Punjab BJP chief seeks support for PM Modi's stand on farmers
The BJP state chief said the US, which considers itself the global enforcer, has been continuously pressuring India to allow its agricultural products into Indian markets.
To this end, the US has imposed stringent tariff restrictions on India.
"However, Prime Minister Narendra Modi understands that allowing US agricultural products into India would devastate Indian farmers, and thus, he has refused to bow to this pressure," he said in a statement here.
Jakhar emphasised that at a time when major global powers have succumbed to US demands, Prime Minister Modi has prioritised the interests of Indian farmers and refused to open Indian markets to the US.
He appealed to farmers and farmer organisations, stating that this is the time to stand firmly with the Prime Minister in the interest of the nation, so he can fight for farmers' rights with even greater resolve.
Jakhar further remarked that parties shedding "crocodile tears" over the Punjab government's land pooling policy did little to pressure the government.
It was only the BJP that made every possible effort to protect farmers' land and built public opinion against the policy.
Due to the BJP's pressure and the strong opposition from Punjab's people, the government was forced to withdraw this policy.
He added that the people of Punjab have now clearly understood who engages in politics in the name of farmers and who truly stands with them in difficult times.
Jakhar stressed that this is the time to identify those who exploit farmers' names for political gain while doing nothing substantial for them.
In contrast, the BJP took a firm stand against the land pooling policy in Punjab and stood strongly with farmers.
At the national level, Prime Minister Modi has taken on the US to protect the interests of the country's farmers.
Jakhar urged everyone to seize this opportunity to support the Prime Minister in his efforts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
5 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
CP Radhakrishnan: Rise of a tested, trusted swayamsevak and BJP's V-P candidate
Born on October 20, 1957, in Tiruppur -- the 'knitwear capital of India' in Tamil Nadu's Kongu belt -- Radhakrishnan was drawn to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) early. At just 17, he joined the Bharatiya Jan Sangh, the political forerunner to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). A founding foot soldier of the BJP since its inception in 1980, Radhakrishnan has held multiple key roles in the party's Tamil Nadu unit, including State President (2004–07). His 19,000-km, 93-day Rath Yatra across Tamil Nadu during this period spotlighted issues ranging from river-linking and counter-terrorism to social reform and anti-drug campaigns. He later led two more padayatras for separate causes. Radhakrishnan entered Parliament from Coimbatore in 1998 and retained the seat in 1999. He contested the same constituency multiple times, finishing strong even in 2014 — when the BJP went solo, with nearly 3.9 lakh votes. During his time in Parliament, he served as Chairman of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Textiles and was a member of panels on PSUs, finance, and the stock exchange scam. Beyond politics, Radhakrishnan holds a BBA and made his mark as an entrepreneur. Between 1985 and 1998, he pioneered the export of 100% cotton knitted fabric to Bangladesh and developed textile links with countries across Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. In administrative roles, he was Chairman of the Coir Board (2016–2020) and later BJP's Kerala in-charge (2020–22). His appointment as Governor of Jharkhand in February 2023 marked a transition from party politics to constitutional office. In his first four months as governor, Radhakrishnan toured all 24 districts. He briefly held additional charges as Governor of Telangana and Lt. Governor of Puducherry. Since July 2024, he has been Governor of Maharashtra. Known for his grassroots connect and political adaptability, Radhakrishnan has maintained cordial relations across party lines including recent gestures such as visiting Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin to inquire about his health. Though he has remained outspoken on national issues, Radhakrishnan ruled out any return to active politics. "An advocate after becoming a judge cannot go back to being an advocate... I don't think about returning to active politics," he said in a recent interview, drawing a parallel with his gubernatorial responsibilities. A tireless campaigner, a disciplined ideologue, and a seasoned parliamentarian, Radhakrishnan's elevation to the Vice-Presidency marks a symbolic coming-of-age for the BJP in Tamil Nadu, a state where the party still seeks a significant electoral breakthrough.
Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tehsildar sings at farewell, revenue min suspends him for lack of ‘decorum'
Pune: Revenue minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule on Sunday said that tehsildar Prashant Thorat, who was recently transferred from Umri in Nanded to Renapur in Latur, has been suspended after a video of him singing a song while sitting in his office on the day of his farewell on Aug 8 was widely circulated on social media platforms. The action was taken based on a report by Nanded district collector Rahul Kardile which stated that Thorat's conduct maligned the image of govt and recommended disciplinary action, the suspension order issued by the divisional commissioner Jitendra Papalkar of Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar said. Bawankule, in an official statement, said govt officers are expected to maintain the dignity of their office. "Such performances may be acceptable in family or private gatherings, but it is essential that decorum is maintained on govt platforms," he said. You Can Also Check: Pune AQI | Weather in Pune | Bank Holidays in Pune | Public Holidays in Pune | Gold Rates Today in Pune | Silver Rates Today in Pune The video showed Thorat singing while seated in his office chair. The suspension order said, "His act does not suit a govt officer and is irresponsible." The revenue minister told reporters in Nagpur that he and additional chief secretary of the department, directed the divisional commissioner to initiate suspension action against the concerned tehsildar. "The way the farewell was conducted in the office, it seemed as though only an orchestra was left to be arranged. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo The officer was singing while seated on the official chair, which is not only a constitutional post but also serves as a judicial bench," he said. Bawankule said that thousands of cases of citizens are pending in the office and Thorat had no time to address them, yet he found time to indulge in such activities while seated on the tehsildar's chair. "This is unacceptable which is why he has been suspended. Such conduct will not be tolerated in the revenue department. If our officers behave in this manner, they should be sent home," he said, adding that all govt officials must uphold the dignity of their positions. The suspension has drawn criticism from citizens and political leaders, including members of the BJP, who argued that it was too harsh and urged govt to review it. Pune-based BJP leader Ujwal Keskar said, "The tehsildar was moved by his emotions and simply enjoyed the moment. The only mistake was the place where he chose to do it. And he had to face disciplinary action." Keskar added that instead of imposing such a severe penalty, the officer should have been given a warning and allowed to continue his duties. "In a democracy, decisions already taken can be revisited, and I am hopeful the state govt will reconsider this one too," he said. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
The Hindu
5 minutes ago
- The Hindu
A conservation manual, drafted by the ordinary citizen
In his Independence Day addresses delivered from the Red Fort, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been exhorting fellow citizens to preserve the memory of those who overthrew colonial rule. Even as his reminders have been timely, his tactics — enumerating a few freedom fighters' names and including some of their words in his speeches — are as well-worn as the Archaeological Survey of India's (ASI) approach to conserving the nation's built heritage. With a few exceptions, the ASI has largely been content with selecting monuments, isolating them, repairing them and occasionally polishing them. Given the enormity and complexity of India's past and the risk of large sections of it fading from our collective consciousness, it is time to articulate a more thoughtful and holistic approach to the conservation of ASI monuments. Acknowledging that the current frameworks informing conservation are the result of certain historical circumstances is important. Driven by a conviction that edifices, if properly analysed, can unlock histories of communities and thus allow for governing them more effectively, colonial officers located and catalogued pillars, rock-cut caves, stupas, temples, mosques, citadels, water reservoirs, and other edifices, promulgated historical preservation laws, and prescribed procedures for maintaining their structural integrity. John Marshall's Conservation Manual (1923) advocated extensive repair of ancient monuments and reshaping their immediate surroundings into gardens. Marshall's handbook continues to inflect the preservation of about 3,600 ASI sites, along with new laws, amendments, and provisions of international agreements. Notwithstanding these efforts, field surveys, audit reports, and court rulings establish that many protected monuments are falling apart. Recommendations of a conservation policy enunciated in 2014 are being irregularly followed. Not surprisingly, the government has begun to invite corporations to adopt monuments. A road map for conserving monuments Studying the writings of modern India builders is one way to begin articulating a new approach to conserving monuments. Consider lessons provided by Sarvodaya, Mahatma Gandhi's transcreation of a collection of essays by John Ruskin, a Victorian art critic. His rendering accentuated the art critic's advocacy of improving the social condition of all individuals irrespective of their backgrounds, discussed the importance of all vocations, and