
Congress Takes Huge Step To Repeal 6 Student Loan Repayment Plans And Force Many Borrowers To Pay More
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 29: Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) speaks at a press conference ... More with other members of House Republican leadership, following a meeting of the House Republican Conference, in Washington, DC on April 29, 2025. A key GOP House committee passed legislation that would fundamentally reshape federal student loan repayment and loan forgiveness. (Photo by Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)
A key House committee passed the Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan on Tuesday, a Republican bill that is part of the party's broader effort to enact President Donald Trump's legislative agenda of extending massive tax cuts paid for by slashing government spending. If the bill is ultimately enacted through the budget reconciliation process, it would fundamentally remake the entire federal student loan repayment system by cutting off or pushing out loan forgiveness and forcing millions of borrowers into more expensive repayment plans.
'Today, the Education and Workforce Committee passed the Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan—a vital portion of Trump's big, beautiful bill to provide tax relief for American families and small businesses, rein in wasteful spending, and reduce the federal budget deficit,' said the committee in a statement on Tuesday.
'Our current student loan system is broken and has left students holding over $1.6 trillion in federal student loan debt, with taxpayers estimated to lose hundreds of billions of dollars on loans disbursed over the next decade,' said Education and Workforce Committee Chairman Tim Walberg (R-MI) following the commitee's passage of the bill. 'The bill passed by Committee Republicans today not only would save taxpayers over $350 billion but also bring much-needed reform in three key areas: simplified loan repayment, streamlined student loan options, and accountability for students and taxpayers. I'm proud of the Committee's work today to finally stand up and end the status quo of endless borrowing.'
But the proposed changes to student loan repayment programs would have profound impacts for millions of borrowers, potentially leading to higher payments and cutting off loan forgiveness eligibility. Here's a breakdown.
A core element of the Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan bill is a complete overhaul of the federal student loan repayment system. And the changes won't just impact new borrowers; many existing borrowers currently in repayment on their student loans would be affected, too.
Currently, there are about a dozen federal student loan repayment plans, broken into two broad groups. There is a collection of repayment plan options with fixed monthly payments over a traditional amortization schedule, without regard to a borrower's income or their ability to pay. This includes a 10-year Standard plan, a 25-year Extended plan, a Graduated repayment option where payments start off relatively low and increase over time, and consolidation Standard plans with terms of up to 30 years, depending on the initial balance.
Then, there are income-driven repayment plans. IDR is an umbrella term that encompasses a collections of repayment plans tied to a borrower's income and family size, with borrowers entitled to student loan forgiveness for any remaining balance by the end of the repayment term, typically 20 or 25 years. Under the IDR umbrella, there are three 'income-contingent' repayment plans including Income-Contingent Repayment, Pay As You Earn, and the new SAVE plan which was designed to be the most affordable IDR option. Separately, there are two 'income-based' repayment plans; an older version of IBR that is the most accessible IDR program, and a newer version of IBR that is about 33% less expensive than it's older counterpart with a 25-year student loan forgiveness term instead of 20. This 'new' IBR plan is only available for borrowers who first took out federal student loans on or after July 1, 2014.
The Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan would upend this federal student loan repayment plan system by narrowing down the number of plans to just two. One 'Standard' plan option would have fixed payments on a term of between 10 and 25 years, depending on the borrower's balance. And a new income-driven option called the 'Repayment Assistance Plan' (or RAP for short) would have monthly payments comparable to the PAYE plan and new IBR, but with a 30-year student loan forgiveness term instead of 20 or 25 – effectively forcing borrowers to repay their loans for far longer.
It would be one thing if, under the bill's terms, current student loan borrowers would be able to continue repaying their student loans under existing plans. That would be largely true for borrowers currently in repayment under Standard and Graduated plans. But for current borrowers in one of the four existing IDR plans, things get very complicated.
