What happened to HS2? The project that made Britain a laughing stock
I t was supposed to be the flagship rail project to the north-south divide, a catalyst for growth, new employment opportunities and unrivalled connectivity.
London, Birmingham, Leeds, Manchester and Sheffield would be linked by trains travelling at up to 248mph. There would be connections to Heathrow and potentially to the Channel Tunnel. The cost was to be a mere £32.7 billion.
Almost two decades after it was first proposed, however, HS2 is in tatters. The absence of a guiding mind, a single accountable person in Westminster or Whitehall, has led to runaway costs, delays and routes being axed. What remains is little more than a skeleton of the original design.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Now Stephen Fry turns on JK Rowling: Star who narrated Harry Potter books says the author has been 'radicalised by TERFs' and is 'a lost cause'
Harry Potter narrator Sir Stephen Fry has turned on JK Rowling, branding her a 'lost cause' and accusing her of being 'radicalised by TERFs'. The comedian and television presenter, who previously hosted QI, told how he used to have dinner regularly with the author and described her views towards the trans community as 'strange'. Recording podcast The Show People last week, Sir Stephen, who is himself gay, said: 'She has been radicalised I fear and it may be she has been radicalised by TERFs, but also by the vitriol that is thrown at her. 'It is unhelpful and only hardens her and will only continue to harden her I am afraid. I am not saying that she not be called out when she says things that are really cruel, wrong and mocking. She seems to be a lost cause for us.' Sir Stephen recorded audio books for all seven of the Harry Potter series, but has now turned his back on the author, accusing her of 'mocking' LGBT + people and insisting he supports the trans community. He said: 'She started to make these peculiar statements and had very strong difficult views. She seemed to wake up or kick a hornet's nest of transphobia which has been entirely destructive. 'I disagree profoundly with her on this subject. I am angry she does not disavow some of the more revolting and truly horrible, destructive violently destructive things that people say. She does not attack those at all. 'She says things that are inflammatory and contemptuous, mocking and add to a terribly distressing time for trans people. 'She has crowed at the success of legislation in Scotland and elsewhere declaring things about gender. 'So I am very happy to go on the record to say that I am really angry about that. My view about all things of sharp and difficult nature is that is is much more important to be effective than to be right.' Sir Stephen, who has until now not spoken openly about the row, explained that he had previously got on well with the author. 'I am sorry because I always liked her company. I found her charming, funny and interesting and then this thing happened and it completely altered the way she talks and engages with the world now.' Sir Stephen has faced criticism from parts of the LGBT+ community for not being more vocal earlier on transgender issues. He notably called for both sides to stop fighting each other over trans rights in 2022, adding: 'There is no winner'. He told Roger Bolton's Beeb Watch podcast at the time that he refused to get involved in the debate: 'I definitely wouldn't because I am aware that you are talking about an issue where two sides are very sore and anxious about their enemies.' Addressing his friendship with JK Rowling, he said: 'She is a friend of mine and I have trans friends and intersex friends who are deeply upset by her. That is a circle I have to square personally', adding he did not plan to 'abandon' friendships. But three years later Sir Stephen has changed his stance and waded head-on into the bitter row. He called for peace and humanity amid the contentious debate over trans people's rights, while calling attention to the higher rates of mental health issues, self-harm and suicide that exist for them. He told the podcast: 'When it comes to the transphobia issue it is right to remind people that trans people are here and that they are hurting and that they are being abominably treated. 'The recent way the culture has gone against them means there is a great deal of bullying, violence and suicide and genuine pain and agony in the trans community. 'But to scream 'transphobe' at anybody who does not buy into every single aspect of that particular person's trans views is so self harming. It does not get the thing done. You have to let people love you.' One study in the UK found that some 34.4 percent of trans people in the UK had attempted suicide at least once. For the entire population, the figure is closer to six percent. The comedian is far from the only former Harry Potter star to speak out in criticism of JK Rowling's views on the subject. Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint, who played the three central characters, have all previously come out and supported the trans community. By contrast Tom Felton, who played Harry's nemesis Draco Malfoy in the franchise, said he remains 'grateful' to Ms Rowling and her views on trans rights don't affect his work. He said: 'I'm not really that attuned. The only thing I always remind myself is that I've been lucky enough to travel the world. 