India's Voronezh Radar from Chitradurga Could Break China and Pakistan's Strategic Backbone
In a world where security threats are evolving faster than ever, India is considering a bold move that could transform its defence landscape. Reports suggest India is eyeing Russia's advanced Voronezh Over-the-Horizon (OTH) radar system, a $4.5 billion deal that would place the nation among an elite group—alongside the United States, Russia, and China—as operators of this cutting-edge technology. If this deal goes through, it could be a defining moment for India's strategic capabilities, offering unmatched surveillance over vast regions and a critical edge against modern threats. A Radar Like No Other
The Voronezh radar is no ordinary system. Unlike India's existing ground-based radars, such as the Israeli-made Green Pine (500 km range) or the homegrown Swordfish (1,500 km range), the Voronezh can 'see' far beyond the Earth's curvature. It uses high-frequency radio waves that bounce off the ionosphere, allowing it to detect objects up to 8,000 km vertically and 6,000 km horizontally. What is the ionosphere?
The ionosphere is a special layer of Earth's atmosphere, starting about 50 km above the surface and extending up to 1,000 km. It's filled with charged particles (ions) that reflect radio waves back to Earth—almost like a giant invisible mirror in the sky. This unique quality makes long-distance communication and radar detection over the horizon possible. By bouncing signals off this layer, the Voronezh radar can 'see' far beyond what the eye—or conventional radar—can.
This means it could spot stealth aircraft, fighter jets, and ballistic missiles—including long-range intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs)—launched from as far away as China or Pakistan.
For a country like India, located in a tense neighbourhood with ongoing border disputes, this capability is a game-changer. The radar's ability to provide several minutes of early warning—compared to mere seconds with current systems—could mean the difference between a successful defence and a devastating strike. Imagine detecting China's anti-ship DF-21D missiles or Pakistan's Shaheen-III missiles long before they reach Indian territory. That's the kind of strategic advantage the Voronezh offers.
Why This Matters Now
India's security challenges have grown more complex in recent years, especially since the 2020 border tensions with China along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). China's advanced J-20 and J-35 stealth fighters and Pakistan's missile developments, including hypersonic and multiple-warhead (MIRV) missiles, pose serious threats. Conventional radars struggle to detect these low-flying or stealth platforms due to line-of-sight limitations. The Voronezh, with its Very High Frequency (VHF) and Ultra High Frequency (UHF) bands, is designed to counter such challenges, making it a perfect fit for India's needs.
If placed in Chitradurga, Karnataka—a hub for India's Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO)—the radar could monitor Chinese missile sites near the LAC, Pakistani deployments, and even maritime activities across the Indian Ocean Region (IOR). This would not only strengthen India's deterrence against its neighbours but also boost its role in regional security frameworks like the Quad, enhancing its standing in the Indo-Pacific. A Boost for 'Make in India'
What makes this deal even more compelling is its alignment with India's 'Make in India' initiative. The proposal includes 60% local manufacturing, likely involving major Indian firms like Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) and Tata Advanced Systems. This would create skilled jobs, build technical expertise, and reduce long-term maintenance costs. For a country striving to become self-reliant in defence production, this is a golden opportunity to absorb advanced technology while strengthening the domestic industry.
The Voronezh's modular, prefabricated design also means it can be assembled in months, not years, unlike older radar systems. This rapid deployment capability ensures India can quickly enhance its defence infrastructure, addressing urgent security needs. The Cost Question
At $4.5 billion (roughly ₹40,000 crore), the price tag is steep, and it's bound to spark debate. India's defence budget is stretched across multiple priorities—from modernizing the armed forces to developing indigenous weapons. Critics may argue that the funds could be better spent elsewhere. However, the Voronezh's unmatched range and capabilities make it a strategic investment. Some experts even call it a 'strategic steal' given its potential to counter stealth and missile threats from India's adversaries.
The deal would likely proceed under a government-to-government agreement, possibly using rupee-rouble trade mechanisms to bypass international sanctions on Russia. However, India must carefully navigate potential risks under the U.S.'s Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), which could complicate relations with Washington. A balanced diplomatic approach will be key to securing this technology without straining ties with other partners. A Step Toward Strategic Autonomy
For India, acquiring the Voronezh radar is about more than just defence—it's about asserting strategic autonomy in a multipolar world. By joining the exclusive club of nations with OTH radar capabilities, India would signal its readiness to tackle 21st-century threats head-on. The system's ability to monitor vast areas—from Chinese naval movements in the IOR to missile launches deep in enemy territory—would give India a massive edge in situational awareness.
