logo
Longevity icon Bryan Johnson's methods may be a bust. Is there a secret to living longer?

Longevity icon Bryan Johnson's methods may be a bust. Is there a secret to living longer?

USA Today03-04-2025

Hear this story
Bryan Johnson has yet to quench his thirst for longevity. He's taking all the supplements and trying all the therapies and medical interventions you can imagine to the tune of $2 million per year. You might also recognize him as the man who's used his son Talmage as a "blood boy," injecting himself with his son's plasma.
In his Netflix documentary, "Don't Die," earlier this year, he claims to have shrunk his "biological age" by 5.1 years. A New York Times story, however, reported that his age at one point actually increased 10 years according to internal studies. Yes, these measures fluctuate, as Johnson told the Times, but it throws a large bucket of cold water on Johnson's sweeping claims.
Longevity experts are mostly over Johnson's shtick and hope people consider the basics when it comes to taking care of themselves. "Biological age," they add, isn't currently as useful a measure as many companies might persuade you into thinking.
"Bryan (Johnson) can do all he wants to lower his biological age through whatever means he's choosing," says S. Jay Olshansky, professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at the University of Illinois Chicago, "but unless it's translated into science that tells us that a modification of the biomarker actually makes people live longer and/or healthier, then it's pretty much a useless statistic."
Is there a 'fountain of youth'?
What's the secret to living longer? Get back to the basics.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
The things that we know that work today include sticking to an exercise routine, keeping your weight at a healthy level, getting regular and good sleep and avoiding cigarettes and other toxins, according to Dr. Douglas E. Vaughan, professor of medicine at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and the director of the Potocsnak Longevity Institute. You should also try and reduce stress in your life and maintain healthy relationships with loved ones.
Dr. Thomas Perls, professor of medicine at Boston University and longevity expert, also suggests curbing alcohol use. On diet specifically, Marion Nestle, the Paulette Goddard Professor of nutrition, food studies and public health, emerita, at New York University, says to eat a variety of minimally-processed "real foods" and balance calories.
In Olshansky's mind, "exercise is about the only equivalent of a fountain of youth that exists today."
But he's curious about Johnson's efforts to push the envelope of how much you can manipulate the functioning of specific organs. "The question is," he says, "can you do it without all these supplements and all the stuff that he's taking and using?"
What is biological age?
Biological age isn't some mysterious figure. "You go to your high school reunion, you'll see some people on one side of the room that appear to be biologically much younger than others," Olshansky says. Quantifying it, however, has sprouted up more and more in the zeitgeist.
No official "biological age" test exists; companies and institutions measure it by looking through different determinants, including levels of proteins in the blood and DNA methylation testing, or how much your genes are expressed based off your habits. Researchers can analyze common diagnostic tools like an electrocardiogram and look at biological age that way, too.
Keep in mind these numbers aren't actually telling you how long you're going to live; they're a snapshot in time and an update for you on the health of certain organs.
"All these different clocks will give you different numbers, and which ones are actually the truth? I don't know," Doug says.
Olshansky agrees with that point, and asserts what Johnson's biomarkers say is irrelevant: "What you need in order for any of that information to be useful is evidence to indicate that if you have a biomarker indicating that your biological age is younger than your chronological age, that it will actually make you live longer. That's what's missing from the equation."
Scientists have yet to agree on which biomarkers actually indicate longevity, and what medical interventions might be able to help bring down someone's biological age. "We haven't been using these approaches long enough to have any longitudinal studies to actually measure how long people live when they're engaging in these kind of regimens," says Laura L. Carstensen, professor of psychology at Stanford University and director of the Stanford Center on Longevity.
Vaughan thinks Johnson's approach, however, is "misguided, misinformed and a mistake, and I do not encourage people to emulate it."
More answers needed about longevity, biological age
Still, Vaughan anticipates everyone will get biological age testing done and use it to inform their lifestyle choices.
But it's likely that "what may make me healthier is not necessarily the same formula as what would make you healthier," Carstensen adds. For now, it's best to not take any "biological age" metric you receive as gospel.
Scientists will keep looking to prove methods for lowering biological age, like weight loss drugs GLP-1s, cold immersion therapy and hyperbaric oxygen therapy.
"All these things are hypothetically helpful, but we need to do the studies," Vaughan adds. "We need science to guide us on where to go. We don't need to just start grabbing everything off the shelf."
To that end, perhaps Johnson is missing out on the best part of life in his quest to not die: Living. "I often want to put my arm around Bryan Johnson's shoulder," Carstensen says, "and say, 'bless your heart. Honey, go have a hamburger. I mean, go do something.'"

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Arkansas legislative committee reviews, advances water quality standards
Arkansas legislative committee reviews, advances water quality standards

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Arkansas legislative committee reviews, advances water quality standards

