Paris Fashion Week schedule unveiled
Belgian designer Julie Kegels, the avant-garde brand Matières Fécales and the eponymous label of Marni's new creative director, Meryll Rogge, are among the newcomers included in the show schedule. Belgian brand Façon Jacmin appears on the list of newcomers in the presentations programme, alongside Danish brand Ganni, which showed for the first time in Paris in September 2024, but outside the official calendar.
The season will also be marked by the return of several major brands with new creative direction: French brand Jean Paul Gaultier, accompanied by Duran Lantink; Carven, with Mark Thomas; Mugler with Miguel Castro Freitas; Loewe with the duo composed of Jack McCollough and Lazaro Hernandez; and Maison Margiela (first ready-to-wear collection for its new creative director Glenn Martens). The return of Celine, Vêtements, Agnès b. Thom Browne and Lanvin has also been noted.
Among the most anticipated shows, Chanel's probably tops the list. The French brand will present the first collection designed by Matthieu Blazy, former creative director of Bottega Veneta, on Monday 6 October at 8pm GMT. Pierpaolo Piccioli's first collection for Balenciaga will also be among the season's most closely watched shows. This article was translated to English using an AI tool.
FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@fashionunited.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
BBC's Father Brown shares first-look at series 13 as filming wraps
BBC's Father Brown shares first-look at series 13 as filming wraps The hit BBC series Father Brown has wrapped filming on its 13th series and will see a number of famous faces joining Mark Williams in the fictional Cotswold village of Kembleford, Fans of the beloved BBC period drama Father Brown, which was inspired by the G.K Chesterton books, have reason to celebrate as filming for series 13 has officially wrapped up, with some thrilling guest stars set to feature. Actress Maureen Lipman, renowned for her role as Evelyn Plummer in Coronation Street, is set to appear in the upcoming series alongside other notable figures. Julia Sawalha, Phil Daniels, Debra Stephenson, Davood Ghadami, Kevin Harvey, George Rainsford, and Timothy Watson are also set to make appearances. They'll be joining Mark Williams, who has portrayed the detective clergyman in the BBC programme since its inception in 2013. Also returning to their roles in the series, which concluded filming in the Cotswolds, are fan favourites Tom Chambers as Inspector Sullivan, Claudie Blakley as the new Mrs Isabel Sullivan, Ruby-May Martinwood as Brenda, and John Burton as Sergeant Goodfellow, reports Gloucestershire Live. Coronation Street's Maureen Lipman will appear in series 13 (Image: BBC) In the first episode, viewers will be delighted to see Sorcha Cusack making a special comeback as Mrs McCarthy. A synopsis for the upcoming series states: "Following the jubilant wedding celebrations at the end of series 12, the new Mr and Mrs Sullivan settle into married life and a new home, with Isabel thrilled to be welcomed into the Policeman's Wives Society. "Meanwhile, Brenda goes on a journey of self-empowerment as she covers the role of Parish Secretary and learns to drive with the help of Sergeant Goodfellow. Father Brown is tasked by Flambeau to visit Father Lazarus in prison, resulting in a deadly game of cat and mouse, which ruffles the feathers of Canon Fox. Sorcha Cusack makes a special return as Mrs McCarthy (Image: KEVIN BAKER/BBC) "With his consecration now looming, Bishop-Elect Fox plans to enact his revenge upon Father Brown, leaving Kembleford changed forever. And in a Father Brown first – the group takes a trip to the seaside!" The BBC series will also see the return of Nancy Carroll as Lady Felicia, John Light as Hercule Flambeau, Lex Shrapnel as Father Lazarus, Roger May as Canon Fox, and Kieran Hodgson as Father Lindsey. Discussing the filming locations for this series, actor Mark Williams revealed it was an exceptional year for intriguing sites. He remarked: "We have filmed in The Chateaux Impney, a French fantasy in Droitwich, the little theatre in Chipping Norton (an ex Salvation Army Citadel), the wonderful 18th-century octagonal Crown Courts in Warwick, and an atmospheric ex-Nunnery in Great Malvern with a glorious chapel by Ninian Comper. BBC's Father Brown shares first-look at series 13 as filming wraps (Image: BBC) "Also, The Fleece Inn in Bretforton which is a English pub time capsule, the spectacular Baroque church at Great Witley, and to top it off a selection of lovely stone Cotswold houses and churches. What a fabulous itinerary. And we filmed an episode at the seaside! Lucky lad, as my Dad would have said." Executive Producer Neil Irvine expressed his excitement about the return of Mark Williams in the role of Father Brown for an impressive thirteenth series, stating: "I'm delighted that Mark Williams is back as Father Brown for a phenomenal thirteenth series, which promises to be the most exciting to date." He teased some of the upcoming highlights, adding: "Mrs McCarthy's return, a rock'n'roll invasion and a trip to the seaside are just a few of the treats in store for our loyal audience. And when Canon Fox becomes Bishop-Elect, Father Brown finds his position dangling perilously on a thread. Can he secure his position in Kembleford once and for all?" Article continues below Father Brown series 13 will air on BBC One and BBC iPlayer early next year.
