logo
Government prepares for release of landmark review into ailing water sector

Government prepares for release of landmark review into ailing water sector

Rhyl Journal20-07-2025
The Independent Water Commission, led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, will outline recommendations to turn around the floundering sector in its final report on Monday.
The review was commissioned by the UK and Welsh governments as part of their response to systemic industry failures, which include rising bills, record sewage spills and debt-ridden company finances, although ministers have ruled out nationalising companies.
The Government will respond to the recommendations in Parliament later on Monday.
The review reportedly includes proposals to establish a new system of regulation, which is currently split between Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate.
Ministers will announce a consultation that could lead to axing Ofwat, which oversees how much water companies in England and Wales can charge for services, according to the Guardian.
Ofwat has faced intense criticism for overseeing water companies during the years that they paid shareholders and accrued large debts while ageing infrastructure crumbled and sewage spills skyrocketed.
In an interview with the Sunday Times, Environment Secretary Steve Reed suggested he was in favour of a new model where regional boards managed water in their areas, including representatives from water companies, local authorities and other organisations.
He said: 'I think the catchment-based model has a lot to commend it. Because if you can manage what's going into the water better, you can clean up the water faster.'
Asked on Friday if there were plans to scrap Ofwat as the regulator, Downing Street said the Government will wait for a final report.
A No 10 spokesman said: 'We are waiting for Sir Jon Cunliffe's final report next week, you can expect us to set out our response after that on what more we will do to turn the sector around.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'We are not going to comment on speculation.' Ofwat declined to comment.
Mr Reed is also expected to announce a new Government pledge to halve sewage pollution from water companies by the end of the decade, during broadcast interviews on Sunday.
He said: 'Families have watched their local rivers, coastlines and lakes suffer from record levels of pollution.
'My pledge to you: the Government will halve sewage pollution from water companies by the end of the decade.'
But in his Sunday Times interview, he acknowledged that bills were unlikely to fall from their current level, saying instead that an investment of £104 billion in the sector would 'avoid the need for any big bill hikes in the future'.
It comes after the Environment Agency on Friday said the number of serious pollution incidents caused by water companies across England rose by 60% in 2024 compared with the previous year.
The figures showed companies recorded a total of 2,801 pollution incidents, up from 2,174 in 2023.
Of these, 75 were categorised as posing 'serious or persistent' harm to wildlife and human health – up from 47 last year.
The Environment Agency said it is clear some companies are failing to meet the targets it has set on pollution, attributing failures to persistent underinvestment in new infrastructure, poor asset maintenance and reduced resilience because of the impacts of climate change.
Earlier on Friday, the Public Accounts Committee also released a report which called the level of pollution 'woeful' and recommended an overhaul of the regulation system.
The cross-party group of MPs said the Government must act with urgency to strengthen oversight of the sector to rebuild trust and ensure its poor performance improves.
The Independent Water Commission published its interim report in June, which found the sector to be beset with 'deep-rooted, systemic' failures.
While the paper outlined the commission's direction of travel, it stopped short of providing detailed recommendations on policy, regulatory reform and corporate governance, which are now expected in the final report.
The interim review pointed to the need for better regulation of water companies but it did not recommend the wholesale scrapping of Ofwat, which some have urged.
Nationalisation, which some campaigners have also called for, was excluded from its terms of reference when commissioned by the Government.
Meanwhile, the Conservatives accused Labour of copying the previous government's policies and doing nothing to halt rises in water bills.
Shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said the Government should be 'transparent' about where the money to fix Britain's sewers was coming from, warning that consumers may have to stump up some of the cash.
She added: 'Labour's water plans must also include credible proposals to improve the water system's resilience to droughts, without placing an additional burden on bill payers and taxpayers.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Milei-style shock therapy may be needed to save Britain from fiscal disaster
Milei-style shock therapy may be needed to save Britain from fiscal disaster

Telegraph

time29 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Milei-style shock therapy may be needed to save Britain from fiscal disaster

