logo
One in 7 high street shops now stands empty… we don't need government tweaks to a broken system – we need radical reform

One in 7 high street shops now stands empty… we don't need government tweaks to a broken system – we need radical reform

The Sun2 days ago
OUR high streets have had a tough time in recent years — battered by a global pandemic, war, energy shocks and soaring inflation.
Yet despite it all, shops have kept going — serving their communities, creating jobs, and showing remarkable resilience.
3
3
But resilience isn't a plan for growth, and nostalgia won't pay the bills.
If we are serious about bringing our high streets back to life, we need to stop papering over the cracks and fix the system for good.
That means a tax regime built for today, not for the 1500s — a time before supermarkets, retail parks and the internet.
Right now, retail accounts for just five per cent of the UK economy but pays more than 20 per cent of all business rates.
That's an immense burden and it falls most heavily on the very businesses that invest in local places, local jobs and local people.
It is no wonder that there were around 100,000 fewer jobs in retail at the start of 2025 than the year before, the equivalent of losing every job in the UK steel industry three times over.
Since 2015, the sector has shed around 350,000 jobs, and new research suggests another 160,000 part-time roles could vanish if costs rise further — exactly the kinds of jobs that provide flexibility to hardworking families.
Physical retailers are businesses that play by the rules, open their doors every morning and form the backbone of our communities.
Meanwhile, online sales have more than doubled in the past decade.
Why are so many shops going bust?
At the height of the pandemic, they made up 37 per cent of all retail — and while that has dipped slightly since, online is still booming.
Yet the digital giants face nothing like the same tax burden, and contribute next to nothing to the Government's tax receipts that pay for the NHS, our emergency services, roads and welfare.
This clearly, is not fair.
The health of the high street is also a bellwether for the health of the wider economy
This is a system designed for a different age. Business rates were first introduced in the 1500s, when physical property was a proxy for wealth.
Today, that logic just doesn't hold. We now see a massive imbalance that punishes our local communities.
To be clear, this isn't about the high street asking for a handout. It's about giving retail a fair shot.
Fair deal
Our sector is the UK's largest private employer — supporting three million jobs; in sales, marketing, accounting, logistics and many more.
Retail has all the career disciplines needed for a growing economy.
The health of the high street is also a bellwether for the health of the wider economy. When shops shut, town centres hollow out.
Footfall fell by 1.7 per cent in July, and one in seven high street units now stands empty.
The ripple effect has an immediate impact on the community: nearby independents see sales fall, bus routes get quieter, and the whole centre loses momentum.
That affects everything from local policing and public transport to housing demand and health outcomes.
The Centre for Retail Research now predicts that store closures will rise to around 17,350 this year — the highest level in more than a decade.
That is nearly 50 shops a day closing their doors for good, leaving empty units, boarded windows and fewer reasons for people to visit their town centres.
The loss is not just economic — it chips away at the social fabric, reducing spaces where people meet, work and spend time.
Once a shop shuts, it is far harder and costlier to bring it back, meaning each closure represents a long-term wound to the health of the high street.
To their credit, the current Labour government has done more than its predecessors, with proposals to support smaller stores with targeted business rates relief, which are of course welcome.
But we cannot end up with just tweaks to a system that needs radical reform and reset. You can't fix a broken model with just a few sticking plasters.
We need to ask a bigger question: what should a modern, fair retail tax look like?
One that reflects how we all actually shop, and one that rewards investment in jobs and premises.
After everything the high street has been through, asking it to carry even more weight would be the final straw for many.
The Government must ensure that no shop pays more in the upcoming Autumn Budget.
Retail isn't asking to be saved, it's asking for the rules to be fair.
If you give the high street a fair deal, it will more than repay you — with jobs, opportunity, and of course a vibrant local community.
Let's not forget that a healthy high street with tills ringing means more money into the coffers of the Treasury, giving the economy a much needed boost to growth.
Theo Paphitis, TV Dragon and owner of Ryman, Robert Dyas & Boux Avenue
3
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rise in no-fault evictions despite Labour's pledge to ban them
Rise in no-fault evictions despite Labour's pledge to ban them