Moreover, this deal strengthens India's longstanding defence partnership with Russia. Moscow's willingness to offer technology transfers could pave the way for deeper collaboration, further boosting India's indigenous capabilities. At a time when global alliances are shifting, this partnership underscores India's ability to maintain diverse ties while prioritizing its national interests. The Road Ahead
The Voronezh radar represents a transformative opportunity for India, but it's not without challenges. The high cost, geopolitical risks, and the need to integrate this system with existing defences will require careful planning.
Yet, the benefits—enhanced early warning, superior threat detection, and alignment with 'Make in India'—make a compelling case for moving forward. As India stands at a crossroads, the decision to acquire the Voronezh radar could define its defence strategy for decades.
It's a bold step toward securing the nation's future in an increasingly unpredictable world. For a country with big ambitions and bigger challenges, this could be the leap that cements India's place as a global security powerhouse—with Chitradurga at its command post.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'Life is full of unexpected surprises': The mystery of Iran's robotic voice calls amid blackout
As Iran reels from escalating conflict and sweeping internet restrictions, a new and deeply unsettling phenomenon has gripped the Iranian diaspora : calls to loved ones inside the country are being intercepted by robotic, pre-recorded voice messages. This bizarre development, first widely reported after a nationwide internet blackout, has left families anxious, experts puzzled, and the world asking—who is really behind the voice on the line? 'Life is full of unexpected surprises, and while some of these can bring joy, others may present challenges.' For Iranians and their families, the greatest challenge now is simply being heard. A disturbing new reality for Iranians abroad Since Wednesday, Iranians living in the UK, U.S., and across Europe have described a surreal experience: dialing family members' mobile numbers in Iran, only to be greeted by a mechanical voice. The message, sometimes in English and sometimes in Farsi , ranges from eerily philosophical to outright nonsensical. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like How Much Money Should You Have Before Hiring a Financial Advisor? SmartAsset Learn More Undo It urges the listener to 'close your eyes and imagine a peaceful place'. Other callers have encountered a more stilted, AI-generated voice with not so perfect English being heard speaking: 'Alo? Alo? Who is calling? I can't heard you. Who you want to speak with? I'm Alyssia. Do you remember me? I think I don't know who are you'. Live Events For many, the experience is not just unsettling—it's terrifying. 'Calling your mom and expecting to hear her voice and hearing an AI voice is one of the scariest things I've ever experienced,' said a 30-year-old woman in New York. Who is behind the voice? The origins and purpose of the robotic messages remain shrouded in mystery. Five telecommunications and cybersecurity experts who reviewed recordings for AP offered several theories: Government Control: Four out of five experts believe the Iranian government is likely responsible, using the messages as a tool to restrict, monitor, or confuse communications during a period of heightened security concerns. Iranian cybersecurity specialists suggest the diversions may also serve to prevent hacking attempts or sow confusion among the population. Foreign Interference: One expert posited that Israel or another foreign actor could be behind the calls, as a form of psychological warfare . Technical Explanation: Alp Toker , director of NetBlocks, explained that during internet outages, calls may be redirected to a default gateway message. The content, he noted, appears hastily generated using text-to-speech or AI, and is likely a standard fallback when calls cannot be completed. Notably, neither the Iranian nor Israeli governments have commented on the phenomenon, and the true source remains unconfirmed. The human toll: isolation and helplessness The timing of these messages is critical. They began as Israel launched airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military sites, prompting retaliatory missile and drone strikes from Iran. In response, the Iranian government imposed a sweeping internet blackout, cutting off WhatsApp and other messaging services. With digital communication down, families turned to direct phone calls—only to find this new barrier. For many, the inability to reach family is more than an inconvenience. Ellie, a British-Iranian, described her desperation to contact her diabetic mother in Tehran, who was running low on insulin and trapped on the city's outskirts. 'I don't know why they're doing this,' she said, her voice breaking. As of Saturday, NetBlocks reported that international internet access was partially restored in some regions after 62 hours of severe disruption. Yet, overall connectivity remains below normal, and many Iranians—both inside and outside the country—are still struggling to reconnect with family and access independent information.
Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
Delhi govt mulls bringing back private liquor vends under new excise policy
Private players could make a comeback in Delhi's liquor shops. The Delhi BJP government, which is preparing a new excise policy, is considering reintroducing private liquor shops in the Capital — just as it was in the old excise regime before 2021. The government plans to implement the new policy by July 1 with an aim to increase revenue, curb corruption and bring transparency. According to sources, the government is likely to provide licences to private players to provide a good walk-in experience for customers. 'About 100-150 private liquor shops, mostly in malls and other premium locations, are being considered. The numbers will be finalised once the policy is ready. The modalities of how to issue the licence, whether through an e-auction or e-lottery, are currently being discussed. A meeting of a high-level committee set up to prepare the policy, which is headed by the Chief Secretary, was also held on Friday. Issues such as the number of shops, licensing, etc, were discussed,' sources said. Under the pre-2021 policy, both government and private liquor shops operated in Delhi. In November 2021, the government — the AAP was in power at the time — had exited the liquor business and handed things over to private vendors, with an aim to cut down corruption. The policy soon ran into controversy and investigations by multiple agencies like the Enforcement Directorate and the Central Bureau of Investigation. In 2022, the government scrapped this policy and brought back the old excise regime — but only liquor shops run by government corporations were allowed to operate. Almost all top AAP — including former chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh, and former deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia — were jailed in the case. Currently, a major issue facing Delhi is the unavailability of popular and good quality brands of whisky, beer, vodka, gin, and several others. 'Some popular brands are not in Delhi as their parent company was blacklisted from selling liquor in the national capital following complaints of irregularities and court cases during the implementation of the now-scrapped liquor policy… Less popular brands have entered the scene, which has pushed customers to neighbouring states… The government is planning to increase the availability of popular brands and is likely to reintroduce some that are currently not available in Delhi shops…,' said sources. Popular choices like Chivas Regal, Blenders Pride and Royal Stag, part of the Pernod Ricard brand, are not available in Delhi. Pernod Ricard India's application for an L-1 licence was rejected earlier. Benoy Babu, a regional manager at PRI, was a witness in the CBI's excise case. Babu was eventually arrested by the ED. Meanwhile, discussions on rationalising brand licence fees and retail margins are also underway, said sources, adding that excise duty and retail licensing are also likely to be increased under the new policy. 'The retail margin cap is Rs 50 for Indian-Made Foreign Liquor and Rs 100 for foreign liquor. This is on a per-bottle basis. Government-run shops have monopolised the retail business by pushing less popular brands at the range of Rs 400 to Rs 600, instead of stocking premium brands. Also, cheaper brands sell fast… Thus, discussions are on to rationalise these margins to increase revenue as well as make premium brands available for customers,' said sources. Industry sources said private retailers have started searching for properties in the city to set up shop. Currently, there are over 700 liquor shops in Delhi run by the four government corporations — Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation, Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation, Delhi Consumer's Cooperative Whole-sale Store and Delhi State Civil Supplies Corporation. The Excise Department has asked the four corporations to carry out document validation online by June 30. Last week, Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said several reforms will be incorporated into the new policy, including scientific testing of liquor quality, digitisation of the sale system, curbing illegal sales, and ensuring transparency in the licensing process. The high-level committee is also studying policies implemented in Delhi earlier and those in neighbouring states.
