logo
Trump to host South African president for trade, refugee talks

Trump to host South African president for trade, refugee talks

Ramaphosa called accusations of racial persecution against Afrikaners a "completely false narrative." Although apartheid - in which South Africa was controlled by the country's White minority and Black South Africans were deprived of basic civil rights, ended in 1994 - white people still own a large majority of the land and control a hugely outsized share of the country's wealth.
Ramaphosa to talk between South Africa and US
Trump has said the White South Africans are the victims of "genocide" - an accusation the South African government and human rights experts say is not supported by evidence.
Ramaphosa told reporters May 17 ahead of his trip that he wasn't worried about a hostile welcome at the White House.
"There is no genocide in South Africa," Ramaphosa said. "We are going to have good discussions on trade."
John Steenhuisen, the South African minister for agriculture, said on social media May 20 that he had a constructive meeting with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.
"Trade is essential between our two countries and we are determined to ensure that access for agricultural products remains open in a mutually beneficial way," Steenhuisen said. "Trade means jobs and a growing economy."
The United States had an $8 billion trade deficit with South Africa in 2024.
Trump suspends refugee program for most other than Afrikaners
Upon taking office, Trump immediately suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program and ordered most potential refugees to remain in other countries.
But an exception Trump ordered Feb. 7 was for "Afrikaners in South Africa who are victims of unjust racial discrimination" who he offered admission and resettlement in the United States as refugees.
The Trump administration warmly greeted 59 White people from South Africa upon their arrival on May 12, after granting them refugee status.
But experts on South Africa say Trump's claims of anti-White discrimination - much less genocide - are baseless.
"Genocide has a very clear definition and what is happening in South Africa with White South Africans does not fit the definition at all," said Mandeep Tiwana, chief officer of evidence and engagement at CIVICUS, a human rights advocacy organization headquartered in South Africa. "In fact, White South Africans are a privileged minority."
"There is no White genocide. It is a story that has been sold," said Thapelo Mohapi, secretary general of Abahlali baseMjondolo, a South African poor people's movement.
"It is very unfortunate, as a poor South African that lives in a shack, seeing somebody going abroad on a flight with gifts and clothing and receiving a warm welcome from the presidency in the U.S., with a lie that they are being persecuted," Mohapi said of the Afrikaners granted refugee status.
"We, in fact, are the ones who are living in poverty," Mohapi said.
Some White Afrikaners have praised Trump for highlighting what they say is the discrimination they face.
Theo de Jager, an Afrikaner who chairs the Southern African Agriculture Initiative, wrote in a letter to Trump that "the opportunity you have extended" to enter the U.S. as a refugee could be the "only viable path forward" for some Afrikaners.
But, he added, some Black families suffer "just as much--if not more."
"It is critical for you to understand that the tensions in our country are not simply a black-and-white issue."
Trump's admission of the Afrikaners also angered refugee assistance programs. The Episcopal Church announced it would shutter its refugee resettlement program on May 12 after Trump asked it to help resettle the group of Afrikaners - even as the flow of refugees from all other countries had stopped.
"This is a corruption of the U.S. refugee program," Kenn Speicher, co-founder of Northern Virginia Friends of Refugees, said at Dulles Airport, where he was protesting the Afrikaners' arrival.
Disputed claims of 'genocide' in South Africa
Genocide is defined in the Genocide Convention, an international treaty that criminalizes genocide, as the killing of members of a group because of their race, religion or national origin, as in the Holocaust.
"White farmers are being brutally killed," Trump told reporters May 12 in the White House Roosevelt Room.
Ramaphosa has branded the claim a "false narrative."
In South Africa, White people are much less likely to be murder victims than Black people. The group Genocide Watch has said that while South Africa's population is 7% White, White people make up just 2% of its murder victims.
The South African government said on May 9 that "The South Africa Police Services statistics on farm related crimes do not support allegations of violent crime targeted at farmers generally or any particular race."
Allegations of a White "genocide" in the country have been heavily bolstered by Elon Musk, Trump's close advisor, who is South African by birth.
Last week, users of X, the social media site owned by Musk, widely reported that its AI chatbot repeatedly spitted out statements that the South African White genocide is real in unrelated conversations. Musk has also frequently used the platform to broadcast his accusations that White South Africans are victims of targeted racial violence.
"When a farmer dies, then the whole world must know, because that farmer is White and the farmer is privileged," Mohapi said. "Black people can die anytime, like flies."
Rubio, Kaine clash at Senate hearing over South African refugees
The conflict over South African refugees erupted at a Senate hearing May 20 between Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Kaine disputed that Afrikaners are refugees because their political party is part of the government.
"I assert that this claim that there is persecution of Afrikaner famers is specious," Kaine said.
Rubio said the Afrikaners who arrived as refugees felt persecuted because "their farms were burned down and they were killed because of the color of their skin."
Rubio denied the Trump administration favored Afrikaners as refugees because they are White. He said accepting refugees from more countries would lead to millions of more people arriving.
"It was acting as a magnet," Rubio said of the refugee program. "They can't all come here."
Black South Africans suffer disproportionate poverty
Trump's allegations of a White "genocide" in South Africa center on recent land reform legislation signed by Ramaphosa in January called the Expropriation Act.
The bill, aimed at rectifying inequality in land ownership left over from South Africa's racial apartheid system, opens pathways for the government to seize private land for public use - sometimes without compensation.
The White House's executive order slammed the bill as "in shocking disregard of its citizens' rights" and Musk branded it "racist."
But South Africa's racial wealth gap leans starkly in the opposite direction. Whites make up just over 7% of the population, but own around 72% of the country's farms and agricultural land, according to a 2017 government report.
The country's inequality levels - consistently rated by the World Bank as among the worst globally - impact its Black population at a vastly disproportionate rate. Last year, the unemployment rate hit 37.6% for Black South Africans, while 7.9% of Whites were without a job. Around 10% of Blacks had medical care in 2018, as compared to 72% of their White counterparts.
"We are finding ourselves in a very tight and difficult situation," said Mohapi. "People celebrate when they get a meal a day."
"We are defending White privilege rather than to actually talk about the real issues, the bread and butter issues," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge rules federal prisons must continue providing hormone therapy to transgender inmates
Judge rules federal prisons must continue providing hormone therapy to transgender inmates