A prior version of the Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan (called the College Cost Reduction Act) would have grandfathered in current borrowers into the existing IDR system. But the legislation passed by Republicans in the House Education and Workforce Committee on Tuesday would not do that. The bill would repeal all income-contingent repayment plans including the ICR, PAYE, and SAVE plans. It also would eliminate the 'new' IBR plan. That effectively would leave only the older, more expensive version of IBR, and the new RAP plan created by the bill.
If enacted, this will have profound impacts for millions of federal student loan borrowers. The more than eight million borrowers who have been in the SAVE plan will be forced under the bill's terms into the older version of IBR, which could double or even triple their monthly payments. They could opt into the RAP plan instead to have somewhat more affordable payments, but that would extend their repayment term by five to 10 years or more (SAVE allowed for student loan forgiveness on varying timelines between 10 and 25 years).
Meanwhile, borrowers currently in PAYE and 'new' IBR would also be forced into the older version of IBR under the terms of the legislation. This will result in most of these borrowers experiencing roughly a 33% increase in their monthly payments, as the older version of IBR uses a 15% discretionary income formula rather than 10% for PAYE and new IBR. As with SAVE plan borrowers, those who are in PAYE and new IBR could opt to switch into the new RAP plan instead, which would have comparable payments for most middle-income borrowers (although lower-income borrowers would have higher payments under RAP). But the tradeoff is an additional five to 10 years in repayment due to RAP's 30-year student loan forgiveness term. Borrowers would also be locked into RAP if they opt in – they would not be able to change their minds later and switch to IBR.
The situation would be particularly complicated for Parent PLUS borrowers. Parent PLUS borrowers are generally ineligible for income-driven plans, but if they consolidate their Parent PLUS loans into a Direct consolidation loan, that Direct consolidation loan can be repaid under the ICR plan. For older Parent PLUS borrowers on a fixed income, ICR can be a lifeline when no other fixed repayment plans are affordable. But the Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan eliminates the ICR plan.
Under the bill, Parent PLUS borrowers who have already consolidated their loans and are enrolled in ICR as of the bill's enactment would be automatically moved into the older version of IBR – which may actually lower their monthly payments, since IBR is generally a more affordable plan than ICR. But all other Parent PLUS borrowers would be permanently locked out of any income-driven repayment option, since they cannot enroll in RAP and would be barred from enrolling in IBR after the bill's passage.
This would also effectively prevent Parent PLUS borrowers not already enrolled in income-driven repayment from pursuing student loan forgiveness, as well. If these borrowers cannot enroll in IDR, they cannot get their loans forgiven under IDR. They also would not be able to benefit from Public Service Loan Forgiveness, which typically requires that borrowers enroll in an IDR plan.
For the time being, none of these changes to student loan repayment plans have become law yet. The Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan must now go to the House Budget Committee before it can be sent to the full House for a floor vote. The Senate must also pass its own reconciliation bills. Then, leaders from key House and Senate committees must hammer out any differences between the two versions of the bills before they can finalize the legislation, pass it through both chambers of Congress, and send it to President Trump for his signature. There could be changes to the legislation at nearly any step during this process.
