&w=3840&q=100)
Lok Sabha passes Bill to prohibit online games played with real money
Rahul Goreja New Delhi
The Lok Sabha on Wednesday passed the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, aimed at prohibiting all forms of online real-money games.
The Bill was passed by a voice vote after brief remarks by Minister of Electronics and Information Technology Ashwini Vaishnaw, amid protests from Opposition members. Following its passage, the House was adjourned for the day.
What does the Bill ban?
The legislation defines an 'online money game' as any game in which an entry fee or monetary deposit is required, irrespective of whether it is based on skill or chance. The Bill prohibits any person or company from offering, aiding, or promoting such games. It also bars advertisements for these platforms and prevents banks and other financial institutions from processing related payments.
Criminal penalties
Once enacted, any individual or entity found offering or facilitating online money gaming could face imprisonment of up to three years, a fine of up to ₹1 crore, or both. The legislation is part of a broader government effort to regulate digital gaming in India while attempting to safeguard users from financial and psychological risks associated with such platforms.
The Bill had earlier been cleared by the Union Cabinet and now awaits consideration in the Rajya Sabha. Lawmakers have highlighted the growing use of online gaming applications, some of which have been linked to financial scams and addictive behaviour, as justification for the legislation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
13 minutes ago
- United News of India
Rajya Sabha passes IIM Amendment Bill 2025 amid Opposition walkout
New Delhi, Aug 20 (UNI) The Rajya Sabha today passed the IIM (Amendment) Bill, 2025 by voice vote amid a walkout by the Opposition. The bill pertains to the establishment of an Indian Institute of Management (IIM) in Guwahati, Assam. With this, the bill has received the approval of both Houses of Parliament, as the Lok Sabha had already passed it earlier. The Opposition staged a walkout over their demand for a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar, which was not accepted. Due to the uproar by the Opposition, the House was adjourned twice. When proceedings resumed at 2 PM, presiding Deputy Chairman Bhubaneswar Kalita called upon Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan to introduce and move the bill for discussion and passage. As soon as Pradhan stood up to speak, Opposition members began demanding a discussion on the electoral roll issue and started raising slogans near the Chair. Kalita allowed Leader of the Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge to speak, but when Kharge attempted to raise the electoral roll issue, the Chair disallowed it, stating that no discussion on matters other than the bill would be permitted. In protest, the Opposition members raised slogans and walked out of the House. Following a brief discussion and the Minister's reply, the bill was passed by voice vote. Some amendments to the bill had been proposed by Opposition members, but due to their absence from the House, these could not be moved. The bill provides for the establishment of an IIM in Guwahati. Until the first Board of Governors is formed, the institute will be run by a person appointed by the central government. The estimated cost for this institute is Rs 5,500 crore. The bill also includes amendments to the Indian Institutes of Management Act, 2017, declaring IIMs as institutions of national importance and providing for regulation of their functioning. Responding to the discussion, Pradhan said the bill fulfils a long-standing demand of Assam and that academic sessions would begin from this term itself. He added that student admissions and faculty recruitment would be done accordingly. He noted that this would be the 22nd IIM in the country, with a total cost of Rs 555 crore. Pradhan highlighted that India has become the world's fourth-largest economy and is on its way to becoming the third largest, attributing this progress to the skills of its youth and the contribution of national institutions. He accused previous governments of neglecting the Northeast. He said that while only 13 IIMs were established in the first 53 years since the inception of IIMs in 1961, the number has increased to 22 in the last 11 years under the Narendra Modi government. The Education Minister also mentioned that the UAE had requested India to establish IITs and IIMs there, in recognition of their achievements. As a result, such institutes have now been established in Abu Dhabi and Africa. Earlier, BJP's Geeta alias Chandraprabha initiated the discussion by saying that the pace of opening educational institutions has doubled since the Modi government came to power. She claimed that two new colleges and one new ITI are being opened every day in the country. YSRCP's Golla Babu Rao demanded that vacant faculty positions at the Visakhapatnam IIM be filled. Biju Janata Dal's Niranjan Bishi supported the bill and also raised the issue of filling vacancies in these institutions. AIADMK's M. Thambidurai raised the issue of student suicides in management institutes. NCP's Praful Patel welcomed the move to open an IIM in Assam and supported the bill. BSP's Ramji raised the issue of SC/ST students not receiving their PhD fellowships on time. He demanded that 50 percent of seats at the new institute be reserved for students from the Northeast. BJP's Kanad Purkayastha called the bill historic for the Northeast, stating that the people of Assam have been deprived of premier institutions for decades. UNI RBE SS
