ICE Detention Center in Full Revolt as Four Detainees Escape
Four detainees were unaccounted for at Delaney Hall detention center after about 50 captives pushed down a dormitory wall in protest of their living conditions, an immigration attorney representing one of the men told NJ Advance Media.
Detainees were starving, reportedly having been made to wait hours for their next meal, when the literal pushback began.
'It's about the food, and some of the detainees were getting aggressive and it turned violent,' the lawyer, Mustafa Cetin, told NJ Advance Media. 'Based on what he told me it was an outer wall, not very strong, and they were able to push it down.'
But the crowd was not alone in their protest—instead, a gathering of people outside of the facility mobilized to block ICE activity, barricading the gate to prevent more officers from entering the center.
Amy Torres, executive director of New Jersey Alliance for Immigrant Justice, told NPR affiliate WHYY that officers had used 'pepper spray and tackled and dragged protesters away from the facility.'
'She said some protesters had minor injuries, but no one was hit by the vehicles,' WHYY reported.
Delaney Hall is run by a private prison company, GEO Group, that made $2.24 billion in revenue in 2024, according to its fourth-quarter earnings report. The company currently has a $60 million contract with the Trump administration to hold up to 1,000 people in the New Jersey detention center.
Shortly after the ICE facility reopened in May, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka and New Jersey Representative LaMonica McIver were arrested and charged while touring the facility. The lawmakers were reportedly visiting the facility to serve a summons for code violations to a Geo Group representative. The charges against Baraka were dropped weeks later.
'I have serious concerns about the reports of abusive circumstances at the facility,' McIver wrote in a statement late Thursday regarding the break out. 'Even now, as we are hearing reports from news organizations and advocates on the ground about a lack of food and basic rights for those inside, the administration appears to be stonewalling efforts to learn the truth.'
Dozens of anti-ICE protests have spread from coast to coast, with gatherings in New York, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Atlanta, San Francisco, San Diego, Denver, Seattle, Las Vegas, Raleigh, Columbus, Oklahoma City, Washington, D.C., and others. But Donald Trump is still having a difficult time believing that his nativist agenda is facing such widespread opposition: On Wednesday, the president torched a Fox News reporter when she informed him that the protests had spread outside of Los Angeles, spouting from the Kennedy Center's red carpet that he simply didn't believe her while patting his administration on the back for its military intervention in the City of Angels.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
'We Don't Have Contracts With DHS or ICE': Home Depot Stock (NYSE:HD) Slips as it Fights Rumors
The role that home improvement giant Home Depot (HD) plays in the ongoing war against illegal immigration could perhaps be best described as 'amorphous.' It is not exactly clear, but it is present nonetheless. When a new rumor emerged that Home Depot's role might have been more deliberate than some expected, Home Depot moved to take the rumor on directly. This did not help it much with shareholders, however, and shares slipped fractionally in Wednesday afternoon's trading. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Just days ago, mostly through social media, a rumor emerged that said Home Depot was receiving a $250 million payday from the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arm. That payment gave ICE the ability to stake out Home Depot parking lots looking for illegal immigrants. While Home Depot has certainly expressed support for the Trump administration in the past, the rumor was quickly quashed and declared just what it was: a rumor. Home Depot representative Beth Marlowe offered up a statement from the company, saying 'This story is false. We don't have contracts with DHS or ICE. We aren't notified that ICE activities are going to happen, and we aren't involved in them. In many cases, we don't know that arrests have taken place until after they're over.' To underscore the point, Tricia McLaughlin, Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security, offered a statement as well, calling the claim 'ridiculous' and '…just another attempt to smear our brave ICE law enforcement.' The Skelly Effect Meanwhile, yesterday, we revealed that Home Depot was rolling out the Halloween decorations perhaps a little early. But a lot of that new line is focused on Skelly, a giant skeleton model, as well as some new additions like Skelly's cat and dog. As it turns out, Skelly is giving Home Depot a surprising advantage over its competitors in the field, as it serves as a kind of status symbol. Back in 2020, through 2023, Skelly units would routinely sell out, sometimes in as little as a few hours. And homes would even keep them up year-round, decorating them for the season with leprechaun garb on St. Patrick's Day or Uncle Sam outfits for the Fourth of July. Customers call the decoration '…realistic without being too scary or graphic,' and that makes it an attractive draw that competitors are rushing to compete against. Is Home Depot a Good Long-Term Buy? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Strong Buy consensus rating on HD stock based on 18 Buys and six Holds assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. After a 2.49% rally in its share price over the past year, the average HD price target of $428.12 per share implies 13.77% upside potential.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine's parliament to consider restoring power of anti-graft agencies