If the bill in its current form ultimately becomes law, borrowers could see changes to their student loan repayment plan, their monthly payments, and their student loan forgiveness eligibility by the end of this year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hochul's estranged lieutenant announces he will challenge her in NY governor's race
ALBANY – Lt. Gov. Antonio Delgado is challenging his estranged boss, incumbent Gov. Kathy Hochul, in next year's election. Delgado called for 'bold, decisive, transformational leadership' for New York in a video launching his campaign for the Democratic gubernatorial nomination, released alongside an interview in The New York Times Monday afternoon. 'It's love of family, it's love of community, it's love of state, it's love of country — and I'm dedicated to that,' Delgado says in the spot. 'That's why I'm running for governor of New York.' The video and Times story were released moments after The Post reported that Delgado was telling allies that he would make his campaign plans public sometime this week. The former Hudson Valley congressman formally split from Hochul earlier this year following significant public disagreements between the two. Delgado first attracted the governor's ire last summer when he publicly called for President Biden to drop out of the 2024 presidential race. Hochul, at the time, was an outspoken voice in the chorus of Democrats still cheering on the dithering president despite clear evidence of his failing health. Delgado also got out in front of Hochul earlier this year when he called for Mayor Eric Adams to resign amid his swirling corruption scandals. While sources familiar with the two's declining relationship said they were heading towards a public breakup for months, Delgado made it 'social media official' on Feb. 24, suddenly announcing that he wouldn't run for re-election as her No. 2 next year. 'There are a lot of folks in politics who wake up every single day thinking about everything but the damn people,' Delgado told a room full of Democrats in his hometown of Schenectady a day later in what unmistakably resembled a campaign speech. The abrupt announcement prompted Hochul to take away many of Delgado's state perks, like his capitol office and even official email, according to the sources. Since then, Delgado has been using an email address set up for him by the state Senate, which he technically presides over as lieutenant governor, according to a source familiar with the situation. He has spent the last few weeks traipsing around all corners of the state hosting town hall events. A spokesperson for Governor's campaign declined to comment, but referred The Post to a statement from the Hochul-friendly Democratic Governors Association. 'The Governor knows how to take on big fights and win for New York families — and her agenda is overwhelmingly popular with New Yorkers on both sides of the aisle,' the statement from Democratic Governors Association Executive Director Meghan Meehan-Draper read. 'The Democratic Governors Association is 100 percent behind Governor Hochul as she continues to deliver for New York, take on Donald Trump, and build the operation it will take to beat Republicans up and down the ballot in 2026,' it continued. Delgado would no doubt struggle in an attempt to topple Hochul — who became governor in 2021 after Andrew Cuomo resigned in disgrace and who was elected to a full term the following year. She has an undeniable advantage in name recognition, a massive $15 million campaign war chest and the benefit of keeping New York's powerful unions and other special interests happy as the incumbent. According to Siena College polling's most recent survey, Delgado would currently receive just 12% of the vote in a matchup including him, Hochul and Bronx Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) who is also rumored to be considering a bid in the 2026 race. Hochul won in that simulation, though with only 46% of the vote. Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-NY), who posed a bruising primary challenge against Hochul in 2022, was quick to pan Delgado's entry into the race. 'Antonio, you are a talented guy, with a great future. Based upon my experience this may not be the most well-thought out idea!,' Suozzi posted to X. Delgado was Hochul's second pick after her first lieutenant governor, Harlem state Sen. Brian Benjamin (D-Manhattan) resigned while facing charges he accepted bribes from a real estate developer — a case that was eventually dropped. She recently made a point to slam the door shut on any chance she may have to serve with Delgado for another four years by shoving a provision into the state budget that would change New York election law so governors and lieutenant governors run as a ticket during the primary, instead of separately as it worked previously. Hochul's detractors were quick to chime in on Delgado's entry as well. 'Her own Lieutenant Governor that she hand picked is now primarying her which shows she has lost support not just from Republicans and Independents, but Democrat New Yorkers as well,' North Country Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) wrote in a statement. 'Her first LG was indicted for public corruption. Her second LG has announced he's running against her. We can't wait to see who she picks as her third LG candidate,' Hudson Valley Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) snarked on X.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance says it was a 'huge mistake' for Musk to go after Trump with Epstein accusation
