Own a The Little Gym Franchise: A Brand with 45+ Years in Child Development
The Little Gym franchise empowers you to own a business that helps children build confidence, physical skills, and social connections through fun, movement-based programs. Backed by decades of experience and the support of Unleashed Brands, franchisees benefit from comprehensive training, ongoing operational support, and powerful marketing resources.
Benefits of owning a The Little Gym franchise:
Proven Success: Over 45 years of experience and hundreds of locations worldwide.
Growing Demand: Parents are increasingly seeking enrichment programs that foster healthy development and lifelong skills.
Turnkey Support: From site selection to grand opening and beyond, you'll receive expert guidance every step of the way.
Community Impact: Make a positive difference for families in your area while building a profitable business.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
5 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why We're Dodging These 3 Gold CEFs (Even With Gold Soaring)
A lump of gold on a stone floor getty Here's a surprise from a die-hard closed-end fund (CEF) fan like me: Sometimes CEFs aren't your best bet. I'll admit, that's tough for me to say—especially when the average CEF yields a historically high 9.1%. (CEF yields are usually around 8.5%). That high yield partly reflects the fact that many CEFs are trading at steep discounts to their net asset value (NAV). Translation: The fund is trading for less than what its underlying portfolio is worth. That, in turn, has resulted in lower prices among some CEFs, along with higher yields (as yields and prices move in opposite directions). All of this simply means that CEFs are generally out of favor right now, which is an opportunity for us. But not every CEF is ripe for buying. We especially want to avoid the three top performers among CEFs with market caps over $200 million: ASA Gold and Precious Metals (ASA), the Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and the Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). The fact that these funds have booked strong runs this year shouldn't come as a surprise: They're all gold funds, and gold has taken off due to rising economic uncertainty (the usual fuel for the yellow metal). Even so, as you can see, there are some clear differences in performance here, and those are worth unpacking. Gold Funds Ycharts Above we see that the Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust—with the somewhat confusing 'CEF' ticker, not to be confused with CEFs in general (in purple)—and PHYS (in blue) have similar returns to the benchmark SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) ETF (in green), at around 25%. Then there's ASA (in orange), which has more than doubled even the best of these three other funds. There is some logic at work here. For starters, PHYS and GLD really should track each other, since they both devote almost 100% of their portfolios to physical gold (both own gold bars that are locked up in vaults), and both have similar expense ratios (0.4% for GLD, 0.41% for PHYS). The lower performance of 'CEF' is also not surprising, given that the fund also holds silver, and the 'poor man's gold' hasn't done as well as its yellow counterpart this year. ASA, however, is the clear outperformer. That's thanks in part to its ownership of several gold-mining stocks. Its largest position, G Mining Ventures Inc., a Canadian firm that explores for precious metals, has nearly doubled year to date. ASA's fast short-term gain is, of course, great, but it's unlikely to last. Here's why. Note that, if we go back to 2010, the year the last of these funds, PHYS, launched, we see that GLD (again in green) outran all three of the CEFs. This shows that CEFs were poor options in the case of gold. Moreover, ASA (again in orange) was actually the worst performer, returning just 53% over 15 years, and being in the red for most of that time. ASA Underperforms Ycharts In terms of key takeaways, there are a few here. First, if you want to hold gold, this is a rare case where an ETF, not a CEF, is the better choice. Second, gold is not a great play for income, given that the highest yielder among these funds is ASA, with a puny 0.2%. Third, gold itself is a poor play for the long term, no matter how you invest in it. To see why, all we need to do is splice the S&P 500's performance (in pink below) into that last chart. Gold Underperforms Ycharts It doesn't get much clearer than that! This, however, is where the good news ends for ETF