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Judge rules federal prisons must continue providing hormone therapy to transgender inmates

The federal Bureau of Prisons must continue providing hormone therapy and social accommodations to hundreds of transgender inmates following an executive order signed by President Donald Trump that led to a disruption in medical treatment, a federal judge ruled Tuesday. U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth said a federal law prohibits prison officials from arbitrarily depriving inmates of medications and other lifestyle accommodations that its own medical staff has deemed to be appropriate. The judge said the transgender inmates who sued to block Trump's executive order are trying to lessen the personal anguish caused by their gender dysphoria, which is the distress that a person feels because their assigned gender and gender identity don't match. 'In light of the plaintiffs' largely personal motives for undergoing gender-affirming care, neither the BOP nor the Executive Order provides any serious explanation as to why the treatment modalities covered by the Executive Order or implementing memoranda should be handled differently than any other mental health intervention,' he wrote. The Bureau of Prisons is providing hormone therapy to more than 600 inmates diagnosed with gender dysphoria. The bureau doesn't dispute that gender dysphoria can cause severe side effects, including depression, anxiety and suicidal thoughts, the judge said. The Republican president's executive order required the bureau to revise its medical care policies so that federal funds aren't spent 'for the purpose of conforming an inmate's appearance to that of the opposite sex.' Lamberth's ruling isn't limited to the plaintiffs named in the lawsuit. He agreed to certify a class of plaintiffs consisting of anyone who is or will be incarcerated in federal prisons. Trump's order also directed the federal Bureau of Prisons to ensure that 'males are not detained in women's prisons.' In February, however, Lamberth agreed to temporarily block prison officials from transferring three incarcerated transgender women to men's facilities and terminating their access to hormone therapy. American Civil Liberties Union. Ronald Reagan in 1987.

