Council slammed for £50million ‘bridge to nowhere' as officials admit they ‘can't afford to finish half-built road'
ROAD RAGE Council slammed for £50million 'bridge to nowhere' as officials admit they 'can't afford to finish half-built road'
A COUNCIL has been slammed for building a "bridge to nowhere" that may never be finished.
The £50 million bridge was part of a project started by Lincolnshire County Council in 2022 to ease traffic on the A16.
Advertisement
3
Construction has been delayed by monetary issues
Credit: Bav Media
3
The "bridge to nowhere" has left locals angry about wasted taxpayer money
Credit: Bav Media
3
An estimated £50 to £60 million is needed to finish the project
Credit: Bav Media
On Monday, May 2, officials admitted the project - known as the Spalding western relief road - might not be completed.
It comes as the council are seeking up to £33 million in "external funding" in the hopes of finishing the development.
They cited "turbulent" years for the shortage of cash, including rising costs during the pandemic, inflation, and problems caused by the national economy.
This led the council to scrap nearly £28 million in funding in 2023 for their road projects.
Advertisement
As a result, the relief road has been left with a "road to nowhere bridge."
Residents and campaigners have been left frustrated by the lack of progress on the project.
They have criticised it as a waste of taxpayer money, as aerial photos showed that the ongoing work had suddenly stopped.
In a YouTube video about the project, Jon Jefferson who runs Auto Shenanigans, was critical of the "road to nowhere bridge."
Advertisement
Commenters on the video shared their own frustrations with similarly unfinished projects across the UK.
One wrote: "We have an unfinished roundabout with NO finish date for when it will ever open. Total p*** take of the tax-payers."
Blyth's Crisis: Locals Voice Anger Over Crime, Job Losses, and Political Betrayal
Another sarcastically commented: "Awesome. A road with no traffic and rail lines with no trains."
Others expressed their disappointment at the state of British infrastructure, writing: "It's got to the point I'll be dizzy with astonishment and suspicion when a road project success story comes along."
Advertisement
Construction of the north section of the four-mile-long, five-section road was completed in October 2024 - including the bridge.
This 0.6 mile stretch of road, was complete with a T-junction for later extension, and a bridge over a railway between Doncaster and Peterborough.
The council's highways department told The Times: "Construction of the north section of the Spalding western relief road was completed in October 2024.
According to the department, £27.7 million has been set aside for the southern section of the road in the upcoming 2025-26 budget.
Advertisement
This is still much lower than the estimated cost of £50 to £60 million, leaving developers trying to find other sources of funding to make up the shortfall.
They said: "The current estimated cost of building this section is between £50 and £60 million, which means external funding will be needed."
The council said they are working closely with South Holland district council to "identify funding opportunities, including remaining in touch with Homes England."
They added: "In addition, no funding has yet been allocated or secured for the middle sections of the relief road as these are intended to be built in the long term."
Advertisement
According to the project description, "the primary source of funding for both [southern and middle roads]" is likely to come in the form of contributions from developers.
Their ongoing plans are outlined in the South East Lincolnshire Local Plan.
Project bosses have estimated that the project will now take until 2030, with the financial issues causing significant setbacks.
The completed northern section of the road has freed up land that could be used for 1,100 properties.
Advertisement
Parts of the project remain fenced off.
