Nordic Parents Have It Great-But Birth Rates Are Still Falling
Much of the world is facing a birth rate crisis, and Norway is no exception despite implementing many of the policies governments, activists, and experts have touted. Newsweek has broken down why.
Many trying to tackle this global issue have called for public health policies and financial plans to help make it easier for couples to have children in society.
The financial crisis and its impact on housing, inflation and pay is generally cited a major contributor to people's decisions to delay having children, to have fewer children or not to have them at all.
Parental leave and childcare come up just as often, with multiple experts telling Newsweek that improved policies in these areas would be a game-changer.
Norway is considered a global leader in parental leave and childcare policies, with the United Nations International Children's Fund (UNICEF) ranking it among the top countries for family-friendly policies.
"The Nordic model is characterized by strong institutional support for families with children," Rannveig Kaldager Hart, a senior researcher at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health's Centre for Fertility and Health, told Newsweek.
Norway offers parents 12 months of shared paid leave for birth and an additional year each afterward.
It also made kindergarten (similar to a U.S. day care) a statutory right for all children 1 year of age or older in 2008, which the government has subsidized to make it possible for "women and men to combine work and family life," as Norway's former Minister of Children, Equality, and Social Inclusion Solveig Horne said at a parental leave event in 2016.
And yet, Norway's fertility rate has dropped dramatically from 1.98 children per woman in 2009 to 1.44 children per woman in 2024, according to official figures. The rate for 2023 (1.40) was the lowest-ever recorded fertility rate in the country.
Oslo created a Birth Rate Committee to investigate the causes, consequences and possible solutions of Norway's birth rate problem last year.
It found that "an important cause is that fewer people are having their first child before age 30" and fewer people have more than two children, Hart, who is also the Committee's chair, said.
Professor Katrine Vellesen Løken, from the Norwegian School of Economics, told Newsweek that "one leading hypothesis points to lower rates of couple formation for those in their 20s, which in turn contribute to reduced fertility."
"While Norway has eased some financial barriers, that's only part of the picture; other psychological, cultural, and structural factors matter too," said Theodore Cosco, a research fellow at the Oxford Institute of Population Ageing.
"Parenting is shaped by many factors, and Norway is beginning to reckon with those beyond just financial support, especially the deeper challenges of parenting itself," he told Newsweek.
Indeed, Hart also said that "young adults are more likely to live alone" and "young couples split up more frequently than before."
He went on to speak about "intensive parenting," which refers to the modern parenting style in which parents invest time, money and energy into creating successful adults.
The expectations of this parenting style "may cause some to postpone or have fewer children than they otherwise would," Hart said.
Øystein Kravdal, who was a demography professor at the University of Oslo for almost three decades, said the same.
"One may also wonder whether young adults to an increasing extent are being exposed to overwhelming expectations about how 'intensely' one should care for a child to be a responsible parent," he told Newsweek.
So does this mean that Norway's progressive parental leave and childcare policies should not be part of other countries' solutions?
Cosco does not think Norway's approach should be dismissed globally. "Norway shouldn't be seen as a failure," he said. "Fertility is a complex issue that requires a multi-pronged approach."
Kravdal argued that Norway would be worse off without its family-friendly policies.
"In the last 15 years, Norway's generous support system has not been weakened. If that had happened, the total fertility rate would likely have been even lower than the current 1.44," he said."
Løken agreed, saying: "This uncertainty does not rule out the potential role of family policies in addressing the issue."
"Measures that provide families with more financial support or time could, in theory, influence the opportunity costs associated with couple formation and having children," she continued.
But she added: "Most studies examining the impact of family policies on fertility find only modest and short-term effects-typically influencing the timing of childbirth rather than the total number of children people have."
Løken went on to call for a "more ambitious policy direction" involving "efforts to reduce screen time, enhance community and social engagement opportunities, and shift cultural norms around relationships and fertility, particularly among people in their 20s."
In its interim report, the Birth Rate Committee looked at offering additional child allowance for parents younger than 30 years old and better education about the ability to have children and pre-pregnancy help.