Steel industry braced for 50% Trump tariff despite UK-US deal
Steel industry braced for 50% Trump tariff despite UK-US deal

Western Telegraph

time35 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

Steel industry braced for 50% Trump tariff despite UK-US deal

Downing Street would not say on Tuesday whether British steel exporters would be hit with 50% tariffs from the US from Wednesday, despite an agreement to eliminate the charges. Last week US President Mr Trump announced he was doubling tariffs on the imports of steel from 25% to 50%. The UK struck a deal with Washington for import taxes on its steel to be removed weeks ago, but its implementation has not been finalised. The steel industry is working on the understanding that the sector will be impacted by the new rules and the 50% levy will likely affect UK steelmakersfrom Wednesday. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds was due to meet US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday. Asked whether it was 'embarrassing' that steelmakers could face a worse situation despite the announcement of the deal last month, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'I'm not going to get ahead of announcements for the United States. 'But what you've seen so far is the US and the UK agree a landmark deal across sectors to protect British industries – cars, steel, aluminium – and you've seen the welcoming statements the industries have made in support of the agreement. 'When it comes to implementation of the agreement, that work is ongoing.' Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaking on the phone to US President Donald Trump during a visit to the West Midlands in May (Alberto Pezzali/PA) Number 10 later insisted that Mr Trump would keep his word on the UK-US deal. Asked if Mr Trump could be trusted, a No 10 spokesman said: 'Yes, absolutely. We have a very close relationship with the US. I think that's reflected in the fact that this deal has been signed, and that it is, as we've said before, the first of its kind.' UK Steel has previously said the tariff announcement is a 'body blow' for the industry. Director general Gareth Stace said: 'The deal that the Prime Minister and President Trump struck just a few short weeks ago is yet to be finalised, so this doubling of tariffs plunges the UK steel industry further into confusion. 'Uncertainty remains as to whether and when our second biggest export market will be open for business or is being firmly shut in our faces.' Meanwhile, a Tata Steel director told the Business and Trade Committee on Tuesday that the UK 'absolutely' needs to go faster in supporting the steel industry in response to US tariffs. Russell Codling, director of markets, business development and commercial services at Tata said: 'It is not just for us making sure that this deal (with the US) is the right deal, it is also about making sure that the trade protection measures are the appropriate ones in the UK, and they are at least as good as other trading partners around the world.' When asked if the UK needs to go faster on the issue, Mr Codling said: 'Absolutely.' The same committee also heard from leaders in other sectors that have been affected by the tariff arrangements, including car manufacturing. An industry figure told the MPs that motoring firms would 'of course' like the 100,000 quota for a 10% tariff on car imports into the US to be higher. The Government is engaging intensively with the US to implement the Economic Prosperity Deal that we agreed on May 8 at pace, including on steel and aluminium, and will update on progress in due course Government spokesperson Murray Paul, public affairs director at Jaguar Land Rover said: 'Of course we'd prefer for it to be higher. 'But I think if we're honest it's there or thereabouts what the current market volume is of producing from the UK into the US. 'We are expectant that it's administered fairly, that if there's a small amount of pain that that is distributed equally amongst British manufacturers of goods. 'Obviously, we would like it to grow in the future because we think there's a growth opportunity in the US market as the incredible cars that we produce in this country are admired around the world.' A Government spokesperson said: 'Ministers and officials have worked tirelessly to ensure that the UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US, helping us deliver on the Plan for Change. 'The Government is engaging intensively with the US to implement the Economic Prosperity Deal that we agreed on May 8 at pace, including on steel and aluminium, and will update on progress in due course.'