We have reached out to Lincolnshire County Council for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK Market Exodus: Companies that have moved away from a London listing
June 5 (Reuters) - British money transfer firm Wise (WISEa.L), opens new tab became the latest UK listed firm on Thursday to say that it intends to move its primary listing to the U.S. from London. A growing number of companies have shelved or shifted plans to list in London, due to investor pushback and Brexit-related challenges that have pressured UK market valuations. Instead, they have opted for the U.S. and other markets, where they see stronger appetite and higher valuations. Cobalt: The Glencore-backed metals investor scrapped its plans for a London IPO (IPO-COBL.L), opens new tab on Wednesday, which, according to one source, was driven by a lack of demand. The company, valued at around $230 million, would have seen London's largest market debut since Air Astana's ( opens new tab listing in February 2024. Indivior (INDV.L), opens new tab: The drugmaker said on Monday it will cancel its secondary listing on the London Stock Exchange effective July 25, citing cost savings and a desire to align more closely with its U.S.-focused operations. The 1.25 billion pound ($1.70 billion) pharmaceutical firm will retain its primary listing on the Nasdaq. BHP: The world's largest miner by market value ($125.10 billion) made Australia ( opens new tab its primary stock market when it ended its dual-listing structure in 2021. The company was the second largest by market value in London when it left the stock market. Unilever (ULVR.L), opens new tab: The Ben & Jerry's maker in February picked Amsterdam as the primary listing for its ice cream business. The business, which generated a turnover of 8.3 billion euros ($9.47 billion) in 2024, will have secondary listings in London and New York. Glencore (GLEN.L), opens new tab: The Swiss miner said in February it was considering moving its primary listing from London. The company, with a market value of 34.5 billion pounds, said New York was at the top of the list under consideration. Shein: The online fast fashion retailer is working towards a listing in Hong Kong after its proposed initial public offering (IPO) in London failed to secure the green light from Chinese regulators, three sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters in May. However, before its attempt to list in London, Shein had pursued a listing in New York, as part of its efforts to gain legitimacy as a global, rather than a Chinese company, and access to a wide pool of large Western investors. Ashtead (AHT.L), opens new tab: The second-largest equipment rental company in the U.S. said in December it plans to shift its listing to New York. With a market value of 18.3 billion pounds, Ashtead has been listed in London since 1986, and transformed into a major U.S. player in the early 2000s. Just Eat Takeaway ( opens new tab: The Amsterdam-listed food delivery company delisted from the London Stock Exchange in December, citing efforts to reduce administrative and regulatory costs. The company has a market value of 4.05 billion euros. Flutter Entertainment (FLTRF.L), opens new tab: The FanDuel-owner in 2024 moved its primary listing to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), just a few months after it added a secondary listing in the US. CRH (CRH.N), opens new tab: The building materials solutions provider, which has $61.29 billion in market value, switched its primary listing to the NYSE in 2023, while maintaining a standard listing on the London Stock Exchange. Arm Holdings: The UK-based chip designer chose Nasdaq over London for its 2023 IPO — the largest of that year. The company, now valued at just over $138 billion, was previously listed in London for 18 years till 2016, when it was taken private by SoftBank (9984.T), opens new tab in a $32 billion acquisition. ($1 = 0.8763 euros) ($1 = 0.7355 pounds)
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Dr Martens promises not to raise prices this year despite US tariffs
Dr Martens has vowed not to increase prices this year and will continue sourcing from Vietnam and Laos, despite the threat of cripplingly high tariffs on the south-east Asian countries, where the bulk of its shoes are made. The British footwear brand, best known for its boots with distinctive yellow stitching, said the majority of its autumn and winter stock would be either in the market or in transit by the start of July, around the time when the 90-day pause on an array of tariffs imposed by the US is due to come to an end. Almost two-thirds (62%) of Dr Martens footwear is made in Vietnam, and a further 31% is produced in neighbouring Laos. Both countries were previously hit with some of the highest US tariffs, after China – 46% for Vietnam and 48% for Laos – before Donald Trump's temporary pause reduced them to 10%. Despite this, Dr Martens said it was not considering moving any of its manufacturing to other locations. 'We are really thoughtful and scenario-planning about tariffs, but they are not making us do anything crazy,' Ije Nwokorie, the company's new chief executive, told the Guardian. 