
St. John's Pride sees 'one of the largest festival turnouts ever' at weekend parade
"We believe this is one of the largest festival turnouts ever," said St. John's Pride communications lead, Ellen Davis, in a statement.
The parade started at St. John's city hall, where over 2,400 marchers gathered before snaking through downtown St. John's, ending in Bannerman Park for a large celebration.
Over 1,400 people also joined as spectators, said Davis.
Davis commended the work of the St. John's Pride board and volunteers, who she said worked hard to put off the event.
"Our volunteer board is now taking some well earned rest," said Davis. "This festival takes hundreds of planning hours, thousands of emails, tough conversations, late nights, early mornings, and long days. It takes a village."
This year's pride festival theme was "no going back." St. John's Pride co-chair, Eddy St. Coeur, told CBC news on July 18 that the theme was chosen in consideration of rising political attacks against transgender people.
The parade was led by Trans Support N.L., a non-profit that provides support to the trans community, "so that we have our entire community, figuratively and quite literally, marching behind [them] down the streets of St. John's," said St. Coeur.
'Walking together towards justice'
Trans Support N.L.'s board director, Myka Hollahan, said she felt joy being surrounded by the community while speaking at the Bannerman Park celebration.
Hollahan gave a speech about the importance of allyship, and reflected on how it can feel for people to mess up, like by using the wrong pronouns.
But, she said, "imperfect allies are still allies."
"They're the ones who show up even when they're nervous. They're the ones who say, I don't know, but I want to learn. They're the ones who keep coming back even after they mess up," said Hollahan. "They're the ones who take accountability and are committed to learning and doing better."
"And that matters, because allyship isn't about being right all the time. It's about being willing."
Hollahan wrapped up her speech by reflecting on the festival, and pointing out that it is not just a celebration, but also about "recognizing that progress doesn't require perfection, it requires people … walking together towards justice," she said.
Over 100 community groups and organizations also walked in the parade, including members of St. Mark's Anglican Church.
The church's rector, Amanda Taylor, said it was important for them to be there, due to rising hatred and division in the world.
"We just feel it's important to show up, and show that we respect the dignity of every human being ... everybody is loved, valued, [and] accepted just as they are," said Taylor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


National Post
13 minutes ago
- National Post
Terry Newman: Why your steak sucks this summer
Article content When questioned about where the meat comes from, he said that, 'The chicken is almost 99 per cent Canadian. The beef and the pork, one day we could get 10 cases of back ribs and it's all Canadian, and the next day we get two cases of American.' Article content Yet 'none of the labels would tell you. That's what the little flags are for,' he explained, pointing to signs sitting above a bin of meat. 'Every couple of hours, they're constantly revising it in terms of what is and what isn't (Canadian).' Article content Again, there was nothing on the individual packages of meat to indicate whether the beef is foreign or homegrown, just flags or signs being shifted around to indicate whether beef is Canadian. Article content I spoke to a fourth butcher, this time at a Loblaws store, who confirmed that if it is not marked, there is no way for consumers to tell if the beef they are buying is from the United States or elsewhere. Article content At this location, a display case with unpackaged prime cuts featured some pieces of meat with flags indicating that they were Canadian. However, other meats in the case did not have any country-identifying information. Article content Article content There were packages of beef marked 'Canadian Beef,' with stickers saying, 'Pick the Beef with the Leaf,' and clearly displaying a black Canadian flag with 'Canada' written in the centre on each individual package. Article content Article content However, there was also beef that was unmarked. For example, a section filled with stewing beef, striploins and eye round marinating steaks with and without 'Canadian Pepper Seasoning' did not bear the same Canadian symbol on the individual packages. Article content Article content Article content The Loblaws butcher did, however, point to price tags above one bin of meats that had Canadian flags on it. These, he told me, were brought in as part of the 'Buy Canadian' movement against U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs. But these weren't everywhere in the store. In this location, they were above some vacuum-sealed, pre-seasoned pork products. Article content Article content Article content Grading requirements aside, I needed to determine whether the butchers were correct about Canadians not being able to tell if their meat is not Canadian. Article content I contacted Metro, Loblaws and the CFIA to ask why, as per the butchers I spoke with, there appears to be a lack of clarity around the labelling of meats from foreign countries, despite the rules posted on the food agency's website. Article content I asked Stephanie Bonk, communications manager for Metro, if the butchers were correct in saying that beyond marked boxes out back, consumers in the store would not be able to know if their meat was Canadian. Bonk said that Metro follows Ontario rules, which do not require country of origin labelling. Article content When I asked about store inspection, Bonk said that, 'To ensure compliance with federal and provincial requirements, the stores could be inspected by CFIA and/or' the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Agribusiness. Article content She explained that, 'There is no requirement for country of origin on retail meat cuts that are cut and packaged at store level. This would include ground meats, stewing meat, kabobs, stir fry meat, etc.'


