&w=3840&q=100)
India-Pakistan ceasefire: Now US trumpets Trump's claim in court while defending his tariffs
Students of an art school and their teacher carry a hand-drawn portrait of the US President Donald Trump as they celebrate the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, in Mumbai, May 10, 2025. AP
While defending the sweeping trade tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump, top officials in the White House told the US federal court that Trump tariffs helped broker a 'fragile ceasefire' between India and Pakistan . In a statement to the US Court of International Trade, White House officials argued that limiting the executive power of the President of the United States (POTUS) would jeopardise regional security.
It is pertinent to note that India has maintained that New Delhi and Islamabad came to an understanding of a ceasefire only through bilateral means, acknowledging that the US delegations held talks with both nations and nothing more than that. In their argument, Trump's top aides said that blocking the trade tariffs would weaken Washington's ability to negotiate trade deals globally and undermine their strategic use as diplomatic tools.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
According to The Independent, trade representative Jamieson Greer, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio submitted statements to the court in support of the Trump tariffs last week. All of them argued that Trump imposed the tariffs under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
The US once again takes credit for the India-Pakistan ceasefire
The Trump officials were presenting these arguments in response to a lawsuit filed by small businesses, claiming losses from Trump's trade policies. In his statement to the court, Lutnick claimed that Trump tariffs helped the US mediate the conflict between India and Pakistan following four days of military escalation earlier this month.
'A ruling that narrows IEEPA would have ripple effects across every domain in which economic instruments are used for strategic effect,' Lutnick said in his statement as per the Friday court filing. 'This ceasefire was only achieved after President Trump interceded and offered both nations trading access with the United States to avert a full-scale war."
'An adverse ruling that constrains presidential power in this case could lead India and Pakistan to question the validity of President Trump's offer, threatening the security of an entire region and the lives of millions," he added.
While Pakistan has acknowledged the US's role in mediating a ceasefire, Indian External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar has maintained that both nations came to an understanding of a truce only after direct talks initiated by the Pakistani army. India has firmly rejected any form of international mediation.
Tensions between the two nuclear-powered nations reached an all-time high following the Pahalgam terror attack that led to the deaths of 26 tourists in Kashmir. Two weeks after the attack, India launched Operation Sindoor , conducting precise strikes over nine terror camps in Pakistan. This eventually led to further military escalations between the two neighbouring nations.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The China question
In his statement, the commerce secretary also claimed that the Trump tariffs eventually persuaded China to lower levies on US goods , marking a diplomatic win. 'The increased tariff rate against China applied additional pressure to achieve the foreign policy objective of bringing China, the greatest contributor to the national emergency and a well-known strategic adversary, to the negotiating table,' he said.
He insisted that the invalidation of the president's ability to use IEEPA would 'dismantle a cornerstone of his national security architecture," Lutnick noted that the ruling would 'irreparably harm the government's ability to respond to evolving foreign threats' and severely disrupt the commerce department 'coordination of foreign policy-related economic actions on behalf of the president'.
'The imposition of IEEPA tariffs signals to foreign governments that certain conduct, whether economic predation, trade manipulation, or narcotics trafficking, will incur serious consequences. Diluting this authority would not only unravel the current IEEPA actions but also would undermine future deterrence,' he averred. Lutnick closed his argument by stating that the Trump tariffs enabled the US to reach a trade deal with the UK and noted that similar deals are in the pipeline.
All in vain
Despite all these arguments, a federal court in New York blocked Trump from imposing sweeping tariffs on Wednesday. The ruling was delivered by a three-judge panel, arguing that the tariffs left the American economy in chaos.
