In Alaska, Trump gifts Putin more time to grind down Ukraine
It was not the applause, or the red carpet, or the ride in the Beast, or speaking first on the podium, that were the biggest gifts offered up to Vladimir Putin at the Alaska summit. President Donald Trump's greatest favor to his Russian counterpart was time.
Even as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky heads to Washington on Monday with a phalanx of European leaders to hold hurried talks with Trump, the war grinds on.
Russian success or failure on the front line will be measured in a matter of weeks. Putin has until mid-October until the weather cools, ground softens, and advances become harder. That is a full two months. His forces are on the brink of turning painfully incremental and costly micro-advances into 'nowhere' villages in eastern Ukraine into a more strategic gain.
Almost every day, another settlement falls. The secondary sanctions Trump has threatened – which would penalize those buying Russian oil and gas – and has now twice backed away, would not stop Putin's war effort this year. But it has already clearly piled pressure on him, in the forms of calls from the leaders of India and China, and may have led him to accept the invitation to meet with Trump in Alaska, where he was welcomed so graciously.
Putin does not want to maintain a lengthy war effort under economic pressure from his two main energy customers and effective sponsors, themselves having to endure tariff pain from the United States. And so, he is in a rush on the battlefield, but agonizingly slow at the negotiating table.
An oil tanker passes storage tanks at an oil refinery in Mumbai, India, on August 11. Washington is ratcheting up the pressure on New Delhi over oil flows from Russia with a wave of new tariffs.
Abeer Khan/Bloomberg/Getty Images
Trump's instincts correctly assessed that reality in Anchorage, his pained expression belying the positive claims from Russian and American staffers of how well the meeting had gone. Getting on well with another president you have welcomed with clapping and a limousine is not real diplomatic progress. And he perhaps knew that.
In truth, Alaska did not go as awfully as it could have for Kyiv. Ukrainians had to endure a relatively brief revisionist history lesson from Putin at the podium, and the distasteful repetition of how Ukraine and Russia are 'brotherly' nations, despite Moscow's nightly murder of Ukrainian civilians in air assaults. But there were two positive notes for Kyiv.
Firstly, Trump and Putin did not cook up a madcap, real-estate, Sharpie-map peace deal in a hurry, that was short on detail and heavy on wins for Moscow, as some had feared they might. The opposite happened – no deal emerged.
The second gain for Ukraine is that the intransigent nature of Putin – despite all of Trump's fawning – was widely on display. Trump appeared sullen: no lunch, no questions from the press, no return invitation to Moscow unequivocally accepted, and even the suggestion, in an interview with Fox News, that – of all things – he wished he hadn't agreed to talk to network host Sean Hannity. At the end, Trump apparently did not want to be there, and Putin may be in error to have made him feel that way.
But the evolution of Trump's thinking is not all a win for Zelensky. Paramount is the overnight evaporation of a demand for a ceasefire. It was the bedrock of European and Ukrainian thinking last week, and even crept into Trump's talking points ahead of Alaska. But Putin has never wanted one, as it would stop his military advances.
And so, as of Saturday morning, the demand has vanished and the focus shifted to a quick, enduring peace deal. There is no such thing; a lasting deal could take weeks to formulate, if not much longer. But European leaders stepped back from their ceasefire demand in their Saturday joint statement and Zelensky even said the 'killing must stop as soon as possible' rather than preconditioning further talks on a ceasefire.
Trump also took whatever the bad deal was that Putin proposed, and turned it into pressure on the resilient victim – Kyiv. It would be Zelensky's decision what to do next, and Trump urged him to take the deal.
Destruction caused by Russian glide bomb strikes on the front-line city of Kostiantynivka in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine is pictured on March 21.
Thomas Krych/Anadolu/Getty Images
The proposed deal, from what we know, seems potentially quite bad for Ukraine. One European official told CNN that Putin had persisted with his demands for control of all of the Donbas region – something politically and practically impossible for Zelensky to concede, and which he's already rejected. This part-maximalist demand emerged after US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff's meeting in the Kremlin earlier this month, with added confusion over whether this demand meant Putin had given up on claiming the rest of the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions, now partially occupied by Russian forces.