CBC
14 minutes ago
- CBC
Chatham-Kent council defers decision on possible encampment relocation
Social Sharing Residents of a Chatham-Kent homeless encampment will have to wait until next month to find out if they have to move again. Municipal council voted to defer a decision that could relocate the encampment on the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) lands. Councillors passed a motion at a special meeting Monday night to have staff prepare a report outlining which municipal properties homeless people could camp on if they had to stay up to 100 metres away from residential properties. Staff will present options specific to the community of Chatham at council's August meeting and to the rest of the communities in the municipality in September. "My reason for asking for this is just to make sure that we don't repeat what just happened," said Coun. Allyson Storey, referring to the outcry from neighbours of the PUC lands that precipitated Monday's special meeting. "It is not an attempt to delay," Storey said. Where else could campers go? Many homeowners near the PUC lands say they were blindsided by the arrival of the campers approximately two weeks ago after the municipality broke up an encampment on the riverfront to make way for slope stabilization work. They told councillors Monday they were angry at not having been consulted over decisions about where campers could move. Storey's motion was a response to a motion by Mayor Darrin Canniff, which proposed amending Chatham-Kent's encampment protocol to prohibit camping within 100 metres of a residential property. Currently, the proscribed distance is within 10 metres. Storey said she wanted to know what options would be available to campers if the set-back radius was set at 25, 50 or 100 metres — and to give residents a chance to weigh in on any changes. If council had passed Canniff's motion as moved, there would only be two places in all of Chatham where homeless people could camp, Bruce McAllister told councillors. "It would be Thames Grove," said the municipality's general manager of development services. "If you go to 100 metres, you could still accommodate at the very southeast corner of the property a number of tents there. … The other potential option is Paxton's Bush." Councillors did adopt the remaining components of Canniff's motion, which laid out a number of measures aimed at eliminating homelessness and reducing complaints about encampments in the meantime. Those steps include: Requesting that staff prepare reports on options for delivering permanent supportive housing and more transitional cabins; identify properties that could be converted into supportive housing; and engage partner organizations such as mental health service providers to provide services in encampments. Transitioning as many homeless people as possible into the municipality's new transitional cabins. Continuing to work with R.O.C.K. (Reach Out Chatham-Kent) to house as many homeless people as possible. Permitting only one tent per person in encampments and requiring all possessions to be kept inside tents except for bicycles and small structures for pets. Hiring additional bylaw officers to enforce bylaws in encampments. Having police install CCTV cameras as needed at their discretion. Beginning regular communication with residents in the area around the PUC property. Councillors did not consider a motion put forward by Coun. Michael Bondy, which would've required campers to dismantle their campsites and disperse during daytime hours. The four-hour meeting opened with 17 delegations from neighbours of the encampment and advocates for homeless people. Some residents expressed concern about their property values and spoke of feeling unsafe in their neighbourhoods. They complained of garbage, vandalism and attempted break-ins. "When it was announced that the homeless population of Chatham would be relocated to the waterworks facilities, many teams decided they would no longer practice at that location," said John Foster, president of the Chatham Soccer Club. "Many parents are concerned with their children using a facility with such close proximity to possible drug use exposure, drug paraphernalia hazards, lewd behaviour ... including going to the washroom in public fully exposed." But some residents also said they wanted better solutions than to simply move the encampment to another neighbourhood. Larry Hutchins called for increased policing, 24-hour security and regular reports about addressing neighbourhood concerns. Advocates for the homeless, meanwhile, urged residents to view homeless individuals as members of their community who have had to resort to camping in public spaces because of systemic failures to address poverty, mental health issues and addiction. The general manager of Chatham Hope Haven said many of her clients live in the encampment, and they don't like it any more than their neighbours do because they are farther from the services they need for survival. It's absurd to think that moving them will help, Loree Bailey said. "I get being angry," she said. "I'm really angry too. I'm angry at every single system that these folks rely on to live being broken." Priest and soup kitchen volunteer Michael Bolohan urged the community to go beyond managing the housing crisis to experiencing what he called a "conversion of heart." "The ego driven part of us, obsessed with control, comfort and certainty, will always resist the presence of those who disrupt our illusions of safety and prosperity," he said. "Encampments do just that. They confront us with the failure of our systems, fragility of human life, and the lie that success and worth is the same thing."


