New York sued by National Retail Federation over surveillance pricing law
The world's largest retail trade group said New York's Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act, which would take effect on July 8, violates many members' First Amendment free speech rights.
Governor Kathy Hochul signed the first-in-the-nation law in May, saying the practice of charging different prices based on customers' willingness to pay was "opaque," and prevented those customers from comparison shopping.
In its complaint filed in Manhattan federal court, the National Retail Federation objected to requiring members to affix "misleading and ominous" warnings to prices set by algorithms linked to customer data.
It said the law reflected "speculative fear" of price gouging, even though retailers use algorithms to offer promotions and reward customer loyalty, sometimes resulting in lower prices.
According to the complaint, the law violates the U.S. Constitution by compelling a broad range of retailers to express misleading "government-scripted opinion" without justification, or face potential civil fines of $1,000 per violation.
The only defendant is state Attorney General Letitia James, who enforces New York laws. Her office did not immediately respond to requests for comment after business hours. Hochul's office did not immediately respond to a similar request.
In January, a divided Federal Trade Commission issued a study on surveillance pricing, saying location data and online browsing histories could permit retailers to "target" individual consumers with different prices for the same products.
FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson, then a commissioner, dissented from issuing the study, saying it was rushed out three days before Donald Trump succeeded Joe Biden as U.S. president to meet a "nakedly political deadline."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
27 minutes ago
- Axios
Texas law requiring Ten Commandments temporarily halted in some schools
A federal judge in San Antonio temporarily barred some school districts from implementing a Texas law requiring every public school classroom to display the Ten Commandments. Why it matters: The ruling slows one of the nation's most aggressive pushes to mandate religious displays in public schools — setting up a likely First Amendment fight that could reach the Supreme Court. Catch up quick: The law, passed by the Republican-controlled Legislature earlier this year, mandated a 16x20-inch Ten Commandments poster in every classroom and was set to take effect Sept. 1. Sixteen Texas families from San Antonio, Austin, Houston and elsewhere — backed by the American Civil Liberties Union — sued in July to stop it, naming 11 school districts, including Alamo Heights, Northside, Northeast and Lackland ISDs. Caveat: U.S. District Judge Fred Biery's order only blocks the law in the 11 districts named in the lawsuit — in the Austin, San Antonio, Houston and Dallas areas — not statewide. What they're saying: Biery wrote that the law would likely result in unconstitutional religious coercion. "The displays are likely to pressure the child-Plaintiffs into religious observance, meditation on, veneration, and adoption of the State's favored religious scripture, and into suppressing expression of their own religious or nonreligious background and beliefs while at school," he wrote. "Children's religious beliefs should be instilled by parents and faith communities, not politicians and public schools," San Antonio plaintiff Rabbi Mara Nathan said in a statement. The other side: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton told CBS he would appeal the ruling. "The Ten Commandments are a cornerstone of our moral and legal heritage, and their presence in classrooms serves as a reminder of the values that guide responsible citizenship," Paxton said in a statement. Texas will always defend our right to uphold the foundational principles that have built this nation, and I will absolutely be appealing this flawed decision."
CNN
28 minutes ago
- CNN
Judge rules that some Texas schools don't have to display Ten Commandments in classrooms
A federal judge has ruled that several Texas school districts do not need to comply with a state law requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in all classrooms. The colorful 55-page opinion issued Wednesday by US District Judge Fred Biery is the latest court victory in a series of legal challenges to laws that have been enacted in three southern states over the last year that require public schools to display the Ten Commandments. 'Even though the Ten Commandments would not be affirmatively taught, the captive audience of students likely would have questions, which teachers would feel compelled to answer. That is what they do,' Biery wrote. The judge – who was appointed by Bill Clinton – skewered the controversial law, known as S.B. 10, concluding that it's likely unconstitutional and cannot be enforced in several Texas school districts, including ones in Houston, Austin and Fort Bend County. 'Teenage boys, being the curious hormonally driven creatures they are, might ask: 'Mrs. Walker, I know about lying and I love my parents, but how do I do adultery?'' Biery added. 'Truly an awkward moment for overworked and underpaid educators, who already have to deal with sex education issues, … and a classic example of the law of unintended consequences in legislative edicts.' The judge ended his opinion by writing, 'For those who disagree with the Court's decision and who would do so with threats, vulgarities and violence, Grace and Peace unto you. May humankind of all faiths, beliefs and non-beliefs be reconciled one to another. Amen.' More than a dozen Texas families of various faiths sued over the state's law – which was signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott in June and is set to take effect statewide starting next month – arguing it violates the First Amendment's Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause. Biery agreed. The law, he said, 'impermissibly takes sides on theological questions and officially favors Christian denominations over others.' The Texas law requires public schools to post in classrooms a 16-by-20-inch (41-by-51-centimeter) poster or framed copy of a specific English version of the commandments, even though translations and interpretations vary across denominations, faiths and languages and may differ in homes and houses of worship. Similar laws were enacted this year and last year in Arkansas and Louisiana. Court challenges to those measures have also resulted in favorable rulings. Legal experts have said that it's likely the cases will eventually be appealed to the US Supreme Court. Attorneys for the families behind the Texas case cast Biery's ruling as a strong rejection of state lawmakers' push to impose their religious preferences on to public school students in the Lone Star State. 'Today's ruling is a major win that protects the constitutional right to religious freedom for Texas families of all backgrounds,' said Tommy Buser-Clancy, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union. 'The court affirmed what we have long said: Public schools are for educating, not evangelizing.' CNN has reached out to Abbott's office and the Texas attorney general's office for comment on the ruling.
Forbes
28 minutes ago
- Forbes
Texas Blocked From RequiringTen Commandments In Classrooms—For Now
A Texas law requiring the state's public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments could violate First Amendment rights, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, temporarily blocking Texas schools from posting the religious directives in class. A six-foot high tablet of the Ten Commandments located on the grounds of the Texas Capitol Building in Austin, Texas. (Photo by Robert Daemmrich Photography Inc/Corbis via Getty Images) Corbis via Getty Images U.S. District Court Judge Fred Biery said in a ruling Wednesday the Texas law is 'likely to pressure the child-Plaintiffs into religious observance, meditation on, veneration, and adoption of the State's favored religious scripture, and into suppressing expression of their own religious or nonreligious backgrounds.' The law was signed by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott in June and was slated to go into effect Sept. 1. This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