investors. Because when it comes to investing in stocks (or pretty well any other asset class, for that matter), you're far better off with CEFs. Let's take a look at the Adams Diversified Equity Fund (ADX), a CEF we've held in my CEF Insider service since its earliest days: We bought ADX in July 2017, just a few months after CEF Insider's launch. Here's how the fund—current yield: 9% (and in orange below)—has done since, as compared to the S&P 500 index fund SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), in purple, with dividends reinvested: ADX Outperforms Ycharts This chart says it all: CEFs like ADX can crush the S&P 500 and pay us generously while doing so. Plus they give us access to top-notch management and upside-generating discounts to NAV, too. Those are strengths no index fund can match. Michael Foster is the Lead Research Analyst for Contrarian Outlook. For more great income ideas, click here for our latest report 'Indestructible Income: 5 Bargain Funds with Steady 10% Dividends.' Disclosure: none
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WWDC to focus on redesigns as Apple remains sidelined on AI, Bloomberg says
Apple's (AAPL) upcoming Worldwide Developers Conference will do little to assuage fears that the iPhone maker is a laggard in AI, Blomberg's Mark Gurman reports. Instead, the event will focus on design and productivity enhancements for its long-established operating system franchises. The company's keynote address will introduce redesigned software interfaces for the iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple TV and Apple Watch, in addition to more minor tweaks to the Vision Pro headset. As part of the end-to-end overhaul, the company is also making a sweeping change to its software branding, which will shift from version numbers to a year-based system. That means Apple will introduce iOS 26, iPadOS 26, tvOS 26, visionOS 26, macOS 26 and watchOS 26 – named for 2026. Internally, the operating systems are known as Luck, Charisma, Discovery, Cheer and Nepali, respectively, the author notes. The AI changes will be surprisingly minor are unlikely to impress industry watchers, especially considering the rapid pace of innovation by Alphabet's (GOOG) (GOOGL) Google, Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT) and OpenAI, the publication adds. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See the top stocks recommended by analysts >> Read More on AAPL: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Apple's growing list of issues hinders AI reboot, WSJ says Apple expands partnership in India with Tata, Reuters reports Morning News Wrap-Up: Thursday's Biggest Stock Market Stories Apple says App Store ecosystem facilitated $1.3T in developer sales in 2024 This Is How Much Analysts Expect Apple's (AAPL) EPS to Fall after Court Ruling
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
America's 50 Richest Retirement Towns
Does it surprise you to hear that California is home to a sizable number of the nation's richest retirement towns? Already beloved for its warm weather and scenic beaches, the Golden State is home to 13 affluent retirement havens, according to new GOBankingRates data. See More: Learn More: To find the country's 50 richest retirement towns, GOBankingRates sourced the U.S. Census American Community Survey for all cities with populations above 15,000 and senior populations with a percentage of 25% or higher. Additional factors sourced include each city's median income and livability index. Saratoga, California, is the richest retirement town in America. The median household income in Saratoga is $241,348. An impressive 13 California towns ranked among the 50 wealthiest retirement metros, the most out of any state. The towns and respective ranks include Saratoga (1), Ranchos Palos Verdes (3), Laguna Beach (9), Walnut Creek (11), Cerritos (12), Fair Oaks (27), Rancho Mirage (29), Lincoln (30), Pacific Grove (33), Los Osos (41), Arroyo Grande (42), Cameron Park (45) and La Quinta (46). Nine affluent Florida retirement towns also cracked the top 50. These towns and ranks are as follows: Naples (8), Lakewood Ranch (15), Palm Valley (21), Palm City (22), Palm Beach Gardens (28), Marco Island (38), Palmer Ranch (39), Estero (43) and East Lake (49). Keep reading to find out which 50 retirement towns are among the richest in America. Learn More: Find Out: Population 65+ (%): 25.9% Median household income: $241,348 Livability: 81 Discover More: Population 65+ (%): 25.8% Median household income: $228,120 Livability: 67 Population 65+ (%): 26.0% Median household