Aldi is trialling grocery delivery in Australia. We put it to the test against Coles and Woolworths
Last week, the German-owned supermarket chain took another step into the Australian mainstream, trialling a grocery delivery service with DoorDash in Canberra ahead of a potential expansion around the country.
Aldi has long resisted offering deliveries, given the service would make a basket of groceries more expensive, undercutting its price advantage over Coles and Woolworths.
Guardian Australia tested it out.
I normally take an ad hoc approach to grocery shopping and visit a few different stores, rather than doing a weekly shop. There's an Aldi near my home, as well as a Coles, and a family-owned fruit and vegetable store.
Using my DoorDash account, I added 10 popular items to my Aldi basket, listing a Canberra address for delivery. These comprised a dozen free range eggs, a head of iceberg lettuce, a two-litre bottle of A2 brand light milk, a loaf of multigrain sourdough bread, a pack of RSPCA-approved chicken breast fillets, five brushed potatoes, five bananas, a 1kg bag of carrots, a pack of four beef mince burgers, and a 250g block of tasty cheese.
This came to a total of $52.57, or $58.88 once DoorDash's $6.31 service fee was included. I was offered free delivery on my first order.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
According to the DoorDash website, its loyalty program, DashPass, which costs $9.99 a month or $96 a year, would give me free delivery on orders over $30. Aldi would not disclose the standard delivery fees for Canberra, other than to say they are based on distance.
In Canberra, you can order from Coles on DoorDash, where a basket of 10 comparable items cost me $75.36 and from Woolworths on Uber Eats, where my basket worked out to $71.19 without any eggs, which weren't available. Both of these totals included service fees, but not delivery.
So, if I use a third-party platform like DoorDash to purchase from the major chains, the price increases significantly. But most shoppers would choose the supermarkets' in-house delivery services.
Unlike Aldi, Woolworths and Coles have built their own delivery services. Both require a minimum $50 spend to order from their websites.
My basket of 10 items came to $61.23 from the Woolworths website, and $56.17 from Coles, excluding delivery. This suggests Aldi – where my basket came to $58.88 including the DoorDash service fee – loses its usual significant discount to the major chains due to the costs associated with its third-party delivery platform.
The delivery fees are cheaper if you plan ahead, but, for the sake of comparison, I chose the fastest option possible, with Coles offering an 'as soon as possible delivery option', in an estimated 64 minutes, for $15.
The supermarket's website tells me if I signed up for a Coles Plus membership – for $19 a month or $199 a year – I would be eligible for free delivery.
Woolworths also offered a $15 fast delivery in 'approximately 50 minutes'. Its website tells me I would be eligible for free delivery on orders of $75 or more with a Delivery Unlimited subscription, for $15 a month or $119 a year.
The calculations change according to delivery fees, which in Aldi's case can vary according to how far you live from a store.
Aldi has acknowledged the cost of running an online shopping service will affect its prices.
The total cost of an online Aldi order includes the item prices, a DoorDash markup, delivery fee and service fee, all of which are set by the delivery platform.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
A spokesperson for Aldi said it was committed to being the most affordable supermarket on DoorDash but acknowledged some of its prices on the platform 'may vary slightly' from those in-store.
'This reflects the added convenience of having everyday essentials delivered quickly and easily,' they said.
I visited an Aldi store in person to check out prices, bearing in mind that my local is in Melbourne, not the same store as one of those delivering from Canberra.
Most of the prices were identical, although the iceberg lettuce, eggs, bananas and potatoes were a bit cheaper in the store.
Overall, my basket cost $48 when shopping in person, saving more than $10 compared to going through the DoorDash site with its service fee.
But I also had to factor in a 25-minute round trip on the tram to get there, which comes with its own costs – or a 40-minute walk or 20-minute bike ride up and down a steep hill.
Aldi tried a similar service with a third-party delivery provider in the UK, but it didn't last. The chain is also hesitant to build its own delivery system because that would add significant costs to the business, which would either result in higher grocery prices, or less profits for its German owners.
Prof Gary Mortimer, a retail expert at the Queensland University of Technology, says Aldi has had to respond to the delivery trend.
'Online food and groceries now represent anywhere between 10 to 12% of supermarket revenue,' Mortimer says.
