logo
Economic boom should lift all boats, not just yachts of the elite

Economic boom should lift all boats, not just yachts of the elite

Hans India2 days ago

India and Japan occupied the global news headlines of late when India achieved the monumental feat of surpassing Japan to claim the title of the world's fourth-largest economy with a nominal GDP of $4.187 trillion, narrowly ahead of Japan's $4.186 trillion.
India and Japan represent two fascinating, yet contrasting, economic stories on the global landscape.
One is a rapidly growing, populous emerging market with a youthful demographic, while the other is a mature, technologically advanced economy grappling with demographic challenges. This tale of two economies highlights their unique strengths, challenges, and forward paths.
Often hailed as the 'world's fastest-growing major economy', India has been on a remarkable trajectory. The milestone of surpassing Japan marks its ascent as a global economic powerhouse, driven by a youthful population, booming tech and manufacturing sectors, and bold infrastructure initiatives.
Yet, for millions of Indians—from tech workers in Bengaluru to farmers in Bihar—this headline masks a deeper question: how does this growth translate into everyday life? And how does it compare to Japan, a nation celebrated for its high living standards, equitable wealth distribution, and efficient society?
India's economic ascent to the world's fourth-largest economy is a point of national pride. Yet, beneath this headline lies a troubling reality: One per cent of Indians control nearly 40 per cent of the nation's wealth, according to recent reports. This extreme concentration of wealth underscores an alarming widening of the gap between the haves and have-nots, threatening social cohesion and sustainable growth.
An economy's size is measured by its Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the total value of goods and services produced annually. India's $4.187 trillion GDP in 2025 places it behind only the United States of America, China, and Germany, fuelled by a population of 1.45 billion.
However, GDP per capita reveals a stark divide. India's per capita income is roughly $2,900, while Japan's is $39,000, over 13 times higher. With Japan's population at 125 million, its wealth is more evenly distributed, ensuring better living standards. For the average Indian, this means national prosperity doesn't yet translate into personal wealth. Japan's edge lies in higher living standards, better infrastructure, and equitable wealth distribution, despite a smaller economy.
Japan's Gini coefficient (a measure of inequality) is among the lowest globally, while India's is high, reflecting greater disparity. Its model shows that equitable growth can enhance stability, a model that India can look to emulate.
India's economic surge is reshaping lives, but the benefits are uneven, and challenges persist. Its economic growth brings opportunities but doesn't automatically translate into immediate improvements for everyone. In total economic size, India has overtaken Japan, but in daily life metrics, Japan remains far ahead due to various factors pointed above.
