logo
How international students help sustain the budgets of these US colleges

How international students help sustain the budgets of these US colleges

A federal judge on Friday temporarily halted a move by the Trump administration that threatened to prevent Harvard University from enrolling international students. Had the order taken effect, it would have impacted more than a quarter of Harvard's student population — a shift significant enough to upend its campus life and put considerable strain on tuition revenue.
The attempted restriction underscores the broader vulnerability of American universities under an administration often at odds with the higher education sector. Institutions with even greater shares of international students, including Columbia University, Carnegie Mellon, New York University (NYU), and Johns Hopkins, face similar risks, the New York Times reported. What was once a symbol of global prestige and financial vitality for these schools has now become a potential liability.
Illinois Tech leads in international student enrolment
Other top-ranking institutions include Carnegie Mellon University (44 per cent), Stevens Institute of Technology (42 per cent), and Northeastern University (40 per cent). Ivy League schools also feature on the list — Columbia (40 per cent), Harvard (28 per cent), and Princeton (24 per cent) — though with comparatively lower international shares. NYU and the University of Southern California (USC) also maintain strong global appeal, with international enrollment at 37 per cent, and 28 per cent, respectively.
The data reflects the deepening dependence of American higher education institutions on international students, particularly among selective four-year colleges with at least 1,000 full-time enrollees.
A two-decade rise in international enrollment
The growing presence of international students in US colleges is a trend two decades in the making. Rising middle-class wealth in countries like China and India has fuelled an increase in families sending children to study abroad, with the United States a leading destination, the news report said.
Domestic funding pressures have further driven this trend. Public research universities, in particular, have leaned on international students, who generally pay full tuition, to make up for dwindling state support for higher education.
The report quoted Gaurav Khanna, an economist at the University of California, as saying, 'We have all this debate about trade deficits with China right now."
'That's a deficit in goods. But when you think of services — like higher ed services — we have a big surplus," Khanna added.
Higher education as an economic export
Beyond the classroom, international students bring billions into the US economy. In the 2023–24 academic year, over 1.1 million foreign students contributed an estimated $43 billion, largely through spending on tuition and living expenses, according to nonprofit international education group NAFSA.
Unlike many American students, who benefit from financial aid or in-state tuition discounts, international students often pay full tuition — in some cases, even higher than standard out-of-state rates. This pricing structure results in international students often contributing over one-and-a-half times more in tuition than their US peers, explained Mirka Martel, head of research at the Institute of International Education, the news report said.
Financial and academic implications of declining enrolment
The revenue from international students supports not just campus budgets, but also subsidises education for domestic students. A decline in this group could have wide-ranging effects — from budget cuts to reduced research output and limited workforce development, the report said.
Even prior to the halted Harvard policy, universities had been preparing for potential drops in international enrollment. The Trump administration's cuts to federal research funding and strict immigration policies have already made the US a less attractive option for global students.
For American universities, the message is clear: maintaining a robust international student population is not just about global rankings — it's critical to their financial and academic stability.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PM's stance on protecting farmers' interests welcomed by farmer groups
PM's stance on protecting farmers' interests welcomed by farmer groups