The Independent

time3 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Rise in no-fault evictions despite Labour's pledge to ban them

Thousands of people have had their homes seized after receiving controversial 'no-fault' eviction notices despite Labour pledging to abolish them, new data shows. Labour said in its election manifesto it would abolish Section 21 eviction notices 'immediately' after winning the election. A year on, and the relevant legislation still progressing through parliament means that the ban is still not in effect. According to Ministry of Justice figures released on Thursday, 11,400 households received no-fault evictions by bailiffs in the year to June. The number of bailiff evictions is an eight per cent rise on the previous year, continuing a trend of a heightened use of the notices. Housing charity Shelter said it is 'unconscionable' that renters 'continue to be marched out of their homes by bailiffs' a year after Labour 's election victory. It warned that nearly 1,000 households could be evicted from their homes by bailiffs every month until the ban on the notices is finally put in place. Section 21 notices grant landlords the power to evict tenants from their properties at two months' notice without needing to give any reason. Former prime minister Theresa May first announced the Conservatives' intention to abolish Section 21 notices in April 2019. Shelter described no-fault evictions as one of the leading causes of homelessness. Mairi MacRae, its director of campaigns and policy, said: "It is unconscionable that more than a year after the government came to power, thousands of renters continue to be marched out of their homes by bailiffs because of an unfair policy that the government said would be scrapped immediately. 'For far too long, tenants' lives have been thrown into turmoil by the rank injustice of 'no-fault' evictions. At the whim of private landlords, thousands of tenants are being left with just two months to find a new home, plunging them into a ruthless rental market and leaving many exposed to the riptide of homelessness.' The government's Renters' Rights Bill, sponsored by the Ministry of Housing, is currently in its final stages. It is expected to pass before the end of the year, or early 2026 at the latest. Alongside abolishing Section 21 notices, it would give tenants a 12-month protected period at the beginning of their tenancy, alongside increasing the notice requirement for landlords to evict on other grounds from two to four months. The bill would also provide protection against 'backdoor eviction ', where tenants are effectively pushed out by above-market rent increases, by giving them greater powers to challenge them. Housing charity Crisis has called on the government to bring forward the legislation and name a date when it will be implemented. Matt Downie, chief executive at Crisis, said: 'Despite good intentions from the Westminster government, thousands of people are still being unjustly evicted from their homes and threatened with – or even forced into – homelessness.' The new data comes after Labour MP Rushanara Ali recently resigned her role as homelessness minister following reports she gave tenants in a property she owned four months' notice to leave, before relisting the property with a £700 rent increase just weeks later. Such a move would likely not be allowed under the Renters' Rights Bill, which is set to introduce new protections for tenants, including banning landlords who evict tenants in order to sell their property from relisting it for rent for six months. A Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said: 'No one should live in fear of a Section 21 eviction and these new figures show exactly why we will abolish them through our Renters' Rights Bill, which is a manifesto commitment and legislative priority for this government. 'We're determined to level the playing field by providing tenants with greater security, rights and protections in their homes and our landmark reforms will be implemented swiftly after the bill becomes law.'

Charity which asked children as young as five to write Valentine's Day cards for asylum seekers is reported to watchdog
Charity which asked children as young as five to write Valentine's Day cards for asylum seekers is reported to watchdog

Daily Mail​

time4 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Charity which asked children as young as five to write Valentine's Day cards for asylum seekers is reported to watchdog