India's unemployment rate in April 2025 was 5.1 per cent, higher than Japan's impressive 2.5 per cent. Urban youth face a steep 17.2 per cent unemployment rate. A skills mismatch—65.7 per cent of India's unemployed are educated but lack training for high-tech roles—remains a hurdle. Income inequality and regional disparities persist, with rural areas lagging in infrastructure and access to services. The informal sector, which employs a large portion of the workforce, lacks social security and stability. India's 250-million-strong middle class is fuelling a consumer boom, from smartphones to 5G streaming. Digital payments, like UPI at village shops, are transforming even rural areas. In contrast, Japan's $39,000 per capita income ensures most citizens enjoy modern homes, reliable public transport, and leisure like dining out or bullet train travel. While India's middle class will expand, its 140th global rank in per capita income underscores that the poorest won't see quick gains.
India's Universal Health Coverage Index has improved, with schemes like Ayushman Bharat providing free care to millions. Yet, 35.5 per cent of under-5 children face malnutrition, and rural healthcare is inconsistent. Economic growth is expanding hospitals, but high out-of-pocket costs burden families.
Japan's universal healthcare ensures near-total coverage with advanced facilities. India's low per capita income limits such access.
The concentration of around 40 per cent of India's wealth in the hands of one per cent of its population has far-reaching consequences such as economic instability, social tensions, political influences and youth frustration, among others.
Extreme inequality can stifle growth. The poorest 43 per cent, who struggled for food in 2022, have limited purchasing power, slowing consumer-driven economic expansion. India's 140th global rank in per capita income ($2,900) reflects this skewed distribution.
Rising inequality fuels resentment, as seen in urban-rural divides and protests over job scarcity. The urban middle class enjoys smartphones and 5G, while rural families face malnutrition (35.5 per cent of under-five children) and inadequate healthcare.
The wealthy one per cent wields disproportionate influence, potentially shaping policies that perpetuate their advantage. These risk undermining democratic fairness and public trust.
With urban youth unemployment at 17.2 per cent, educated young Indians feel excluded from the wealth boom, leading to disillusionment and potential unrest.
To address its wealth gap, India requires bold and inclusive policies like progressive taxation, skilling and education, rural investment, and social safety nets, among others.
Strengthening wealth and inheritance taxes could redistribute resources. Closing loopholes and improving tax compliance would ensure that the rich contribute fairly. Expanding access to quality education and vocational training, especially in rural areas, can bridge the skills mismatch. Boosting agriculture, rural infrastructure, and healthcare (such as expanding Ayushman Bharat) would lift the poorest, reducing the urban-rural divide. Strengthening welfare programs, like food subsidies and unemployment benefits, can support the have-nots, thereby reducing poverty's grip.
India's economic milestone is a moment of pride, but true success lies in improving daily life. The challenge is to ensure that its economic boom lifts all boats, not just the yachts of the elite. Emulating Japan's focus on equitable systems while leveraging India's youthful demographic advantage could transform this tale of inequality into one of shared prosperity. To rival Japan's quality of life, India must prioritise equitable growth, skilling, and infrastructure.
The economic race should be on—not just to grow bigger, but to grow better.
(The author is former Senior Editor, The Economic Times, and currently practicing as an Advocate in Telangana High Court)CR SUKUMAR