The Office for Budget Responsibility's latest report on UK finances paints a grim picture. Economic growth has flatlined, unemployment has risen to 4.7pc – the highest since early 2021 – inflation stubbornly lingers at 3.6pc and government spending is spiralling out of control. Every household understands a simple rule: you must earn more than you spend, or eventually hit the rocks. Yet the UK has long been living beyond its means, maxing out its credit card. For the year ending April 2025, borrowing reached £148bn – a staggering 70pc higher than the £87bn forecast in March 2024. Debt levels are now at heights not seen since the post-Second World War era, and once again, taxpayers are being asked to foot the bill. Worse still, the Government shows no sign of reining in expenditure. The Chancellor is widely expected to announce new tax hikes in the autumn. And when implemented, the real damage will have already occurred following months of speculative debate – 'will-we-won't-we' tax rises that create uncertainty and undermine confidence, dampening economic activity before any policy is even introduced. Those advocating further tax increases misunderstand basic economics, what people need and how to get the best out of them. Beyond a certain point, higher taxes reduce revenue by curbing economic activity – a lesson all too familiar amid rising employer National Insurance contributions, minimum wage increases, and other cost pressures. Businesses across the country are already shedding jobs, particularly among lower-paid workers feeling the squeeze. We may well have passed the point of optimal taxation. Yet instead of easing the burden, the Government whispers about even more tax, including proposals for a wealth tax. This would be disastrous, as the wealthiest 1pc already are estimated to contribute roughly 28pc of income tax. Imposing a wealth tax risks driving more mobile top earners away. As Walter Wriston, the late chairman and chief executive of what was Citicorp, once said: 'Capital goes where it is welcome and stays where it is well treated.' The UK, like many European nations, has lived beyond its means for too long. Month after month, deficits grow. The yield on the UK's 30-year government bond recently topped 5.5pc – far above the 4.85pc seen in October 2022 – reflecting investor wariness. The Bank of England has been forced to adjust and review its quantitative easing reversal following pressure from investors. Political will to cut spending appears scarce. Parliament's handling of the welfare reform bill signals that no meaningful spending reductions will occur, meaning taxpayers will again bear the cost. The debate narrowly focused on trimming a few billion pounds, when the circumstances call for far deeper cuts. And nobody asks how to deliver better public services for less or how it can be fair that taxpayers fund ever-expanding budget black holes. The UK has become addicted to the notion that government should expand its role endlessly – that bigger government automatically means a better society. As a result, spending cuts are politically toxic: the knee-jerk response to every problem is to raise taxes to fund more spending. This is more than policy – it's philosophical, big state versus small state. To say 'I'm from the government, and I'm here to help' remains as dangerous as ever. Borrowing is set to rise significantly over this parliament, even as growth falters. Despite the rhetoric of engineering growth in the economy, the UK faces the prospect of a smaller economy at the end of this parliament. The only way out is to grow the economy. Real, sustained economic growth reduces debt-to-GDP ratios over time and generates the tax revenues needed to fund essential services. Achieving this requires a hard balancing act: cutting spending, committing to fiscal discipline, slashing burdensome regulation, scrapping costly and anti-growth policies like net-zero mandates, and lowering taxes over time. The UK simply cannot rely on ever-higher tax-takes to bail out unchecked spending. We might start to look to Argentina for a solution. Once an economic basket case with inflation soaring over 200pc and poverty affecting more than 40pc of its population, Argentina has faced nine sovereign defaults since independence, caused by persistent fiscal deficits in 57 of the past 65 years. Over half the population relied on government transfers in 2022. Then came Javier Milei, a political outsider who was not expected to win Argentina's 2023 presidential election. Upon victory, he declared bluntly, 'there is no money', and since taking office, Milei has worked aggressively to balance the budget. While many economists initially derided his approach, it is now bearing fruit. Argentina's economy is forecast to grow over 5.7pc this year. Inflation has dropped to 1.6pc monthly as of June, and poverty has fallen significantly – Unicef estimates 1.7 million children have been lifted out of poverty since Milei assumed power. Milei's diagnosis is clear: 'The public sector is the illness. If a body has a virus, a germ, a bug, a parasite, you extract the parasite – you don't feed it. If you feed the parasite, you end up worse off. We got the state out of the way, and things are working better.' Fiscal discipline, slashed public spending, ending monetary financing of deficits, and deregulation have shrunk the state dramatically. These measures are not without pain, with over 50,000 public sector workers laid off, government departments merged or closed, infrastructure spending frozen, and energy and transport subsidies cut. But the result is a state budget surplus and a transformed economy – all within 18 months. Being fiscally responsible also means attracting investment. If the UK is seen as a balanced, prudent economy living within its means, capital will flow in. Right now, the notion that the UK is poised for a global investment bonanza is wishful thinking. To fix the UK's economy and become an attractive destination for investment, we must balance our books. Like Argentina, we need a complete reset – a new philosophy and a radically different approach. This will require an honest conversation with the public about 'there is no money,' and a commitment to sustainable spending plans aligned with growth and fairness. Failing to act risks the UK ending up in the hands of the IMF – a fate best avoided.

