RBI to cut rates by 25 bps on June 6, then once more in August
BENGALURU, May 29 (Reuters) - The Reserve Bank of India will cut interest rates on June 6 for a third consecutive meeting and once more in August to support a weakened economy, according to a Reuters poll of economists whose forecasts were largely unchanged from the last survey.
With economic growth cooling sharply to 6.3% last fiscal year from over 9% the year before and inflation staying below the RBI's 4.0% target, the RBI has ample room to cut rates. Other major central banks were also expected to ease policy further amid rising global tensions fuelled by U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war.
A strong majority of economists, 53 of 61, in a May 19-28 Reuters poll expected the RBI to cut the repo rate to 5.75% at the conclusion of its June 4-6 meeting. Two respondents predicted a cut of 50 basis points and the remaining six expected no change.
More than 80% of economists, 47 of 58, forecast the key rate to end August at 5.50%. That was an increase from a survey conducted last month where just over half had held that view.
"The global risks we are facing in terms of trade tensions are downside risks to global growth and, hence, to India's growth," said Dhiraj Nim, economist at ANZ and one of the few looking for two more cuts after an expected June 6 reduction.
"If domestic inflation is not an issue, then these risks should also lead to a stronger counter-cyclical policy response from the RBI."
Rates could drop more than what economists are currently expecting if a trade deal with the U.S. fails to materialise.
For now, a total expected easing of just 100 basis points would mark the shortest and shallowest RBI rate-cutting cycle in over a decade. Meanwhile, the Indian stock market was forecast to hit a new high by end-2025 despite concerns about its lofty valuations, a separate Reuters poll found.
That partly reflects a relatively upbeat view on the economy. The poll also showed gross domestic product (GDP) growth was expected to average 6.3% this fiscal year, and 6.5% next.
Indranil Pan, chief economist at Yes Bank, said the February rate cut did not translate into much easing in lending rates by banks due to tight liquidity.
Still, bank deposit rates have come down and it is unclear whether that reflects actual policy transmission or signs of stress in the banking system, he added.
(Other stories from the May Reuters global economic poll)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Terrifying moment military plane nose-dives into the ground minutes after take-off in South Korea, killing four crew
Terrifying footage captured the moment a South Korean navy patrol plane nose-dives into the ground during a training mission, killing all four crew members on board. The US-made Lockheed Martin P-3C Orion, went down on May 29 near the southeastern city of Pohang. The P-3 aircraft crashed about six minutes after it left a naval base in the Nam-gu district at 1.43pm (4.43am GMT), the navy said in a statement. The remains of the four crew members have been recovered and no civilian casualties were reported, the navy added. Footage of the horror smash released by local media shows thick black smoke rising from the crash site, located in a forested area near Sinjeong-ri. Mangled pieces of charred metal were seen scattered on the ground in the aftermath of the incident. A Pohang emergency office said rescuers were dispatched after receiving reports from residents that an unidentified aircraft fell to the ground on a hill near an apartment complex and sparked a fire. The US-made Lockheed Martin P-3C Orion, went down on May 29 near the southeastern city of Pohang, just seven minutes after taking off from a naval base Shortly after the devastating incident, the South Korean Navy said in a statement that the aircraft had departed at 1:43pm for a routine exercise before it 'crashed near the base for reasons yet to be determined'. It added that it had established a task force to investigate the cause of the crash and temporarily suspended all flights of P-3s. Manufactured by Lockheed Martin, the platform is equipped with four turboprop engines and capable of deploying torpedoes, depth charges, and anti-ship missiles. South Korea initially acquired eight P-3C aircraft and later added eight more upgraded P-3CK variants, modified by Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) from former US Navy P-3B airframes. In total, sixteen aircraft have served in patrol roles across the East, West, and South Seas, with the P-3C earning a reputation as a capable 'submarine killer.' The Navy previously marked two decades of accident-free operations with the P-3C in 2005 and 2015. However, the crash this week coincides with the fleet's 30th year in service. In 2017, a P-3CK mistakenly dropped six weapons, including Harpoon anti-ship missiles, due to crew error during a mission. Following the devastating incident, the South Korean Navy said in a statement that the aircraft had departed at 1:43pm for a routine exercise before it 'crashed near the base for reasons yet to be determined' A Pohang emergency office said rescuers were dispatched after receiving reports from residents that an unidentified aircraft fell to the ground on a hill near an apartment complex and sparked a fire The incident comes after a Jeju Air passenger plane crashed at Muan International Airport in southern South Korea in December, killing all but two of the 181 people on board. That crash was one of the deadliest disasters in South Korea's aviation history. And in March, South Korean military investigators charged two Air Force pilots on with criminal negligence over an accidental bombing of a village during a training exercise, which injured at least 29 people and caused extensive property damage. Defense Ministry investigators have confirmed that errors by the pilots when they entered coordinates into the aircraft systems were 'direct factors' behind the accidental bombing, the ministry's Criminal Investigation Command said in a statement at the time. The pilots were charged with criminal negligence causing bodily harm, the command said.
Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump's multi-pronged attack on Harvard explained
May 30 (Reuters) - The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is waging a campaign against Harvard University, the country's oldest and richest school, across multiple fronts, including funding freezes, investigations and threats to the school's tax-exempt status. The president says he's trying to force change at Harvard - and other top-level universities across the U.S. - because they have been captured by leftist "woke" thought and become bastions of antisemitism. The Trump administration has opened numerous investigations into Harvard. Some are looking at threats against Jewish students and faculty after pro-Palestinian protests broke out following the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel and subsequent Israeli military actions in Gaza. Others are probing if Harvard discriminates based on sex and gender, along with the school's ties to foreign governments and international students. Harvard and other universities say Trump's attacks are threats to freedom of speech, freedom of academics and the schools' very existence. Here are the main avenues Trump's administration is using to take on Harvard: The Trump administration in April sent a letter to Harvard, opens new tab demanding it make far-reaching changes in how it operates. Harvard's President Alan Garber publicly rejected the demands, saying they amounted to ceding control of the university to the government. Hours after Garber rejected the demands, the Trump administration announced it was freezing more than $2 billion in federal contracts and grants with Harvard, which mostly fund scientific and medical research. A total of some $3 billion in funding has now been frozen by the Trump administration after more blocks were announced. Those were mainly through frozen National Institutes of Health grants along with blocked monies from eight different federal agencies and the Centers for Disease Control. Harvard is fighting the funding cuts in court. Trump in May said he's considering taking previously awarded grant money for scientific and engineering research away from Harvard and giving it to trade schools. The Trump administration in May revoked Harvard's ability to enroll international students and said it was forcing current foreign students to transfer to other schools or lose their legal immigration status. Harvard sued over that action, and a judge has temporarily blocked the administration's action. More than a quarter of Harvard's students come from outside the U.S., and they serve as a vital revenue source at the Ivy League school and at hundreds of other colleges across the U.S. In late May, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the administration would start "aggressively" revoking visas issued to Chinese students attending Harvard and all U.S. schools. Republican concerns over Chinese students in the U.S. are not new - many have expressed worries China is manipulating Harvard and other universities to gain access to U.S. advanced technology. The action on Chinese students is a direct blow to Harvard's strong links to China, and it has left Chinese students in a legal limbo as they contemplate their academic futures. There are two main ways the Trump administration is using the tax system to attack Harvard. First, they are threatening the university's tax-exempt status, which experts say likely saves the school hundreds of millions of dollars each year. It is unclear, however, if the Internal Revenue Service would rescind that tax exemption, or if it would hold up before courts. Most universities, including Harvard, are exempt from federal income tax because they are deemed to be charitable organizations operated exclusively for public educational purposes. The exemption also allows people to make tax-deductible donations to such organizations, a valuable source of income for colleges with wealthy alumni. The second prong on this front is language in Trump's massive spending bill that is before Congress. It would drastically hike taxes that Harvard and other elite schools pay on the profits their massive endowment investments make. Critics say that would weaken the ability of Harvard and other rich schools to provide generous financial aid packages to poorer students.
Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Howmet needs to ramp engine parts production as jet output rises, CEO says
May 30 (Reuters) - Howmet Aerospace (HWM.N), opens new tab will need to produce more parts this year for engines used in Boeing and Airbus narrowbody jets, as the planemakers ramp up output and the need for spares grows, the parts supplier's CEO John Plant said on Friday. Plant's comments come a day after Boeing (BA.N), opens new tab expressed optimism about increasing the production of the best-selling 737 MAX jets to 42 a month. The move could benefit players such as Howmet, one of Boeing's biggest suppliers. However, supply chain challenges continue to weigh on the industry as Boeing and Airbus manufacture more jets, with no one particular bottleneck to blame. Howmet also expects demand for its fasteners to rise, with global inventory running low after a fire at an SPS Technologies factory in Pennsylvania in February destroyed an important source of capacity. "There's lots more to bid and we've got three customers already where we have production orders for as soon as we can make them," Plant said at a Bernstein conference. He also acknowledged a force majeure letter on tariffs sent to customers in April, which was first reported by Reuters. Plant said the letter helped get new agreements in place to cover exposure risk in case of an emergency.