'More is more': Hakeem Jeffries pushes Democrats to flood the zone in opposition to Trump
'More is more': Hakeem Jeffries pushes Democrats to flood the zone in opposition to Trump

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

'More is more': Hakeem Jeffries pushes Democrats to flood the zone in opposition to Trump

WASHINGTON — In the chaotic opening weeks of President Donald Trump 's second administration, Democrats debated whether to push back on every norm-shattering executive action, or pick and choose their spots and hope Trump would prove to be his own worst enemy. That debate has been settled, with Democrats aggressively taking on Trump in the courts, in the streets and on social media. At the center of that messaging strategy is House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., who privately has been urging his members to be more visible in their districts and on digital media, and has stepped up his own visibility in recent weeks. Rather than his regular, once-a-week news conference in the Capitol, Jeffries now holds as many as three press briefings with reporters each week in Washington. He is also making weekly appearances on popular podcasts outside the traditional political media circuit, including those hosted by Stephen A. Smith, Tony Kornheiser, Jon Stewart, Katie Couric and Scott Galloway. Marking the opening months of the Trump administration, Jeffries delivered a scathing 30-minute rebuke of Trump's '100 days of chaos, 100 days of cruelty and 100 days of corrupt behavior.' He also joined Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., for a 12-hour sit-in on the Capitol steps as they protested Medicaid cuts in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'We are in a 'more is more' environment. These aren't ordinary times, and they require an extraordinary response,' Jeffries said in a phone interview with NBC News on Tuesday, one of roughly two dozen digitalmedia interviews he has participated in since February. 'House Democrats are rising to the occasion to meet the moment,' he said, 'but more from all of us will continue to be required until we can definitively end this national nightmare that Donald Trump and House Republicans are visiting on the American people.' After suffering a bruising defeat in the last presidential election and still years out from the next one, Democrats are without a clear national leader. And the party's base has displayed a hunger for a new and younger generation of voices to take charge. That has opened the door for Jeffries, 54, to assume an even bigger role in the party, even as he is still coming into national prominence and — less than three years removed from succeeding Nancy Pelosi as House Democrats' leader — not yet a household name. The flood-the-zone strategy is a marked change for a politician with a reputation for being cautious and calculated. But if that game plan pays off and Democrats manage to win control of the House in next year's midterm elections, Jeffries would be the favorite to become speaker — and the party's most powerful member in Washington. 'Hakeem Jeffries gets it. As he says, we're in an environment where more is more. We need to be flooding the zone. And not only is he doing that, he's encouraging every member of Congress to do that,' Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., an influential progressive in the party, told NBC News in an interview. 'He's meeting the moment,' Khanna added, 'and that's why I say he's, right now, the leader of the Democratic Party.' Rep. Madeleine Dean, D-Pa., also praised Jeffries, saying that 'he is out there as much as he possibly can be, while still running a caucus and trying to block horrible legislation that this administration is putting forward.' Is Democrats' message breaking through? Jeffries' more aggressive approach comes as the Democratic base has demanded party leaders do more to oppose Trump amid federal layoffs, mass deportations of undocumented immigrants and scores of executive actions that have tested the balance of powers. But it's not clear to what degree Democrats' throw-everything-at-the-wall strategy is breaking through in a cacophonous political environment — one almost exclusively driven and dominated by Trump. And there are still lingering questions about whether the party's current crop of leaders and their tactics are meeting the moment. 