'These are long-term relationships, and you support each other's business when you are going through tough times.' Nwokorie said the company – which sells its 1460 model of leather lace-up boots for £170 – was helped by the fact that tariffs were levied on the cost of goods rather than the price they were sold for. 'We are a high gross margin business, which means we are a low cost of goods business. From a competitive point of view, there is less impact on us than companies who don't have our gross margins,' he said. He added that keeping the prices of its shoes, boots and bags unchanged was 'sustainable for this year' but said the company would be keeping control of its costs. Despite the threat of higher tariffs affecting its products imported into the US, Dr Martens said its sales in the country had picked up over the past year as it focused on selling footwear directly to customers through its stores and website. On Thursday, the company reported a slump in profits for the year to the end of March – to £8.8m, down from £93m a year earlier – as it faced 'challenging macroeconomic and consumer backdrop' in several of its key markets, including the UK. The company makes 2,000 pairs of boots a week at its Northampton factory, although this only accounts for 1% of its production. It said UK sales were 'challenging'. Nwokorie blamed this on an extended period of high levels of discounting at UK retailers, which the company is aiming to reduce. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Nwokorie unveiled a plan to turn around the business, including by streamlining operations and tailoring marketing to different markets. He said he wanted to focus on Dr Martens' shoes, sandals and bags, alongside its boots. The company's shares hit an all-time low in April after Trump's first tariff announcement. However, the turnaround plans seemed to please investors, and its shares rose 24% during morning trading on Thursday, making them the top riser on the FTSE 250 index. The boot brand was originally created in 1945 by a young German army doctor, Klaus Märtens, who designed an air-cushioned sole to help his recovery from a broken foot. They were introduced to the UK in 1960, with their sturdy design gaining popularity among postal delivery workers and factory staff before being embraced by skinheads and punks.
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Faro Airport to let Brits use passport e-gates for first time
Faro Airport in Portugal will start this rollout ahead of the peak summer season in the Algarve. This announcement comes after a UK-EU deal where the government shared that British passport holders will be able to use e-gates at more European airports. Since Brexit, British travellers arriving at EU airports have generally been forced to queue for manned desks to have their passports stamped. 📍Faro airport. Horrendous This is instead of using automated gates with facial recognition technology, which has led to long waits in peak periods, The Daily Mail reports. British passports can currently be used at e-gates in the EU at only a limited number of airports in Spain and Portugal. Nick Thomas-Symonds, the minister for EU relations, told Parliament today (Thursday, June 5) that UK tourists arriving at Faro over the coming days will be able to use e-gates. He said: "The historic deal that we signed with the EU on May 19 is in our national interests. "Good for bills, borders and jobs. It slashes red tape and bureaucracy, boosts British exporters and makes life easier for holidaymakers. "Indeed, I'm delighted to confirm this morning that Faro Airport in Portugal will start the rollout of e-gate access to UK arrivals this week." The EU plans to introduce a new Entry/Exit system (EES) in October 2025, which will remove the need for people from non-member countries to have their passports stamped. The UK Government website says: "If you are travelling to a country in the Schengen area using a UK passport, you will be required to register your biometric details, such as fingerprints or a photo, when you arrive." It adds: "When EES is introduced, you will need to create a digital record on your first visit to the Schengen area at the port or airport on arrival. "You will be required to submit your fingerprints and have your photo taken at dedicated booths. You will not need to provide any information before travelling to a Schengen area country, and this data will be kept for three years. There are concerns this will cause queues at EU airports when first rolled out, as well as at the Port of Dover and Eurostar terminals. The countries that make up the Schengen area are: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland. According to the UK Government website, you do not need a visa for short trips to the EU or countries in the Schengen area if both of the following apply: Other reasons include: Recommended reading: Why are passports different colours and what does each colour mean? How to claim compensation for flight delays and cancellations Does buying from duty free at the airport save you money and how does it work? You can travel to more than one country in a 180-day period, but how long you can stay in individual countries depends on their rules. The website adds: "Your total stay in the Schengen area must be no more than 90 days in every 180 days. "It does not matter how many countries you visit. The 180-day period keeps 'rolling'."