A charity which asked children as young as five to write Valentine's Day cards for asylum seekers has been reported to a watchdog. Schools of Sanctuary, a small refugee-sector charity, launched the programme in primary schools across Britain last year. On February 14, 2024, children were asked to send messages of 'love and solidarity' by making handmade cards for asylum seekers. Slogans inside cards included, 'You're welcome here!', and 'I love refugee rights, stop the Rwanda scheme.' In another card, an accompanying poem read: 'Roses are red, violets are blue, refugees are people, just like me and you.' Schoolchildren were also encouraged to discuss topics such as 'kindness, humanity, and equality', and to raise money for local charities with their class or wider school. Some cards featured an orange heart, which represents compassion for those fleeing war and is inspired by the refugee nation flag, according to Together With Refugees. Regarding the matter, Laura Trott, the shadow education secretary, previously said 'children as young as five shouldn't be used to push political agendas'. And now, Sir Gavin Williamson, former Tory Education Secretary, has asked the Charity Commission to probe the branch of the City of Sanctuary charity. He alleged Schools of Sanctuary were 'engaging in political activity', and acting in a way that was not 'consistent with its charitable purpose', The Telegraph reported. And while a Commission spokesperson confirmed has received a complaint of 'alleged political activity' concerning City of Sanctuary, it has yet to make any decision. On its website, the Schools of Sanctuary described itself as 'a registered charity and therefore apolitical. 'Our primary focus is the dignity and humanity of individuals seeking safety and the creation of a kinder, more compassionate society – not the politics surrounding immigration policies.' However, the MP said there were 'numerous' examples where the charity acted politically, including their Valentine's Day Card scheme. He argued such initiatives encouraged people to participate in 'overtly political activity', noting a post including a card which read: 'Stop the Rwanda Scheme'. The former education secretary also claimed the charity's literature referred to the UK's asylum system as 'deliberately hostile' to those fleeing to Britain. Its resource pack also said government legislation fed into 'anti-immigrant sentiment, racism, and stressing community cohesion.' The Charity Commission has yet to reach a conclusion on the report, but if it decides to launch an inquiry and misconduct is found, it can instruct a charity to take action. Among the local authorities to partner with the Schools of Sanctuary Network is Labour-run Birmingham City Council. While teachers cannot promote political views in the classroom there is no suggestion that writing the Valentine's Day cards broke the law. A City of Sanctuary UK spokesperson said: 'We follow all Charity Commission guidelines and are confident that we are working within our charitable aims, we will fully cooperate with any Charity Commission investigation.'

Cancel culture? I'm not to blame, says Sturgeon in wake of Fringe venue Forbes ban
Cancel culture? I'm not to blame, says Sturgeon in wake of Fringe venue Forbes ban

Daily Mail​

time4 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Cancel culture? I'm not to blame, says Sturgeon in wake of Fringe venue Forbes ban

