87-year-old's five-word response to being arrested at Trump protest
One of the U.S. military veterans arrested for protesting President Donald Trump in Washington, D.C. last week had a short and sweet response when he was asked how it felt to be cuffed at 87 years old.
John Spitzberg was arrested during a veterans' protest against Trump's military parade to mark the 250th anniversary of the United States Army on Friday in Washington, D.C. Footage captured by other protesters shows him being handcuffed by law enforcement outside the U.S. Capitol.
According to local broadcaster WCJB, he and approximately 75 other protesters knocked over a bike rack and crossed a police line, after which many were arrested.
Carolina Lumetta, a reporter for WNG who was at the scene and witnessed the arrest, said that rather than arresting him, police initially just returned back over the police line while other protesters were arrested. Spitzberg reportedly walked back across the line with the aid of his walker and told the offices he would rather stay with the protesters, even if it meant his arrest.
After Spitzberg was released from custody, journalist Chuck Modio caught up with the veteran and asked him how it felt to be arrested at age 87.
"I'm just beginning, my friend," Spitzberg replied.
He added that he needed to "get a little sleep" before he starts protesting again.
Spitzberg, who served in the US Air Force, told WCJB that he doesn't "wanna make more of it than it is," referencing the video of his arrest that went viral.
'All I knew is I had to be with my brothers and sisters who were being pummeled. That's all I knew, that they were being pummeled," he said.
Spitzberg lives in a retirement home in Gainesville and was visiting the nation's capital for a work reunion party. He said he was disappointed to see police arresting the veterans at the Capitol.
'It feels like a betrayal of the Americans and other people who served this country for the purpose of keeping democracy, freedom," he told the broadcaster.
He said he hopes that people who see the video focus less on him and more on the message of the protest.
'I'm really not the issue. The issue is what President Trump is doing,' Spitzberg said. 'I'm not a leader there. I don't wanna be a leader.'
On the day of the protest, approximately 75 veterans gathered outside the Supreme Court wearing shirts that said "Veterans Against Fascism."
Shortly after the group gathered, about 60 marches to the U.S. Capitol, where police had established a perimeter. That was the line that the protesters crossed before they were arrested.
"A few people pushed the bike rack down and illegally crossed the police line while running towards the Rotunda Steps," Capitol Police said. "Our officers immediately blocked the group and began making arrests."
Veterans for Peace explained the protest in a Friday Instagram post that said "approximately 60 veterans and military family members staged a sit-in on the steps of the U.S. Capitol to demand the military get off our city streets from LA to DC, and taxpayer money be directed towards real investments in housing, health care, and food — not political stunts or militarism."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘I may do it, I may not': Why Trump's unpredictability on Iran could be his biggest asset
Donald Trump made a dramatic exit from the G7 summit in Canada and then hunkered down with his National Security Council in the White House situation room to plot his next moves on Iran. Then on Wednesday he was asked by reporters whether he was about to send his bombers into action. 'I may do it. I may not do it,' he said on the South Lawn after chatting with construction workers putting up a 27-metre flagpole. 'I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do. I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble.' It is a familiar playbook. In a recent analysis of Mr Trump's leadership style, Julius Kirimi Sindi, an expert in business strategy said the president was not so much governing as running a non-stop negotiation. 'This uncertainty forces people to constantly second-guess their positions, giving Trump the upper hand in any negotiation or political battle,' he wrote. 'The strategy keeps both allies and enemies in a perpetual state of anxiety, which in turn, solidifies his control.' Not for the first time, the president has deployed intentional ambiguity as he keeps friends and foes guessing about his intentions. And once again, he is seeking to gain the upper hand by deploying a trusted 'art of the deal' technique to a tricky geopolitical challenge. His final decision could be the most consequential of his presidency. Join with Israel in attacking Iran with B2 warplanes armed with bunker busting bombs and it could prevent Tehran from ever building a nuclear weapon. But it might also unleash attacks on American interests in the Middle East, and tear apart his Maga coalition at home. urging him not to become entangled in another foreign war. Mr Trump was keeping his options open for now, according to Robert Shapiro, professor of political science, in the hope that something would turn up. 'I think in the best of all worlds for him, he would be perfectly fine with a negotiated settlement, which would give him the prospects of winning the Nobel Peace Prize, which is something he's always talked about,' he said. 'On the other hand, he likes the idea of clean military victory by dropping a bomb and claiming credit for that.' The strategy of unpredictability has been at the heart of this White House. It was how he handled his trade war, for example. A week after 'liberation day,' a day before his steep tariffs were due to go into effect and one hour before the stock market was due to close, journalists peppered the president with questions about his levies and the turmoil they had unleashed. Were they a bargaining chip to secure better deals? Or were they here to stay as part of an attempt to reshape the entire global economy? 'It can both be true,' he said. 'There can be permanent tariffs, and there can also be negotiations.' And he has repeatedly fended off questions about his Ukraine strategy, punting questions about Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, and his desire for peace into the future. 'I can't tell you that, but I'll let you know in about two weeks,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office,' he said seven weeks ago. The idea may be to keep adversaries on their toes, but it is just as awkward for allies. The G7 summit came and went without a joint statement on Ukraine in part because no one is sure where Mr Trump stands. On Wednesday evening, standing in front of reporters in the Oval Office, Mr Trump once again parried questions about whether he was about to launch strikes on Iran or allow more time to begin negotiations. Is he for real or is it all a monumental bluff? 'I have ideas as to what to do,' he said. 'I like to make a final decision one second before it's due.'