Related Articles
World No. 1 Chess Grandmaster Slams Table After Surprise Defeat: VideoNorway To Randomly Select 100,000 Millennials, Gen Z For Tax CutsChinese Must Remove Stone Lions from the Arctic: ReportsPhoenix Ikner Updates: New Details Emerge on FSU Shooter's Childhood
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
9 hours ago
- Newsweek
Most Republicans Enrolled in Medicaid 'Worried' About Funding Cuts—Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. While Republicans in Congress have been pushing for major Medicaid cuts in the new budget, many Medicaid enrollees are worried about what this means for their health coverage — including those who identify as Republican. A new poll from KFF revealed that 76 percent of Republicans enrolled in Medicaid are worried about potential funding cuts. The survey also shows that 17 percent of Republicans identify as Medicaid enrollees. This didn't come as a surprise to experts who spoke with Newsweek. "Many of the heavily Republican-controlled states are often the highest per capita recipients of government assistance," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. Why It Matters Republican lawmakers have advanced sweeping changes to Medicaid as part of their budget reconciliation package, known as the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act." The bill, which passed the House in late May 2025, proposes to cut over $700 billion in federal Medicaid spending, threatening coverage for millions of Americans. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that more than 10 million people could lose Medicaid coverage if the proposal becomes law. Beds and medical equipment are seen inside the US Navy hospital ship USNS Comfort while docked at the Port of Miami, Biscayne Bay, Miami, Florida on June 3, 2025. Beds and medical equipment are seen inside the US Navy hospital ship USNS Comfort while docked at the Port of Miami, Biscayne Bay, Miami, Florida on June 3, 2025. CHANDAN KHANNA/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Potential Medicaid reductions under the new legislation target several key areas, including the federal match for Medicaid expansion, spending caps, new work requirements, and more frequent eligibility checks. While the GOP viewpoint has historically been pro-Medicaid reductions, cuts at this level could significantly impact the nearly 80 million Americans who rely on the program for health insurance, including a significant number of Republicans. In the new KFF report, 76 percent of Republicans enrolled in Medicaid said they were worried about potential funding cuts. Additionally, more than a quarter of Medicaid enrollees are Republican, including one in five who identify with MAGA. "As a government program, Medicaid provides benefits to millions of Americans in 'red' and 'blue' states," Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek. "As such, it should come as no surprise a sizable number of Republicans either receive benefits from the program or know someone who does." The federal government currently pays 90 percent of Medicaid expansion costs, but proposed reductions would lower this rate, threatening financial stability for states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. Changes could also introduce per-capita caps or block grants, limit the use of provider taxes to finance Medicaid, and roll back simplified enrollment rules implemented under President Biden. Together, these measures could force states to limit enrollment, reduce benefits, or impose new costs on enrollees. Republican leaders have tied these reductions to broader budget goals, including $4.5 trillion in tax cuts championed by former President Donald Trump. "Many of the heavily Republican-controlled states are often the highest per capita recipients of government assistance," Thompson told Newsweek. "That's not meant to be disingenuous—it simply shows where the power lies: with the wealthy who control the districts and seats in those regions. The truth is, people often vote for their party and don't believe these policies will ever impact them personally—until they do." House Republicans identified more than $880 billion in savings from Medicaid, with much of the debate focused on whether Medicaid should continue to support able-bodied adults without dependents, or remain narrowly focused on children, seniors, and people with disabilities. The bill would also restrict Medicaid funding for certain health care providers, such as Planned Parenthood, and prohibit federal matching funds for gender-affirming care for minors. Nationally, 54 percent of U.S. adults are worried that reductions in federal Medicaid spending would negatively impact their own or their family's ability to get and pay for health care, the KFF report found. "It's a wake-up call for anyone who thinks Medicaid is just a Democratic issue," Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of told Newsweek. "Medicaid isn't red or blue. It's the safety net stretched under millions of American families, including a significant slice of the GOP base." What People Are Saying Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "Over the last three election cycles, the Republican base has expanded far past the days of simply promoting tax cuts and has a large number of supporters who rely on programs like Medicaid for essential services. And while cuts to the program could occur, we've already seen blowback to any proposed reductions. That's more than likely because some Republican members of Congress know cuts could dramatically affect their reelection chances." Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of told Newsweek: "There's a real disconnect between the political talking points and reality. Many Republican voters may not realize just how much their communities (especially rural ones) depend on Medicaid to keep hospitals open and doctors in town. The myth that Medicaid is for 'someone else' is crumbling fast." Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "There will be a significant number of people kicked off the Medicaid program—either because they didn't submit their work requirements on time, were removed due to the rollback of Medicaid expansion, or simply no longer qualify." What Happens Next Ryan said if the cuts are enacted, rural hospitals will close, and working-class families will lose their health coverage. "The fallout will land squarely in the heart of Republican country," Ryan said. "You can't gut the safety net and expect your own voters to walk away unscathed." "Medicaid cuts are political dynamite. History shows voters punish politicians who take away health coverage. Just ask Missouri and Tennessee. If Republicans push too hard, they risk alienating their own base."