'Here I am in New York. And I have not seen anything bring the world together more than Potter, and she's responsible for that. So I'm incredibly grateful.' Sir Stephen was speaking in the aftermath of a landmark Supreme Judgment ruling in April that determined that specifically within the terms of the equality act, 'woman' meant a biological female and not gender. Lord Hodge said the five Supreme Court justices had unanimously decided that 'the terms woman and sex in the Equality Act refer to a 'biological woman and biological sex '. The ruling was celebrated by women's rights activists including JK Rowling, but its opponents say they fear it could put trans and non-binary people at renewed risk of attacks and discrimination. Sir Stephen said he was sad to speak out against her, adding: 'I am sorry because I always liked her company. I found her charming, funny and interesting and then this thing happened and it completely altered the way she talks and engages with the world now' The judgement marks the culmination of a long-running legal battle between the Scottish government and a women's group over the definition of a 'woman' in Scottish legislation mandating 50 percent female representation on public boards. The case centred on whether somebody with a gender recognition certificate (GRC) recognising their gender as female should be treated as a woman under the 2010 Equality Act. Lord Hodge recognised 'the strength of feeling on both sides' and cautioned against seeing the judgement as 'a triumph for one side over another', stressing that the law still gives trans people protection against discrimination. In the judgement, Lord Hodge accepted the trans community are 'a vulnerable and often harassed minority' who have a right to protection from discrimination on the basis of their identity in place of their biological sex. LGBT+ charity Stonewall's chief executive Simon Blake said at the time: '[This ruling] will be incredibly worrying for the trans community and all of us who support them. 'It's important to be reminded the Court strongly and clearly re-affirmed the Equality Act protects all trans people against discrimination, based on gender reassignment, and will continue to do so. 'Once we read and fully digest the judgement, we will work with stakeholders across all sectors to provide as much clarity as possible.' In the aftermath of the judgement, despite warnings it should not be taken as a 'victory' for one side or another, JK Rowling again courted controversy by taking celebratory snaps with champagne and cigars on her multi-million mega-yacht.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Mrs Rayner's tone was markedly less fiery. A tigress tamed. A curry taken down from vindaloo to korma: QUENTIN LETTS on Prime Minister's Questions
With Sir Keir Starmer still not back from foreign jaunts – for so unexciting a man to have such wanderlust is psychologically intriguing – it fell to Angela Rayner to do the honours at PMQs. On Tuesday she had chaired Cabinet. Now she was at the despatch box using those hallowed words normally reserved for prime ministers: 'This morning I had meetings with ministerial colleagues; I shall have further such meetings later today.' It is rare to hear a deputy use the revered formula. Usually they will simply say: 'I have been asked to respond.' Has Ms Rayner started to fancy her chances of replacing stodgy Starmer? Beside her sat Rachel Reeves, once talked of as her rival. On her other side: Yvette Cooper, another whose share price has fallen. Ms Rayner's aide, Mark Ferguson, sat behind her with a folder of prompt notes fatter than a Harry Potter hardback. Team Rayner had prepared in depth for this test flight. But sometimes you so over-prepare that you lose spontaneity. 'If they ask you about the rape-gangs inquiry, aim for statesmanship,' her advisers possibly said. Sure enough, the Tories ' front man, Chris Philp, focused on that inquiry and on immigration. Mr Philp can be a staccato performer but he did all right. He was trim, clear, nicely regretful when talking about Sir Keir's mishandling of the grooming gangs scandal. Not that the usual, blurty Philp was entirely absent. His shirt collars were askew and he did a lot of that frowning that lends him the look of a man trying to suppress dreadful burps. A Leander rowing club course marshal had possibly been mugged in Henley to provide Ms Rayner with her blue blazer and white trousers. Compared to the usual Rayner fashion disasters, jolly smart. She twice thanked Mr Philp for his 'tone' on the rape scandal. What she probably meant was 'your boss Badenoch has been annoyingly outspoken on this issue and it is costing us votes'. Ms Rayner's own tone was markedly less fiery than of old. A tigress tamed. A curry taken down a few pegs from vindaloo to korma. Here was a reduced-sodium, semi-skimmed, low-cal Rayner, keen to look composed. Her voice sounded as if it had fluff on the stylus. The original Rayner – Rayner Classic, as marketing executives might say – leapt up to the table, whacked the box, yabber-dabbered and laughed a lot. Ange Mark II was eager to portray dignity and open-mindedness. She leaned nonchalantly on the despatch box. She stood at a sideways angle instead of her former full-chested stance. She praised a Tory MP for some pub-charity effort in his constituency. And it all felt... flat. Engineers had not succeeded in removing all the old characteristics. Prescottian linguistic glitches were still evident. She spoke of 'Italia' instead of Italy, complained that the past government had 'spivved money up the wall' and claimed on some spending matter that 'we've given the biggest amount of increase'. Such things are minor. What may matter is any loss of verve, any sense that she has been made less authentic to suit her ambitions. As PMQs ended there was a pause as the Transport Secretary, Heidi Alexander, ran to the despatch box. The thudding as of rhino hooves. Clerks' papers fluttered and some water glasses nearby rippled. Ms Alexander, a likeably straightforward sort, announced the latest diminution of the c.£100billion HS2 railway. What a shameful episode for our political class, for past ministers, yes, but also mandarins, consultants, commentators, think-tankers, economists, forecasters and grubby lobbyists. Big Heidi had an attack of the Rayners when she tried talking about Wales and spoke, twice, about 'Relsh Wailways'. Of greater interest was a question from Clive Efford (Lab, Eltham) who hoped that civil servants who signed HS2 contracts would be asked why they approved spending sometimes before job specifications were set.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
