Rio Tinto appoints iron ore boss Simon Trott as CEO
Trott, 50, will replace Jakob Stausholm, who announced his intention to step down in May.
The Australian national, who has led the iron ore unit, Rio's engine of profit, for the past four years, will take over at the helm of the company beginning August 25.
Trott's appointment came swiftly on the heels of the unexpected news of Stausholm's departure. He will relocate to London for the role.
"It's a relatively safe appointment," said Kaan Peker at RBC in Sydney.
"He knows the iron ore business very well and that's the main driver of free cashflow and earnings. Obviously he has proven himself in the eyes of the chair."
Hailing from a farming family in the Western Australian wheatbelt town of Wickepin southeast of Perth, Trott, who is married with children, enjoys cycling around the city's streets on weekends.
He has spent time at Rio's global operations, including three years as chief commercial officer in Singapore, and has managed its salt, uranium, borates and diamonds units across Australia, Namibia, United States, Canada, and Serbia.
Biggest iron ore mine
In Western Australia, Trott brought to market Rio Tinto's biggest iron ore mine in more than a decade.
"Simon and the Board are aligned that Rio Tinto's next phase is about unlocking significant value for shareholders from our portfolio, driven by operational performance, and cost and financial discipline," chair Dominic Barton said in a statement.
Trott has faced some pushback from investors because the quality of ore in Rio's exports has dropped during his tenure and costs have climbed, while the miner has struggled to reach the top end of its production forecast.
However, the unit has met its production guidance every year since Trott took the reins at the division, after missing it in five of the seven preceding years.
Stausholm, who oversaw a big bet on lithium and expansions in iron ore and copper, was named chief executive in 2020 as the miner grappled with legal, public and investor angst over the destruction of Australia's ancient Juukan Gorge rock shelters, which led to the ousting of its former CEO.>
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
6 hours ago
- India.com
After IPL 2025 Disaster, CSK To Release Senior Stars And Invest In Young Talent: Report
IPL 2026: Chennai Super Kings (CSK) are preparing for a major squad rebuild following their worst-ever IPL season, finishing at the bottom of the 2025 table. Reports suggest a strategy shift toward younger match-winners, with several senior players set to be released. Dhoni, Gaikwad and Owners Discuss Future Plans A meeting in Chennai between MS Dhoni, skipper Ruturaj Gaikwad, and team owners reportedly focused on plugging loopholes from the mega auction squad. Despite the addition of young players like Ayush Mhatre, Urvil Patel, and Dewald Brevis mid-season, CSK couldn't salvage their campaign. Senior Stars on the Chopping Block Veteran off-spinner R Ashwin, bought for ₹9.75 crore, is likely to be released. Other players with uncertain futures include Devon Conway, Rachin Ravindra, Rahul Tripathi, Sam Curran, Gurjapneet Singh, Nathan Ellis, Deepak Hooda, Jamie Overton, and Vijay Shankar. Offloading them could free up ₹34.45 crore, and with an additional purse, CSK might enter the mini-auction with ₹40 crore. Big Targets: Cameron Green and Ben Duckett CSK are reportedly eyeing Australian all-rounder Cameron Green and attacking English opener Ben Duckett to add much-needed firepower. The franchise's primary focus will be on strengthening the top order, securing a reliable middle-order Indian batter, and adding a quality pacer. Sanju Samson in CSK's Radar The franchise has shown interest in Rajasthan Royals captain Sanju Samson, who might exit RR following a fallout with the owners. However, acquiring him before the auction appears challenging, as CSK are unwilling to trade core players like Gaikwad, Ravindra Jadeja, Matheesha Pathirana, and Shivam Dube. A cash-only deal seems the only route, but it would require significant negotiation. Dhoni's Future Still Unclear MS Dhoni, 45, who captained the side after Gaikwad's injury last season, has not confirmed retirement plans. The management believes he could play one more season, but Dhoni has said he will decide after assessing his fitness in the coming months.