'As Aldi enters into that space, even using a third-party provider like DoorDash, Coles and Woolworths will be looking at how they go about defending that market share.'
The retail expert Bronwyn Thompson says Aldi considers the competitive advantage of a delivery service to be worth the additional expense.
'If they're trying to be more of a 'whole shop' destination, this is part of that,' Thompson says.
'They've come a long way from just being a place where you'd get a few things.'
The Aldi Australia chief commercial officer, Jordan Lack, said: 'We know Australians will rejoice at the news of Aldi taking our first step in offering customers this convenient shopping format'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
How Albanese's 1.2million housing policy failure and record immigration has created a new category of Aussies with nowhere to go
Australia's housing emergency is now so dire nurses are living in cars while thousands of mothers and their children are sleeping rough or crammed into crisis accommodation with no path out. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese promised to fix the housing crisis but Australia today is home to some of the most expensive real estate in the world, with near record low rentals available and the worst levels of homelessness in living memory. Recent data by Homelessness Australia reveals the number of people accessing their services each month has grown by 10 per cent since the Albanese government came into power in May 2022. The situation is even more dire for women and girls, with an increase of 14 per cent. But while women and children go without a roof over their heads, immigration is booming, which experts say is putting unprecedented strain on the local property market. Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show in the year to May, 1.1million permanent and long-term arrivals hit Australian shores, including international students and skilled workers. In cities soaking up the bulk of the arrivals like Sydney, Melbourne, Perth and increasingly Brisbane, the competition for rentals is fierce, sending rents and house prices soaring. Australian Population Research Institute president Bob Birrell blamed the housing crisis on record overseas migration, which meant working Australians were being pushed out of the market, unable to buy or rent. 'The Albanese government is completely irresponsible on this issue,' he said. Freelancer CEO Matt Barrie (pictured) said the Great Australian dream of home ownership is out of reach for many now and he places the blame on record migration 'They have neglected it ever since they got back into power in 2022, they've just let immigration rip. 'We've had enormous levels of migrants, which is just unprecedented, and irresponsible in the context of the housing crisis.' Dr Birrell said part of the problem is the skilled migration program recruits hardly any tradespeople, especially for the beleaguered building industry. 'Migration is not adding to the supply of those important trades at all,' he said. 'Although a lot of temporary migrants who are adrift in Melbourne and Sydney would probably like to take up an apprenticeship in these areas, they can't, because they're temporaries.' Freelancer CEO Matt Barrie said the Albanese government had created a system so perverse doctors were living in share houses and nurses were sleeping in their cars. 'The Great Australian Dream is now mathematically impossible for the average Australian,' he said. 'In Sydney it now takes 46 years just to save a house deposit. Think about that, for a child born in Sydney today, their retirement party will come before they've saved enough for a house deposit.' Mr Barrie said the housing crisis had been 'engineered' by the government which has flooded the country with the largest immigration wave in history. 'Why, in a cost of living crisis, would they allow nearly one million international student enrolments? 'Why, in a cost of living crisis, would they allow 2.46million people on temporary visas into a country of 27million when there's only 36,000 rental vacancies?' Refuge workers and frontline services are also sounding the alarm on the crisis which is leaving women and children behind. As politicians returned to Canberra for the first sitting week of the new term, Everybody's Home spokeswoman Maiy Azize said the Albanese government has a chance to deliver a lasting legacy on housing or risk being remembered for letting it slip away. It comes after the public release of a written warning to Treasurer Jim Chalmers that the Albanese government could not meet its commitment of supplying 1.2million homes by 2029. 'This is a national crisis that is now pricing out everyday people right across the country,' she said. 'The government can't ignore the increasing number of Australians who are sleeping on streets and couches, forgoing food and medicine to pay rent, and living in unsafe and makeshift housing.' Ms Azize said warnings the government is unlikely to meet its ambitious housing target are further proof that relying on the private market alone won't work. The organisation said social housing has declined to around 4 per cent of all homes, down from 4.7 per cent in 2013. 'To reach six per cent social housing Australia must build more than 36,000 additional social housing dwellings every year for the next decade,' she said. 