Anglian Water to pay £62.8m over wastewater failures
Anglian Water to pay £62.8m over wastewater failures

BBC News

time29 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Anglian Water to pay £62.8m over wastewater failures

Anglian Water is facing paying out £62.8m after an investigation by the industry regulator found a "serious breach" in how the company managed its sewage has proposed a number of improvements Anglian Water must make to its wastewater treatment works and network after discovering "excessive spills from storm overflows".The firm could have been fined £57.1m but Ofwat said Anglian Water had acknowledged its failures and agreed to fund investments. Anglian - which is one of six water firms banned from paying its chief executive a bonus for last year - said: "We understand the need to rebuild trust with customers and that aspects of our performance need to improve to do that." Lynn Parker, Ofwat's senior director for enforcement, said: "Our investigation has found failures in how Anglian Water has operated and maintained its sewage works and networks, which has resulted in excessive spills from storm overflows."This is a serious breach and is unacceptable."Ofwat said Anglian would invest £57m to improve wastewater flows in its region and also pay £5.8m into a fund to support projects aimed at providing environmental and social benefits for local Thurston, who took over as Anglian's chief executive in July last year from Peter Simpson, said: "It will take time and investment to achieve a significant reduction in spills, but we are making good progress."He said the company has allocated £1bn to fund measures aimed at halving the number of spills by that time, the average annual household water and waste bill for an Anglian customers will rise to £631, compared to an average £491 last year. A recent report by the Independent Water Commission noted that water companies were hiking bills following years of have claimed that they have been held back from investing in the country's pipes and sewage treatment facilities because Ofwat limited price increases for year, Ofwat - which the report recommended to be scrapped and rolled into a single regulator - announced that water bills in England and Wales would increase sharply over five years to raise £104bn to invest in since being privatised in 1989, water companies have been criticised for paying out billions of pounds to shareholders, including to overseas investment Water is owned by a company that is registered in Jersey. Its biggest shareholders are based in Canada, Australia and Abu Dhabi.

Labour minister grilled over Gaza in tense BBC interview
Labour minister grilled over Gaza in tense BBC interview

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Labour minister grilled over Gaza in tense BBC interview

Peter Kyle, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, was quizzed on the mid-recess cabinet meeting that has been called to discuss Gaza and Palestinian statehood on Tuesday's edition of Good Morning Scotland. Kyle said Keir Starmer had been 'intensely moved and disturbed' by images coming from the enclave but defended the continued sale of arms to Israel. READ MORE: LIVE: Donald Trump meets John Swinney on final day of Scotland trip The presenter challenged the timing of the UK Government's reaction, asking why it had taken Starmer so long to be moved given how long the Palestinian genocide has been going on for. Kyle pushed back firmly, saying Starmer has been 'deeply, deeply moved and disturbed by what he has seen,' insisting the Prime Minister had already taken 'incredible action' by working with international partners by recognising the International Criminal Court and sanctioning figures, including members of Benjamin Netanyahu's government and individuals in the West Bank. However, the presenter referenced earlier comments from the SNP's Stephen Gethins, who pointed out the UK Government continues to supply arms to Israel – including parts of F-35 fighter jets. Kyle squirmed as he responded, insisting arms sales were 'under constant review' and claiming that 'British law is applied equally to all areas and all territories'. READ MORE: John Swinney to call for 'immediate' constitutional convention on independence The presenter suggested Labour's pledge to recognise Palestinian statehood – which Starmer continues to drag his heels on despite growing pressure from his own MPs – was nothing more than an 'empty gesture'. Kyle retorted: 'I'm saying nothing of the sort … what we are trying to do is deliver a statehood that has meaning.' Asked repeatedly when Labour would fulfil the commitment, Kyle refused to provide a timeframe, saying: 'What you're asking me to do is to release the contents of a meeting that hasn't happened yet.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store