Hear Me Out: Racism by a thousand microaggressions is a mixed-race kid's reality
Writer Sarah Stanley with her mother and father celebrating Christmas as a child. ST PHOTO: SARAH STANLEY
Hear Me Out: Racism by a thousand microaggressions is a mixed-race kid's reality
SINGAPORE – When I was 14, a schoolmate accused me of not being proud of my Indian heritage.
At the time, I was too young to unpack the deeper implications of that statement. I replayed the moment repeatedly, wondering what I had done – or failed to do – to merit the verdict.
Was it the times I chose to banter in Mandarin – my second language in school – during hangouts? Or that I voted to eat at a steamboat place instead of a prata restaurant? Or was it because I had never travelled to India before?
In my adolescence, such criticism provoked more annoyance than deep thought.
Today – 16 years after the fact – it seems more like my schoolmate's misconstrued observation of how mixed-race kids like myself negotiate identity in different social settings.
Academics often describe the relationship between race and identity as 'complex', and typically agree that while race is a social construct undetermined by biological factors, it has a great impact on identity formation – a core part of being human.
As a child of Indian-Chinese parentage, my upbringing was diverse.
I grew up spending Saturdays at my Indian grandmother's house watching SunTV – a Tamil-language entertainment television channel – and eating my fill of rasam, a South Indian soup-like dish, and basmati rice.
Sundays were spent at my Chinese grandmother's house quaffing liang cha, or herbal teas, and listening in on Hokkien conversations I could not fully understand.
Writer Sarah Stanley (second from left) celebrates Chinese New Year as a child at her maternal grandmother's house with her cousins.
ST PHOTO: COURTESY OF SARAH STANLEY
For most part, this duality shaped how I learnt to observe and adapt to different social settings. But the richness of my childhood was also plagued by unsolicited comments, jokes tinged with casual racism and compliments that came with a sting.
I've been called 'exotic' umpteen times in many ways – a backhanded compliment that exoticises difference while simultaneously 'othering' it.
I've been told I am 'fair' and asked whether my father is 'South or North Indian' – a thinly veiled inquiry into his skin colour.
Writer Sarah Stanley as a child with her father at the Singapore Zoo.
ST PHOTO: COURTESY OF SARAH STANLEY
I've heard far too many jokes – often in poor imitations of Chinese or Indian accents – followed by expectant stares, as if being mixed-race meant I should find these stereotypes amusing or at least familiar.
And I've had both Chinese and Indian acquaintances make disparaging remarks about each other's communities, assuming that I would side with them, or that my partial affiliation granted them permission to share these with me.
In these moments, I became acutely aware of how often mixed-race individuals are expected to either remain silent or become ambassadors for one half of their heritage – whichever half best suits the situation.
Dr Amy Lim, discipline lead for psychology at Murdoch University Singapore, explains that people's psychology 'equips us with a remarkable capacity for cognitive frame-switching'.
'We subconsciously pick up contextual cues that tell us which identity should be 'in use' at the moment, helping us behave appropriately and feel like we belong,' she says, adding that mixed-race individuals often engage in an ongoing negotiation of identities.
How biracial individuals perceive this tension – as conflicting or complementary – can shape confidence, creativity and our sense of belonging.
Having more than one identity may offer a buffer, helping us navigate and resist stereotypes with greater psychological flexibility.
Perhaps it was why in the recent General Election, when Singapore Democratic Party's (SDP) Gigene Wong called her running teammate Ariffin Sha 'keling kia' – now seen as a derogatory term used to demean people of Indian descent – I was outraged, but not overly offended.
Dr Lim explains that stereotype threat – the fear of confirming a negative stereotype about your group – often impacts how you respond to racism.
'By shifting our self-salience towards an identity associated with more positive stereotypes, we activate a different set of expectations and self-beliefs,' she says.
In other words, mixed-race individuals may instinctively lean on one part of their identity to cope with racial bias directed at another.