Newsweek
12 hours ago
- Newsweek
Alert Urging People To Monitor Themselves for Coughs Spreads to 3 States
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Air quality alerts advising people to monitor themselves for symptoms such as coughing are in place for three states, with other warnings about poor air quality extending further as Canadian wildfire smoke descends into the U.S. In addition to respiratory symptoms such as coughing, exposure to wildfire smoke could cause an uptick in heart attacks and strokes, Dr. Scott Budinger, the chief of pulmonary and critical care in the Department of Medicine at Northwestern University, told Newsweek. Why It Matters Smoke from the Canadian wildfires has degraded air quality in the Upper Midwest for the past week. In some instances, smoke has impacted sunsets as far south as the Gulf Coast, with people warned of physical impact as far south as the Plains states. As of Friday, air quality alerts advising people to move indoors if they begin to cough are in place for Maine, Michigan and Wisconsin. Other air quality alerts are in place in Nebraska, the Great Lakes and parts of the Northeast. A stock image shows a man coughing. A stock image shows a man coughing. Liubomyr Vorona/Getty What To Know Most air quality alerts warning of symptoms like coughing were set to expire by noon on Friday, although they could be reissued. The alert in Maine included the cities of Allagash, Clayton Lake, Lincoln, Howland and Springfield, among others. "People who may be especially sensitive to the effects of elevated levels of pollutants include the very young, the elderly, those with pre-existing respiratory problems such as asthma, those with heart disease and anyone who is working hard outdoors," an alert from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection said. "But if you experience symptoms such as shortness of breath, coughing, throat irritation or an uncomfortable sensation in your chest please consider limiting the intensity and duration of your outdoor activities." In Michigan, the alert was in place for cities such as Benton Harbor, Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, Ludington and others. "Smoke associated with Canada wildfires persists over the state today," the Michigan alert said. "Levels of PM2.5 into the Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups (USG) range are expected and reading could reach the Unhealthy (Red AQI) range for a short period of time." In Wisconsin, the alert was in place for areas along the Lake Michigan shoreline. What People Are Saying NWS Weather Prediction Center meteorologist Marc Chenard told Newsweek: "To some extent, there's going to be some smoke that's lingering in the Midwest, Great Lakes and into the Northeast through the weekend. "It generally looks like the concentration will be on a downward trend, so that might mean some of the air quality won't be quite as impacted but there will likely still be periods of smoke." An air quality alert in Wisconsin: "Make outdoor activities shorter and less intense. It is OK to be active outdoors but take more breaks. Watch for symptoms such as coughing or shortness of breath. People with asthma: Follow your asthma action plan and keep quick relief medicine handy. People with heart disease: Symptoms such as palpitations, shortness of breath, or unusual fatigue may indicate a serious problem. If you have any of these, contact your health care provider." What Happens Next If someone's cough lasts for seven days or is associated with breathlessness, they should see a doctor. Most of the air quality alerts will expire on Friday.