But Putin is a studied, patient pragmatist. He can take what he can now and then come back for the rest later. He has no electoral cycles to worry about, given his grip on the country, although likely knows his overheated and hyper-militarized economy cannot keep going like this indefinitely.
In his post-talks remarks, Putin remained set on what he considers the 'root causes' of the conflict being fixed — which have previously included Ukraine's existence as a sovereign state and NATO's eastward expansion since the end of the Cold War – and on 'peace' for Ukraine, which effectively means its surrender and more dead civilians. He even ominously urged Europeans and Ukraine to not get in the way of whatever proposal he had floated at Trump.
Trump has not fully fallen for this play. His Monday meeting in the Oval Office with Zelensky will likely reveal an evolution in their relationship, and Trump's view of Putin, since their ghastly February blowout. It will be another moment when, whatever Zelensky hears, he will have travelled with only one option available to him, and that is to nod along and play nice. But this time, Zelensky will be flanked by more than half a dozen key European leaders, and Trump perhaps is mindful they are better buddies to him than Putin has been.
Whether this united front can persuade Trump remains to be seen. While standing next to Zelensky at a press conference, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen affirmed that Ukraine must become a 'steel porcupine' to deter future invasions.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, meets with US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, right, at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia on August 6.
Kremlin Press Office/Anadolu/Getty Images
The problem for Ukraine is not how the circus of diplomacy plays out, but the horrors outside of the tent. The time it would likely take to bring the parties together for further talks could be all Putin needs on the battlefield to effect real change.
The coming weeks are the slow limp forwards that Putin wants: Tension between Trump and Zelensky first, followed by European pressure on Trump to ease off on Zelensky, followed by awkward and technical stalling over a three-way meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelensky.
Putin only has to claim scheduling or location conflicts for a week to buy yet more time.
Then a trilateral meeting, if there is one, only risks repeating the cycle again; Putin makes unreasonable demands he knows Ukraine cannot accept, Trump pressures Zelensky to accept them to get quick points on the board, and European leaders lean on Trump to recall that Ukraine's security is also theirs. And rinse and repeat.
Time. Putin needs it to conquer. Trump hates wasting it without points on the board. Zelensky's forces do not have it. European leaders hope it erodes Russia's economic ability to fight.
Much of it has passed since Trump came to power promising to end the war in 24 hours, and while he is clearly wiser to Putin than in February, little in terms of the hard dynamics and demands of this war have changed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Egypt Independent
25 minutes ago
- Egypt Independent
No US troops and 'warm' relationship with Putin: The top Trump headlines today after high-stakes Ukraine talks
World leaders are back to work in their home countries after a day of meetings on a potential end to the war in Ukraine at the White House yesterday. That includes US President Donald Trump, who today ruled out sending American troops to enforce a potential peace deal in Ukraine. Here are some of the top news headlines from the president today:
Egypt Independent
25 minutes ago
- Egypt Independent
UK government walks back controversial Apple ‘back door' demand after Trump administration pressure
The UK government has backed down on a controversial demand for Apple to build a 'back door' into its technology to access private user data following pressure from the Trump administration. The order could have undermined a key security promise Apple makes to its users — the company has said it has not and would never build a backdoor or 'master key' to its products — and compromised privacy for users globally. UK officials had reportedly sought access to encrypted data that users around the world store in iCloud, materials that even the iPhone maker itself is typically unable to access. US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on X Monday that the United Kingdom 'agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties.' Gabbard said that over the 'past few months,' she had been 'working closely with our partners in the UK,' alongside President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance, on the agreement. A source familiar with the discussions told CNN that Gabbard spoke with her counterpart in the UK, Deputy National Security Advisory Matt Collins, a few times about the issue, including once when the UK delegation visited the White House. Vance was also personally involved in reaching a deal, engaging in direct conversations with British government officials to come to what was considered a 'mutually beneficial' agreement for both countries, a White House official told CNN. 