DEQ Director Bailey Taylor (left) and the division's chief legal counsel, Kesia Morrison, address the Joint Public Health Committee on June 4, 2025. (Ainsley Platt/Arkansas Advocate) The Joint Public Health, Welfare and Labor Committee on Wednesday reviewed amendments to Arkansas' surface water quality standards rule, which is part of the state's enforcement of the federal Clean Water Act. As part of the Clean Water Act, the state is required to review — and if necessary, revise — the standards every three years. The rule, currently called Rule 2, was pulled from last month's committee agenda to give lawmakers more time to review the changes, which include the addition of five new health-based water quality standards for benzene, methylbenzene, xylene, toluene and phenol. The rule also amends existing criteria for ammonia and cadmium, which haven't been updated in decades, to bring them in line with revisions made by the Environmental Protection Agency within the last 15 years. Rule 2 standards apply to surface waters — such as rivers, creeks, lakes and wetlands — not to drinking water, which is governed by a separate federal law, the Safe Drinking Water Act. While the Division of Environmental Quality oversees Arkansas' enforcement of the CWA, the Arkansas Department of Health enforces the SDWA in the state. 'It's not a blanket effluent limit,' DEQ Director Bailey Taylor told committee members. The standards are for the 'ambient' water quality, and permit limits for facilities like wastewater treatment plants and industrial plants that discharge waste into surface waters are backcalculated from the standards, she said. Under the revised rule, the 'primary contact season,' the period during which people are most likely to be recreating in the water by swimming, fishing or boating, would be extended by two months so it would now fall from April to October. Pressed by Greenwood Republican Rep. Lee Johnson for an explanation for the change, Taylor said standards during the primary contact season are tighter for some measures than outside of it to account for greater human contact with the water. Taylor singled out bacteria standards as one example. She said the change was made to account for water recreation that's been happening in April and October. Johnson said it was 'interesting' that the division was moving to make the change now, and asked if DEQ believed Arkansans were swimming more in 2025 than they were in 2020 or in the 1980s. 'I just wonder why we're deciding now to change the recreational season when it's been in effect for a long time,' Johnson said. Taylor said the division was trying to account for recreation that was happening outside of the traditional May to September season. Johnson countered by asking if DEQ had collected any data showing that more people were engaging in water recreation during the extended months. Taylor said the decision was based on 'anecdotal stakeholder engagement.' The rule will next be considered by the Arkansas Legislative Council's Administrative Rules Subcommittee. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Milwaukee has the worst air quality in the US right now, according to The New York Times
Milwaukee has the worst air quality in the US right now, according to The New York Times

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Milwaukee has the worst air quality in the US right now, according to The New York Times

Milwaukee has the worst air quality in the nation as of June 4, as Canadian wildfire smoke continues to drift into the U.S., according to The New York Times. The city has an air quality index of 153 as of noon EST, the Times reported. This AQI is considered "unhealthy for sensitive groups," according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's standards. For indexes in this range, members of sensitive groups — like those with lung or heart conditions — could experience health effects. The general population is "less likely" to be affected, according to Wisconsin's Department of Natural Resources did not immediately respond to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's request for comment. More: Air quality map: View current air quality conditions in Milwaukee The DNR has interactive air quality maps, which show the AQI and any active alerts or advisories by county. You can view them on the department's website. You can also type in your ZIP code into the website. More: Canadian wildfire smoke could affect Wisconsin all summer. Here's how to track air quality This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Milwaukee has worst air quality in U.S. on June 4: New York Times

"How Much Ketamine Are You On?': Jon Stewart Spotted A Huge Issue With This "Crazy" Theory Trump Shared Online
"How Much Ketamine Are You On?': Jon Stewart Spotted A Huge Issue With This "Crazy" Theory Trump Shared Online

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

"How Much Ketamine Are You On?': Jon Stewart Spotted A Huge Issue With This "Crazy" Theory Trump Shared Online

Daily Show host Jon Stewart on Monday dismissed Elon Musk's attempt to cut government spending for President Donald Trump as an 'epic fail.' But what really caught his eye was Musk's spacey demeanor during an Oval Office ceremony held last week to mark the billionaire's departure from the job. 'There might've been an explanation for that behavior,' Stewart said, and cited a New York Times report that Musk had been using a blend of drugs including ketamine, ecstasy, psychedelic mushrooms and Adderall. That same report said Musk was experiencing bladder issues, which he told friends were caused by the ketamine. 'He told people that?' Stewart asked in disbelief. 'This dude is a one-man anti-drug campaign.' Stewart then offered up an ad for the mock campaign. Related: A Republican's Response To A "Tax The Rich" Chant At His Town Hall Is Going Viral 'These are your pants,' he said. 'These are your pants on drugs.' As he spoke, an image of Musk was altered to show a wet patch forming around his groin. Elon Musk has denied the New York Times's report, saying he is "NOT taking drugs!" @elonmusk/X / Via Twitter: @elonmusk Related: "I Am So Torn With What You Are Doing" — 11 Posts From MAGA Business Owners Who Are So Close To Getting It Later in the segment, Stewart turned to Trump's latest conspiracy theory: the president shared a post on his Truth Social platform claiming that Joe Biden was executed in 2020 and replaced by clones. Stewart said it was another example of Trump 'pulling some new crazy thing out of his ass to distract us.' But Stewart pointed to a big flaw in that conspiracy theory with a question for the president. 'You're saying that the Joe Biden who doesn't even know where he is is actually an incredibly advanced cloned robot?' he asked. 'How much ketamine are you on?' Much like the image of Musk earlier, the one of Trump shifted to show a wet patch appearing around the groin. 'A lot,' Stewart concluded. See more in his Monday night monologue: This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: People Can't Believe This "Disgusting" Donald Trump Jr. Post About Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Is Real Also in In the News: One Body Language Expert Spotted Something Very Telling When Donald Trump "Held His Own Hand" At His Recent Press Conference Also in In the News: Republicans Are Calling Tim Walz "Tampon Tim," And The Backlash From Women Is Too Good Not To Share

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store