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Progress is destroying the planet: the rants of a self-hating American
In what may be the only joke in this book – it is hard to tell, because quite often reading it I started to believe the whole thing was an elaborate parody – Samuel Miller McDonald begins his acknowledgements by expressing his 'infinite thanks' to his editors (he merits six of them) on the grounds that 'no work can be good without good editors'. Apparently some works can't be good even with good editors – unless the author is trying to tell us that his, like his oeuvre, weren't especially good at all. Progress is a prolix, tendentious book, radiating self-regard, arrogance and flannel. One irritation (which became like waiting to hear the next drip of a tap) is that virtually every name cited comes with a prefixed label, such as 'historian', 'economist', 'geographer' or, when all else fails, 'scholar'. A notable example is 'French aristocrat and military officer Marquis de Lafayette'. It is but one aspect of the absence of literary style, which makes one wonder whether the phalanx of editors expected anyone to read the book. I am reluctant to deploy the old joke about my having read it so you don't have to, but believe me, you really don't. McDonald advances an argument that since the dawn of time mankind has been on a course of ecological destruction in the name of progress. Because he is manifestly a very special scholar of this process, and has very special ideas of what to do about it, he invents his own special language to describe what has happened, and what is still happening, to ensure that 'progress' destroys our planet. He writes exhaustively about 'parasitism', which he defines as when 'one organism captures energy from another to the other's detriment'. 'Energy capture' becomes one of his catchphrases, used when he wants to describe the exploitation (usually by white capitalists) of poorer people (usually those of colour). The reader soon feels that the author is spending hours shouting at him or her, railing against the existence of human nature and the events of the past. His writing, when he gets worked up, is barely comprehensible: Contiguous parasitism relies on a particular form of energy capture in which primarily centralised bureaucracies organise armies and industries to extract energy from both indigenous human populations and native ecological systems in their immediate vicinity. Where were his editors when he needed them? McDonald lays out his core beliefs in an introduction that sets the standards of the book for verbosity, dismal style and aggressive assertion. Progress? Rubbish, he argues. Poverty is not falling, it's rising. Freedom is not expanding, it's contracting. Liberalism? A means of legitimising various parasitic activities. He concedes that longevity is increasing: but even if it is, does that entail 'more positive outcomes'? At that point I feared he was about to advocate mass suicide. He voices all the current obsessions beyond the hell of climate change – the wickedness of slavery (I have yet to meet anyone in favour of it, so we might consider that argument as having been won, but in any case McDonald does not regard abolition as 'evidence of a long moral arc'); the odiousness of empire and colonisation; and the general vileness of white men, especially capitalists. America is the ultimate villain – not just keen on slaves but horrid to the indigenous people, even including that nice Abe Lincoln. (The author presents as a self-hating American.) The Whig interpretation of history this is not: the world turns out to have been appalling throughout its existence, and things are only getting worse. To be fair, McDonald is pretty rude about Stalin and Mao, less so about Lenin, and, perhaps to establish his credentials with a certain sort of reader, has the obligatory swipe at Margaret Thatcher. Occasionally, the assertions become rants and are simply absurd. He says of Andrew Carnegie that he became rich 'in part by imposing extreme labour practices on workers, forcing employees to toil 12 hours a day seven days per week for poverty-level wages'. Forcing them? Were they enslaved? And where is Carnegie the man who gave away 90 per cent of his fortune? Macdonald goes even more off the rails with a bizarre attack on King Edward VIII, who certainly did enjoy the company of leading Nazis; but because McDonald and the concept of constitutional monarchy are strangers to each other, he does not grasp that the King was powerless when the Germans reoccupied the Rhineland in March 1936, and that the fault for any inaction was Stanley Baldwin's. Similarly, there was nothing the King could have done about Oswald Mosley; but McDonald's detestation of royalties and aristocrats doesn't allow such details to get in the way. He also seems unaware that the British state abhorred the Duke of Saxe Coburg and Gotha even more than he does, and took away his Dukedom of Albany in 1919 for fighting against Britain in the Great War; but again, details, details. Apparently 'intensive fossil energy capture' by other nations was what defeated Hitler and Mussolini, not the vast firepower of the hated Americans, the hated British Empire and their allies. McDonald also assaults Harold Macmillan, who might usually ask for it; but in this case it is for his 1957 'never had it so good' speech, in which he also warned that a Labour government might bring 'rationing, shortages, inflation and one crisis after another'. The author, who is a geographer, yet one who clearly imagines he has an almost omniscient grasp of history, calls this 'a strange and ahistorical assertion'. He seems unaware that those pestilences had featured in the previous Labour government, and thus Macmillan was entirely justified in warning his audience that they might return. I could go on listing the absurdities, but it is enough to express amazement that William Collins felt it was a good idea to publish this book by a man who comes to resemble a pub bore. It ends with a long, pie-in-the-sky, rambling set of thoughts about how the future might be better. I read them once and could not understand what this visionary author was saying. I tried to read them again and lost the will to live. If you really want to punish yourself, you can try too.
