harris, for "throwing billions of dollars out the window." The then-presidential candidate vowed that should he win a second term, his incoming administration would halt wasteful spending. "We will stop wasteful spending and big government special interest giveaways, and finally stand up for the American taxpayer, which hasn't happened since I was president," he said. "We stood up. Our current massive deficits will be reduced to practically nothing. Our country will be powered by growth. Our country, will be powered by growth, will pay off our debt, will have all this income coming in." Gop Senators Express 'Concerns,' 'Skepticism' Over Trump's Spending Bill After Musk Rant Thune has agreed with his colleagues in the House GOP that the tax cut package needs to achieve steep savings, and believes that the Senate GOP could take those cuts a step further. After the bill advanced from the House last month, the top Senate Republican re-upped his vow to slash federal funding. "It does everything that we set out to do. It modernizes our military, secures our border, extends tax relief and makes permanent tax relief that will lead to economic growth and better jobs in this country, and makes America energy dominant, coupled with the biggest spending reduction in American history," he said. "So those are our agenda items, and that's what we campaigned on. That's what we're going to do." Johnson had to strike a balancing act in the House to cobble together enough support behind the legislation, and struck deals and satisfied concerned lawmakers across the spectrum of the House GOP while still setting a goal of $1.5 trillion in spending cuts. Rooting out waste, fraud and abuse has been a continued mantra of the speaker and his allies. "I said this is the beginning of a process, and what you're going to see is a continuing theme of us identifying waste, fraud and abuse in government, which is our pledge of common sense, restoring common sense and fiscal sanity," Johnson said. Original article source: FLASHBACK: Musk accused Trump, GOP leaders of not wanting to cut spending — here's where they said they would
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Biden Weaponized Law Enforcement Against Catholics
Even the initial story about the FBI targeting Catholics for suspicion and surveillance was bad enough. In December 2023, the House Judiciary Committee published a detailed report about how the FBI specifically identified traditional Catholics as potential domestic terror threats. The House report revealed the shocking finding that the Richmond, Virginia, office of the FBI suspected traditional Catholics "as violent extremists and proposed opportunities for the FBI to infiltrate Catholic churches as a form of 'threat mitigation." In sworn testimony before the U.S. Senate, former FBI Director Christopher Wray was challenged by Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri: "Now we know that, in fact, FBI agents did approach a priest and a choir director to ask them to inform on parishioners." Despite this serious allegation, Wray denied a wider FBI initiative and blamed a localized mistake in Richmond. Well … new information reveals that, at best, FBI Director Wray was playing fast and loose with the truth. At worst, the then-sitting chief law enforcement investigator of America committed perjury when he dishonestly stated that the memo was "a single product by a single field office." Oh, all while completely maligning the largest denomination of Christian believers in the United States. But, alas, the sad story of the FBI targeting Catholics does not end in 2023. New information uncovered by Sen. Charles Grassleys committee reveals that the so-called "Richmond memo" was more like a nationwide all-points-bulletin from FBI brass, informing legions of agents to suspect and investigate faithful parishioners across the land. As CatholicVote describes, "the FBIs anti-Catholic Richmond memo was distributed to more than 1,000 employees in FBI field offices across the country." Sen. Grassleys press release states that a whistleblower "produced at least 13 additional documents and five attachments that used anti-Catholic terminology and relied on information from the radical far-left Southern Poverty Law Center" to target Catholics. Amazingly, such harsh anti-Catholic actions formed a key policy agenda for Joe Biden, a politician who constantly trumpeted his Catholic bona fides and bragged about the rosary he carries in his pocket. Of course, those pronouncements did not stop him from targeting the Little Sisters of the Poor for brutal Department of Justice intimidation when he was vice president. Nor did Joes faith restrain him as president, when he awarded Americas highest civilian honor, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, to the late Cecile Richardson, one of the most prolific abortion providers in U.S. history. Unfortunately, Bidens anti-Catholic actions follow a tragic trend of recent decades for Democrats, once the proud home to generations of Catholic voters across America. In fact, Bidens eventual vice president, Kamala Harris, engaged in brazen anti-Catholic bigotry as a U.S. senator in 2018. Harris tried to derail the judicial nomination of Brian Buescher simply because the district court nominee dared to belong to the Catholic fraternal charity organization, the Knights of Columbus. I wrote about that prejudice - an unconstitutional religious litmus test - in a December 26, 2018, opinion piece for RealClearPolitics. No wonder that during the 2024 presidential race, then-Sen. JD Vance called the Biden-Harris White House "the most anti-Catholic administration in living memory." Which brings us back to the present day and these newfound facts about the breadth and scope of the anti-Catholicism of Bidens FBI. This targeting fits within a larger context of the completely unacceptable politicized weaponization of federal law enforcement by people like Biden, Harris, Wray, and former Attorney General Merrick Garland. Sen. Grassley makes it clear that he believes Wray lied under oath. If that allegation is correct, then the Trump-Vance DOJ must charge Wray. In addition, this issue carries great political peril for Democrats and big continued rewards for Republicans. Historically, Catholics decide national elections. For over half a century, the Catholic vote has determined the winner in every election but one (choosing Al Gore over George W. Bush in 2000). In 2024 Trump rolled up an incredible +11% margin among Catholics nationwide, a giant improvement over his tie among Catholics in 2020. In fact, Trump would not have won the popular vote - surprising every "expert" - without his dominant performance among Catholics. So, lets get to the truth, punish the evildoers, and reap the political spoils as well. Steve Cortes is president of the League of American Workers, a populist right pro-laborer advocacy group, and senior political advisor to Catholic Vote. He is a former senior advisor to President Trump and JD Vance, and a former commentator for Fox News and CNN.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SpaceX launches Sirius XM radio satellite to orbit, lands rocket on ship at sea (video, photos)
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. SpaceX launched the SXM-10 satellite for SiriusXM early Saturday morning (June 7), adding another spacecraft to the company's broadcasting constellation. A Falcon 9 rocket carrying SXM-10 lifted off from Florida's Cape Canaveral Space Force Station on Saturday at 12:54 a.m. EDT (0454 GMT). The rocket's first stage came back to Earth about 8.5 minutes later as planned, touching down on the SpaceX drone ship "A Shortfall of Gravitas," which was stationed in the Atlantic Ocean. It was the eighth launch and landing for this particular booster, according to a SpaceX mission description. Among its previous missions were the Crew-9 and Fram2 astronaut flights and the liftoff on Jan. 15 of this year that sent two private moon landers — Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost and ispace's Resilience — toward Earth's nearest neighbor. Blue Ghost aced its lunar touchdown on March 2, but Resilience crashed during its landing attempt on Thursday (June 5). Related stories: — SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launches Sirius XM radio satellite (video) — SpaceX completes 1st Starlink direct-to-cell constellation with launch from California (video) — SpaceX: Facts about Elon Musk's private spaceflight company The Falcon 9's upper stage carried SXM-10 to geosynchronous transfer orbit high above Earth on Saturday, deploying it there about 33 minutes after launch as planned. The 14,100-pound (6,400 kilograms) satellite, which was built by Maxar Technologies, will now maneuver to join SiriusXM's radio constellation, adding its own capabilities to the mix. Saturday's launch was SpaceX's second for SiriusXM in just six months; a Falcon 9 lofted the SXM-9 satellite in early December 2024. SpaceX has now launched 69 Falcon 9 missions in 2025. Fifty-one of them have been dedicated to building out the company's Starlink broadband megaconstellation in low Earth orbit.