'This agreement between our two governments maintains each country's sovereignty while ensuring close cooperation on data,' a White House official said. The British Home Office reportedly made the order under the Investigatory Powers Act that lets UK law enforcement compel access to communications and metadata from tech companies in secret, although the agency never confirmed the demand. The Home Office did not immediately respond to CNN's request for comment on Tuesday. Reports about the order earlier this year quickly raised alarm among security experts and tech leaders who worried that Apple could be used by a foreign government to spy on its users. The company in February rolled back a data security feature for iCloud called Advanced Data Protection (ADP) for users in the United Kingdom. The feature provides optional end-to-end encryption for personal data such as photos and messages, meaning only the user who holds the account, not even the company itself could view that information. Without end-to-end encryption, Apple could have access to users' data, meaning law enforcement could legally compel the company to hand it over to aid in investigating crimes. Removing the feature for UK users was widely viewed as an effort to protect more advanced security for users elsewhere in the world in the face of the UK government's demand for a technical back door. But it didn't necessarily address the UK's demand for access to user data globally. Apple said in a statement at the time that it was 'gravely disappointed' to no longer offer ADP to UK users, 'given the continuing rise of data breaches and other threats to customer privacy.' Apple did not immediately respond to CNN's request for comment on the UK government's retreat from the demand. Tech executives, including Apple CEO Tim Cook, have sought to foster close relationships with Trump since he took office in hopes of gaining his support on key policy and regulatory issues. The UK agreement marks the latest instance of the Trump administration convincing a foreign government to walk back regulation of an American tech company. In June, Canada said it would rescind a digital services tax — which Trump had called a 'direct and blatant attack' on the United States and its companies — to restart trade negotiations with the US.
Egypt Independent
2 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
North Korea is where this 95-year-old wants to die. South Korea won't let him go
Paju, South Korea — Captured during the Korean War and imprisoned for decades for refusing to renounce his political beliefs, 95-year-old Ahn Hak-sop now has a single dying wish: to return to North Korea and be buried alongside his comrades. Ahn has spent most of his life resisting what he calls the American 'occupation' of South Korea – first as a soldier in the North Korean army, and later as a dissident in the country that captured him. His refusal to renounce his unwavering support for North Korea condemned Ahn to more than four decades behind bars in the South. Now frail, ailing and confined to a wheelchair, he tells CNN he longs to cross into North Korea one final time and be laid to rest in the country that has defined his life. On Wednesday Ahn slowly shuffled to a bridge leading to the Korean Peninsula's Demilitarized Zone (DMZ), pleading for permission to cross the zone – one of the most heavily militarized borders in the world – and enter North Korea. Hours later, amid a scrum of security personnel and protesters demanding South Korean officials allow him to cross, Ahn was denied access to the land route into North Korea and sent back. The rejection was crushing. 'I miss the North, it's unbearable,' he said, holding a North Korean flag. 'I want to be buried in the free land.' South Korea's government has banned individuals from making unauthorized contact with North Korea, and civilians are restricted from entering the heavily fortified DMZ. The 1950-53 Korean War ended in an armistice, not a peace treaty, meaning North and South Korea are still technically at war. If Ahn had been allowed to return, Pyongyang could present his repatriation as a symbolic victory, a onetime prisoner of war crossing back from a nation it has long denounced as its chief adversary. But for Ahn, the issue is far more personal, and existential. Weakened by illness, having been hospitalized multiple times this year, he says his only wish is to be buried in the soil of North Korea. Or as he calls it, 'the homeland of my ideology, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK).' Ahn is one of six remaining long-term unconverted prisoners in South Korea who have recently asked to return to the North. The government in Seoul is reviewing 'various options from a humanitarian perspective,' a Unification Ministry official said, noting that any decision would require cooperation from Pyongyang. 