Trump's AI plan calls for massive data centers. Here's how it may affect energy in the US
President Donald Trump's plan to boost artificial intelligence and build data centers across the U.S. could speed up a building boom that was already expected to strain the nation's ability to power it.
The White House released the 'AI Action Plan' Wednesday, vowing to expedite permitting for construction of energy-intensive data centers as it looks to make the country a leader in a business that tech companies and others are pouring billions of dollars into.
The plan says to combat 'radical climate dogma,' a number of restrictions — including clean air and water laws — could be lifted, aligning with Trump's 'American energy dominance' agenda and his efforts to undercut clean energy.
Here's what you need to know.
What AI means for the environment
Massive amounts of electricity are needed to support the complex servers, equipment and more for AI. Electricity demand from data centers worldwide is set to more than double by 2030, to slightly more than the entire electricity consumption of Japan today, the International Energy Agency said earlier this year.
In many cases, that electricity may come from burning coal or natural gas. These fossil fuels emit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon dioxide and methane. This in turn is tied to extreme weather events that are becoming more severe, frequent and costly.
The data centers used to fuel AI also need a tremendous amount of water to keep cool. That means they can strain water sources in areas that may have little to spare.
What Big Tech is saying and doing about finding all that power
Typically, tech giants, up-and-comers and other developers try to keep an existing power plant online to meet demand, experts say, and most existing power plants in the U.S. are still producing electricity using fossil fuels — most often natural gas.
In certain areas of the U.S., a combination of renewables and energy storage in the form of batteries are coming online.
But tapping into nuclear power is especially of interest as a way to reduce data center-induced emissions while still meeting demand and staying competitive.
Amazon said last month it would spend $20 billion on data center sites in Pennsylvania, including one alongside a nuclear power plant. The investment allows Amazon to plug right into the plant, a scrutinized but faster approach for the company's development timeline.
Meta recently signed a deal to secure nuclear power to meet its computing needs. Microsoft plans to buy energy from the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant, and Google previously signed a contract to purchase it from multiple small modular reactors in the works.
What's at stake in the kind of energy that powers data centers
Data centers are often built where electricity is cheapest, and often, that's not from renewables. And sometimes data centers are cited as a reason to extend the lives of traditional, fossil-fuel-burning power plants.
But just this week, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres called on the world's largest tech players to fuel their data center needs entirely with renewables by 2030. It's necessary to use fewer fossil fuels, he said.
Experts say it's possible for developers, investors and the tech industry to decarbonize.
However, though industry can do a lot with clean energy, the emerging demands are so big that it can't be clean energy alone, said University of Pennsylvania engineering professor Benjamin Lee.
More generative AI, ChatGPT and massive data centers means 'relying on wind and solar alone with batteries becomes really, really expensive,' Lee added, hence the attention on natural gas, but also nuclear.
What does AI growth mean for my electricity bills?
Regardless of what powers AI, the simple law of supply and demand makes it all but certain that costs for consumers will rise.
New data center projects might require both new energy generation and existing generation. Developers might also invest in batteries or other infrastructure like transmission lines.
All of this costs money, and it needs to be paid for from somewhere.
'In a lot of places in the U.S., they are seeing that rates are going up because utilities are making these moves to try to plan,' said Amanda Smith, a senior scientist at research organization Project Drawdown.
'They're planning transmission infrastructure, new power plants for the growth and the load that's projected, which is what we want them to do," she added. "But we as ratepayers will wind up seeing rates go up to cover that.'
___
Alexa St. John is an Associated Press climate reporter. Follow her on X: @alexa_stjohn. Reach her at ast.john@ap.org.
___
Read more of AP's climate coverage at http://www.apnews.com/climate-and-environment
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Microsoft & Meta earnings, Fed's rate decision: What to Watch
Market Domination Overtime host Josh Lipton outlines the biggest stories to watch on Wednesday, Jul. 30. Microsoft (MSFT), Meta (META), Qualcomm (QCOM), Arm Holdings (ARM), Robinhood (HOOD), and Ford (FORD) will report quarterly earnings results after the markets close. The Federal Reserve's FOMC meeting will continue into its second day. At 2 p.m., Chairman Jerome Powell will announce whether interest rates will be cut or held steady. Tune in to Yahoo Finance on Wednesday at 2 p.m. for coverage of the Fed's rate decision. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Joe Rogan Calls Trump Admin Detaining Pro-Palestine Students ‘Kind Of Shifty'
Joe Rogan came out in support of foreign-born university students across the U.S. who have been detained or face deportation for protesting Israel amid the ongoing conflict in Gaza. 'Isn't a university supposed to be a place where someone's allowed to express themselves and have opinions?' Rogan asked comedian Mike Vecchione on Tuesday's episode of 'The Joe Rogan Experience.' Rogan, who endorsed Donald Trump during the 2024 presidential election, joined a growing group of podcasters who have begun to turn on the president. The comedian previously attacked Trump's immigration enforcement in an episode earlier this month, criticizing raids for targeting workplaces instead of violent criminals. Actor Mark Ruffalo subsequently slammed Rogan's about-face in a post on Threads, saying, 'It's a little late now to pretend like project 2025 didn't exist and wasn't the play book all along.' On Tuesday, Rogan denounced the president's aggressive crackdown on immigration once again, this time condemning the Trump administration for detaining visa and green-card holders, despite a campaign promise of focusing on violent criminals. During the episode, Rogan claimed 'friends' and 'cops' in New York City have told him that increases in immigration have resulted in an 'elevated number of assaults and crimes and robberies' in the city. 'And so, what's the response to that? Well, now you have this insane policy where they're going to Home Depot and rounding people up, and it's kind of scary, you know, and people that are American citizens,' Rogan said. Rogan called Trump's aggressive enforcement 'an overcorrection.' 'You got a bunch of people that are totally innocent, they are going to get caught up in that. They have been, you know, they have been,' Rogan said. 