'The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation using tariffs,' the court wrote, referring to the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'The court does not pass upon the wisdom or likely effectiveness of the president's use of tariffs as leverage. That use is impermissible not because it is unwise or ineffective, but because [federal law] does not allow it,' a three-judge panel said in the decision. Following the judgment, reports are emerging that the Trump administration has filed a notice of appeal. Not only this, but White House officials also issued public statements challenging the court's authority.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
a minute ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Putin's Jet!': Alaska Becomes the Center of the Universe for One Weekend
ANCHORAGE, Alaska—Nearly two decades ago, when the presidential nominee John McCain selected then-Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his Republican running mate, this Far North metropolis was swarmed with media, political consultants and other outsiders. It turns out that was merely a warm-up act. Anchorage now finds itself in a global spotlight, having hosted the much-anticipated summit between President Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin. 'I thought we had sunk back into obscurity,' joked the veteran Alaska pollster Ivan Moore, referring to the end of the Palin frenzy. Instead, Trump-Putin mania has gripped Anchorage, with hotel rooms and car rentals sold out, and buzz about the historic moment sweeping through tourist destinations, including salmon-fishing spots and the Alaska Railroad depot, where visitors await the scenic ride to Denali National Park and Preserve, famed for its grizzlies and high peaks. Reactions have varied. Some are outraged Alaska would host Putin after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Others hope this marks a step toward peace. But most everyone agrees on one point. This summit—with the deadly war at stake—is perhaps the most notable event to happen in Alaska in modern memory. 'All eyes are on Anchorage,' declared a headline in the Anchorage Daily News, while Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy told a local news station that the event 'puts Alaska on the world map—where we should be.' 'This trip is very big,' said Mike Porcaro, a radio talk show host who said calls about the event flooded his conservative program. 'There have been other high-level meetings, but not of this magnitude.' 'Bucket list' On Friday morning, onlookers gathered on a pier, beneath the flight path to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, to see the plane carrying Putin, and Air Force One, land there. A website for the base, in the wooded outskirts, recommends that new arrivals enjoy a 'bucket list' of experiences including the Moose Run Golf Course and beluga whale watching. But the chance to see the rare joint landings of two world leaders topped that. 'Putin's jet!' local resident Cheryl Shroyer, 73, shouted from an overlook as a large plane believed to be carrying the Russian leader appeared first as a black dot against the snow-capped Alaska Range. The big jet grew larger, gliding over the Cook Inlet before disappearing as trees blocked the view of the base's airfield. At 10:17 a.m. local time, Shroyer shouted again: 'There it is, Air Force One!' as Trump's plane emerged from the clouds. (As it turned out, Putin's plane was another one, which came in after Trump.) Though Anchorage has nearly 300,000 people, it feels like a small town. Many locals drive pickup trucks, and the airport greets visitors with taxidermied grizzly, Kodiak and polar bears. Some Alaskans feel more kinship with Canada than the 'Outside,' local lingo for the Lower 48 U.S. states. Of course, Russia has long ties to Alaska. Once Russian territory, Alaska was sold to the U.S. in 1867 for $7.2 million. Palin, as McCain's running mate, drew late-show ridicule for reportedly saying, 'I can see Russia from my house.' (She actually said Russia is visible from the Alaskan island of Little Diomede island, which is about 2.5 miles from the Russian island of Big Diomede.) As hundreds of reporters and officials descended on Anchorage for the summit, local entrepreneurs seized on the surprise windfall. Some proprietors said it had been a challenging summer, with tourism hampered by a slowdown in foreign travel. David Liles, manager of the Ramada by Wyndham in downtown Anchorage, said occupancy jumped from 60%, with rooms running about $300 nightly, to fully booked, with rooms temporarily between $500 and $1,000. (Among those not getting hotels? Some Russian journalists who arrived as part of Putin's press pool Thursday night and slept on beds inside a sports stadium on the campus of the University of Alaska.) The Ramada price was nothing compared with what the owner of an Airbnb tried to charge: $7,000 a night after canceling a previous offer of $1,500. 'Some people are getting greedy ' Liles said. Autumn hues on the tundra on the Chugach peaks above Anchorage signal the approaching long winter. 'People who make money off tourists only have three months to do it in, so any publicity that brings extra people here is good for the economy,' said Kirill Gashenko, who rents out used cars. They were in hot demand. Cheers and jeers America's political divisions were on full display across Anchorage. 