Look at increasing Scottish Government borrowing limits, MPs tell UK Government
But in a report from the Scottish Affairs Committee at Westminster on the fiscal arrangements north of the border, MPs pushed for the limits to be increased.
The report said: 'At present, the Scottish Government's limited borrowing powers constrain its ability to manage fiscal shocks, as it is only able to borrow for resource purposes to cover forecast errors.
'Capital borrowing limits are currently linked to, and grow in line with, inflation, which may not necessarily be the highest metric of growth.'
It added: 'We agree with the Secretary of State that borrowing limits should be linked to the measure which offers the Scottish Government the highest level of flexibility but, crucially, we note that which metric delivers this remains undetermined.
'The UK Government should therefore publish a transparent analysis of what borrowing limits would look like based on the different metrics advised in the evidence for this inquiry.
'At the next fiscal framework review, we encourage the UK Government to consider reforming the Scottish Government's capital borrowing powers, by automatically coupling borrowing to the metric which offers the highest limit.'
The report comes at the end of an inquiry by the committee which sought to gauge the effectiveness of the Barnett Formula – the measure which dictates the level of funding the UK Government sends to Scotland every year.
The MPs found the measure was 'fit for purpose', although it is 'imperfect'.
The committee also rejected calls for the formula to shift and provide funding to Scotland based on need.
Scotland, the report said, already receives more funding per head than any other country in the UK and a change in the framework could see funding cut.
In written evidence to the committee, Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison reiterated the Scottish Government's support for full fiscal autonomy – an arrangement which would see powers over tax and spending devolved.
But the committee dismissed such a move as not being a 'realistic prospect'.
'Fundamental questions remain about how full fiscal autonomy would work in practice, and whether it would be operable within the constraints of the UK's current devolution settlement,' the report said.
'Practicality aside, we do not believe that a compelling case has been made that such a change would automatically result in Scotland receiving a higher level of funding.'
Ms Robison declined an invitation to appear before the committee, leading the MPs to say 'do not see how we can consider this a serious proposition, and we remain to be convinced that this proposal is desirable in principle, let alone workable in practice'.
Responding to the report, Ms Robison said: 'This report rightly recognises that Scotland's finances remain largely dictated by the UK Government's spending decisions, irrespective of the impact on Scottish public services.
'That has meant Scotland has been left with a shortfall of £400 million to pay for the Chancellor's national insurance increase, and saw Scotland short-changed by more than a billion pounds over the next three years at the recent spending review.
'The decisions we have taken to ask higher earners to pay a little bit more – while most income tax payers pay less than in the rest of the UK – mean that we can support vital public services and provide free tuition, prescriptions and the Scottish child payment to help tackle child poverty.'
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said: 'The spending review provided the Scottish Government with an extra £9.1 billion, giving them a record settlement.
'People will expect that to deliver better outcomes for Scots – lower NHS waiting lists and better attainment in our schools.
'Spending per head in Scotland is around 20% higher than the rest of the UK thanks to the Barnett formula. This report confirms that it appears to be the position of the Scottish Government to scrap that formula that delivers higher funding – they should explain why they want less money for public services in Scotland.
'Their plans for full fiscal autonomy would mean a £12 billion cut in public spending for Scotland.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
25 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Customers queue down street as new Glasgow pizza joint opens
The mouthwatering menu was revealed ahead of its official opening SLICE OF THE ACTION SLICE OF THE ACTION Customers queue down street as new Glasgow pizza joint opens Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) HUNGRY punters were spotted queuing down the street as a new pizza joint opened its doors in Glasgow. Detroit Crusts on Fenwick Road, Giffnock, welcomed its first customers from 4pm on Tuesday. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Hungry punters were spotted queuing down the street Credit: Detroit Crusts 3 100 lucky diners were treated to complimentary pizzas Credit: Detroit Crusts 3 Detroit Crusts has officially opened its doors on Fenwick Road, Giffnock Credit: Detroit Crusts The official launch saw hordes of Scots line up outside the restaurant in the rain. To mark the grand opening, 100 lucky diners were treated to complimentary pizzas. There was also a 50 per cent discount on slices throughout the evening. Taking to social media after the launch, Detroit Crusts said: "Giffnock, you understood the assignment. "Y'ALL DID NOT COME TO PLAY! "We gave away 100 FREE Detroit-style pizzas and the queues were out the door, even in the rain." Satisfied punters flocked to social media to react to the tasty scran. One wrote: "I was one of the first people to get a pizza and it is class man." Another raved: "I can honestly say, you won't be disappointed with the food! Delicious and the best pizza I've had." A third wrote: "The crust—crisped to golden-edge perfection—was divine. The toppings? Generous, balanced, and bursting with flavour. The menu is wide, inventive, and everything just works." Stag party orders £150 of Dominos pizza to a moving train In addition to its signature pizza, Detroit Crusts offers juicy strips, wings, creamy soft service, desserts and milkshakes. We recently told how two Scottish pizza parlours have been ranked among the best in Europe.