'If we want one in ten homes to be social housing, we need to build an extra 54,000 social homes every year for 20 years. 'Whichever way you look at it, the scale dwarfs current government commitments and lays bare both the enormous demand and decades of chronic underinvestment.' During Question Time on Wednesday, Opposition leader Sussan Ley pushed Mr Albanese on whether he would abandon his failing policies to tackle the housing crisis. In his defence, Albanese said Labor had 'inherited a decade of neglect' and it would take time to catch up. One Nation Senator Pauline Hanson said Australian cities were full, housing is unaffordable, and services are stretched to breaking point. She said One Nation will cut permanent and temporary migration and restore the population to a level the country can support. 'This isn't extreme. It's common sense,' she said. 'Mass migration must stop. The system is broken. Let's fix it and give our people the chance to thrive.' For many it is too late. Shocking new data from Homelessness Australia reveals a record surge in families stuck in temporary refuges, with thousands of mothers and children sleeping rough or crammed into crisis accommodation. CEO Kate Colvin said one reason for the dramatic deterioration in families and women being pushed further into crisis is rising rents, with Labor's investment in social housing failing to keep pace with demand. Ms Colvin said many were one health tragedy away from losing a stable roof over their heads. 'It's heartbreaking when you meet people who have cancer and due to the number of hospital visits they attend they can no longer work. They lose their home and end up living in their car because you can't afford rent on income support payments,' she said. 'I've spoken to lots of young people who have been in and out of refuges for years, slept in parks or are couch-surfing with dubious people. 'There's always someone who'll offer a 16-year-old girl a bed but it comes with obligations.' Ms Colvin said homelessness is increasing for all, but women and girls are copping the brunt of this crisis. 'The Prime Minister talks about leaving no one behind but the harsh reality is that with 45 per cent of women and girls seeking homelessness support having experienced domestic and family violence, more women and girls are returning to violent homes.' Housing and Homelessness Minister Clare O'Neil said the government has invested more than $1.2billion in crisis and transitional housing. 'We're acutely aware of just how complex the challenge of homelessness is, which is why we continue to listen to people with first-hand knowledge right across the homelessness sector,' she told the ABC.
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
On a roll: Who Gives a Crap toilet paper co-founder aims for ‘world domination'
It has been ubiquitous in middle class British bathrooms since a flush of growth during the Covid pandemic. Now Who Gives a Crap is aiming to wipe out the Andrex puppy, Cushelle's koala and Little Duck's little duck with a more ethical version of toilet roll. Its product, made from recycled paper or bamboo and wrapped in colourful paper, has risen rapidly to become the UK's third biggest non-supermarket brand. Now, the company – which claims to be the first ever online specialist loo roll maker – is aiming for 'world domination' with a rollout into Tesco supermarkets, and beyond. The Australian brand gives 50% of its profits to clean water and sanitation projects, and raising money for good causes is a key part of the company's purpose, according to its co-founder, Simon Griffiths. After experiments with a 'click to give' donations website and then a bar that sold beer and wine from developing countries, he settled on the idea of linking philanthropy to an everyday product that could reach every household. Griffiths says a trip to the loo inspired a 'quarter-second epiphany' on what that product could be, alongside the company's risque name and its mission to raise funds to provide access to clean water and sanitation in developing countries via partners including WaterAid. From the beginning, the company promised to donate half its profits to sanitation projects and as sales around the world have rapidly grown, it has raised close to £10m so far for projects such as eco-friendly waterless toilets in Kenya and school toilet blocks in Timor-Leste. Sales at its UK arm rose 17% to £45.5m in 2024 when operating profits more than doubled to £2.8m, according to the most recent figures available at Companies House. The company does not reveal international profits, but it donated £2.43m to sanitation projects last year, suggesting they have hit almost £5m. The brand is aiming to more than double donations to A$50m (£24m) by 2028 and within a decade collect 'hundreds of millions' of donations by adding new products and new countries. 'The reason why we exist is because there's still 2 billion people without access to adequate sanitation today, globally,' Griffiths says. 