Social media companies not liable for 2022 Buffalo mass shooting, New York court rules
Reversing a lower court ruling, the state Appellate Division in Rochester said defendants including Meta Platforms' (META.O), opens new tab Facebook and Instagram, Google's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab YouTube, and Reddit were entitled to immunity under a federal law that protects online platforms from liability over user content.
The case arose from Payton Gendron's racially motivated mass shooting at Tops Friendly Markets on May 14, 2022.
Relatives and representatives of victims, as well as store employees and customers who witnessed the attack, claimed the defendants' platforms were defective because they were designed to addict and radicalize users like Gendron.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Other defendants included Alphabet, Amazon.com (AMZN.O), opens new tab, Discord, 4chan, Snap (SNAP.N), opens new tab and Twitch, all of which Gendron used, the mid-level state appeals court said.
Writing for a 3-2 majority, Justice Stephen Lindley said holding social media companies liable would undermine the intent behind Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act, to promote development of and competition on the internet while keeping government interference to a minimum.
While condemning Gendron's conduct and "the vile content that motivated him to assassinate Black people simply because of the color of their skin," Lindley said a liability finding would "result in the end of the Internet as we know it."
"Because social media companies that sort and display content would be subject to liability for every untruthful statement made on their platforms, the Internet would over time devolve into mere message boards," he wrote.
Justices Tracey Bannister and Henry Nowak dissented, saying the defendants force-fed targeted content to keep users engaged, be it videos about cooking or puppies, or white nationalist vitriol.
"Such conduct does not maintain the robust nature of Internet communication or preserve the vibrant and competitive free market that presently exists for the Internet contemplated by the protections of immunity," the judges wrote.
Gendron pleaded guilty to state charges including murder and terrorism motivated by hate, and was sentenced in February 2023 to life in prison without parole.
He faces related federal charges that could lead to the death penalty. Questioning of potential jurors in that case is scheduled to begin in August 2026, court records show.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Virginia Giuffre's family pleads with Trump not to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell
The family of Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein 's victims, has urged Donald Trump not to pardon the disgraced financier's longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell. As backlash grows over his administration's handling of the Epstein case, Trump told reporters on Monday that he is 'allowed' to grant clemency to Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking minors, adding that he hadn't thought about it. The family of Giuffre, a key survivor of Epstein's sexual abuse who died by suicide in April, said any leniency shown toward Maxwell would be 'one of the highest travesties of justice.' 'The government and the President should never consider giving Ghislaine Maxwell any leniency,' the family said in a statement Wednesday. 'Ghislaine Maxwell is a monster who deserves to rot in prison for the rest of her life for the extraordinary violence and abuse she put not just our sister Virginia through, but many other survivors, who may number in the thousands.' A senior administration official told NBC News that no leniency towards Maxwell is being discussed. The family also noted that Trump said that 'clemency for Maxwell is not something he is even thinking about at this time.' The Giuffres pounced on Trump's claims on Tuesday that Epstein 'stole' the victim from his Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach. Aged 16, Giuffre had worked at Trump's resort as a locker-room attendant during the summer of 2000. 'It was shocking to hear President Trump invoke our sister and say that he was aware that Virginia had been 'stolen' from Mar-a-Lago,' they said in the statement. 'It makes us ask if he was aware of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal actions, especially given his statement two years later that his good friend Jeffrey 'likes women on the younger side... no doubt about it.'' Trump denies having any knowledge of Epstein's criminal activity, and the president has never been accused of wrongdoing in connection with the disgraced financier's case. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Wednesday evening that the president kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago for 'being a creep' to female staff. In the statement, the family acknowledged that Giuffre had worked at Trump's Florida resort years before Epstein and Trump allegedly fell out over a real estate deal around 2004, and a year before police began investigating Epstein. However, the family accused Maxwell of having 'preyed upon' Giuffre while she worked at the resort 25 years ago. Giuffre's family told The Atlantic on Wednesday that the Epstein victim's work at Mar-a-Lago was meant to be a fun summertime job, but instead led to her being sex trafficked. For more than a decade, the Epstein case has been a subject of intense public interest, amid speculation that high-profile public figures who had ties to the financier may have been involved in – or had knowledge of – his sex-trafficking network. The Trump administration has been facing backlash after the Justice Department and FBI said in a memo released earlier this month that there was no client list of Epstein's associates who may have participated in his crimes. It also noted that Epstein did indeed die by suicide in his jail cell in 2019. Giuffre's family noted in its statement that they and the public are demanding answers about the case and that 'survivors deserve this.' In what Democrats are calling a veiled effort to drown out the outrage at the Trump administration's sudden U-turn on the files, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Maxwell privately for nine hours last week. Last week, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee subpoenaed Maxwell, leading her to signal that she would testify to Congress if granted immunity. Giuffre's family warned Maxwell had already been convicted for lying under oath and said she 'will continue to do so for as long as it affects her position.' The committee quickly rejected Maxwell's proposal, stating through a spokesperson that immunity will not even be considered.