endorsed his admiration of craftspersons and their labour, even as it critiqued Ruskin's valorisation of Britain's imperial ambitions. Might the lessons that Gandhi learned and promoted inspire the ASI's new conservation manual to propose the following: when an edifice is conserved not only is its structural fabric to be tended, but the lives of all those who live around it and visit it are to be improved; and interpretive materials at an edifice should enable visitors to appreciate its builders' sophistication, inventiveness, and resilience. Conservation is a shared concern of contemporary practitioners of diverse disciplines including translators, health-care professionals, wildlife biologists, mycologists, and economists. By convening dialogues among and between these experts at various venues, listening to how they comprehend terms such as repair, preservation, and restoration and observing how audiences respond to them, the ASI can identify more principles of their new conservation manual. Translators today are attentive to the style and mood that the authors of source texts have sought to nurture and are grasping how sentences are formed and meanings generated in unalike languages. They are recognising that connotations change over time. Thus, their outputs are intricate works in dialogical relationships with assorted pasts, and not obsequious reproductions of texts initially written in other languages. Can such viewpoints inspire the ASI conservation manual to recommend that archaeologists acknowledge their distance between the deep past and contemporary moment and make their physical interventions of a monument's fabric clearer for visitors to discern? Contemporary translators sophisticated thinking of a particular language aptness to render anew a certain text may also be used to inform a clause in the new manual: that periodic reviews be undertaken of the aptness of preservation materials to ensure that they do not harm historical fabrics. Varied perspectives are important Humans preserve themselves by saving memories. Listening to divergent perspectives allows memories to be exercised and sustains their propagation. Such insights should inspire the ASI to study how visitors are using protected monuments today and craft conservation principles thereafter. One way to do so would be to offer visitors opportunities to participate in open-ended conversations about their experiences. Wildlife biologists are also thinking about protection. They reason that supporting a range of interactions occurring among and between sundry biotic and abiotic elements in an ecosystem and exchanges between networks are more efficacious strategies for restoring waning populations than safeguarding individual animals. Following this line of reasoning, might the ASI conservation manual recommend that archaeologists pay more attention to linkages between monuments and water bodies, fields, deserts, forests and settlements around them and deliberate whether certain boundary walls may be dismantled. Mycologists have found that fungi are far from unsettling sights. Fungi are powerful agents that break down organic matter, form mutually beneficial relationships with plants including helping them access nutrients, cause diseases in humans but also provide medicines, and help produce food. Such discernments can stimulate the ASI's manual to encourage the conservation of thousands of small, half-forgotten ancient monuments strewn across the country. Old city walls, cisterns, cenotaphs and dovecotes can have multiple benefits for communities living around them including securing neighbourhoods, recharging ground water aquifers, bringing visitors who might boost local economies, providing habitats and creating public spaces. Finally, contemporary economists' findings may also be generative. They have shown that value is produced by how things work and not just by their appearance. Following this dictum, the conservation manual may propose that it is more important for archaeologists to restore a haveli's natural ventilation systems than to regularly repaint its façade. Emphasising a particular resource's scarcity is another way in which value is created. Thus, further research should be undertaken to advance our knowledge of what makes ASI monuments sites of national significance. The new knowledge be used to justify larger budgets for their protection. The economic concept of creative destruction as an impetus for growth may also be utilised. For example, it can guide the transformation of old temples submerged in the reservoirs of large dams into laboratories for developing and testing technologies to document underwater sites and forge innovative alliances between historians, geologists and marine biologists. The citizen's role In a country as diverse as ours, conservation's meaning and value are always going to be positional and contested. Thus, all of us as ordinary citizens can help shape a new conservation manual by becoming more aware of our own locations and actions. We can also assist by further educating ourselves. Learning to read the language of the stones that monuments are built of, will allow us to listen to stories they tell and amplify largely silenced voices. We will also be able to glean builders' biases and use monuments as mirrors to confront our prejudices. Ultimately acquiring such literacy will empower us to discover India as a monument without walls and preserve ourselves as we shape a new future. Nachiket Chanchani is an Associate Professor in the Department of the History of Art at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, U.S.