Mint
7 hours ago
- Mint
Trump's ‘Two Weeks' Pause on Iran Strikes Comes With High Stakes
President Donald Trump often suggests that something will happen in 'two weeks' when he's looking to buy himself some time. But his latest two-weeks declaration — on possible US military strikes in Iran — comes with unusually high stakes. The pause, after days of bellicose rhetoric and social posts about evacuating Tehran, rattled markets in the region, triggered new threats from the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen, led Iranian officials to call the US Israel's 'partner in crime' and left Israel in a holding pattern. Because by now the world knows that Trump's 'two weeks' could mean two days, two months or never, his delay this time only fed the uncertainty. Regional equities slid on Friday, despite a sustained surge in oil prices that would typically support sentiment in Gulf economies. Israel — a US ally with particularly close ties to Trump — has been placed in a holding pattern. It launched its attacks arguing that Iran's nuclear capabilities must be neutralized. But experts say it will be hard for Israel to destroy Iran's most fortified uranium enrichment facility, the Fordow plant, without the bunker-busting bombs only the US has. The US military launched several long-range stealth B-2 bombers — the kind that could carry the 30,000-pound bombs — from Missouri over the Pacific, according to media reports, possibly positioning them in case of a strike. The Wall Street Journal cited officials saying that no order has been given to ready an operation. 'For the Israelis it does put them in a bind,' said Illan Goldenberg, a former White House and Pentagon official who worked on Iran issues. 'They'd prefer this not go on for weeks and months.' 'My guess is they have some kind of option for Fordow, but it's not as good as our option for Fordow,' said Goldenberg, a senior vice president at J Street, a liberal Israel lobbying group focused on creating a two-state solution. The Israelis 'put themselves in this limbo by launching a war and putting their faith in Donald Trump to come and finish the job.' Israeli officials told the White House in what was described as a tense phone call on Thursday that two weeks is too long to wait for Iran to reach a deal to dismantle its nuclear program, Reuters reported Saturday. Iran, meanwhile, could seek to disrupt oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint for roughly 20% of global crude flows. Even without a direct move by Tehran, nearly 1,000 vessels daily have reported GPS jamming near the narrow passage separating Iran from its Arab neighbors, according to the French naval liaison body MICA Center. The Houthis, an Iran-backed militia in Yemen, threatened on Saturday to target US vessels and battleships if the US joins Israeli attacks. The conflict started June 13 when Israel, saying it had evidence that Iran was close to achieving nuclear weapons capability, launched a series of missile attacks on Iran, which has returned missile attacks. Keeping the world guessing Trump for years has had a penchant for setting two-week deadlines, sometimes following through and at other times missing them or never acting at all, making 'within two weeks' a stock phrase for pending decisions in both his White House terms. On Friday, Trump kept the world guessing on his next steps. Speaking to reporters in New Jersey, he called himself a 'peacemaker' and dismissed the idea of sending in ground troops. He both suggested he wanted a diplomatic path and said he might support a ceasefire, but also kept a military threat alive, describing the two-week time frame as a maximum. 'I'm giving them a period of time,' he declared. Israel has pressed Trump to offer support, but in return Trump has only offered a run of tough commentary. European diplomats have stepped in to try to de-escalate tensions by talking to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi with little to show for it but a dismissive remark from Trump. Trump won the presidency twice promising not to get the US involved in the kinds of intractable Middle East wars he savaged his predecessors over. His most fervent MAGA supporters have been urging him publicly and privately to avoid military action in keeping with his 'America First' position. Since Israel's assault on Iran started, Israelis have faced hundreds of ballistic missiles and 1,000 drone attacks launched by Tehran. Iran has lost a slew of military officials, with more than 400 people dead and several nuclear facilities and related infrastructure destroyed or damaged. Israel, which has been waging a military campaign in Gaza since Hamas militants attacked the country on Oct. 7, 2023, may struggle to sustain a war against Tehran. The US is already working to replenish Israel's defenses as they deplete their stock of interceptors. And Israeli officials say Trump's pause means the war will last even longer. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisted the Jewish state will 'achieve all of our objectives,' including rendering Fordow inoperable. Trump cited hopes for negotiations as part of his aim for the 'two-week' pause. But Iranians refuse to negotiate with the US while an Israeli assault continues, and the talks with European leaders appeared to make little progress. Trump expressed skepticism about those efforts Friday, saying: 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help them.' Yet Iran refuses to talk to the US while the Israeli assault continues. Peter Krause, a Boston College professor who specializes in Middle Eastern politics, argued that if Trump is doing 'coercive diplomacy' with Iran, then his 'hand is strengthened' the more damage Israelis do to Iran. Krause said the next two weeks will likely see a 'ramping up with more of the same militarily, but simultaneously, attempted diplomacy led by the Europeans and maybe the United States and the Turks to see if we can get an off-ramp before things get worse.' Trump has also long hurled ultimatums at opponents that he often quickly reverses as he pushes them to make concessions — as the world saw with his tariffs regime in the spring — demanding exorbitant tariffs only to back off once the trading partner arrived at the negotiating table. But taking that approach here may not work. The latest signals from the White House suggest a demand for zero uranium enrichment in Iran, a condition Tehran sees as fundamentally unacceptable. Iranian officials maintain they have no intention of pursuing nuclear weapons, but argue that some level of enrichment, under clear restrictions and oversight, is a sovereign right. Stripping that away, they contend, would amount to capitulation rather than compromise. With assistance from Ethan Bronner. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
