&w=3840&q=100)
Do you know why India and Pakistan celebrate I-Day on different dates?
On August 15, schools, offices, and neighbourhoods across India will come alive with saffron, white, and green decorations. Kite-flying adds colour to the skies, symbolising the spirit of freedom. Representational image
On August 15, 2025, India will mark its 79th Independence Day, a moment to reflect on the country's long journey from colonial rule to becoming the world's largest democracy.
It was on this day in 1947 that the Indian tricolour was hoisted for the first time at the ramparts of Delhi's iconic Red Fort by the country's first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. The moment marked the end of nearly 200 years of British rule, ushering in a new era of freedom and self-governance.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Over the decades, the day has grown into a nationwide celebration of unity in diversity, resilience, and the shared aspirations of over a billion people.
Across the country, schools, offices, and neighbourhoods come alive with saffron, white, and green decorations. Kite-flying adds colour to the skies, symbolising the spirit of freedom.
But here's a lesser-known nugget from history — the Indian Independence Act 1947 had set 15 August as the date for both India and Pakistan to gain freedom. However, Lord Mountbatten, India's last British Viceroy, wanted to be present at both handover ceremonies.
To make that possible, Pakistan's independence ceremony in Karachi was held a day earlier, on 14 August 1947, followed by India's on 15 August.
As India celebrates its 78 years of Independence tomorrow, it's worth remembering such fascinating chapters from the nation's freedom story. Here's a closer look
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
23 minutes ago
- Hans India
CM Stalin writes to PM Modi; seeks urgent relief as US tariffs threaten TN exports, jobs
The Tamil Nadu government has raised an alarm over the severe implications of the United States' 25 per cent tariff on Indian exports, warning that the proposed escalation to 50 per cent could devastate the state's manufacturing sector and cost millions of jobs. In a detailed letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin highlighted that Tamil Nadu's dependence on the US market is higher as compared to other Indian states. While 20 per cent of India's total goods exports worth $433.6 billion in 2024-25 went to the US, Tamil Nadu sent 31 per cent of its $52.1 billion exports there. This heavy reliance, the Chief Minister warned, makes Tamil Nadu particularly vulnerable to tariff shocks. The most affected sectors include textiles, apparels, machinery, auto components, gems and jewellery, leather, footwear, marine products, and chemicals. All of these are labour-intensive industries where any decline in exports would swiftly translate into mass layoffs. The textile industry, which accounts for 28 per cent of India's exports in the sector and employs nearly 75 lakh people in the state, faces an especially grave threat. Officials estimate that as many as 30 lakh jobs are at immediate risk if tariffs are doubled to 50 per cent. To cushion the blow, CM Stalin urged the Centre to take urgent corrective measures. These include rectifying the GST inverted duty structure for the man-made fiber value chain by bringing it under a uniform 5 per cent GST slab, exempting import duty on all varieties of cotton, and providing collateral-free loans of up to 30 per cent under the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) with a 5 per cent interest subvention and a two-year moratorium on repayment. Further demands include enhancing RoDTEP (Remission of Duties and Taxes on Exported Products) benefits to 5 per cent and extending pre and post-shipment credit facilities to all textile exports, including yarn. Industry consultations revealed similar challenges in other sectors as well. To provide relief, CM Stalin requested the Union Government to launch a special interest subvention scheme for exporters hit by tariffs, accelerate Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) to offset market risks, and announce a financial relief package similar to the COVID-era moratorium on principal repayments. The letter also drew parallels with Brazil, which recently introduced tax deferrals and credits to support its exporters. Warning of an unprecedented crisis threatening Tamil Nadu's manufacturing sector, CM Stalin called for urgent intervention from PM Modi in consultation with ministries and industry stakeholders. He assured the Centre of Tamil Nadu's full cooperation in implementing national-level measures to safeguard livelihoods and preserve the competitiveness of Indian exports.