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
The Catholic influencers spreading the word of God
Vatican City In an auditorium just outside St Peter's Basilica, the Vatican's Secretary of State, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, sat solemnly in the front row as a young crowd sang, danced and hopped around to a pop hymn. The cardinal, who is 70, was widely expected to become the pope earlier this year. Instead, he inaugurated the Catholic Church's first social media influencer conference. Around 1,000 influencers attended last week's Jubilee of Digital Missionaries and Catholic Influencers. In his opening remarks, Parolin described social media as not just an instrument of communication, but 'a way of living in the world'. The division between the real world and the virtual world is thinning, or nonexistent, for many young people, and the Church believes 'digital missionaries' can reach them. Some influencers host podcasts and make short explainer videos on Church history, apologetics and how to pray. Others look more like typical influencers, creating 'day in the life' videos which weave prayer in with studying and relationship advice. The first influencer saint, Carlo Acutis, will be canonised next month. During his life – he died of leukaemia in 2006 at 15 – he made a website cataloguing eucharistic miracles. He's a bit of a celebrity for young Catholics (his relics are currently 'on tour'). At the conference, a Franciscan priest performed a rap single about him: 'Yo, listen up, lemme tell you 'bout a kid/ Carlo Acutis, yeah the bro on the grid.' Grainy camcorder footage of Carlo's life features in the music video. One influencer told me these recordings made her emotional: 'I've been going through old videos of my dad, and it made me feel like he was still here. It all just makes you think, this stuff has the potential to move hearts.' Can TikTok videos move hearts? God works in mysterious ways, but I wonder if rapping priests and videos which play on the same reward pathways in my brain as the non-religious ones are reducing faith to online slop in an infinite 'feed'. Several influencers I spoke to used the word 'addiction' when speaking about social media. Doesn't that make them enablers? 'The Church goes into the places of great infection, of great woundedness,' said Mary Harper, a theologian who creates Catholic fashion content. 'She can't respond to the wound, she can't respond to the illness, until she meets the person there.' Still, while influencer content is offputting or cringey to many people, it has reached others. Soeur Albertine, a French nun and influencer, cited a poll saying that 78 per cent of French catechumens (adults preparing to join the Catholic Church) said they decided to be baptised thanks to social media. After mass in St Peter's, Pope Leo XIV made a surprise appearance to address the influencers. A group of young women shrieked with joy at the top of their lungs. People cried, and filmed themselves crying. You could hardly see him through the flock of selfie sticks and people standing on plastic chairs to get a better camera angle. 'Faced with cultural changes throughout history, the Church has never remained passive,' the Pope told the crowd. 'She has always sought to illuminate every age with the light and hope of Christ by discerning good from evil, and what was good from what needed to be changed, transformed and purified.' It is difficult to see where new technology will lead. Did Gutenberg imagine his printing press would end up splintering the Church? Did televangelists imagine they would turn into hucksters? Can digital missionaries resist the pull towards addiction and isolation? I asked Mackenzie Hunter, a faith and lifestyle influencer, whether being on social media so often took a toll on her soul. 'It would be easier not to be on social media,' she admitted. 'There would be less risk of sin and downfall, but some people are called to dive in.' The Catholic influencers see their talent for creating content as a gift from God, which they have a responsibility to use for good.