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
Are you in a mid-career to senior job? Don't fear AI
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Have you ever sat in a meeting where someone half your age casually mentions "prompting ChatGPT" or "running this through AI", and felt a familiar knot in your stomach? You're not a growing narrative that artificial intelligence (AI) is inherently ageist, that older workers will be disproportionately hit by job displacement and are more reluctant to adopt AI such assumptions - especially that youth is a built-in advantage when it comes to AI - might not actually ageism in hiring is a real concern, if you have decades of work experience, your skills, knowledge and judgement could be exactly what's needed to harness AI's power - without falling into its does the research say?The research on who benefits most from AI at work is surprisingly murky, partly because it's still early days for systematic studies on AI and research suggests lower-skilled workers might have more to gain than high-skilled workers on certain straightforward tasks. The picture becomes much less clear under real-world conditions, especially for complex work that relies heavily on judgement and our Skills Horizon research project, where we've been talking to Australian and global senior leaders across different industries, we're hearing a more nuanced older workers do experience AI as deeply unsettling. As one US-based CEO of a large multinational corporation told us: "AI can be a form of existential challenge, not only to what you're doing, but how you view yourself."But leaders are also observing an important and unexpected distinction: experienced workers are often much better at judging the quality of AI outputs. This might become one of the most important skills, given that AI occasionally hallucinates or gets things CEO of a South American creative agency put it bluntly: "Senior colleagues are using multiple AIs. If they don't have the right solution, they re-prompt, iterate, but the juniors are satisfied with the first answer, they copy, paste and think they're finished. They don't yet know what they are looking for, and the danger is that they will not learn what to look for if they keep working that way."Experienced workers have a crucial advantage when it comes to prompting AI: they understand context and usually know how to express it a junior advertising creative might ask an AI to "Write copy for a sustainability campaign", a seasoned account director knows to specify "Write conversational social media copy for a sustainable fashion brand targeting eco-conscious millennials, emphasising our client's zero-waste manufacturing process and keeping the tone authentic but not preachy".This skill mirrors what experienced professionals do when briefing junior colleagues or freelancers: providing detailed instructions, accounting for audience, objectives, and constraints. It's a competency developed through years of managing teams and workers, despite their comfort with technology, may actually be at a disadvantage here. There's a crucial difference between using technology frequently and using it young people may become too accustomed to AI assistance. A survey of US teens this year found 72 per cent had used an AI companion app. Some children and teens are turning to chatbots for everyday the professional experience to recognise when something doesn't quite fit, younger workers risk accepting AI responses that feel right - effectively "vibing" their work - rather than developing the analytical skills to evaluate AI everyone benefits from learning more about AI. In our time educating everyone from students to senior leaders and CEOs, we find that misunderstandings about how AI works have little to do with age.A good place to start is reading up on what AI is and what it can do for you:What is AI? Where does AI come from? How does AI learn? What can AI do? What makes a good AI prompt?If you're not even sure which AI platform to try, we would recommend testing the most prominent ones, OpenAI's ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, and Google's you're an experienced worker feeling threatened by AI, lean into your strengths. Your decades of experience with delegation, context-setting, and critical evaluation are exactly what AI tools small. Pick one regular work task and experiment with AI assistance, using your judgement to evaluate and refine outputs. Practice prompting like you're briefing a junior colleague: be specific about context, constraints, and desired outcomes, and repeat the process as importantly, don't feel threatened. In a workplace increasingly filled with AI-generated content, your ability to spot what doesn't quite fit, and to know what questions to ask, has never been more valuable.