income: $175,307 Livability: 58 Population 65+ (%): 26.3% Median household income: $159,882 Livability: 78 Population 65+ (%): 27.0% Median household income: $158,398 Livability: 87 Population 65+ (%): 27.3% Median household income: $155,675 Livability: 61 Read Next: Population 65+ (%): 25.6% Median household income: $155,321 Livability: 80 Population 65+ (%): 56.2% Median household income: $140,833 Livability: 79 Population 65+ (%): 27.8% Median household income: $140,508 Livability: 66 Population 65+ (%): 26.3% Median household income: $139,707 Livability: 82 Population 65+ (%): 29.0% Median household income: $135,665 Livability: 77 For You: Population 65+ (%): 25.3% Median household income: $133,953 Livability: 74 Population 65+ (%): 25.0% Median household income: $124,632 Livability: 72 Population 65+ (%): 25.9% Median household income: $124,123 Livability: 78 Population 65+ (%): 31.4% Median household income: $123,471 Livability: 63 Population 65+ (%): 29.9% Median household income: $120,685 Livability: 73 Trending Now: Population 65+ (%): 34.4% Median household income: $119,591 Livability: 82 Population 65+ (%): 26.3% Median household income: $119,454 Livability: 83 Population 65+ (%): 33.6% Median household income: $119,212 Livability: 61 Population 65+ (%): 29.9% Median household income: $118,462 Livability: 67 Population 65+ (%): 26.4% Median household income: $118,280 Livability: 70 Explore Next: Population 65+ (%): 28.8% Median household income: $117,689 Livability: 81 Population 65+ (%): 25.7% Median household income: $114,682 Livability: 70 Population 65+ (%): 25.6% Median household income: $113,844 Livability: 68 Population 65+ (%): 26.3% Median household income: $113,301 Livability: 66 Population 65+ (%): 34.9% Median household income: $113,201 Livability: 70 Try This: Population 65+ (%): 25.5% Median household income: $111,332 Livability: 57 Population 65+ (%): 30.6% Median household income: $110,563 Livability: 70 Population 65+ (%): 49.9% Median household income: $109,943 Livability: 49 Population 65+ (%): 27.2% Median household income: $108,108 Livability: 67 Population 65+ (%): 26.2% Median household income: $107,372 Livability: 82 Discover More: Population 65+ (%): 38.0% Median household income: $105,944 Livability: 70 Population 65+ (%): 28.9% Median household income: $105,568 Livability: 84 Population 65+ (%): 25.2% Median household income: $105,535 Livability: 88 Population 65+ (%): 34.9% Median household income: $105,342 Livability: 81 Population 65+ (%): 39.4% Median household income: $104,955 Livability: 73 Check Out: Population 65+ (%): 39.6% Median household income: $104,788 Livability: 69 Population 65+ (%): 59.0% Median household income: $104,105 Livability: 70 Population 65+ (%): 51.1% Median household income: $103,682 Livability: 72 Population 65+ (%): 27.5% Median household income: $103,561 Livability: 79 Population 65+ (%): 26.5% Median household income: $103,504 Livability: 66 See Next: Population 65+ (%): 25.7% Median household income: $103,258 Livability: 77 Population 65+ (%): 50.7% Median household income: $100,459 Livability: 79 Population 65+ (%): 31.9% Median household income: $100,124 Livability: 65 Population 65+ (%): 25.3% Median household income: $97,786 Livability: 56 Population 65+ (%): 31.1% Median household income: $97,628 Livability: 57 Explore More: Population 65+ (%): 25.3% Median household income: $97,348 Livability: 67 Population 65+ (%): 39.2% Median household income: $96,715 Livability: 63 Population 65+ (%): 28.7% Median household income: $93,862 Livability: 65 Population 65+ (%): 25.8% Median household income: $92,746 Livability: 64 Editor's note: Photos are for representational purposes only and might not reflect the exact locations listed. Methodology: For this study, GOBankingRates analyzed cities to find the richest retirement towns. First, GOBankingRates found cities with populations above 15,000 and population percentages for 65+ age range of 25% or higher, as sourced from the U.S. Census American Community Survey. With these 142 cities isolated, the total households, population ages 65 and higher and household median income were also sourced from the American Community Survey for each location. The livability index was sourced from AreaVibes. The cities were sorted to show the highest median household income, representing the 'richest' cities. All data was collected on and is up to date as of Feb. 4, 2025. More From GOBankingRates 4 Affordable Car Brands You Won't Regret Buying in 2025 This article originally appeared on America's 50 Richest Retirement Towns