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Dire jobs data are the canary in the coal mine
The latest employment figures released by the Office for National Statistics this morning paint a stark picture of Britain's economic malaise. For the fourth month running, payrolled employment has fallen, a clear indicator that the UK is now in the midst of a serious jobs recession. Without urgent action, the impact on people will be devastating. According to the ONS, another 40,000 people dropped off payrolls in June, meaning nearly two hundred thousand salaried employees have lost their jobs in the past year – the most significant decline in employment we've seen since the Covid pandemic or the global financial crash. This fall means the Government's goal of boosting the employment rate by bringing two million more people into work is now even further away. Vacancy numbers tell an equally alarming story: for the 36th consecutive period, job vacancies have fallen. Employers – hit by the recent rise in Employer NICs, the increase in the Living Wage, and the looming threat of the Employment Rights Bill – are unsurprisingly choosing not to hire. Last month, the Government faced mass rebellion from MPs as they attempted to make tweaks to the welfare system to encourage more people into employment. But any serious attempt to reform welfare to make sure more people can enjoy the benefits of a good job is reliant on businesses being there to create the employment and training opportunities that support people into work. Without businesses being there to give people a step on that first rung on the ladder of employment, the Government will struggle to ever seriously reform welfare. Clearly, a welfare to work programme requires changes to welfare and the creation of work. Both go hand in hand. As employment stalls, it's not surprising that GDP is contracting too. The heady days of the Chancellor lauding the UK as being the fastest growing G7 nation in the first quarter of this year seem long gone, with two consecutive months of GDP contraction. When looking at GDP per capita, economic growth is even worse. As individuals, we have long experienced falling living standards. And yet, even as employment and GDP figures are flashing red, indications are that the Government is about to make the same mistakes that they made in the run up to the autumn Budget last year. Rather than focusing on jobs and investment, ministers now openly flirt with the idea of a wealth tax – with the Chancellor notably refusing to rule this out in her Mansion House speech earlier this week. Speculation is rife that the autumn Budget will contain some form of levy on assets. And business leaders, whose confidence is already in tatters, will now spend the next three months worrying about what tax rises they may face down the line. Whilst some argue that wealth taxes are justified, this would be an act of economic self-harm. These taxes don't just hurt the wealthy. They scare away investment, depress confidence, and send exactly the wrong message to job creators – just when we need them most. The UK is already witnessing the consequences of this, with a record outflow of wealth creators and entrepreneurs. In 2024 alone, over 10,000 millionaires reportedly left the country – a 157 per cent rise on the previous year – and projections suggest more than 16,500 will depart in 2025, making the UK the world's leading exporter of high-net-worth individuals. This exodus is not just a matter of lost tax receipts. It threatens the broader ecosystem of job creation and investment. From venture capital backing for UK startups, to employment in hospitality and professional services, the loss of affluent residents means fewer opportunities and less capital circulating in the domestic economy. As the Government dismantles the non-dom regime and introduces broader global income and inheritance tax liabilities, it must recognise that this risks undermining the very jobs and growth that the UK desperately needs. The fact the catchphrase of advocates of a wealth tax is 'Tax the Rich' and not 'Help the Poor' is telling. More worryingly still, the Government has recently signed up to a UN-led tax manifesto that pushes for higher environmental levies and what it calls 'gender-responsive taxation'. It's questionable as to why committing to international tax pledges is apparently the economic priority of a Government that is focused on boosting economic growth and getting more people back to work. Time is not too late for the Prime Minister and the Chancellor to wake up to the crisis currently happening in the UK's jobs market. A jobs-first economic policy would see a wealth tax immediately ruled out, the devastating hike to Employer NICs reversed, and a commitment to using the autumn Budget to give businesses the environment they need to thrive. If we fail to act, we will look back on the employment figures published this summer not just as a warning sign, but as the start of a prolonged crisis. It's not the high-net-worth individuals that will suffer if this happens, but those who remain locked out of work through a lack of businesses able to give them an opportunity. That would be an unforgivable failure.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Jaguar Land Rover cutting up to 500 management jobs in UK
The Tata-owned firm said around 1.5% of its UK workforce would be affected by the job cuts, which are going as part of a voluntary redundancy programme for managers in the UK. A spokesperson for Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) said: 'As part of normal business practice, we regularly offer eligible employees the opportunity to leave JLR through limited voluntary redundancy programmes.' It comes after JLR revealed last week that retail sales plunged 15.1% in the three months to June after a temporary pause in exports to the US and the planned wind-down of older Jaguar models. READ MORE: Scottish unemployment falls while UK rate rises to highest since pandemic The company said the significant fall in sales was partly driven by the pause in shipments to the US in April after US President Donald Trump's administration introduced new tariff plans. In April, the US government said it would launch an additional 25% tariff on car imports into the US, in an effort to encourage more car production within the country. However, the US and UK have since agreed a deal which would see a lower 10% tariff applied to the first 100,000 UK-manufactured cars imported into the US each year. UK cars imported to the US beyond this threshold will however face a 27.5% tariff. JLR halted new shipments to the US in April but restarted exports in early May amid hopes that a trade deal for the sector would be struck. The car firm saw wholesale sales in North America drop by 12.2% year-on-year after the pause. But wholesale sales in the UK were also heavily down – tumbling 25.5% in the second quarter – after the planned wind-down of older Jaguar models. Jaguar stopped selling new cars in the UK late last year as it shifts its production to new electric models, which are set to go on sale in 2026.