'We're really distraught that Putin is allowed on our soil, period,' said Janice Bunting, 65, watching for planes with her husband, Glenn, from lawn chairs beside a Ukrainian flag. Standing nearby, Jeff Henson, a 61-year-old Air Force veteran, disagreed. He said talking is the only way to resolve the conflict. 'The previous administration had three years,' said Henson, a Trump supporter accompanied by his husky mix, Leo. As the two presidents huddled, hundreds of Putin critics converged on a park near downtown Anchorage and unfurled a 132 foot by 65 foot Ukrainian flag—one of the largest in the world, organizers said. 'I can't think of a bigger F U to Trump and Putin,' organizer Erin Jackson-Hill said over a microphone to cheers. Minutes earlier, a lone man taunted the crowd with shouts of 'U.S.A.! U.S.A.!,' to which a demonstrator, Courtney Moore, shot back, 'Bootlicker!' A giant Ukrainian flag was unfurled at Delaney Park Strip in the heart of Anchorage. For her part, hotel clerk Amber Rookard just wanted the whole summit to go away. 'It just makes everybody uneasy,' said Rookard, who said three FBI agents came in and asked her if she had seen any 'unusual people.' Confused, she answered, 'I see a lot of unusual people.' Still, most locals seemed supportive. Soon after Anchorage was announced as the summit venue, Ivan Moore's Alaska Survey Research conducted a poll of 848 registered voters that found 59% said it was appropriate that Putin was invited to participate in the summit on U.S. soil—even if only 6% gave Putin a favorable rating. Unfortunately, there was little time for the two leaders to enjoy the outdoor adventures for which Alaska is revered. The incoming planes passed a line of fishermen at a creek known for its salmon. That might have caught the eye of Putin, who has been pictured fishing shirtless. At the Alaska Railroad depot, Steve Richmond, an Oregon resident visiting with his wife, suggested that Trump and Putin follow the group and see the park's famed wildlife. 'They should take advantage of being in this area,' Richmond, 74, said, as the train whistle blew nearby in preparation for departure. Write to Jim Carlton at
Hindustan Times
a minute ago
- Hindustan Times
Did Trump cave to Putin during Alaska Summit? Shocking report out as Zelensky, EU left scrambling
Did Trump cave to Putin during Alaska Summit? Shocking report out as Zelensky, EU left scrambling
Hindustan Times
a minute ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump-Putin Summit Ends Without Breakthrough
ANCHORAGE, Alaska—President Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin ended their highly anticipated meeting here without announcing a breakthrough, leaving the path toward ending the war in Ukraine unclear. At the end of the over three-hour meeting, the two men offered few details about their talks. 'There's no deal until there is a deal,' Trump told reporters at a news conference following the close of the summit. The typically talkative U.S. president took no questions from the dozens of reporters assembled before him. The president said the delegations made progress on key issues, but added, 'We haven't quite got there.' Trump said he would call members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. 'We will probably see you again very soon,' Trump told Putin. The Russian president interjected and offered that their next meeting could take place in Moscow. Trump responded, 'I can see it possibly happening.' Trump had come into the summit seeking Putin's agreement on a cease-fire in Ukraine. But Putin in his remarks gave no indication he was prepared to agree to that demand, repeating that Moscow wanted the root causes of the 3½ year conflict addressed—a term that refers to Moscow's demands for demilitarizing Kyiv and blocking its hopes for membership in NATO. In contrast to the handshakes and smiles that characterized the start of their meeting on the tarmac on Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Putin and Trump looked stone-faced during much of the news conference. Putin spoke for roughly eight minutes. Trump then spoke for three minutes, before leaving the room. Even before the meeting officially began, Putin, who has been sanctioned by the U.S. and largely snubbed on the world stage, racked up a series of symbolic wins. Trump waited onboard Air Force One for 30 minutes before the Russian president's plane touched down. The U.S. president greeted his Russian counterpart warmly, applauding as he walked down a red carpet and shook his hand. After posing for photos, both men got into the U.S. president's armored limousine, known as the Beast, giving Putin the one-on-one time with Trump that some of the American president's advisers sought to avoid. Photographers caught the Russian leader smiling as he sat next to Trump in the limo. While it isn't unusual for an American president to invite a foreign leader for an intimate ride in the president's motorcade, the privilege comes after Putin has repeatedly thumbed his nose at Trump's repeated calls to stop the violence in Ukraine. Trump's earlier reception of Putin was markedly different from the way the U.S. president treated Zelensky during a February visit to the Oval Office. Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated the Ukrainian president for not, in their view, showing sufficient gratitude for U.S. support in the war with Russia. Relations between Trump and Zelensky have subsequently improved. But Trump, a former reality-television star who focuses intently on stage-managing his public events, also sent a message to Putin about America's military might. Trump and Putin walked down a red carpet flanked on either side by F-22 stealth fighters and, as the two leaders stepped onto a riser with the words 'ALASKA 2025,' a nuclear-capable B-2 bomber and four F-35 jet fighters roared overhead. As the meeting was in progress, Russian military forces launched new attacks targeting Ukraine's eastern regions, according to the Ukrainian air force. Securing a face-to-face meeting with Trump is a win for Putin, analysts said. The fact that the meeting took place in Alaska, which Russia sold to the U.S. in 1867, is an bonus for the Russian leader. It's 'a Russian revisionist dream come true,' said Celeste Wallander, a senior Pentagon official in the Biden administration. The Russian Foreign Ministry's spokeswoman Maria Zakharova wrote on Telegram that the meeting signaled to the media a shift in relations between Moscow and Washington. 'For three years, they have been reporting that Russia is in isolation, and today they saw the red carpet, laid to greet the Russian president in the United States,' she wrote. Trump has expressed frustration with Putin in recent months after once claiming his strong relationship with the Russian president could lead to a resolution of the war in just a day. In the days leading up to the summit, Trump played down the prospects for a breakthrough, calling his first face-to-face meeting with Putin in six years a 'feel-out meeting.' He didn't rule out the possibility the talks could fail and he said he was prepared to walk away entirely if Putin refused to work toward peace. Trump said he hoped Friday's meeting would lay the groundwork for a second meeting in the near future in which Putin would negotiate directly with Zelensky toward a cease-fire. But in the hours before the summit, Trump upped the stakes, telling Fox News that he wouldn't be happy if Putin didn't agree to a cease-fire at the meeting. The summit was initially set to begin with a one-on-one meeting between Trump and Putin, but it was expanded to include top advisers from each delegation at the U.S. president's request. Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff represented the American delegation, while Putin was joined by Yuri Ushakov, his longtime foreign-policy adviser, and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. While Trump and Putin have spoken several times in the last six months, the meeting in Anchorage was the first time they met in person since the Group of 20 summit in Osaka, Japan, in 2019. Russian officials indicated that Putin wanted to push a spectrum of bilateral issues onto the negotiating table, likely in an attempt to water down talks about Ukraine, decouple the conflict from U.S.-Russia ties and avoid the threat of sanctions from the Trump White House. The absence of any binding steps for the Russian side to follow out of the meeting could give Putin a chance to continue prosecuting his war in Ukraine, where Russian troops are gaining crucial footholds in eastern Ukraine, while avoiding any new sanctions on Russian oil. Putin's broader goal of trying to put Russia on an equal footing with the U.S., however, was already achieved just by clinching the meeting, particularly on U.S. territory. 'This meeting elevates Russia in some ways to an equal status to the United States, which is what he has craved,' said Heather Conley, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a former top State Department official on European affairs. Kremlin loyal media had suggested the meeting would carry echoes of the 1945 Yalta Conference in which the U.S. and the Soviet Union managed to carve up Europe into spheres of influence, a scenario Putin would be eager to repeat with Trump. Putin is unlikely to be deterred from his ultimate goal of conquering Ukraine militarily or politically to re-establish the Russian sphere of influence in Europe which Moscow lost with the collapse of the Soviet Union. 'Putin is primarily carrying out this war to end the post Cold War order, that is to return Russia to its place as a great power in the classic sense, with its sphere of influence and the right to establish its own conditions there,' said Ruslan Pukhov, founder of Moscow-based defense think tank Center for the Analysis of Strategies and Technologies. Conflict negotiation is usually a drawn-out process that involves detailed timetables, confidence-building measures and verification over months and years. But little of that is expected to be hammered out in a matter of several hours, leaving the rapid cease-fire agreement that Trump wants an open question. 'The big question is whether any of this is enough for Trump,' said Samuel Charap, a veteran Russia watcher and senior political scientist at Rand Corporation. 'He wants an immediate cease-fire, and that's highly unlikely.' Write to Lara Seligman at Meridith McGraw at and Thomas Grove at