Time of India
13 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump's ‘gorilla' approach has actually made it harder for India to do a deal
When Dmitry Grozoubinski started writing 'Why Politicians Lie About Trade', Joe Biden was in the White House. 'I did not see the present developments coming,' he laughs. 'It's been great for my book sales, but not so great for the world.' The former Australian trade negotiator and diplomat who has trained officials from several countries, including India, speaks to Shruti Sonal about how trade policy became a frontline political weapon Trump has doubled tariffs on India to 50% and even halted trade negotiations. Did you think that it would play out this way? I have been following this negotiation and right from the start, one of the consistent things has been the lack of consistency. In a traditional negotiation — for example, between India and the UK — you had an Indian team who knew roughly what its govt wanted and would accept, and you had a UK team that knew what London would accept. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They would negotiate and then bring the final big questions to the leaders. In this case, the US negotiating teams do not know for a fact what Donald Trump will accept. At the end of a phone call, there is a 50% chance of an announcement where everyone's happy, and a 50% chance of a tariff escalation. When all of this kicked off, I had some optimism that India could do a reasonably good deal, or at least one that sort of turns the Trumpian 'Eye of Sauron' away from India and onto other targets because of the close personal relationship between Modi and Trump, and also because the Indian system itself is quite protectionist. I also naively thought that the US had a real strategic interest in making sure that they have a close working relationship with India. From the US perspective, India would be a natural ally in China's neighbourhood that should be courted and should certainly not be pushed into deepening its engagement with the BRICS. What we saw this week is that none of that was enough. In a recent podcast, you described Trump as the world's 'apex predator' when it came to deals. What did you mean by that? I think that Trump fundamentally believes that any negotiation is effectively kind of a power dynamic, where one side maximises the concessions it can extract and the weaker side gives up what it has to in the face of that power. To butcher a nature metaphor, it's sort of him saying, 'I am going to use US power to go and get things from others because we are the gorilla and they're the monkeys'. The problem with that approach is that it puts other leaders in a position where they have to politically justify any concession they make because it is a national humiliation. Some countries will understand a degree of national humiliation. But when you come to someone like Modi, whose personal image is that of someone who is tough and who fights for India, you actually make it hard for him to do a particularly one-sided deal. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It would be much, much easier for him to sell a deal with Trump if the latter did not have a tendency to then go on TV and be like 'we own them'. That makes it harder for other countries to give up too much. And if you look at what Trump has actually managed to gain from most countries, it's either fairly made-up stuff or not that much. Given your Ukrainian roots, how do you see Trump's criticism of India buying Russian oil? I was born in Kharkiv, and was there just three months ago, sitting as drones crashed down around me in Kyiv. I don't love the fact that India is buying Russian oil, but I have so much sympathy for the Indian govt because three months ago, I don't think anyone knew what side of that war the US was even on. So, to turn around today and say, 'As we've said all along, India's purchases of Russian oil are unconscionable' feels like a U-turn. Europe was able to wean itself off a lot of Russian oil and gas by throwing an insane amount of money at the problem, and even then, they've still got a huge amount of import. The idea that India can suddenly just flip a switch now that the Trump administration has decided that Russia's not a friend is an insane prospect. Even if my politics are fairly loudly anti-Russian, it feels like Russia's just an excuse. Long before Trump, populist leaders have used tariffs and sanctions. How are his tactics different? The scale is just nowhere close. It is a little bit like comparing nuclear war to a fistfight. The Trump administration finds tariffs appealing for a couple of reasons. First, they are one of the few levers of power that it can wield unilaterally due to a series of weird quirks of past legislation. If they wanted to raise taxes on anything in America, they would have to pass an Act of Congress and get it through the Senate. It would take months and be messy. On the other hand, he is able to wield tariff announcements like a scalpel or a flame-thrower to punish his enemies and reward his friends. Second, he believes he has a story that the American people have bought — that tariffs are paid by foreigners. And the reason tariffs and protectionism will always be rhetorically attractive is that politicians can pretend that the choice that's being made is between locals and foreigners. You've negotiated complex agreements at the World Trade Organisation (WTO). Is this the end of the rules-based order in world trade? The WTO, if you strip away all the pageantry, is a series of promises govts made to one another. It has always only been as strong as their commitment to those promises and to the premise those promises are built on. What we saw even before Trump's second term is govts increasingly reassessing some of that calculation. India is among those countries that have said these promises require us to give up too much sovereignty and too much policy space in exchange for the predictability that they give. A legitimate debate that's been raging at the WTO for 25 years. Obviously, it is bad for the system that the US is now just doing whatever it wants. I think the system, however, is holding on to the fact that he probably won't be president forever…but who knows? (laughs) The more important thing to keep in mind here is that other countries haven't started doing the same thing. You don't see India and Sri Lanka start using tariffs as weapons against each other in violation of WTO rules because Trump is doing it. That's giving people confidence that other countries still see value in the rules, especially now that they see what a lawless world might look like. India, for instance, was already making a bit of a trade policy push before Trump came in, but I think there's been a real acceleration in concluding more free-trade agreements than ever. It has also put the spotlight back on BRICS… Regional integration organisation models are really hard to crack, and there's a reason it's only ever really been done in Europe, and even that was considered a minor miracle. The five core BRICS members are not comfortable pooling sovereignty in that way. I keep having to remind people that China and India have literal border skirmishes, while Brazil's on the opposite side of the world. You're never going to get that same level of integration. With that being said, we've just seen the first visit by an Indian leader to China in decades. The US is in real danger of making BRICS work —despite itself.