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
DHS to limit lawmaker access to ICE facilities after confrontations with Democrats
Immigration and Customs Enforcement has unveiled new restrictions on members of Congress and their staff members for visiting immigration facilities, following a series of tense clashes between federal agents and Democratic officials attempting to perform oversight visits amid the Trump administration's push to rapidly arrest and deport millions. While members of Congress can show up unannounced for inspections at immigration detention centers, the new rules specify that legislators must provide at least 72 hours of advanced notice before visiting other ICE facilities like field offices, the first point of contact for many detained migrants. The rules also say members of congressional staff must provide a day's notice when visiting detention facilities. Democrats criticized the new rules. 'This unlawful policy is a smokescreen to deny Member visits to ICE offices across the country, which are holding migrants – and sometimes even U.S. citizens – for days at a time,' Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi said in a statement to The Hill. 'They are therefore detention facilities and are subject to oversight and inspection at any time. DHS pretending otherwise is simply their latest lie.' The policy comes after a series of high-profile incidents in which Democrats accused the Trump administration of blocking them from conducting lawful oversight, while the White House alleges lawmakers aren't following proper protocols and are causing security risks. Most recently, New York City comptroller and mayoral candidate Brad Lander was handcuffed by federal agents as he attempted to observe a federal immigration court in Manhattan on Tuesday. The former council member says his brief arrest was an alarming erosion of usual norms. 'I am happy to report I am just fine. I lost a button,' he said after the confrontation. 'The rule of law is not fine. And our constitutional democracy is not fine.' Last week, Senator Alex Padilla of California was forcibly removed and pinned to the floor by federal agents as he interrupted a press conference from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. At the briefing, which came at the height of Los Angeles-area protests against the administration's immigration policies, Noem was in the middle of saying federal authorities would 'liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city.' Padilla, in a floor speech on Tuesday, said the comments inspired him to speak up. 'When I heard something so blatantly un-American from the Secretary of Homeland Security, a cabinet official, of course, I was compelled, both as a senator and as an American, to speak up, but before I could even get out my question, I was physically and aggressively forced out of the room,' he said. The Trump administration accuses Padilla of being aggressive and failing to promptly identify himself or comply with security officers' commands. Last week, New Jersey congresswoman LaMonica McIver was indicted on federal charges over an incident in May, in which members of Congress, protesters, ICE agents, and the Democratic mayor of Newark, Ras Baraka, pushed and shoved outside of an ICE facility in New Jersey, after officials declined to let Baraka join an inspection of the building. McIver has called the charges 'a brazen attempt at political intimidation,' while Acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba said in a statement that conduct like McIver's alleged actions 'endangers law enforcement and the communities those officers serve.' Previous federal charges against Baraka over the May incident were dropped, a reversal a federal judge called an 'embarrassing retraction.' Even with the new restrictions, the issue of detention center access looks set to remain. On Wednesday, Democratic lawmakers in Illinois and New York both criticized the administration for allegedly denying them access to ICE facilities. 'ICE just blocked @RepDanGoldman and me from inspecting their detention center at 26 Federal Plaza, where migrants are reportedly being forced to sleep on the floor for days at a time,' Rep. Jerry Nadler of New York wrote on X. 'Congress has a duty to conduct oversight, and the American people deserve transparency. ICE doesn't get to lie about the nature of this facility to dodge oversight and hide behind masks while doing it. This is completely unacceptable, and we will not back down.' Also today, Rep. Chuy Garcia alleged he was denied entry for an oversight visit to the Broadview ICE Processing Center. Democrats and immigration observers have alleged a decline in conditions inside ICE facilities since Trump took office and began pushing for a record pace of deportations. At least nine people have died in ICE custody since Trump took office, quickly outpacing the data from the worst year of deaths under the Biden administration. use of face masks and other security precautions.
Reuters
34 minutes ago
- Reuters
Former DB Ramzee Robinson sues Chiefs for wrongful termination
June 18 - Ramzee Robinson, a former NFL defensive back who then served as director of player engagement for the Kansas City Chiefs, filed a lawsuit against the franchise for wrongful termination. The suit accuses the Chiefs of discriminating against Robinson because he is Black. A nine-year employee with Kansas City, Robinson filed the lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri earlier this week. He claims that, in a meeting in February, he was accused of attacking a female co-worker, though the Chiefs refused to show him security footage of the incident. Kansas City ultimately fired Robinson, who added that the team paid him a salary of $125,000 while other franchises paid comparable positions an average salary of $171,932, not including other benefits. The suit claims that "the Chiefs paid African-American business employees less than their white counterparts." Robinson, 41, was the last player selected in the 2007 NFL draft out of Alabama. He played in 26 games across four seasons with the Detroit Lions, Philadelphia Eagles and Cleveland Browns, registering 37 tackles and a fumble recovery. --Field Level Media