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'18 Triumphs 18th': RCB Win IPL 2025 Crown With Win Over PBKS In Ahmedabad
'18 Triumphs 18th': RCB Win IPL 2025 Crown With Win Over PBKS In Ahmedabad

News18

time42 minutes ago

  • News18

'18 Triumphs 18th': RCB Win IPL 2025 Crown With Win Over PBKS In Ahmedabad

1/27 2/27 Players and the umpires stand for the Indian national anthem before the start of the Indian Premier League cricket final match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/ Ajit Solanki ) 3/27 Former British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, centre, waves prior to the start of the Indian Premier League cricket final match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/ Ajit Solanki ) Royal Challengers Bengaluru's Virat Kohli plays a shot during the Indian Premier League cricket final match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/ Ajit Solanki ) 5/27 Punjab Kings' Kyle Jamieson , right, celebrates the dismissal of Royal Challengers Bengaluru's Phil Salt during the Indian Premier League cricket final match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/ Ajit Solanki ) Royal Challengers Bengaluru's captain Rajat Patidar, left, fist bumps with his batting partner Virat Kohli during the Indian Premier League cricket final match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/ Ajit Solanki ) Punjab Kings' Azmatullah Omarzai , left, celebrates the dismissal of Royal Challengers Bengaluru's Virat Kohli during the Indian Premier League cricket final match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/ Ajit Solanki ) Royal Challengers Bengaluru's Liam Livingstone plays a shot during the Indian Premier League cricket final match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/ Ajit Solanki ) 9/27 Royal Challengers Bengaluru's Jitesh Sharma is bowled out by Punjab Kings' Vijaykumar Vyshak during the Indian Premier League cricket final match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/ Ajit Solanki ) 10/27 Punjab Kings' Arshdeep Singh celebrates the dismissal of Royal Challengers Bengaluru's Romario Shepherd during the Indian Premier League cricket final match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/ Ajit Solanki ) 11/27 Punjab Kings' Prabhsimran Singh plays a shot during the Indian Premier League cricket final match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/Ajit Solanki) 12/27 Royal Challengers Bengaluru's players celebrate the dismissal of Punjab Kings' Prabhsimran Singh during the Indian Premier League cricket final match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/Ajit Solanki) 13/27 Royal Challengers Bengaluru's Romario Shepherd, left, and teammate Virat Kohli celebrate the dismissal of Punjab Kings' captain Shreyas Iyer, second right, during the Indian Premier League cricket final match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/Ajit Solanki) 14/27 Punjab Kings' Shashank Singh plays a shot during the Indian Premier League final cricket match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/ Ajit Solanki ) 15/27 Punjab Kings' Josh Inglis plays a shot during the Indian Premier League cricket final match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/Ajit Solanki) 16/27 Royal Challengers Bengaluru's Bhuvneshwar Kumar celebrates the wicket of Punjab Kings' Nehal Wadhera with teammates during the Indian Premier League final cricket match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/Ajit Solanki) 17/27 Punjab Kings' Nehal Wadhera plays a shot during the Indian Premier League final cricket match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/ Ajit Solanki ) 18/27 Royal Challengers Bengaluru's Yash Dayal, extreme right, celebrates the wicket of Punjab Kings' Azmatullah Omarzai with teammates during the Indian Premier League final cricket match between Punjab Kings and Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/Ajit Solanki) Royal Challengers Bengaluru's Virat Kohli reacts after their win in the Indian Premier League final cricket match against Punjab Kings at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/Ajit Solanki) 20/27 Royal Challengers Bengaluru's Virat Kohli, center, reacts after their win in the Indian Premier League final cricket match against Punjab Kings at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/Ajit Solanki) 22/27 Jitesh Sharma (c) of Royal Challengers Bengaluru , Bhuvneshwar Kumar of Royal Challengers Bengaluru celebrating win during the final of the Indian Premier League season 18 (IPL 2025) between Royal Challengers Bangalore and Punjab Kings held at the Narendra Modi Stadium, Ahmedabad on the 3rd June 2025 Photo by: s Saikat Das / Sportzpics for IPL 23/27 Virat Kohli of Royal Challengers Bengaluru celebrating win with wife Anushka Sharma during the final of the Indian Premier League season 18 (IPL 2025) between Royal Challengers Bangalore and Punjab Kings held at the Narendra Modi Stadium, Ahmedabad on the 3rd June 2025 Photo by Tamal Das / Sportzpics for IPL 24/27 Royal Challengers Bengaluru players celebrate with the winners trophy after their win in the Indian Premier League final cricket match against Punjab Kings at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Wednesday, June 4, 2025. (AP Photo/Ajit Solanki) 25/27 Virat Kohli of Royal Challengers Bengaluru celebrating with Champions trophy during the final of the Indian Premier League season 18 (IPL 2025) between Royal Challengers Bangalore and Punjab Kings held at the Narendra Modi Stadium, Ahmedabad on the 3rd June 2025 Photo by: s Saikat Das / Sportzpics for IPL 26/27 Royal Challengers Bengaluru's Virat Kohli holds the winners trophy and poses with his wife Anushka Sharma after their win in the Indian Premier League final cricket match against Punjab Kings at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, India, Wednesday, June 4, 2025. (AP Photo/Ajit Solanki)

Sulphur-cleaning device in coal plants not necessary: Central scientific committee
Sulphur-cleaning device in coal plants not necessary: Central scientific committee

The Hindu

time43 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Sulphur-cleaning device in coal plants not necessary: Central scientific committee

