Bank of England governor blocks Rachel Reeves's Revolut meeting
Andrew Bailey intervened after learning of the plan to bring together representatives from Revolut, the Treasury and the Bank's regulatory arm, the Prudential Regulation Authority, to discuss the fintech's ambitions to become a fully authorised UK bank.
The three-way meeting, first reported by the Financial Times, had been due to take place in the past few weeks but was cancelled over concerns that the central bank's regulatory decisions should be independent from government interventions and influence.
A Treasury spokesperson said: 'The chancellor and the governor have a strong and productive relationship, and the government fully supports the operational independence of the Bank of England.'
The Bank declined to comment.
The meeting would have been part of the government's charm offensive, with ministers desperate to convince Revolut – last estimated to be worth $45bn (£33.6bn) – to choose London for its much-awaited stock market debut primary listing.
Ministers have been spooked by comments from Revolut's co-founder and chief executive, Nik Storonsky, who suggested last December that New York could be a better fit because of the regulatory environment and the size of the market.
Losing Revolut, which is Europe's most valuable private fintech, would represent a major blow to the City and the London Stock Exchange, which has suffered from a growing number of defections, with companies snubbing the UK for listings abroad.
The chancellor has also been urging UK watchdogs to support financial firms in the name of growth, having gone so far as to claim in her Mansion House speech this month that regulation was acting as a 'boot on the neck' of businesses.
Revolut secured a limited UK banking licence last year, after a rare three-year wait, having had to convince regulators that the company had addressed a number of accounting issues and EU regulatory breaches, as well as reputational concerns, including an overaggressive corporate culture. The fintech company says it has since resolved those accounting and regulatory problems, and has made efforts to improve its working culture.
However, the fintech was only granted a restricted licence and, 12 months on, has yet to have its application fully authorised.
The restrictions mean it cannot currently offer its own loans in the UK, and while it can hold customer deposits, they are capped at £50,000. Banks are usually put under these restrictions until they can prove they have appropriate staff, IT systems and governance and accountability checks in place to satisfy officials.
Revolut has been hoping to gain full approval from UK regulators this year. A fully fledged licence would open the door to new income streams, as being able to hold customer deposits would allow it to start funding own-branded loans and mortgages.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
It would also mean it face stricter regulations and make it part of the compensation scheme.
A full licence was expected to be the first step in open the door to banking licences in other countries, including the US. Revolut has already secured an EU banking licence through Lithuania.
However, in the absence of UK approvals, it has emerged that Revolut is considering buying an American bank in order to secure an American banking licence and accelerate its expansion stateside.
The fintech company originally launched as a pre-paid card focused on free currency exchange for customers. It has since grown to more than 10,000 staff, serving customers in more than 36 countries, with more than 50 products and services. As well as money transfers, it offers home rentals, buy now, pay later credit, wage advances, e-sims for mobile data plans and crypto trading.
Its annual report in April showed Revolut more than doubled its annual profits in 2024, jumping almost 150% to £1bn, thanks to a rise in subscriptions, and revenues from its wealth and crypto trading divisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
Number of investors paying tax doubles in four years
The number of investors paying tax on dividends is set to more than double in just four years as successive governments have cut the tax-free allowance, analysis suggests. More than 3.7 million taxpayers are projected to pay dividend tax this year, according to an internal HMRC forecast, up from 1.8 million in 2021-2022. In addition, frozen income tax thresholds mean that more investors are expected to be dragged into higher tax bands, and in turn pay higher dividend tax bills. The tax-free limit on dividend income was cut last year from £1,000 to £500 by the then chancellor, Jeremy Hunt, who had already halved it from £2,000 in 2023. It comes amid speculation that Chancellor Rachel Reeves could further target dividends in the autumn Budget, as her fiscal headroom tightens. Scrapping the allowance entirely could raise as much as £300m, and was one of a package of measures suggested by Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, in a memo leaked earlier this year. Officials are said to be considering abolishing the £500 tax-free allowance for dividend payments, or increasing the rate of tax from its current level of 39pc. The number of higher-rate taxpayers is expected to increase by 44,000 this tax year, and the number of additional rate taxpayers caught will rise from 324,000 to 340,000. However, the number of savers-rate payers – whose income does not exceed the personal allowance, but pay the dividend levy – is anticipated to fall by 22,000. Laith Khalaf, at AJ Bell, said: 'Taxes on dividends have skyrocketed in recent years as a result of severe cuts to the annual dividend allowance. 'Combined with frozen tax thresholds dragging more people into higher tax bands, this could mean heaps more tax for those with even modestly sized share portfolios.' Mr Khalaf said that stocks on the FTSE 100 would be particularly vulnerable to the tax because of their relatively high dividend payments. He said: 'The dividend tax, combined with stamp duty on UK share purchases, means the tax system actually penalises those who invest domestically rather than overseas.' Between April and July this year, UK dividends fell by 1.4pc to £35.1bn, according to Computershare's Dividend Monitor. A stronger pound against the dollar wiped £934m from headline payouts. Mike Warburton, The Telegraph's tax expert, said that unlike savings tax, for which interest paid is reported to HMRC by banks, taxpayers have to report dividend income themselves. He said: 'For dividends, there is no system in place to capture the information, so it has to rely on disclosure by taxpayers. 'It really is disgraceful that we now have 1.7 million basic rate taxpayers paying tax on dividends. It is an example of successive chancellors scraping around for extra tax to avoid having to put up the tax rate.' It comes as fears for the future of the £20,000 annual allowance for cash Isas grow, despite backlash from savers and building societies. The Government has said that it would like more cash savers to invest their money instead, and signalled it was prepared to slash the allowance to encourage them to do so. But money held outside the tax-free accounts could attract other charges, such as capital gains tax or savings tax. Jason Hollands, of wealth manager Evelyn Partners, said: 'These options, which might not happen, underline the importance of doing what makes sense anyway – utilising Isa allowances as fully as you can, including migrating any shares of funds held in a taxable environment into Isas if you aren't already making the most of the £20,000 allowance. 'The Chancellor is on record as stating the £20,000 Isa allowance will stay, and government sources have briefed that plans to cut the cash component have been put on pause. For now at least, the important thing is to use Isas while the rules remain as they currently are.' Around 3.1 million taxpayers were caught when the dividend tax allowance was halved from £2,000 in 2023, meaning an extra 700,000 have been dragged into the tax net. Before 2017, the allowance was £5,000. Dividends are taxed at 8.75pc for basic rate taxpayers, 33.75pc for higher rate taxpayers and 39.35pc for additional rate taxpayers. The rates paid on dividend tax rose in 2021 by 1.25 percentage points. A Treasury spokesman said: 'This government inherited the previous government's policy of frozen tax thresholds. At the Budget and the Spring Statement, the Chancellor announced that we would not extend that freeze. 'We are also protecting payslips for working people by keeping our promise to not raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee National Insurance or VAT. That's the Plan for Change – protecting people's incomes and putting money into people's pockets.'