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
How Americans' views of racial discrimination have shifted since 2021, according to AP-NORC polling
Slightly less than half of U.S. adults believe that Black people face 'a great deal' or 'quite a bit' of discrimination in the United States, according to a new poll. That's a decline from the solid majority, 60%, who thought Black Americans faced high levels of discrimination in the spring of 2021, months after racial reckoning protests in response to the police killing of George Floyd. Significant numbers of Americans also think diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, also known as DEI, are backfiring against the groups they're intended to help, according to the survey from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, including many people who belong to those groups. The findings suggest Americans' views on racial discrimination have shifted substantially since four years ago, when many companies launched efforts to promote diversity within their workforces and the products they sold. Since then, many of those companies have reversed themselves and retreated from their diversity practices, a trend that's accelerated this year under pressure from President Donald Trump, a Republican who has sought to withhold federal money from schools and companies that promote DEI. Now, it's clear that views are changing as well as company policies. Claudine Brider, a 48-year-old Black Democrat in Compton, California, says the concept of DEI has made the workplace difficult for Black people and women in new ways. 'Anytime they're in a space that they're not expected to be, like seeing a Black girl in an engineering course ... they are seen as only getting there because of those factors,' Brider said. 'It's all negated by someone saying, 'You're only here to meet a quota.'' Reversal in views of racial discrimination The new poll finds 45% of U.S. adults think Black people face high levels of discrimination, down from 60% in the spring of 2021. There was a similar drop in views about the prevalence of serious discrimination against Asian people, which fell from 45% in the 2021 poll — conducted a month after the Atlanta spa shootings, which killed eight people, including six women of Asian descent — to 32% in the current survey. There's no question the country has backtracked from its 'so-called racial reckoning' and the experiences of particular groups such as Black people are being downplayed, said Phillipe Copeland, a professor at Boston University School of Social Work. Americans' views about discrimination haven't shifted when it comes to all groups, though. Just under half of U.S. adults, 44%, now say Hispanic people face at least 'quite a bit of discrimination,' and only 15% say this about white people. Both numbers are similar to when the question was last asked in April 2021. Divisions on the impact of DEI on Black and Hispanic people The poll indicates that less than half of Americans think DEI has a benefit for the people it's intended to help. About 4 in 10 U.S. adults say DEI reduces discrimination against Black people, while about one-third say this about Hispanic people, women and Asian people. Many — between 33% and 41% — don't think DEI makes a difference either way. About one-quarter of U.S. adults believe that DEI actually increases discrimination against these groups. Black and Hispanic people are more likely than white people to think DEI efforts end up increasing discrimination against people like them. About 4 in 10 Black adults and about one-third of Hispanic adults say DEI increases discrimination against Black people, compared with about one-quarter of white adults. There is a similar split between white adults and Black and Hispanic adults on assessments of discrimination against Hispanic people. Among white people, it's mostly Democrats who think DEI efforts reduce discrimination against Black and Hispanic people. Only about one-quarter of white independents and Republicans say the same. Pete Parra, a 59-year-old resident of Gilbert, Arizona, thinks that DEI is making things harder for racial minorities now. He worries about how his two adult Hispanic sons will be treated when they apply for work. 'I'm not saying automatically just give it to my sons,' said Parra, who leans toward the Democratic Party. But he's concerned that now factors other than merit may take priority. 'If they get passed over for something," he said, "they're not going to know (why).' About 3 in 10 say DEI increases discrimination against white people The new poll shows that Americans aren't any more likely to think white people face discrimination than they were in 2021. And more than half think DEI doesn't make a difference when it comes to white people or men. But a substantial minority — about 3 in 10 U.S. adults — think DEI increases discrimination against white people. Even more white adults, 39%, hold that view, compared with 21% of Hispanic adults and 13% of Black adults. The recent political focus on DEI has included the idea that white people are more often overlooked for career and educational opportunities because of their race. John Bartus, a 66-year-old registered Republican in Twin Falls, Idaho, says that DEI might have been 'a good thing for all races of people, but it seems like it's gone far left.' It's his impression that DEI compels companies to hire people based on their race or if they identify as LGBTQ+. 'The most qualified person ought to get a job based on their merit or based on their educational status,' Bartus said. Brider, the Black California resident, objects to the notion that white people face the same level of discrimination as Black people. But while she thinks the aims of DEI are admirable, she also sees the reality as flawed. 'I do think there needs to be something that ensures that there is a good cross-section of people in the workplace,' Brider said. 'I just don't know what that would look like, to be honest.' ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,437 adults was conducted July 10-14, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 3.6 percentage points.