A high-powered committee of experts, chaired by Principal Scientific Advisor (PSA) Ajay Sood, has recommended that India do away with a decade-long policy of mandating equipment, called Flu Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) units, in all coal-fired thermal power plants (TPPs), according to documents perused by The Hindu. These FGD units are required to be retro-fitted in TPPs to cut harmful sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions. While 92% of India's 600 TPPs have not yet installed FGD units, the recommendation would exempt about 80% of them from needing to install such equipment. The limited number of vendors capable of installing such equipment in India, the high installation costs, the potential rise in electricity bills, and disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic have been some of the reasons historically cited by the Power Ministry, the overseer of India's TPPs, for plants' inability to adhere to previous deadlines. In theory, the costs of non-compliance could run to crores of rupees in fines, though these have not materialised thanks to deadline extensions. 'FGD not necessary' However, this was the first time that multiple arms of the government congregated to deliberate on whether FGDs were required in the first place. Their verdict draws on three reports by the CSIR-NEERI, the National Institute of Advanced Studies, and the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi. The lead scientists of these three institutions – each 'supported' by different arms of the government – were at the meeting on April 23, along with representatives from the Office of the PSA, the Union Power Ministry, and the NITI Ayog. They were all largely unanimous that FGD 'was not necessary.' The guiding principles informing the committee's recommendation are that: SO2 levels in ambient air across the country are around 10-20 micrograms/cubic metre, well below India's air quality norms of 80; Indian coal is low in sulphur; SO2 levels in cities near plants with operational FGD units do not differ significantly from those without these units, and all of these were anyway well below permissible levels. The committee opined that concerns about sulphates – a potential by-product when SO2 emissions reach certain atmospheric levels, thus forming particulate matter (PM) – are unfounded. They cited an analysis of 5,792 PM samples across the country, which found 'low elemental sulphur' content (max 8 micrograms/m3 after outlier removal) which was deemed 'insignificant — for considering PM removal as a benefit of FGD.' FGDs may worsen carbon emissions One argument mentioned in the report was that using FGDs might result in additional carbon dioxide emissions and accentuate global warming. 'Installing FGDs in all TPPs by 2030 will increase the Auxiliary Power Consumption (APC) of the TPPs, thereby adding approximately 69 million tons of CO2 emissions to the atmosphere (2025-30) while reducing SO2 emissions by —17 million tons. Adding more long-lived CO2 emissions while removing short-lived SO2 emissions by installing FGDs indiscriminately in all TPPs in India despite the low Sulphur content of Indian coal will enhance global warming.' On the other hand, given that burning coal is India's primary source of electricity, India's annual SO2 emissions has risen from 4,000 kilotonnes in 2010 to 6,000 kilotonnes in 2022. By comparison, Indonesia, a source of imported coal to India has averaged about 2,000 kt in the same period, according to data from the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), a Helsinki-based think tank. This is when India's emission standards, at 100 micrograms/m3 (thus requiring FGD), is lower than Indonesia's 800. Environment Ministry 'studying' order Those who attended the meeting included the Secretary, Minister of Power and three other senior officials; Secretary, Environment and Forests and two other officials; four officials of the Office of the PSA; representatives of the NITI Ayog, Central Electricity Authority (the power regulator), Central Pollution Control Board, and academicians. A detailed questionnaire to the Power Ministry was unanswered until press time. Tanmay Kumar, Secretary, Environment Ministry, told The Hindu that his Ministry was 'studying' the order. India has 180 coal-fired thermal power plants, each of them with multiple units. The 600 TPPs, depending on their size, age, proximity to densely populous cities, and background pollution levels, were given different timelines by the Environment Ministry to comply with the FGD installation requirements. Deadlines have been shifted three times, with the most recent extension coming on Dec 31, 2024. Major population centres The committee, according to the minutes of the meeting seen by The Hindu, will 'recommend' to the Power and Environment Ministers that only power plants located within a 10-km radius of the National Capital Region and other cities with a million-plus population be required to install FGDs. These are called Category A plants. There are 66 such plants, and only 14 of them have installed FGDs. Currently, all these plants are required to comply by 2027. Plants within a 10-km radius of 'Critically Polluted Cities' or 'Non Attainment Cities', called Category B plants, would be eligible for exemption on a 'case by case' basis, on a joint review by the Central Electricity Authority or Central Pollution Control Board. There are 72 such plants, with only four having installed FGD. These plants currently have a deadline of 2028. The remaining 462 plants all come under Category C, of which 32 have installed FGDs. These plants have been given a 2029 deadline, but the committee has now recommended that Category C plants be exempted completely, along with some units in Categories A and B which were set up at least 20 years ago. 'Will not affect public health' 'The key common point in these studies is that fitment of FGDs in all TPPs in India is not necessary to comply with the NAAQ (National Ambient Air Quality) standards whose compliance is essential to safeguard public health. While all TPPs must comply with the December 2015 stack emission standards for PM pollution and freshwater consumption, the SO2 stack emission standards can be relaxed to ensure that they are in conformance with the NAAQ standards which are notified by CPCB, keeping in mind the human health and other aspects. This way, TPPs may be able to comply with these standards without fitting FGDs. Since the existing NAAQ standards (for ambient SO2) must be complied with, this change will not affect human health in India,' the committee concludes. Currently, State governments or affiliated companies run a majority of the Category A TPPs, whereas private authorities hold the highest share in Categories B and C.