In some ways, it explains how in that moment during the SDP rally, I may have subconsciously toggled between my Indian and Chinese identities – landing somewhere between empathy and indignation.
People often say being biracial is an advantage. And while there is truth in that, my reality as a mixed-race millennial feels more complicated.
I straddle two generations – the younger, increasingly vocal about the harms of casual racism; and the older, who grew up in a time when such linguistic nuances were rarely scrutinised.
In mid-June, I turn 30 and at this point in my life, facing racial microaggressions is less of a struggle and more a daily exercise in empathy and calling out what needs to change.
I don't laugh off racist jokes as often as I used to. And when the situation calls for it, I call out racist remarks out for what they are, even among friends.
So, no, I was not ashamed of my Indian heritage at 14. I was simply trying to make room for all the parts of me in a world that kept asking me to pick a side.
I have come to see that many of the comments and assumptions I faced weren't really about me – they were about others trying to make sense of difference using limited, often racialised frames.
I don't think I ever really picked a side. And now, I don't think I ever will.
Hear Me Out is a new series where young journalists (over)share on topics ranging from navigating friendships to self-loathing, and the occasional intrusive thought.
Check out the Headstart chatbot for answers to your questions on careers and work trends.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
34 minutes ago
- Straits Times
White House calls South Korea election ‘fair', expresses concern about Chinese influence
In recent days, right-wing allies of US President Donald Trump have taken aim at Mr Lee Jae-myung. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG WASHINGTON - The White House said on June 3 that South Korea's election, which saw liberal party candidate Lee Jae-myung win the presidency, was fair, but it expressed concern about Chinese interference. "The US-ROK Alliance remains ironclad. While South Korea had a free and fair election, the United States remains concerned and opposed to Chinese interference and influence in democracies around the world," a White House official said in an emailed response to a Reuters request for comment made at an earlier White House briefing. "ROK" refers to the Republic of Korea. The official did not elaborate on the reference to alleged Chinese interference or connect it directly to the South Korean election. In recent days, however, right-wing allies of US President Donald Trump have taken aim at Lee, who has spoken of the need to balance Seoul's relations with China and the United States. Ms Laura Loomer, a far-right activist who has jockeyed her way up from online agitator to self-appointed Mr Trump adviser, posted "RIP South Korea" on X on June 3 after Lee's victory became clear. "The communists have taken over Korea and won the Presidential election today," she wrote. "This is terrible," she added. Ms Loomer has shown herself to be highly influential: Several high-ranking White House officials were fired in 2024 after she presented Mr Trump with a list of national security staffers she perceived to be disloyal. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a statement congratulating Lee, and like the White House spoke about the two countries' alliance, also calling it "ironclad." He made no mention of concerns about China. "The United States and the Republic of Korea share an ironclad commitment to the Alliance grounded in our Mutual Defence Treaty, shared values, and deep economic ties," Mr Rubio said. "We are also modernising the Alliance to meet the demands of today's strategic environment and address new economic challenges." Mr Rubio also said the United States would continue to deepen trilateral cooperation with South Korea and Japan, 'to bolster regional security, enhance economic resilience, and defend our shared democratic principles.' As South Korea's ousted former president, Yoon Suk Yeol, fought for his political life earlier in 2025, he raised unsubstantiated claims about possible fraud in South Korea's elections as one reason for his announcement of a martial law decree that had prompted his ouster. His backers adopted "Stop the Steal" slogans and expressed hopes that Mr Trump would intervene to help, but that never came. Last week, without providing evidence, Mr Trump ally Mike Flynn, a retired general who briefly served as the president's national security adviser during his first term, referred in a post on X to "signs of fraud" in the South Korea election, and said a fraudulent outcome would only benefit the Chinese Communist Party. Another Mr Trump ally, Mr Steve Bannon, explored a similar theme of Chinese election interference on his WarRoom channel last week. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Marco Rubio praises bravery of Chinese people killed in Tiananmen Square crackdown