Ukraine's parliament to consider restoring power of anti-graft agencies By Dan Peleschuk KYIV (Reuters) -Ukrainian lawmakers on Thursday are expected to consider a bill restoring the independence of the country's two main anti-corruption agencies, aiming to defuse a political crisis that has shaken faith in President Volodymyr Zelenskiy's wartime leadership. Thousands of protesters rallied in Kyiv and other cities in recent days in a rare show of discontent after lawmakers led by Zelenskiy's ruling party rushed through amendments last week defanging the respected agencies. Zelenskiy reversed course after the outcry and under pressure from top European officials, who warned Ukraine was jeopardising its bid for EU membership by curbing the powers of its anti-graft authorities. Demonstrations had continued even after he submitted the new bill restoring their independence, with hundreds rallying near the presidential administration in Kyiv late on Wednesday to chants of "Shame!" and "The people are the power!". "I really want parliament to vote (for the new measure) just as quickly as it did last time," said protester Kateryna Kononenko, 36, referring to last week's fast-tracked approval of the controversial amendments. Activists also called for demonstrations near parliament ahead of Thursday's vote in an attempt to pressure lawmakers to approve the new bill. Eradicating graft and shoring up the rule of law are key requirements for Kyiv to join the EU, which Ukrainians see as critical to their future as they fend off a Russian invasion. Last week's amendments had given Zelenskiy's hand-picked general prosecutor the power to transfer cases away from the anti-graft agencies and reassign prosecutors - a step critics had said was designed to protect allies from prosecution. While much smaller, the rallies of the past week have sparked comparisons to Ukraine's 2014 Maidan revolution, when protesters toppled a president they accused of corruption and heavy-handed rule. More than two-thirds of Ukrainians support the recent protests, according to a recent survey by Ukrainian pollster Gradus Research. CORRUPTION FIGHTERS The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) have stepped up a closely watched campaign against graft since Russia's February 2022 invasion. They have produced charges against lawmakers and senior government officials, including a then-deputy prime minister who was accused last month of taking a $345,000 kickback. Speaking to Reuters last Friday, after Zelenskiy's reversal, NABU chief Semen Kryvonos said he expected pressure against his agency to continue, fuelled by what he described as corrupt forces uninterested in cleaning up Ukraine. He added that he and other anti-corruption officials felt a greater sense of responsibility following the protests, but also called on the country's leadership to help their effort. "This responsibility must be shared with the government, which needs to react and say, 'Okay, there's corruption here - let's destroy it.'" Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine's parliament to consider restoring power of anti-graft agencies
Ukraine's parliament to consider restoring power of anti-graft agencies By Dan Peleschuk KYIV (Reuters) -Ukrainian lawmakers on Thursday are expected to consider a bill restoring the independence of the country's two main anti-corruption agencies, aiming to defuse a political crisis that has shaken faith in President Volodymyr Zelenskiy's wartime leadership. Thousands of protesters rallied in Kyiv and other cities in recent days in a rare show of discontent after lawmakers led by Zelenskiy's ruling party rushed through amendments last week defanging the respected agencies. Zelenskiy reversed course after the outcry and under pressure from top European officials, who warned Ukraine was jeopardising its bid for EU membership by curbing the powers of its anti-graft authorities. Demonstrations had continued even after he submitted the new bill restoring their independence, with hundreds rallying near the presidential administration in Kyiv late on Wednesday to chants of "Shame!" and "The people are the power!". "I really want parliament to vote (for the new measure) just as quickly as it did last time," said protester Kateryna Kononenko, 36, referring to last week's fast-tracked approval of the controversial amendments. Activists also called for demonstrations near parliament ahead of Thursday's vote in an attempt to pressure lawmakers to approve the new bill. Eradicating graft and shoring up the rule of law are key requirements for Kyiv to join the EU, which Ukrainians see as critical to their future as they fend off a Russian invasion. Last week's amendments had given Zelenskiy's hand-picked general prosecutor the power to transfer cases away from the anti-graft agencies and reassign prosecutors - a step critics had said was designed to protect allies from prosecution. While much smaller, the rallies of the past week have sparked comparisons to Ukraine's 2014 Maidan revolution, when protesters toppled a president they accused of corruption and heavy-handed rule. More than two-thirds of Ukrainians support the recent protests, according to a recent survey by Ukrainian pollster Gradus Research. CORRUPTION FIGHTERS The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) have stepped up a closely watched campaign against graft since Russia's February 2022 invasion. They have produced charges against lawmakers and senior government officials, including a then-deputy prime minister who was accused last month of taking a $345,000 kickback. Speaking to Reuters last Friday, after Zelenskiy's reversal, NABU chief Semen Kryvonos said he expected pressure against his agency to continue, fuelled by what he described as corrupt forces uninterested in cleaning up Ukraine. He added that he and other anti-corruption officials felt a greater sense of responsibility following the protests, but also called on the country's leadership to help their effort. "This responsibility must be shared with the government, which needs to react and say, 'Okay, there's corruption here - let's destroy it.'"