Miami Herald
16 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Nordic Parents Have It Great-But Birth Rates Are Still Falling
Much of the world is facing a birth rate crisis, and Norway is no exception despite implementing many of the policies governments, activists, and experts have touted. Newsweek has broken down why. Many trying to tackle this global issue have called for public health policies and financial plans to help make it easier for couples to have children in society. The financial crisis and its impact on housing, inflation and pay is generally cited a major contributor to people's decisions to delay having children, to have fewer children or not to have them at all. Parental leave and childcare come up just as often, with multiple experts telling Newsweek that improved policies in these areas would be a game-changer. Norway is considered a global leader in parental leave and childcare policies, with the United Nations International Children's Fund (UNICEF) ranking it among the top countries for family-friendly policies. "The Nordic model is characterized by strong institutional support for families with children," Rannveig Kaldager Hart, a senior researcher at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health's Centre for Fertility and Health, told Newsweek. Norway offers parents 12 months of shared paid leave for birth and an additional year each afterward. It also made kindergarten (similar to a U.S. day care) a statutory right for all children 1 year of age or older in 2008, which the government has subsidized to make it possible for "women and men to combine work and family life," as Norway's former Minister of Children, Equality, and Social Inclusion Solveig Horne said at a parental leave event in 2016. And yet, Norway's fertility rate has dropped dramatically from 1.98 children per woman in 2009 to 1.44 children per woman in 2024, according to official figures. The rate for 2023 (1.40) was the lowest-ever recorded fertility rate in the country. Oslo created a Birth Rate Committee to investigate the causes, consequences and possible solutions of Norway's birth rate problem last year. It found that "an important cause is that fewer people are having their first child before age 30" and fewer people have more than two children, Hart, who is also the Committee's chair, said. Professor Katrine Vellesen Løken, from the Norwegian School of Economics, told Newsweek that "one leading hypothesis points to lower rates of couple formation for those in their 20s, which in turn contribute to reduced fertility." "While Norway has eased some financial barriers, that's only part of the picture; other psychological, cultural, and structural factors matter too," said Theodore Cosco, a research fellow at the Oxford Institute of Population Ageing. "Parenting is shaped by many factors, and Norway is beginning to reckon with those beyond just financial support, especially the deeper challenges of parenting itself," he told Newsweek. Indeed, Hart also said that "young adults are more likely to live alone" and "young couples split up more frequently than before." He went on to speak about "intensive parenting," which refers to the modern parenting style in which parents invest time, money and energy into creating successful adults. The expectations of this parenting style "may cause some to postpone or have fewer children than they otherwise would," Hart said. Øystein Kravdal, who was a demography professor at the University of Oslo for almost three decades, said the same. "One may also wonder whether young adults to an increasing extent are being exposed to overwhelming expectations about how 'intensely' one should care for a child to be a responsible parent," he told Newsweek. So does this mean that Norway's progressive parental leave and childcare policies should not be part of other countries' solutions? Cosco does not think Norway's approach should be dismissed globally. "Norway shouldn't be seen as a failure," he said. "Fertility is a complex issue that requires a multi-pronged approach." Kravdal argued that Norway would be worse off without its family-friendly policies. "In the last 15 years, Norway's generous support system has not been weakened. If that had happened, the total fertility rate would likely have been even lower than the current 1.44," he said." Løken agreed, saying: "This uncertainty does not rule out the potential role of family policies in addressing the issue." "Measures that provide families with more financial support or time could, in theory, influence the opportunity costs associated with couple formation and having children," she continued. But she added: "Most studies examining the impact of family policies on fertility find only modest and short-term effects-typically influencing the timing of childbirth rather than the total number of children people have." Løken went on to call for a "more ambitious policy direction" involving "efforts to reduce screen time, enhance community and social engagement opportunities, and shift cultural norms around relationships and fertility, particularly among people in their 20s." In its interim report, the Birth Rate Committee looked at offering additional child allowance for parents younger than 30 years old and better education about the ability to have children and pre-pregnancy help. Related Articles World No. 1 Chess Grandmaster Slams Table After Surprise Defeat: VideoNorway To Randomly Select 100,000 Millennials, Gen Z For Tax CutsChinese Must Remove Stone Lions from the Arctic: ReportsPhoenix Ikner Updates: New Details Emerge on FSU Shooter's Childhood 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