Pak aimed to bring India to its knees, but folded in 8 hours, says Chief of Defence Staff Gen Chauhan
Pak aimed to bring India to its knees, but folded in 8 hours, says Chief of Defence Staff Gen Chauhan

Time of India

time44 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Pak aimed to bring India to its knees, but folded in 8 hours, says Chief of Defence Staff Gen Chauhan

1 2 Pune: Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan on Tuesday said "on May 10 around 1am, Pakistan aimed to bring India to its knees in 48 hours" but "their operation, which they thought would continue for 48 hours, folded up in about eight hours". "Then they picked up the telephone and said they wanted to talk," Gen Chauhan said. He said Op Sindoor was the first time India had engaged in non-contact warfare. "We didn't see each other. We saw it either through radar or at different ranges, except for what was happening on the LoC. It was a mixture of kinetic and non-kinetic war. When I say non-kinetic, that happened in the information domain and cyber domain. And, of course, there were kinetic operations where destruction was being caused to each other. It was also nonlinear in nature. So there's something happening on the LoC and something happening as far back as Sargodha." Gen Chauhan spoke about how India networked all its air defence architecture and was using AI for predictive analysis to give a comprehensive picture and negate the threat. "So better and faster information was available to our side. We also tried to kind of network our counter UAS system, which was countering drones. And in the 7-15 days, we were able to do that," Gen Chauhan said. The CDS, delivering a special lecture organised by Savitribai Phule Pune University's Department of Defence and Strategic Studies on the "Future of War and Warfare", also touched upon data-centric warfare, which will be based on data analysis deciding cognitive or decision superiority. "Similar green shoots of that were visible in Op Sindoor," he said. He also explained how, through Operation Sindoor , India raised the bar and redrew new lines for military operations in response to terror. Referring to his previous media statements about India suffering losses, Chauhan said, "You should be able to understand what went wrong, rectify your mistakes, and go out again despite the initial setbacks. That is a hallmark of a professional force. And that's the kind of thing we displayed. What I said in a couple of my interviews — that losses are not important, it's the outcome which is important." Chauhan likened it to Test cricket, where, when one side wins by an innings, there are no questions about how many balls or players played. Gen Chauhan said they would share data on the result of Indian strikes based on technical parameters like electronic intelligence and signal intelligence at some point. Stating that it was Pakistan's strategy to bleed India by a thousand cuts, Chauhan said Gen Asim Munir (now field marshal) had spewed similar venom against India and Hindus a few weeks before Pahalgam. "But these decisions can be retracted as Pakistan is faced with a different kind of prospect, that it faces military action in case we find terror happening against us. So we have kind of raised the bar. We have connected terror to water and we have drawn out new lines for military operations against terror." When Pakistan did ask for talks and de-escalation, Gen Chauhan said India accepted, but not immediately. According to the CDS, Pakistan's decision to talk stemmed from two facts: "They must have assumed that if they continued in this mode, they were likely to lose much more. And the second, since they struck us on multiple fronts, they still did not have the benefit of understanding what they struck and they wanted to talk. It is only after one or two days that they realised that all their attacks against us had failed." Revealing details of the night of the first airstrikes on May 7, the CDS said, "We did it from 11.05pm to around 1.30am, and five minutes later we rang the director-general of military operations to say that we've done this, we hit only terror targets, that military establishments are out of the purview of the strikes, and we ensured that there was no collateral damage to civilians. We need to talk to each other." The CDS said war has expanded into space, cyberspace, the electromagnetic domain, etc. "A lot of activities took place between both of us for four days in the electromagnetic domain. Interactivity also took place in the cyber domain. We also had a lot of activity in the domain of perception management, information, or maybe you can call it cognitive warfare, in which shaping the mind of the people is more important than the landscape. "

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store