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Hawley says he and Trump had ‘nice visit' after president ripped him as ‘second-tier' over stock bill: ‘Full speed ahead'
Sen. Josh Hawley laughed off President Donald Trump's attack on him, telling The Independent that he and the president met after Trump called him a 'second-tier' senator. Earlier in the day, Trump had posted on Truth Social and attacked the Missouri Republican for his legislation that would ban stock trading among lawmakers as well as the president and vice president, and for not supporting a measure by Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) that would review former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's stock trading. Hawley had named his bill the PELOSI Act, as a play on her and her husband's trading. 'He is playing right into the dirty hands of the Democrats,' Trump said. 'It's a great Bill for her, and her 'husband,' but so bad for our Country! I don't think real Republicans want to see their President, who has had unprecedented success, TARGETED, because of the 'whims' of a second-tier Senator named Josh Hawley!" But Hawley told The Independent that he and Trump later spoke. 'He and I had a nice visit this afternoon and he reiterated that he is in favor of a stock ban for members of Congress that he wants to see it passed,' he said. 'He thinks we need to move full speed ahead.' Despite the fact that in 2021, Hawley led efforts to object to the 2020 presidential election results even after the Senate reconvened when the riot at the US Capitol ended, he has occasionally been on the opposing side of Trump's policies. For much of the debate around the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' Hawley raised objections about cuts to Medicaid, though he ultimately voted for the bill. Banning members of Congress from trading stocks has long held bipartisan support. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) and even former congressman Matt Gaetz supported legislation to ban members from trading stock. Despite this, the legislation has long stalled. Many Democrats and Republicans have pointed to Pelosi and her husband Paul's success on the stock market as a potential reason the bill never received a vote on the floor, though she expressed openness to legislation toward the end of her tenure. Hawley clashed earlier with Senate Republicans on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs about his legislation, which he entitled the PELOSI Act. Republicans argued that the legislation would unfairly target Trump. But committee chairman Rand Paul (R-KY) argued that since the bill would only apply to lawmakers after their next term began, it provided cover to Trump and Vice President JD Vance. 'But the fact that they don't want to apply it to Donald Trump means that it's a really crummy bill and it would do terrible things to Donald Trump's finances,' Paul said. The committee passed his legislation to ban members of Congress and their spouses from trading stocks. But Hawley was the sole Republican to vote on his own legislation and it passed with the help of Republicans. In the end, Hawley was the only Republican on the committee to vote for the legislation. But Hawley does not have much reason to worry about losing his seat for a while. He won re-election in 2024 and would not be up again for another six years, after Trump has left office. Pelosi, for her part, endorsed the bill, which was renamed as the HONEST Act. 'While I appreciate the creativity of my Republican colleagues in drafting legislative acronyms, I welcome any serious effort to raise ethical standards in public service,' she said. 'The HONEST Act, as amended, rightly applies its stock trading ban not only to Members of Congress, but now to the President and Vice President as well.' OnTuesday, Hawley floated legislation that would send $600 tariff rebate checks to Americans, but not to 'Biden voters,' only to 'Trump blue-collar voters.' 'Well, you wouldn't give it to everybody, you'd give it to the working people,' the Missouri Republican told far-right podcaster and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon on Tuesday. 'You'd give it to our people.' 'I mean, you know, the rich people don't need it … what I mean by that is all those Democrat donors of Wall Street, all these hedge fund guys, who all hate the tariffs, by the way.'
