Frank White prepared to back Chiefs stadium tax — but under these conditions
But it comes with significant caveats.
White, the Jackson County executive, wrote to Kehoe last week that he would back a 3/8th-cent sales tax extension in the county — but with only one-third of it reserved for an Arrowhead Stadium makeover.
In a letter obtained by The Star through an open records request, White lays out a plan to reserve one-third of the tax to upgrade the downtown Jackson County courthouse and the juvenile rehabilitation facility; one-third for capital improvements at University Health, county-owned hospitals in Kansas City; and one-third for upgrades and maintenance for Arrowhead stadium.
'This approach represents exactly the kind of balanced, responsible investment the moment calls for,' White wrote in the letter.
A Kehoe spokesperson did not indicate whether the Republican governor supported White's plan in an email to The Star, but she emphasized that local support was necessary for the teams.
'Governor Kehoe appreciates the willingness of Jackson County Executive Frank White to explore options for local investment to keep the Chiefs and Royals in Missouri,' said spokesperson Gabby Picard, who also pointed to issues with Jackson County tax assessments, adding Kehoe 'also believes Jackson County residents deserve certainty for fair and reasonable property tax assessments, which is a critical piece to any Jackson County solution.'
The Chiefs declined comment on the letter.
But a three-way split is likely a non-starter in any negotiations with the Chiefs, who possess something today they didn't two years ago when their talks with White commenced:
Options.
The Chiefs are not only pursuing a renovated stadium at the Truman Sports Complex, but they continue to explore the possibility of building a new stadium across the state line. Both Missouri and Kansas have passed competing stadium-incentives packages, and the Chiefs recently successfully persuaded Kansas to extend the deadline for its funding package.
The Missouri bill passed last month not only encourages but requires a local source of funding — which is the significance of the letter.
While it's long been known the stadium tax measures White does not support, his writing to Kehoe offers the first behind-the-curtain peek of the brand of ballot measure he would promote.
'Governor, I'm aware that some have tried to suggest that I'm opposed to any level of public funding for these teams. That's just not true,' White wrote. 'What I am opposed to is continuing the status quo for another generation.'
White's office confirmed the letter but declined further comment. White is facing a recall election, possibly as soon as next month.
The Royals are not a party to his proposal to Kehoe. Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas and his office has been a more active party in the talks with the Royals on proposed sites in Jackson County, most recently Washington Square Park, which is located north of Crown Center and east of Union Station.
White says the county is 'ready to support the city's efforts and is willing to step back in should the team present a proposal for us to consider or express interest in reengaging. To date, the Royals have not done so.'
If the Royals elects to pursue their original vision of downtown baseball — over options in Kansas or Clay County — that stadium is unlikely to be county-owned. At least one top Missouri lawmaker has suggested that the Royals moving to Clay County would take off 'half the pressure on Jackson County.'
Chiefs team president Mark Donovan has consistently said that if the NFL team stays at Arrowhead Stadium, its local funding source would come through the county — which owns the stadiums at the Truman Sports Complex, where the teams are tied through a lease that expires in 2031.
For two years, though, White and the Chiefs (and Royals, for that matter) have failed to reach an agreement on what taxpayer support beyond 2031 would entail. White vetoed a combined Chiefs and Royals measure to put a sales tax extension on the ballot before the county legislature overrode him and put the item in front of voters. They rejected it, 58-42%.
The Chiefs are unlikely to return to the voters with anything other than a tax reserved for one thing and one thing only. They are adamant about dislodging any confusion from a future ballot question.
A three-way chop would also, quite obviously, secure the team less money.
For White, that's the idea.
For the Chiefs, that would almost certainly be a sticking point, even after they have secured a path toward a significant contribution from the state.
The Chiefs and Royals have long split the 3/8th-cent sales tax evenly, but they have separated their stadium plans moving forward — and any future ask of the voters would therefore be separate, too. That's purposeful in the aftermath of last year's rejection at the ballot box.
In response to a question from The Star, Donovan said last week the Chiefs would likely target an April 2026 vote if they stay in the county. They estimate a renovated Arrowhead Stadium would cost north of $1 billion.
But it's not yet clear what kind of tax they will seek absent sharing it with the Royals.
White's request is that other county parties get a cut — 'generational investments in public health and public safety,' he called the proposed tax support for the courthouse, juvenile facility and hospitals.
White and the Chiefs reengaged in talks after last year's vote failed, but they have not discussed the matter recently. Instead, Donovan said last week he talked to the county legislature, a signal of the team's potential plans to once again try to gather enough support from the nine-member committee to put the item on the ballot, rather than an avenue through White.
In his letter to Kehoe, White sought an amendment to the Missouri sales tax statue to allow for the three-way split for the 3/8th-cent sales tax extension. The state's General Assembly would have to pass that amendment before a vote.