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
Taxpayer bill for public sector pensions jumps by record £47bn
Taxpayers were hit with a record £47bn bill to fund public sector pensions last year. Civil servants, doctors and teachers banked pots worth three times more than their private sector counterparts. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) data showed contributions from public sector employers hit a record high in 2024, eclipsing those made by businesses in the private sector, which stood at £46.4bn. This is despite the private sector employing 27.9m people, four times more than the public sector, which has just over six million employees. Gold-plated public sector pensions offer members a guaranteed income in retirement, making them much more generous than the workplace pensions in the private sector, which provide no such guarantee and rely on stock market returns to grow their retirement pot. Contributions by schools and hospitals are ultimately met by the taxpayer once teachers, nurses and doctors retire. The data also showed the average employee in the public sector enjoyed an average increase of £9,320 on their future pension pots – or the equivalent of a quarter of their salary – compared with £3,230 in the private sector. The figures were released against the backdrop of a summer of strikes, with a five-day doctors' walkout ending this week and nurses threatening further industrial action unless the government boosts their pay. The British Medical Association (BMA) is asking for a 29pc pay rise on top of an uplift of almost 30pc since 2022-23, according to the Nuffield Foundation. Sir Steve Webb, a former pensions minister, said: 'These figures are a reminder of the great value of public service pensions. The typical public sector worker gained pension rights worth over £9,000 last year, compared with not much more than £3,000 for the average private sector worker.' The data also show that total tax relief on pensions grew to £78.2bn in 2023-24, up from £72.1bn in the previous year. Labour has left the door open to a tax raid on pension pots as Rachel Reeves struggles to fill a yawning black hole. Torsten Bell, the pensions minister, refused to rule out a raid in the autumn Budget, suggesting that reliefs such as the 25pc tax-free lump sum currently available to retirees could be in the firing line, or salary sacrifice contributions, which enjoy National Insurance relief. However, a pensions raid could lower incomes in retirement. HMRC data showed individuals poured £14.6bn into their personal pensions in 2023-24, up from £12.9bn in the previous year. The Government has also paved the way for the state pension age to be raised and suggested millions of workers would have to sacrifice more of their pay to prevent a looming retirement crisis. Currently, workers who are auto-enrolled into a pension scheme give up 5pc of their salary in return for a minimum 3pc top-up from their employer. Retirement giants have suggested the split needs to be closer to 6pc each to avoid swathes of the population struggling financially in retirement. Public sector workers, including nurses, doctors and teachers, are currently in discussions about swapping lower pension contributions for higher pay today. The Telegraph revealed this month that Catherine Little, the permanent secretary to the Cabinet Office, has been heading discussions within Whitehall about the changes.
BBC News
a few seconds ago
- BBC News
Former Taunton Debenhams building goes up for sale
The former Debenhams building in Taunton has been put up for sale, four years after the shop Properties, the owner of the building, has listed the shop for £1.75 million.A spokesperson for the company said: "We are confident of finding a suitable buyer for this prominent and high-profile building. "We want to see something positive happening here as soon as possible, and we hope to find a buyer with the expertise to secure the future of the site." Ropemaker Properties had previously applied to demolish the building and build 92 flats in its place, but those plans were scrapped in staff member Margaret Harris, who worked there for more than 37 years, said: "The department store brought people into town because it sold everything."It needs to be a department store again."Taunton and Wellington MP Gideon Amos, who had been campaigning for the store to reopen, told BBC Somerset the building "has been empty for far too long."It's a really positive opportunity that it's on the market, it's important it gets brought back into use."It would be great if the building could be kept. It is a landmark in the town centre," he said. The 7,815 sq m (84,127 sq ft) building sits over five floors in a prominent location in Taunton's town Maynard, partner at Alder King, who are managing the sale, said: "Although the commercial property market remains challenging, this building's enviable town centre location combined with Taunton's ambitious regeneration plans, means we are confident of finding a suitable buyer for this high-profile site."