The Hindu

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

PM's stance on protecting farmers' interests welcomed by farmer groups

Farmers' groups close to the government, during an interactive meeting with the Union Agriculture Ministry here on Tuesday, appreciated Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent statement that his government would provide high priority to the welfare of farmers. The groups said such a stern message addressed the concerns of farmers at a time when U.S. President Donald Trump and the American administration wanted to impose 'unjust tariffs' on India. Meanwhile, the Left leaning All India Kisan Sabha said Mr. Modi had ignored the welfare of farmers throughout his tenure, and his policies had pauperised the agriculture sector in the past 11 years. In the interactive meeting chaired by Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, the farmers' groups expressed gratitude and support for the Union government's 'decisive action to protect farmers' interests'. Dharmendra Choudhary, national president of the Indian Farmer Chaudhary Charan Singh Organisation, said Mr. Modi had made an unwavering statement in the interests of farmers, livestock rearers, and fishermen. 'India will not compromise their interests at any cost. This announcement not only brings relief to millions of food providers but also strengthens the self-reliance of agriculture and rural India. We wholeheartedly welcome and support this far-sighted and farmer-friendly vision, which will inspire future generations,' Mr. Choudhary said. Virendra Lohan of the Chhattisgarh Youth Progressive Farmers' Association said the courageous decision to not allow American companies into our agriculture and dairy sectors is echoing in every field, village, and cowshed. 'You have shown that the Indian farmer is not just a food provider but the very soul of this nation, a soul no foreign power can ever control,' he said. Dharmendra Malik of the Bharatiya Kisan Union (Non Political) appealed to the government to stand firm on the stance taken, and 'not change our policies on free trade'. 'We will always stand by you,' Mr. Malik said. Agriculture Minister Mr. Chouhan said in his reply that the government would soon bring in a new law to take strict action against those producing fake fertilizers and chemicals. He said various schemes for farmers' welfare were being advanced on priority. Meanwhile, All India Kisan Sabha leaders Ashok Dhawale and Vijoo Krishnan said Mr. Modi's statement was an attempt to find favour with the farmers. 'Indian farmers are not going to fall for such claims as they have heard many such jumlas and false promises from him in the last 11 years. In fact, the NDA government has ruined the competitiveness of farmers during its 11 year-rule. The PM did not fulfil the promise made in the 2014 election manifesto of the BJP of Minimum Support Price at a rate of C2+50% for all crops with guaranteed procurement as recommended by [the late] M.S. Swaminathan, [then] Chairman of National Farmers Commission. The lack of remunerative prices and spiralling input costs have put Indian agriculture in an acute crisis. Farmers are facing abysmal indebtedness and distress migration is rampant,' they said. 'As per government data, 31 farmers commit suicide in India daily. But the PM has not initiated any debt relief scheme so far. In contrast, corporate debt amounting to ₹16.11 lakh crore has been waived in the last 11 years. About 48% of the Indian workforce depends on agriculture, and around 60% of families live in rural India. The peasantry's suffering under the neo-liberal regime emerges clearly from Indian data,' they said, adding the policies being rigorously enforced in the past 11 years had pauperised the agrarian classes, and all the resources of agricultural land, forest, minerals and water were being placed in the hands of the corporate companies, both foreign and domestic.

Russia is suspected to be behind hack of US federal court filing system: Report
Russia is suspected to be behind hack of US federal court filing system: Report

India Today

time26 minutes ago

  • India Today

Russia is suspected to be behind hack of US federal court filing system: Report

Investigators have uncovered evidence that holds Russia partly for a recent hack of the computer system that manages US federal court documents, including highly sensitive records that might contain information that could reveal sources and people charged with national security crimes, according to several people briefed on the is unclear about what entity is responsible, whether an arm of Russian intelligence might be behind the intrusion or if other countries were also involved, which some of the people familiar with the matter described as a years-long effort to infiltrate the system. Some of the searches included mid-level criminal cases in the New York City area and several other jurisdictions, with some cases involving people with Russian and Eastern European disclosure comes right before President Trump is expected to meet with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir V Putin, in Alaska on Friday, where Mr. Trump is planning to discuss his push to end the war in ABOUT THE HACK As per a Reuters report, the hack occurred on 7th August when the electronic case filing system was compromised. It affected the Case Management/Electronic Case Files, or CM/ECF, which legal professionals use to upload and manage case documents; and Public Access to Court Electronic Records, or PACER, which provides the public with pay-for access to some of the same case management system - which carries sensitive information about indictments and arrest warrants has long been a target for foreign spies.- EndsWith inputs from Reuters Tune InMust Watch

India-US trade talks: Should New Delhi wait and watch or retaliate? Experts debate
India-US trade talks: Should New Delhi wait and watch or retaliate? Experts debate

India Today

time42 minutes ago

  • India Today

India-US trade talks: Should New Delhi wait and watch or retaliate? Experts debate

The top focus of this episode of News Today is on India-US trade talks. Amid the India-US trade deal stalemate, New Delhi is focussing on export diversification. Meanwhile, sources said US trade representatives will travel to India for the next round of talks. While US President Donald Trump is set to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. Ahead of the talks aimed at ending the Russia-Ukraine war, Trump on Monday claimed to have dealt a big blow to Moscow by imposing unprecedented tariffs on India. While the US President trumpeted the tariffs on India, the highest in the world, he extended the trade truce with China by another 90 days, right after he called his relationship with President Xi Jinping very good. Now the trade talks between India and the US hang in the balance as Trump hopes putting pressure on New Delhi to curtail ties with Moscow will help him reach an agreement on Ukraine. So, is Trump linking tariffs to Ukraine war? Should India wait and watch or retaliate? Watch as panellists debate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store