'If you're going to solve that problem that affects billions of people, you need to eventually be everywhere. That's not something we plan to do in the next 12 months. In 30 years' time, I think we will want to be in every supermarket in the UK.' The brand, which began online, is already in more than half of Australian supermarkets and went on to Tesco shelves earlier this month in the UK after launching in Whole Foods Market and Waitrose in 2023 . However, further expansion may be tough during a cost of living squeeze and the imposition of US tariffs on Chinese-made goods which is pushing up prices in what is now its biggest market – just ahead of the UK. Even in the UK, the ethical stance comes at a price for shoppers, with its 100% recycled rolls priced at 39p for 100 sheets for a six-pack at Tesco – on a par with Cushelle's six-pack but a considerable mark-up on the 16p for the supermarket's recycled own-brand and ahead of the 32p for 100 sheets for Andrex's 'family soft' nine-roll pack. He cheerfully admits that its success so far is down partly to the colourful paper wraps on its loo rolls, which people like to show off in their bathrooms, as much as its environmental and ethical considerations. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion From the outset the plan was to provide a stylish and ethical counterpoint to 'this sea of white and purple and different colours and pictures of puppies and pillows and feathers and things that were entirely unrelated to toilet paper' on supermarket shelves, Griffiths says. He has said the company might be only a fifth of the size it is today if it wasn't for the wrapping. Having started with 100% recycled loo roll made using waste – such as old letters and cardboard boxes – it now also sells a version made from bamboo. Other products include recycled tissues and, perhaps more controversially, recycled plastic bin bags and dog poo bags. The group is also expanding geographically including entering Canada this year – taking it to 37 countries in total. It is a long way from the toilet seat where Griffiths sat for 50 hours as part of a 2012 crowdfunding campaign that raised A$50,000 to back the first order and where it also signed up the brand's first 1,000 customers. Expansion today is underpinned by A$41.5m in 2021 from investors including Verlinvest, the Belgian investment company behind the oat milk Oatly and the fair trade chocolate brand Tony's Chocolonely. So far, a rising number of shoppers seem persuaded that the product is worth paying more for than bog-standard rivals and Griffiths insists it is more than a passing fad with every decision based on 'trying to do the right thing'. 'We've been around now for about 12 years in Australia. I don't think there's a risk of us kind of going out of fashion in the same way that you might see with clothing,' he says.
The Herald Scotland
8 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Age verification UK explained: How is it impacting the UK?
This means that age verification tools are now being used on sites where they could access harmful content. Here's all you need to know about the new rules and how they are being implemented. Well done to everyone who campaigned to ensure age verification for pornography was in the Online Safety Act! Today it comes into force and while no doubt there will be some who get around it, it means young kids in particular won't be stumbling on violent and harmful porn. — Jess Asato MP (@Jess4Lowestoft) July 25, 2025 What is the Online Safety Act? The Online Safety Act is a piece of legislation that received Royal Assent on October 26, 2023, with the aim of protecting children and adults online. The Government website adds: "It puts a range of new duties on social media companies and search services, giving them legal duties to protect their users from illegal content and content harmful to children. "The Act gives providers new duties to implement systems and processes to reduce risks their services are used for illegal activity, and to take down illegal content when it does appear. Why is age verification being used on the internet? As of July 25, internet platforms have a legal duty to protect children from harmful content. Companies within the scope of the act must introduce safety measures as part of this, which include age verification. The Guardian reports: "This means all pornography sites must have in place rigorous age-checking procedures." They continued: "Social media platforms and large search engines must also prevent children from accessing pornography and material that promotes or encourages suicide, self-harm and eating disorders." Platforms will also have to suppress other material that could be potentially harmful to children. This could include "the promotion of dangerous stunts, encouraging the use of harmful substances and enabling bullying". How is age verification utilised by platforms? Ofcom, the media regulator, has set out a number of ways websites can verify the age of users. This can be done through credit card checks, photo ID matching and estimating age using a selfie. Whatever format platforms choose, they must be "technically accurate, robust, reliable and fair," BBC News reports. Which sites will require age verification? Pornhub and a number of other major adult websites have confirmed they will introduce enhanced age checks, BBC News reports. Recommended reading: Reddit has already introduced checks to stop people aged under 18 from looking at "certain mature content", while X and Grindr have committed to this as well. Discord gives UK users a choice of face or ID scanning as a way to verify their age, after testing methods, and Bluesky says it will give UK users a range of different verification options, external. BBC News adds: "Many more services which allow sexually explicit material may need to bring in measures to comply with the new rules."