'Not liberated' Ahn was born in 1930 on Ganghwa Island, off Korea's western coast, during Japan's brutal colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula. He grew up among turbulence and uncertainty: one brother was forced into the Japanese army, another deserted. When police came searching, Ahn escaped and found refuge with his aunt. When Japan surrendered in 1945, Ahn was 15 years old. Instead of celebrating, he said he felt betrayed by a proclamation from Gen. Douglas MacArthur that placed Korea south of the 38th parallel under American military control. The declaration gave American officials broad authority over the South's political, economic and security affairs until a new government could be formed. 'So, looking at the proclamation, I realized that we were not liberated,' he said. 'That's how it all started. That is why I started anti-US movements.' When the Korean War began in 1950, Ahn was a middle school student in Kaesong, then a bustling city near the 38th parallel. He watched as armies surged back and forth across a newly-imposed dividing line between North and South. And in 1952, he formally enlisted with North Korea's People's Army, serving in the intelligence department. Ahn Hak-sop Charlie Miller/CNN As the war drew to a bloody stalemate in 1953, Ahn was captured. Out of the ten soldiers in his unit, he said he was the only one to survive. Under then-existing South Korean legislation, if Ahn had signed a paper renouncing the North and its communist ideology, he would have been eligible for parole. However, he refused, and remained behind bars in the South for the next 42 years and six months. Decades in jail Ahn's imprisonment is among the longest endured by a North Korean POW held in the South. He described his time as relentless, not simply for the physical hardship but for the psychological pressure to abandon his beliefs. 'At first, they tried to convert me through conversation,' he recalled. 'When that didn't work, they started torturing me.' Ahn alleges he endured brutal punishments, including beatings and exposure to freezing water. At one point, he said, interrogators even brought him back to Ganghwa Island to reunite with his sisters, who begged him tearfully to renounce the North. He refused. 'That was really painful,' he recalled. When he was finally pardoned in 1995, on South Korea's Liberation Day holiday, Ahn described the moment in bitter terms. He said he simply moved from 'a small and locked-up prison to an open and big prison.' Even then, he said he remained under close monitoring and was followed by police. In 2000, amid a brief thaw of political tensions between Seoul and Pyongyang, South Korea permitted 63 unconverted long-term prisoners to return to the North. Ahn was offered the chance to cross the border but made the agonizing decision to stay. Those who returned to North Korea were feted with parades and banners. But Ahn said he remained on South Korean soil because his 'mission' was unfinished. Despite decades in the South, he has never wavered in his belief that South Korea remains a colony under American influence. 'I came here, to a US 'colony,'… fighting against the US, but I couldn't do anything and only served time in prison,' he said. 'How could I go back, feeling ashamed? If I am to shout, 'US out,' I must do it from here, not the North. That's why I didn't return… I was determined to die after witnessing the Americans leave this land.' 'Either I drive the Americans out of here, or I die,' he said. Today, Ahn lives in a modest home in Yonggang-ri, barely a mile from the North Korean border he dreams of crossing, shunned by his extended family. To get by, he relies on the government benefits given to low-income people and support from his acquaintances. The walls of his home are covered with faded photographs and North Korean posters, mementos of an ideology that has defined his existence. His doormat is a US flag. 'It would be too much of a resentment to be buried in a colony even after death,' he said. Permission denied The Unification Bridge, spanning the Imjin River in Paju, South Korea, has long been a ceremonial crossing point for summit meetings, family reunions, and rare delegations traveling between the Koreas. On Wednesday, it became the site of Ahn's latest confrontation with the South Korean government. Officials blocked his passage, citing national security law and the absence of any agreement with Pyongyang to facilitate his return. North Korea halted all communications with South Korea in 2023, making it tougher for Seoul to discuss Ahn and other prisoners' repatriation. Human rights groups in South Korea expressed sympathy for Ahn's plight, but few expected the government to allow the crossing. After being denied permission at the border on Wednesday, Ahn hobbled into a waiting ambulance and was taken away. For Ahn, the refusal underscored what he has believed for nearly 80 years: that his fate is bound up not in reconciliation, but in perpetual division. 'I am determined to go back to the home of my ideology, the home of my principles,' he said. 'DPRK, the beginning of my life.'