Vice President JD Vance told comedian and podcast host Theo Von on Saturday that Elon Musk made a "huge mistake" by accusing President Donald Trump of being implicated in the Jeffrey Epstein files. Vance warned that Trump and Musk being embroiled in a "blood feud" with one another will be bad for the country and will likely not end well for the Tesla CEO either. "I think it's a huge mistake for him to go after the president like that. And I think that if he and the president are in some blood feud — most importantly — it's going to be bad for the country, but I think it's going to be, I don't think it'll be good for Elon either," Vance argued. 'Gone Too Far': Gop Lawmakers Rally Around Trump After Musk Raises Epstein Allegations Musk referenced Jeffrey Epstein in relation to Trump on Thursday as part of a larger attack against the president and Republican leaders over their budget reconciliation bill. "Time to drop the really big bomb. [Trump] is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" Musk wrote on X. "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out." Read On The Fox News App Vance told the comedian Trump "didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein" and that his loyalties will always be with the president. He noted that he hopes Musk will eventually "come back into the fold," but doubted the possibility of that coming true after his tweet accusing Trump of being involved with Epstein. Click Here For The Latest Media And Culture News When asked by Von why he believed Musk's "feelings were hurt," Vance speculated that the culmination of the violent threats against him and his company, paired with Congress' budget reconciliation bill, may have pushed him over the edge. "His businesses are being attacked nonstop. They're literally like firebombing some of his cars," he pointed out. "So I think part of it is this guy got into politics and has suffered a lot for it. But I mean, and I get the frustration there… Congress, you got this spending bill. But the main purpose of the bill is not actually spending or cutting spending, though it does cut a lot of spending." The vice president acknowledged Musk's concerns over the spending bill that allegedly started the feud between the two and noted that disagreements over its contents likely caused some "frustrations." "The main purpose of the bill is to prevent the biggest tax increase, but I understand — it's a good bill — it's not a perfect bill," Vance said. "The process in D.C., if you're a business leader, you probably get frustrated with that process because it's more, you know, bureaucratic. It's more slow-moving. So I think there's just some frustrations there." Fox News' Elizabeth Elkind, Deirdre Heavey and Alex Miller contributed to this article source: JD Vance says it was a 'huge mistake' for Musk to go after Trump with Epstein accusation
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk jokes about reconsidering stance on Big Beautiful Bill after Schiff's praise
Elon Musk appeared to jokingly reconsider his stance on the Big Beautiful Bill after a California Democrat came to his defense. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., wrote on X that "I can't believe I'm saying this – but [Elon Musk] is right." However, that seems to be the last point on which the two agree. They both object to the Big Beautiful Bill, viewing it as full of pork. Musk opposes the bill because he believes it raises government spending too much, while Schiff objects to what he calls its "far-right" content, which he describes as "dangerous." Republican Lawmakers Stand Firm Against Musk's 'Kill The Bill' Assault On Trump's Agenda Musk fired off a response rejecting Schiff's alleged praise of the tech billionaire's position on the bill. "Hmm, few things could convince me to reconsider my position more than Adam Schiff agreeing with me!" On May 30, Musk's time with the administration came to an end, and he seemed to leave things on good terms. President Donald Trump thanked Musk for his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and gave him a symbolic "key to the White House" as a parting gift. Read On The Fox News App Following his departure from the White House, Musk said he was looking forward "to continuing to be a friend and adviser to the president." However, things took a sharp turn as a feud between Trump and Musk quickly heated up after the Tesla founder began publicly criticizing the Big Beautiful Bill. Inside The Musk-trump Fallout After the legislation passed the House, Musk said that the "massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." Musk's criticisms received mixed reactions from Republicans, with some — such as Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. — agreeing with him. Meanwhile, House Speaker Mike Johnson said he was "surprised" by Musk's reaction and claimed the two of them had a good discussion about the bill. Trump and Musk then began slugging it out on their respective social media platforms — X and Truth Social — as well as TV. The president told reporters in the Oval Office that he was "very disappointed" with Musk and claimed that the former DOGE head knew what was in the bill, something that Musk denied. Trump Not Interested In Talking To Musk: 'Elon's Totally Lost It' The heated exchange led to two explosive tweets, both of which were later deleted. In one post, Musk claimed Trump was mentioned in files relating to Jeffrey Epstein, the deceased sex offender and disgraced financier. In his other post, Musk endorsed a message that called for Trump's impeachment and said that Vice President J.D. Vance should take over. While it's unclear whether Trump and Musk will reconcile, for now it seems unlikely. Trump told Fox News chief political anchor Bret Baier that he was not interested in talking to Musk and that "Elon's totally lost it."Original article source: Musk jokes about reconsidering stance on Big Beautiful Bill after Schiff's praise