Nicola Sturgeon is under fire after denying blame for the ' cancel culture ' which led to deputy First Minister Kate Forbes being banned from an Edinburgh Festival Fringe venue. She also refused to apologise to the women vilified for opposing her botched gender reforms. The Scottish Tories accused Ms Sturgeon of being 'delusional' for not accepting she had fuelled a cancel culture by branding her critics intolerant and bigoted. Her 'obsession with gender ideology and intolerance towards women's groups poured fuel on the fire', the party said. During the official launch of her memoir, Frankly, at the Edinburgh book festival, she said: The world is 'literally' her oyster and she may move abroad It could be another 10 years before SNP policies have an effect She received cruel messages about rape and her miscarriage online Summerhall Arts venue this week caused outrage after indicating Kate Forbes won't be allowed back because of her views on trans issues. The Scottish Daily Mail revealed how bosses apologised to performers after the Deputy First Minister appeared at a Fringe event last week. Some artists set up a 'safe room', claiming to be 'terrified' by the 5ft 2in MSP. The venue said booking Ms Forbes, who has criticised gender reforms and backs single-sex spaces for biological women, was an 'oversight' they would prevent 'happening again'. It led to calls for a recent award of £608,000 of public funding to be withdrawn. After appearing at the Edinburgh Book Festival yesterday, Ms Sturgeon, who now admits she should have 'paused' her gender reforms, was asked about the ban. She said: 'I don't agree with cancel culture and I don't agree with that.' The Book Festival has been criticised for failing to include gender critical writers, including the authors of the best-selling essay collection The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht. While the National Library of Scotland has been accused of 'cowardice' for pulling the book from a major exhibition after staff complained about it promoting 'hate speech'. Asked if she bore responsibility for the 'censorious atmosphere', Ms Sturgeon said: 'No, I don't.' Pressed on whether she would say sorry to people who felt vilified for their gender-critical views, she said: 'No, I won't apologise. People on both sides of this debate are vilified. I've been vilified and received some awful abuse - nothing like the abuse trans people are getting right now. 'I tried to stand up for rights of one of most stigmatised minorities in the country. I don't believe that is in conflict with the rights of women which I have stood up for and will continue to stand up for.' She added: 'As a frontline politician for three decades, I am not without responsibility for the state of public discourse. I've got to take my share of collective responsibility. 'But I think we've also all got to just stop shouting abuse at each other and take a step back and try to find out a way of find a way of agreeing and disagreeing.' Conservative MSP Roz McCall said: 'It's frankly shameful that Nicola Sturgeon still refuses to apologise to women and girls for putting them in harm's way. 'For years she arrogantly dismissed their valid concerns, vilified them, and sacrificed their rights to appease extremist gender activists. 'Across Scotland, public bodies are still unpicking the chaos caused by her botched gender reforms - yet Nicola Sturgeon and her partner in crime John Swinney refuse to admit they were wrong. 'We saw that this week at the Fringe and it's delusional for her to deny that this cancel culture doesn't stem from the gender policies she pushed. 'Vile abuse on either side of this debate is completely unacceptable, but it's impossible to deny that Nicola Sturgeon's obsession with gender ideology and intolerance towards women's groups poured fuel on the fire.' The ex FM also revealed she received a rape threat and vile comments about her miscarriage after the release of her memoir. She said: 'These are people who call themselves feminists, standing up for women's rights, saying things about me, such as when I described my miscarriage experience the other day, 'I haven't laughed as much in years', accusing me of making it up, people saying they hope I'm raped in a toilet. These are the kind of things that go in both directions.' Earlier, on stage with broadcaster Kirsty Wark to discuss her memoir Frankly, Ms Sturgeon was cheered by fans for taking a swipe at Joanna Cherry, KC. The former SNP MP, who was ostracised by party colleagues for opposing gender reforms, said this week Ms Sturgeon was 'Stalinist' in how she ran the SNP. Ms Sturgeon said: 'There are certain people in this world who spend a lot more time thinking about me than I spend thinking about them.' She also admitted her flagship pledge to close the attainment gap in schools could take twice as long to deliver as she promised. She vowed in 2016 to end the gulf in exam results between rich and poor areas in a decade. But she suggested yesterday it could be another 10 years before SNP policies had an effect - as she hadn't realised tackling poverty was needed to address the poverty-related problem. She said: 'Unless you're changing the conditions kids are growing up in, then you're not going to have the impact, and that's what I learned along the way. 'Some of the things that I am proudest of are the Scottish Child Payment, the doubling of early years education, the baby box. These are things that are lifting children out of poverty, and I believe in time will make a difference.' Ms Wark replied incredulously: 'In time? That was ten years ago. That gap has not been closed. 'In time' is leaving a whole generation of children without that.' Ms Sturgeon: 'It will take longer than I appreciated or allowed myself to appreciate at the time, and that was my mistake. But it will work through the system. 'I absolutely believe that things like Scottish Child Payment, if we're looking back 10 years from now, the benefits of that in school attainment, in the attainment gap, will be seen.' Scottish Tory education spokesman Miles Briggs said: 'Nicola Sturgeon claimed that education was her top priority, but her record was disastrous - and now she says it will be another decade before progress is made on the flagship promise she made 10 years ago. 'It would be laughable if it wasn't so serious for the young people she has let down.' Asked why there was so little in her memoir about Scotland's drugs deaths crisis on her watch and if she owed the public an explanation, Ms Sturgeon said: 'It's for the public to read my book and make up their minds about that and other issues.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store