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Analysing the entry of foreign higher education institutions in India
India's higher education sector has grown remarkably, boasting 1,168 registered universities and 45,473 colleges serving millions of students. Despite this expansive network, the government's move to allow foreign universities to establish campuses in India raises some concerns. Studying abroad Each year, eight to 10 lakh Indian students choose to pursue higher education abroad, even as over 4.33 crore students enroll in institutions within India. However, the decision to study overseas isn't driven by academic quality alone. Many of those who can afford the high costs often see international education as a worthwhile investment. What they're really seeking is not just a degree but the experience of living in a new culture, building global networks, and gaining professional exposure, which cannot be replicated by foreign campuses located within India. Career prospects also play a significant role. Many students believe they stand a better chance of securing high-paying jobs in developed economies after graduation. In fact, education often becomes a stepping stone toward long-term goals like permanent residency in or citizenship of countries such as the U.S., U.K., Canada, or Australia, which attract students with their stronger economies, higher salaries, and robust career opportunities. While foreign universities operating in India may offer excellent academic programmes, they could fall short of delivering these broader, more aspirational benefits. Challenges The idea of global institutions setting up campuses in India may sound progressive or even visionary, but it comes with several serious concerns that deserve closer examination. A pressing issue is the potential financial drain without corresponding benefits to the local education ecosystem. Foreign universities will likely repatriate profits to their home countries instead of reinvesting in India. In contrast, domestic institutions typically use their earnings for faculty development, fund research, and upgrade infrastructure. This means foreign campuses could create a steady outflow of resources that benefits their countries of origin more than India's education sector. Another major concern is the limited alignment of these campuses with the real aspirations of Indian students. Indian students seek overseas education for immigration benefits, international job markets, and cultural exposure. Without these incentives, their appeal remains limited. There's also the risk of competitive displacement. India already boasts an extensive higher education network. Bringing in established global institutions could marginalise smaller or less-known Indian universities. The brand power of foreign universities might attract the best students and faculty, leaving local institutions to struggle for relevance and resources. Cost is another major factor. Global universities tend to operate on a high-cost model, charging tuition fees far above what most Indian institutions ask for. If they follow a similar pricing strategy here, access will likely be limited to affluent students, creating an elitist and exclusionary education system. Such a model goes against the broader national goal of inclusive and equitable education for all. Further, the long-term benefits of foreign campuses remain unproven. India already enables international education collaborations through IITs, IIMs, and other premier institutions. The effectiveness of standalone foreign campuses in significantly improving education standards remains uncertain, making the policy a risky experiment. Alternatives Given these concerns, India would do well to consider alternative strategies that enhance its higher education sector while maintaining economic and academic autonomy. A more sustainable approach would begin with strengthening Indian universities themselves. This means increasing funding, expanding research opportunities, and investing in faculty development so that domestic institutions can offer globally competitive education without depending on foreign players. Another promising strategy involves encouraging global collaborations within Indian campuses. Joint research projects, faculty exchange programmes, and integrated curricula can bring international standards and perspectives into Indian classrooms without leading to large-scale financial outflows. Technology also offers an effective and affordable pathway to global exposure. Virtual exchange programmes, international webinars, and global faculty lectures could offer students exposure to world-class education at lower costs, making international learning more accessible. Finally, if the objective is to facilitate global education, increasing scholarships for Indian students seeking international opportunities would be a more effective and targeted approach. The focus should be on strengthening Indian institutions, fostering international collaborations, and expanding global exposure more effectively. For now, this policy seems like a miscalculated opportunity rather than a strategic advancement for India's higher education ecosystem. (Views expressed are personal) P. John J. Kennedy is former Professor and Dean, Christ University, Bengaluru. S.P. Mishra is Founder, India Career Centre, Hyderabad.
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
No friction between BJP, RSS: Ram Madhav praises PM's Independence Day address; reiterates ideological unity
RSS leader Ram Madhav has categorically asserted that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) are part of the same ideological family, and there is no friction between the two, as both organisations work in their respective fields of politics and social service. The senior RSS leader also praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for recognising the 100-year history of the RSS during his Independence Day speech. When asked about certain doubts over possible 'friction' between the two organisations in an interview with ANI, Mr. Madhav dismissed any such speculation and reiterated that the two organisations are united in regards to ideology and working for the development of the country, with BJP working in politics, and RSS working outside it for social service to the nation. 'These atkale (speculations) are always put from time to time. If they don't find any issue then RSS is brought forward and said that there is friction between RSS and BJP. RSS and BJP are two organisations joined together under the same ideological umbrella,' Mr. Madhav, former National General Secretary of BJP told said in New Delhi. The RSS leader's remarks come amid Congress and other opposition parties criticising PM Modi for his address for mentioning the 100-year-old Sangh. Congress leaders have called the mention of the organisation an 'insult to the Constitution and tricolour.' There has also been speculation on a tense relation between the Sangh and the BJP with political opponents alluding to it. 'BJP works with a political angle, and RSS works outside politics, does multiple types of service for the development of the country. We are of the same ideological family so we keep in touch, and in that there have never been any tensions. There is no tension,' Mr. Madhav added. Mr. Madhav further reiterated that people from all sorts of diverse political backgrounds are welcome in the organisation, including the Congress. He however, criticised the act of opposing the RSS for 'political gains.' 'Some people, due to political reasons, have always opposed RSS, for example some Congress leaders. They opposed for political reasons but ultimately everyone knew inside them that RSS is works for the Hindu religion and the country while being away from politics. The organisation is doing the work of making good people, man-making, that everyone knows. In our lower levels of organisation, everyone from diverse backgrounds gets a chance to work,' he said. 'When I say that from all political backgrounds get a chance, that means Congress is also included in it, but some people feel that if they oppose RSS then they will benefit politically,' he added. He further mentioned how the Sangh works for building good people, doing 'man-making' in the organisation. The RSS leader also praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Independence Day address, saying that the speech sent a 'very good message across the country and RSS workers.' 'With Prime Minister mentioning RSS on its 100-year anniversary, and also appreciating the work done by the organisation for the nation, and also saying that the swayamsevak be an inspiration for all, these things have been appreciated by the people of RSS after hearing them. But there are crores of other people in the country, who are not perhaps part of the organisation and watch it from outside and understand the work done, those people are also appreciated this (PM's remarks),' he added. In his Independence Day speech, PM Modi praised RSS for completing 100 years of service to the nation, describing it as the 'biggest NGO in the world' and praising its century-long contribution to nation-building. 'Today, I would like to proudly mention that 100 years ago, an organisation was born - Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). 100 years of service to the nation is a proud, golden chapter. With the resolve of 'vyakti nirman se rashtra nirman', with the aim of welfare of Maa Bharati, swayamsevaks dedicated their lives to the welfare of our a way, RSS is the biggest NGO of the world. It has a history of 100 years of dedication,' PM Modi said.