CBC
14 minutes ago
- CBC
Kinew cabinet uses order to dismiss appeals against Chinese miner's environmental licence
Wab Kinew's NDP cabinet has dismissed four attempts to appeal Manitoba's decision to let a Chinese-owned company continue mining critical minerals alongside a lake in eastern Manitoba's boreal forest. On July 16, Kinew's cabinet issued an order in council that allows Environment and Climate Change Minister Mike Moyes to dismiss appeals of an August 2024 decision to grant the Tantalum Mining Corp. of Canada a new environmental licence. Also known as TANCO, the Chinese-controlled company operates a cesium, tantalum and lithium mine at Bernic Lake, a small body of water located between Whiteshell and Nopiming provincial parks. The mine itself has operated on and off since 1929. The new environmental licence replaces one originally granted by the province in 1983. Sinomine Resource Group, which purchased the TANCO mine in 2019, applied for the new licence in order to continue mining ore and processing it at Bernic Lake — as well as to produce new forms of cesium at the site, once home to two thirds of the world's cesium deposits. The licence application did not include a proposal to drain Bernic Lake in order to create an open-pit mine, something the company mused about in a 2023 Globe and Mail story. There is a worldwide scarcity of cesium, a volatile element used in drilling fluids for oil and gas wells, medical imaging and maintaining time in atomic clocks, among other uses. During the licensing process, the province fielded 49 submissions about the application, mostly involving concerns about road safety and water quality downstream in the Bird River watershed, according to Manitoba Environment and Climate Change. The Kinew cabinet's order in council states those concerns were addressed during the licensing process. Four subsequent appeals involved the same concerns, prompting Moyes to propose dismissing them without holding public hearings, the order stated. "The issues raised by the appellants were similar to those raised during the public review period and were addressed during the environmental assessment process through licensing conditions," the order in council stated. The Kinew government did not make Moyes available for comment. In a statement, the minister repeated cabinet's assurance the concerns raised by the appellants have already been addressed. Dismissal not transparent or accountable: advocate Eric Reder, an environmental advocate who works as a campaigner for the Wilderness Committee, said this was not a transparent, responsible or accountable way for Manitoba to consider appeals under the Environment Act, even though he took no issue with the approval of the TANCO licence itself. Reder said the TANCO mine has a history of conducting its operations reasonably and properly, without creating excess waste outside of its Bernic Lake site. His issue is with the way Manitoba denies environmental appeals in general. He said the province does not name appellants or make their concerns public, does not respond to their concerns in a substantive manner and creates a hostile political environment for appeals in the first place. "The only recourse to appeal an Environment Act licence is to the same minister whose department issued the licence," Reder said. He suggested the province create an independent body to consider environmental appeals or hand that duty off to the arm's-length Clean Environment Commission. A spokesperson for Sinomine did not respond to a request for comment prior to publication. A spokesperson for the Bird River Cottage Owners' Association, several of whose members made submissions in opposition to the mine's new environmental licence, was not available to comment. In recent years, Kinew and his predecessor Heather Stefanson have touted Manitoba's critical mineral deposits as a strategic asset for the province. Nonetheless, the province has lagged behind most others when it comes to major mining, energy and forestry projects.