logo
Five Nations and EU Urge Trump Not to Impose New Airplane Tariffs

Five Nations and EU Urge Trump Not to Impose New Airplane Tariffs

Yomiuri Shimbun11-06-2025
Reuters
A picture taken through a telescope shows a silhouette of an aircraft against the sun during a partial solar eclipse in the settlement of Kojori outside Tbilisi, Georgia October 25, 2022.
WASHINGTON, June 10 (Reuters) – Five nations and the European Union, as well as airlines and aerospace firms worldwide, urged the Trump administration not to impose new national security tariffs on imported commercial planes and parts, documents released on Tuesday showed.
Airlines and planemakers have been lobbying President Donald Trump to restore the tariff-free regime under the 1979 Civil Aircraft Agreement that has yielded an annual trade surplus of $75 billion for the U.S. industry.
The documents made public by the U.S. Commerce Department bared concerns over the fallout of possible new tariffs expressed by companies as well as nations such as Canada, China, Japan, Mexico and Switzerland, besides the European Union.
'As reliable trading partners, the European Union and United States should strengthen their trade regarding aircraft and aircraft parts, rather than hinder it by imposing trade restrictions,' the EU wrote.
It would consider its options 'to ensure a level playing field,' it added.
Trump has already imposed tariffs of 10% on nearly all airplane and parts imports.
'No country or region should attempt to support the development of its domestic aircraft manufacturing industry by suppressing foreign competitors,' the Chinese government wrote.
Separately, U.S. planemaker Boeing BA.N cited a recent trade deal unveiled in May with Britain that ensures tariff-free treatment for airplanes and parts.
'The United States should ensure duty-free treatment for commercial aircraft and their parts in any negotiated trade agreement, similar to its efforts with the United Kingdom,' Boeing told the Commerce Department in a filing.
Mexico said in 2024 it exported $1.45 billion in aircraft parts, just a tenth of the total, to the United States. The EU said it took U.S. exports of aircraft worth roughly $12 billion, while exporting about $8 billion of aircraft to the U.S.
In early May, the Commerce Department launched a 'Section 232' national security investigation into imports of commercial aircraft, jet engines and parts that could form the basis for even higher tariffs on such imports.
Last week, Delta Air LinesDAL.N and major trade groups warned of tariffs' impact on ticket prices, aviation safety and supply chains.
'Current U.S. tariffs on aviation are putting domestic production of commercial aircraft at risk,' Airbus Americas AIR.PA CEO Robin Hayes said in a filing.
'It is not realistic or sensible today to create a 100% domestic supply chain in any country.'
Boeing said it had been increasing U.S. content in its airplanes over the last decade and its newest airplanes, the 737 MAX 10 and 777X, would have 'more than 88% domestically-sourced
content.'
The United Auto Workers union, which represents 10,000 aerospace workers, said it supports tariffs and domestic production quotas, adding that U.S. aerospace employment has fallen to 510,000 in 2024 from 850,000 in 1990.
'To safeguard the entire aerospace supply chain across the commercial and defense sectors, comprehensive tariffs and production quotas on several products are needed,' it said.
JetBlue Airways JBLU.O opposed new tariffs, however, saying, 'Trade policy should reinforce, not destabilize, the proven systems that keep our aircraft flying safely and affordably.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EV slump isn't stopping CATL's battery production buildup
EV slump isn't stopping CATL's battery production buildup

Nikkei Asia

time8 minutes ago

  • Nikkei Asia

EV slump isn't stopping CATL's battery production buildup

CATL leads the world in automotive battery market share. (Photo by Shizuka Tanaka) SHIZUKA TANABE GUANGZHOU -- CATL, the world's largest supplier of electric-vehicle batteries, is maintaining a high pace of production investments in an effort to stay ahead of its biggest rivals. The Chinese company, formally Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., posted a record-high 30.4 billion yuan ($4.22 billion) net profit in January-June earnings out Wednesday. Revenue grew 17% in CATL's core EV battery segment.