ROSS CLARK: The farce of HS2 shows how Whitehall has allowed waste and fraud to flourish on an industrial scale
Year by year, the tale of HS2 grows more wretched. The latest report on the fiasco, by James Stewart, former chief executive of Crossrail, depicts contractors behaving like a gang that tarmacs driveways taking advantage of an octogenarian widow. Endless wheezes have been devised to drive up costs, with HS2 Ltd – the government-owned company set up to handle the project – seemingly too gullible to prevent itself from being ripped off. Some of what has gone on, according to the report, may constitute outright fraud. Contracts were signed off even before aspects of the design were decided upon, effectively giving expensive additions a blank cheque. An elaborate remodelling of Euston station was abandoned, but not before £250 million was blown on design work. It beggars belief not that a firm charged £20,000 to make a model station out of Lego, but that HS2 paid it. In all, costs have been inflated by an astonishing £37 billion since 2012. To put that into context, Rachel Reeves ' eye-watering tax rises in last October's budget were supposed to raise an extra £40 billion. The culture at HS2 is prodigal and woe betide any miser who tries to spoil the party. When risk assessor Stephen Cresswell raised concerns that the ballooning HS2 bill was 'actively misrepresented', he was soon shown the door in 2022. He took the firm to an employment tribunal and was this month awarded £319,000 compensation. His condemnation afterwards was withering: 'HS2 is not an organisation that should be trusted with public money.' And yet, we give it more public money. While the official estimate for its final cost is between £45 billion and £54 billion, many fear it will cost more than £100 billion. One of the many ways in which the project was misconceived from the start was that it was needlessly designed to be the fastest train service in the world, even though all the cities it connected were less than 200 miles apart. Consequently, far more earthworks were required and far more properties had to be demolished than if the line was built for a lower speed. Even at its original estimate, HS2 was going to cost, per mile, multiples of what the high-speed line from Paris to Strasbourg – its first phase was completed in 2007 – cost. It is bizarre that then-prime minister David Cameron and chancellor George Osborne waved through HS2 as a fully taxpayer-funded project in 2012 at the same time they were taking a scythe to public services to try to close Gordon Brown's gargantuan spending deficit. In their hubris, they imagined that Whitehall would make a better fist of HS2 than was made of HS1 – the line from London St Pancras to the Channel Tunnel – which was built with private money and sailed over its budget by around 20 per cent. An HS2 worker stands in front of tunnel boring machine Karen at the Old Oak Common station box site during preparations for completing the 4.5 mile HS2 tunnelling to London Euston How could they have not noticed the lousy record of cost control in almost everything run by the state? Time and time again, we find ourselves paying through the nose for things that other countries seem able to build for far less. Just look at the Stonehenge tunnel, a billion-pound project that has been 30 years in the making but was cancelled last year because of its mushrooming costs. And the less said about a third runway at Heathrow, the better. While other countries build things, we spend billions talking about it, holding endless inquiries, backtracking and redesigning the whole thing. We are about to go through the whole tortuous process again with the construction of Sizewell C. Like HS2, the Suffolk nuclear power plant follows a similar private sector project – in this case, the Hinkley C station in Somerset, which has itself been delayed and overrun its budget. Even by nuclear reactor standards, its design is complex, as the same plants in Finland and Normandy have proved with 14-year and 12-year delays, respectively. It's little wonder that the private sector judged Sizewell to be too risky, but that has not stopped the Government ploughing taxpayer money into the scheme in the deluded belief that, yet again, the public sector will manage it better. Don't believe it. Private enterprise doesn't always manage things well, but at least it has a strong incentive to keep a lid on costs and avoid extravagance. Let spending spiral out of control and you can crash your company – taking your bonus and pension with it. In the public sector, on the other hand, you just run off to the Treasury with a begging bowl, assured that the Government has invested so much of its political capital in it that it won't be brave enough to pull the plug. That is what has happened with HS2. Contractors know that ministers are desperate to get the project over the line, and behave accordingly. We are never going to solve the problem of infrastructure unless we first tackle the culture of the public sector. Public officials need proper incentives and penalties pegged to performance, and have it drummed into them that they are spending our money, not a bottomless pit of funds. Yet introducing a dash of private-sector dynamism into Whitehall is anathema to this Labour administration more concerned with union demands that civil servants continue to run the country from their sofas. Rachel Reeves sees spending on infrastructure as key to future growth, but with more projects on the horizon – such as building small modular nuclear reactors and updating the National Grid – there's little hope that these won't become very expensive millstones around the taxpayer's neck.