'The strategy of quarter one and quarter two was 'let Trump implode.' But you don't win elections, saying how bad that guy is — you have to win on substance,' said one Democratic strategist, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. Still, Jeffries has notched some key symbolic wins. In March, Jeffries unified House Democrats against a Republican-led government funding bill that included a hike to military spending and cuts to domestic spending. Only a single Democrat voted yes. By comparison, Jeffries' counterpart in the Senate, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., faced significant blowback when he and a band of Democrats in the chamber allowed the bill to pass to avert a shutdown. As House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., tried to push through the sweeping domestic policy package before Memorial Day, Jeffries and the Democrats threw up roadblocks to make it as politically painful as possible for Republicans. More than 100 Democrats testified against the Trump bill in the Rules Committee, dragging out the meeting for nearly 22 hours and delaying the process. As they stalled, Jeffries' leadership team urged members to record videos and join livestreams to speak out against the bill, which could boot millions of Americans from Medicaid rolls and off food stamps. Jeffries said he believes Democrats' messaging is breaking through, pointing to polls showing that most Americans disapprove of the way Trump is handling the presidency and a special election victory in Wisconsin in April that allowed liberals to hold their majority on the state Supreme Court. If 'Democrats as a party are truly on the run,' Jeffries said, 'then we'd be losing special elections, not winning them in the way that we are, including most decisively in Wisconsin.' An affirmative agenda In the wake of Trump's inauguration in January, some Democrats privately grumbled that perhaps Jeffries wasn't the right man for the job. Some pined for Pelosi, who famously clashed with Trump during his first term, lecturing the president in a 2019 White House meeting and ripping up a copy of his State of the Union speech the next year. While not pointing fingers at Jeffries, other Democrats have said the party needs to clearly state what it is for — not just say it's against Trump. 'Voters are turned off by Trump, but they want to know Democrats' affirmative agenda as well,' one Democratic official said. But few Democrats have chosen to directly challenge Jeffries. Ashley Etienne, who served as a top adviser to both Pelosi and Vice President Kamala Harris, has been the exception. Etienne, appearing on a Politico podcast last month, said Trump has given Democrats a tremendous political gift and that Jeffries and other leaders were 'squandering' it. She faulted him for failing to coordinate with outside groups and other elected officials around the country. 'If you don't have coordination, you've just got words on a paper that you're calling talking points,' Etienne told Politico. 'It's meaningless. And I think that's where we are right now.' Jeffries said in his 100-day address that Democrats in the coming months would lay out a 'vision for this country's future that isn't about Donald Trump.' But on Tuesday, he declined to offer any details. Internal discussions on that blueprint are getting underway now, following the House's passage of the massive bill for Trump's agenda. 'There are a variety of issues that distinguish Democrats from Republicans. And as we emerge from the debate around the one big, ugly bill that Donald Trump and his sycophants in Congress are trying to jam down the throat of the American people,' Jeffries said Tuesday, 'we will have the opportunity to draw a clear contrast between our values-based vision for making life better for all Americans and the Republican vision that is designed to benefit their billionaire donors like Elon Musk.' And a Jeffries aide pushed back on Etienne, saying their office holds a weekly meeting with between 60 and 100 surrogates, advocates and grassroots activists, in addition to pushing out regular talking points. On Sunday, Schumer said he and Jeffries had spoken 'about ways our caucuses can fight back together' against the Trump package as the Senate considers it. In March, leaders, working closely with House Democrats' messaging arm, also set up space in the Capitol for social media influencers and advocates to rebut a speech Trump gave to a joint session of Congress. 'We need to be messaging on all mediums, for people to see what we're about,' said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., a 35-year-old progressive star. 'As a millennial, I obviously lean on social media. I tend to participate in the mediums that I myself use,' she continued. 'I don't think that's necessarily about what is best for everybody. … I think it makes us better messengers when we are engaging on the platforms that we use ourselves.' Dean, the Pennsylvania congresswoman who served as one of the Democratic prosecutors in Trump's second impeachment trial, said each lawmaker is figuring out their own unique way to fight back against Trump. A member of the House Judiciary Committee, Dean has held seven town halls this year and said she has focused her messaging on the president's potential ethics violations, including accepting a $400 million jet from Qatar. 'The way I've said it, instead of more is more, is we can't normalize any of this stuff. … This is not normal. I don't want anybody to think that what is going on here is actually normal,' Dean said in an interview. 'The American people are really busy, but they have to be aware of these threats.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store