Why the US Is Letting China Win on Energy Innovation
Why the US Is Letting China Win on Energy Innovation

The Diplomat

time3 hours ago

  • The Diplomat

Why the US Is Letting China Win on Energy Innovation

To China's delight, the U.S. has simply stopped competing to be the world's clean energy powerhouse. During the cold war, the United States and Soviet Union were locked in a desperate race to develop cutting‑edge technologies like long-range missiles and satellites. Fast forward to today and the frontiers of global technology have pivoted to artificial intelligence (AI) and next‑generation energy. In one domain, AI, the U.S. has far outpaced any other nation – though China looks to be closing the gap. In the other, energy, the U.S. has just tied its shoelaces together. The reason isn't technology, economics or, despite the government's official line, even national security. Rather, it is politics. Since returning to the White House in January, Donald Trump has handed out huge wins to the coal and oil and gas industries. This is no great surprise. Trump has long been supportive of the U.S. fossil fuel industry and, since his reelection, has appointed several former industry lobbyists to top political positions. According to the Trump administration, national security requires gutting support for renewable energy while performing political CPR on the dying coal industry. The reality is that, since 2019, the United States has produced more oil, gas, and coal annually than Americans want to use, with the rest exported and sold overseas. The U.S. is currently one of the most prolific exporters of fossil fuels in the world. In short, the U.S. does not have an energy security problem. It does, however, have an energy cost problem combined with a growing climate change crisis. These issues will only be made worse by Trump's enthusiasm for fossil fuels. Over the past six months, the Trump administration has upended half a decade of green industrial policy. It has clawed back billions of U.S. dollars in tax credits and grants that were supercharging American energy innovation. Meanwhile, China has roared forward. Beijing has doubled down on wind, solar and next‑generation batteries, installing more wind and solar power in 2024 than the rest of the world combined. To China's delight, the U.S. has simply stopped competing to be the world's clean energy powerhouse. While Trump repeats the tired mantra of 'drill, baby, drill,' China is building factories, cornering the market for critical minerals such as lithium and nickel, and locking in export partners. Roughly one-in-five lithium‑ion batteries, a key component in clean energy products, are made in China. Many of the newest high‑tech batteries are also being developed and patented there. At the same time, household energy spending in the U.S. is expected to increase by $170 each year between now and 2035 as a result of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The bill, which includes sweeping changes to taxes, social security, and more, will raise energy costs mainly because it strips away support for cheap and abundant renewables like wind and solar. Household energy costs could go up even more as Trump threatens to make large‑scale clean energy development much more onerous by putting up bureaucratic hurdles. The administration recently issued a directive requiring the secretary of the interior to approve even routine activities for wind and solar projects connected to federal lands. Meanwhile, climate change is hitting American communities harder with each passing year. As recent flooding in Texas and urban fires in California and Hawai'i have shown, fewer Americans still have the luxury of ignoring climate change. As the cost of these disasters mount – $183 billion in 2024 – the grifting of the oil and gas industry will become an increasingly bitter pill for the nation to swallow. China, with its authoritarian government, is less susceptible to the petroleum-obsessed dogma fueling the Republican party. It does not have prominent leaders like U.S. politician Marjorie Taylor Greene, who previously warned that Democrats are trying to 'emasculate the way we drive' by advocating for electric vehicles. Rather, China's leaders are seeing green – not in the environmental sense, but in a monetary one. It is generally cheaper nowadays to build and operate renewable energy facilities than gas or coal power stations. According to a June 2025 report by Lazard, an asset management company, electricity from new large-scale solar farms costs up to $78 per megawatt hour – and often much less. The same electricity from a newly built natural gas plants, by comparison, can cost as much as $107 per megawatt hour. Across the world, utilities are embracing clean energy, choosing lower costs for their customers while reducing pollution. China saw the writing on the wall decades ago, and its early investments are bearing a rich harvest. It now produces more than half of the world's electric vehicles and the vast majority of its solar panels. The United States can still compete at the leading edge of the energy sector. American companies are developing innovative new approaches to geothermal, battery recycling, and many other energy technologies. But in the battle to become the world's 21st-century energy manufacturing powerhouse, the U.S. seems to have walked off the playing field. In Trump's telling, the U.S. may have simply exited one race and reentered another. But the fossil fuel industry – financially, environmentally and ethically – is obviously a dead end. This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Corporate Japan outlines Trump tariff impact on bottom line
Corporate Japan outlines Trump tariff impact on bottom line

Nikkei Asia

time4 hours ago

  • Nikkei Asia

Corporate Japan outlines Trump tariff impact on bottom line

Komatsu estimates that U.S. tariffs will increase costs by 75 billion yen for the year ending March 2026. (Komatsu) RYOSUKE HANADA and TAKESHI SHIRAISHI TOKYO -- Japanese companies are feeling the impact of higher U.S. tariffs under the Trump administration, with Nissan Motor, Komatsu and others outlining the financial hit to their earnings. In April, the Trump administration had increased tariffs on automobiles exported from Japan to 27.5% from 2.5%. This rate is brought down to 15% in a deal recently announced after more than three months of negotiations, with revised "reciprocal" duties taking effect next Thursday. But the burden on Japanese automakers remains heavy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store