The Star's Kacen Bayless contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's what to expect on Boone County's Aug. 5 election ballots
Early no-excuse in-person absentee voting is now underway for the Aug. 5 election. The early voting period kicked off July 22. Any registered voter can visit from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Saturday at the Boone County Government Center, 801 E. Walnut St. in Columbia, to cast a ballot. The clerk's office will hold a weekend no-excuse voting off site 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Aug. 2 at the Parkade Elementary gymnasium, 111 Parkade Blvd. in Columbia, and 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. Aug. 3 at Columbia/Boone County Public Health and Human Services, 1005 W. Worley in Columbia. Excused in-person absentee voting also is possible, which started July 24 and runs through Aug. 4. This includes those who are out of town on Election Day, work in healthcare or as a first responder or as a poll worker, or a person has an illness, injury or disability. The deadline to request a mail-in absentee ballot was July 3 and the deadline to return it was July 23. There are three questions voters may see on ballots in Boone County, depending on where a person lives. Residents who want to check their voter registration, polling location or to see a sample ballot can visit the Boone County Clerk website to search for their respective voter record. The Boone County Clerk's Office already had mailed physical sample ballots to residents. All of Boone County will be asked if they want to exempt senior citizens from increases in the property tax liability to all taxing authorities. The county already approved an exemption solely for Boone County property tax in April 2024, but other taxing entities include school districts, municipalities like Columbia, Boone County Common Road District, Daniel Boone Regional Library and the state. Columbia Ward 2 residents will have have a choice to make for representation on the Columbia City Council. They will have to decide between Pickleman's Gourmet Cafe executive Ken Rice and librarian and community organizer Vera Elwood. Whoever is selected will serve the remaining two-year term on the council after the resignation of Lisa Meyer due to health reasons. More: Who's funding the Columbia Ward 2 special election candidates? A proposition for residents within the Harrisburg R-8 School district could see an increase in its property tax levy, from $4.0783 to $4.5783 per $100 assessed valuation. If approved, this is a full elimination of the Proposition C Sales Tax Rollback in its operating levy. A letter to families by Harrisburg Superintendent Steve Combs notes this will mean an average 7% increase in the property tax bill. He also provided an example. For a person in a house bought at $200,000, it's assessed value is $38,000. Multiplying by the proposed 50-cent increase results in $190,000. Because the tax levy increase is per $100, that is a $190 increase, divided across twelve months is an additional $15.83 per month. "Missouri ranks 47th in the nation in funding for its public schools. Our local tax revenue is a significant portion of our income and the only option we have for increasing our revenue. We are asking the patrons of the Harrisburg School district to increase the operating tax levy, which will enable our district to continue to provide resources to our students, the leaders of tomorrow," Combs wrote in the letter. This article originally appeared on Columbia Daily Tribune: Boone County August 5 election: What's on the ballot Solve the daily Crossword


New York Times
39 minutes ago
- New York Times
How to watch Top Rank Boxing's TV finale: Xander Zayas, Jorge Garcia battle for world title
Rising Puerto Rican star Xander Zayas will take on Mexican veteran Jorge Garcia this Saturday at The Theater at Madison Square Garden in New York City. Perhaps more significant after the final bell, which will crown a new WBO junior middleweight world champion, is that this main event will be the final Top Rank boxing show on ESPN. Advertisement Here's how to watch it live. Live coverage is also available on ESPN+. Top Rank and ESPN decided to have their final fight card together, showcasing perhaps their hottest prospect in the former's half-century of existence as a boxing promotion. In 2019, then 16-year-old Zayas became the youngest signee in Top Rank history, a company that has promoted greats like Muhammad Ali and Manny Pacquiao. Now 22, Zayas (21-0, 13 KOs) looks to win his first world title since turning pro six years ago. He faces upset-minded 28-year-old Garcia (33-4, 26 KOs). On the undercard is 2023 Ring Magazine Prospect of the Year Bruce 'Shu Shu' Carrington (15-0, 9 KOs). Carrington, 28, takes on Mateus Heita for the WBC interim featherweight world title. After Saturday's fights, it will be the first time in more than 80 years that boxing will not be shown on linear television in the United States. The first boxing TV broadcast in U.S. history was in 1939, a heavyweight bout between Max Baer and Lou Nova. Top Rank was the last major boxing promotion in the country that had a media rights deal with a 'mainstream' TV network. The boxing company's agreement with ESPN expires in August after the parties reached a seven-year deal in 2018. In those seven years, ESPN broadcast some of the biggest fights in the sport's history, including the second and third heavyweight title fights between Tyson Fury and Deontay Wilder. Other boxing promotions — such as Golden Boy, Premier Boxing Champions and Matchroom — have switched to streaming platforms like DAZN, Amazon Prime and Netflix to show their respective fighters. Top Rank has yet to announce a new broadcasting partner. Streaming and ticketing links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication. (Photo of Xander Zayas: Al Bello/ Getty Images)


New York Times
39 minutes ago
- New York Times
Removal of Castro and Guevara Statues Ignites Outcry in Mexico City
When Fidel Castro first met Che Guevara in Mexico City in 1955, they began planning a guerrilla war that would sweep Cuba and change the course of Latin American history. Mr. Castro became Cuba's Communist leader, defying the United States for decades. Mr. Guevara, an Argentine, became a legend to his supporters and enemies alike, even after he was executed in Bolivia in 1967. In 2017, Mexicans commemorated their meeting with statues, linking Mexico to a pivotal moment in the Cold War. But the statues were removed last week by a local Mexico City mayor, setting off a political firestorm that has drawn in the country's president and reignited a debate about how to recognize a divisive history. The local mayor, Alessandra Rojo de la Vega, said the statues were improperly installed and that the men should not be honored, calling them 'murderers' who 'continue representing a lot of pain.' She pointed to people who were silenced, jailed and killed under Mr. Castro's nearly half-a-century reign, and to how Cuba still struggles with food and electricity shortages. 'I understand that there are people who see Fidel and Che as their revolutionary figures, but governing isn't about choosing which victims to show solidarity to,' Ms. Rojo de la Vega said in an interview. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.