Mr Marco Rubio said the CCP actively tries to censor the facts, but the world will never forget. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON - US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on June 3 praised the bravery of the Chinese people who were killed in a bloody crackdown on pro-democracy protesters at Tiananmen Square in Beijing 36 years ago. "Today we commemorate the bravery of the Chinese people who were killed as they tried to exercise their fundamental freedoms, as well as those who continue to suffer persecution as they seek accountability and justice for the events of June 4, 1989," Mr Rubio said in a statement. "The CCP actively tries to censor the facts, but the world will never forget," he said, referring to the Chinese Communist Party. The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment. Chinese tanks rolled into the square before dawn on June 4, 1989, and troops opened fire to end weeks of pro-democracy demonstrations by students and workers. The ruling Communist Party has never released a death toll, though rights groups and witnesses say the figure could run into the thousands. The events are a taboo topic in China and the anniversary is not marked or publicly discussed, although public commemorations take place annually in overseas cities. "Their courage in the face of certain danger reminds us that the principles of freedom, democracy, and self-rule are not just American principles. They are human principles the CCP cannot erase," Mr Rubio said. The statement from the US' top diplomat comes at a rocky time in the US -China relationship. Since beginning his second White House term on January 20, US President Donald Trump has unleashed 145 per cent tariffs on most Chinese goods over what his administration sees as decades of trade abuses by China. Beijing responded with its own 125 per cent tariffs on US products. Officials from the two sides agreed in Geneva to dial back the triple-digit tariffs for 90 days, but have yet to address the underlying reasons for Mr Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods, mainly longstanding US complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. Senior US officials have said this week that Mr Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would speak soon to iron out trade issues, including a dispute over critical minerals and China's restrictions on exports of certain minerals. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told a regular news briefing on June 3 the Trump administration "is actively monitoring China's compliance with the Geneva trade agreement," and added that "there will be a leader-to-leader talk very soon." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Rubio praises bravery of Chinese people killed in Tiananmen Square crackdown
FILE PHOTO: U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio testifies at a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on U.S. President Donald Trump's State Department budget request for the Department of State, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 21, 2025. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday praised the bravery of the Chinese people who were killed in a bloody crackdown on pro-democracy protesters at Tiananmen Square in Beijing 36 years ago. "Today we commemorate the bravery of the Chinese people who were killed as they tried to exercise their fundamental freedoms, as well as those who continue to suffer persecution as they seek accountability and justice for the events of June 4, 1989," Rubio said in a statement. "The CCP actively tries to censor the facts, but the world will never forget," he said, referring to the Chinese Communist Party. The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment. Chinese tanks rolled into the square before dawn on June 4, 1989, and troops opened fire to end weeks of pro-democracy demonstrations by students and workers. The ruling Communist Party has never released a death toll, though rights groups and witnesses say the figure could run into the thousands. The events are a taboo topic in China and the anniversary is not marked or publicly discussed, although public commemorations take place annually in overseas cities. "Their courage in the face of certain danger reminds us that the principles of freedom, democracy, and self-rule are not just American principles. They are human principles the CCP cannot erase," Rubio said. The statement from the U.S.'s top diplomat comes at a rocky time in the U.S.-China relationship. Since beginning his second White House term on January 20, U.S. President Donald Trump has unleashed 145% tariffs on most Chinese goods over what his administration sees as decades of trade abuses by China. Beijing responded with its own 125% tariffs on U.S. products. Officials from the two sides agreed in Geneva to dial back the triple-digit tariffs for 90 days, but have yet to address the underlying reasons for Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods, mainly longstanding U.S. complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. Senior U.S. officials have said this week that Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would speak soon to iron out trade issues, including a dispute over critical minerals and China's restrictions on exports of certain minerals. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told a regular news briefing on Tuesday the Trump administration "is actively monitoring China's compliance with the Geneva trade agreement," and added that "there will be a leader-to-leader talk very soon." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.