India Today
43 minutes ago
- India Today
Parliament monsoon session turns into washout; Bills passed amid Opposition protests
The Monsoon Session of Parliament this year was reduced to a near-total washout, with the Opposition staging relentless protests both inside and outside the House over the issue of SIR. From the very first day, the Opposition remained steadfast in its demand for a discussion, resulting in repeated disruptions and preventing the smooth conduct of legislative only structured discussion that took place during the entire session was on Operation Sindoor, while several other important debates — including a special discussion proposed by the government on India's space programme for Viksit Bharat 2047 — were stalled due to ruckus in both sources expressed disappointment at what they termed the 'obstinate behaviour' of Opposition parties, which, they said, not only paralysed parliamentary debates but also denied their members a chance to participate in the passage of several significant pieces of legislation. Despite the chaos, the government succeeded in getting multiple Bills passed in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. Many of these legislations were cleared either without discussion or after brief debates held amid din, with Opposition MPs either shouting slogans, staging walkouts, or refusing to PASSED IN LOK SABHAIn the Lok Sabha, some of the Bills that managed to secure limited discussion before passage included:The Readjustment of Representation of Scheduled Tribes in Assembly Constituencies of the State of Goa Bill, 2025The Merchant Shipping Bill, 2025The National Sports Governance Bill, 2025The National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 2025The Indian Ports Bill, 2025The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2025The remaining Bills were passed without any discussion, underscoring the extent of disruption in the Lower PASSED IN RAJYA SABHAThe Rajya Sabha witnessed a similar scenario. The Bills of Lading Bill, 2025, was the only legislation that sailed through smoothly on the very first day, before protests subsequent Bills were either passed amid uproar or after Opposition members staged a walkout, including:The Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill, 2025The Coastal Shipping Bill, 2025The Manipur Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2025The Manipur Appropriation (No. 2) Bill, 2025The Merchant Shipping Bill, 2025The Readjustment of Representation of Scheduled Tribes in Assembly Constituencies of the State of Goa Bill, 2025The National Sports Governance Bill, 2025The National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 2025The Income-tax Bill, 2025The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2025The Indian Ports Bill, 2025The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2025The Indian Institutes of Management (Amendment) Bill, 2025While the government defended its decision to proceed with the legislative agenda amid din, citing constitutional obligations, Opposition parties accused the ruling dispensation of bulldozing laws without observers noted that the session highlighted the deepening standoff between the Treasury and Opposition benches. Important legislations with far-reaching consequences—from taxation and sports governance to higher education and shipping reforms—were passed with little Monsoon Session of 2025 may be remembered more for protests and paralysis than for meaningful parliamentary debate.- Ends
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Rahul Gandhi approaches top court over 'vote chori' in Bengaluru Lok Sabha seat
Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha and former Congress President Rahul Gandhi has approached the Supreme Court, seeking an enquiry into alleged irregularities and manipulation in the voter list of the Bengaluru Central constituency during the 2024 Lok Sabha public interest litigation (PIL), filed by Congress legal representative advocate Rohit Pandey, urges the Court to order an investigation by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) headed by a retired judge. It also requests that the Election Commission be restrained from making any further changes to the voter list until the matter is petition highlights serious concerns about discrepancies in the electoral roll, alleging the presence of fake voters and the omission of eligible voters. Pandey argues that the integrity of the voter list is fundamental to the conduct of free and fair elections, and that the current irregularities threaten this principle. The plea also claims that the Election Commission failed to provide a machine-readable version of the voter list, limiting public scrutiny and undermining the key prayers in the petition are: The formation of an SIT under the supervision of the Supreme Court; An immediate halt to any modifications in the voter list pending judicial review; Issuance of clear guidelines to ensure the Election Commission maintains transparency and accountability in the preparation and publication of voter rolls; Access to machine-readable voter lists for public verification.- EndsTune InMust Watch