'A lot of people that have green cards, a lot of people that are supposed to be over here.' Among those who have been caught up in Trump's immigration enforcement are university students who openly protested against Israel, including Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil, a green-card holder who was detained after the administration claimed his beliefs and presence in the U.S. could hurt American foreign policy. Mohsen Mahdawi, another Columbia student who led peaceful pro-Palestinian protests on campus, was arrested during his citizenship interview. He was released after 16 days in detention, but said the administration's 'intimidation' would 'not silence' him. Rogan called it 'fucking crazy' that 'they're kicking students out that like write articles they don't like.' Though he did not name a specific case, the comment seemed to be a reference to Tufts University student Rümeysa Öztürk, who was taken by federal agents and held for more than six weeks after co-authoring an op-ed in her student newspaper calling on the university to divest from Israeli companies. 'They're writing something down, and they're not calling for violence either. And they're getting challenged. That's supposed to be how it happens,' Rogan said. 'You get challenged. Smarter people have better arguments or your argument stands.' Vecchione said that a university is 'supposed to be a place for discourse,' and Rogan agreed. 'You're deporting people because you don't like who they're criticizing,' Rogan said. 'Like that gets kind of shifty.' Related... Old Clip Of Stephen Miller Praising Torture Resurface Amid Aggressive Immigration Enforcement 'Sensitive' Memo Reveals How Many Border Agents Trump Is Using For Immigration Raids Volunteers Flock To Support Migrants Targeted By ICE At Immigration Courts
Washington Post
9 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump softens stance on China amid trade talks and summit push
The Trump administration has softened its approach to Beijing amid high-stakes trade talks this week and in advance of a potential fall summit between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. The moves include dissuading Taiwan's leader from making planned stopovers in the United States next month, postponing a meeting between Taipei's defense minister and top Pentagon leaders in June, and pausing new export controls on China, according to more than a dozen current and former U.S. officials and other people familiar with the actions. Critics of the nascent détente — including both Republicans and Democrats — have warned that the recent moves could undermine U.S. national security and impact regional alliances. Their concern is that Trump's desire to strike a trade deal with China is sidelining administration efforts to more forcefully compete with Beijing economically, technologically and militarily. China is aggressively seeking to displace the U.S. and its western allies in emerging technologies such as AI and quantum computing, which it sees as the key to accelerating its military modernization and global economic dominance. 'The president cares more about American businesses getting access to China's market than he seems to about national security concerns with Beijing,' said Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. The trip by Taiwan President Lai Ching-te, which was tentatively slated for early August to include stops in Dallas and New York City on a visit to diplomatic allies in Latin America, was pulled down after the Trump administration tried to change the itinerary, according to three people familiar with the matter, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid retaliation. One person said the administration sought to have Lai avoid major cities and limit public engagement. 'They didn't say absolutely no, but they put so many restrictions on [the stopovers] that it was clear they didn't want it,' a second person said. Beijing, which claims Taiwan as its own and views any U.S. engagement with Taiwanese officials as a provocation, had intensely lobbied the administration and China experts in Washington to discourage the visit. Asked for comment, Taiwan's unofficial embassy in Washington pointed to an earlier statement from Lai's office that 'the president currently has no plans for overseas visits in the near future.' The cancellation of Lai's trip after pressure from the Trump administration was first reported by the Financial Times. 'These concessions send a dangerous signal that America's approach to Taiwan is negotiable,' said Ely Ratner, a former senior defense official in the Biden administration. 'That will only lead to more Chinese pressure and coercion. For Beijing, the hunger will grow with the eating.' The latest round of trade talks in Stockholm concluded Tuesday with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent saying the president would have to decide whether to extend a trade truce between the two countries. 'President Trump has publicly discussed his desire for a constructive relationship with China, who is sending rare earth magnets to the United States,' White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said in a statement. 'He is focused on advancing American interests, such as leveling the playing field for American industries and getting China to stop the flow of fentanyl into our country.' Lai isn't the first senior Taiwanese official to see his U.S. trip canceled this year. Taiwanese Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo was scheduled to visit Washington in June for high-level meetings with Pentagon officials, including policy chief Elbridge Colby, according to two other people familiar with the situation. Those meetings were abruptly canceled by the U.S. after Xi urged Trump to limit U.S. engagement with Taiwan during a phone call earlier in June, the two people said. Washington has yet to reschedule the meetings. Meanwhile, the administration is weighing whether to directly ship more military equipment to Taiwan. The Defense Department submitted a tranche of aid to the White House for the president's consideration earlier this summer, but it has not yet been approved, according to a U.S. official. Instead, it sent the package to the State Department, which also plays a role in the security assistance process, according to another person familiar with the matter. The Pentagon and State Department did not respond to requests for comment. Critics have also voiced concern about the Trump administration's moves to lift restrictions on the sale of AI semiconductors to China. In July, the administration reversed an April decision to ban the sale of the H20, an AI chip made by the American semiconductor leviathan Nvidia, after CEO Jensen Huang's intensive efforts to persuade Trump. Nvidia has claimed that the H20 chips would not be used to aid China's military and that America benefits when other countries depend on its technology. National security experts and lawmakers from both parties have blasted the H20 decision, saying the technology will help advance China's military-industrial complex, with applications from simulating nuclear weapons to developing unmanned aircraft. 'We believe this move represents a strategic misstep that endangers the United States' economic and military edge in artificial intelligence — an area increasingly seen as decisive in 21st-century global leadership,' said 20 national security experts in a letter Monday urging Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to reverse course. The signatories include former members of both Trump administrations such as David Feith, who spearheaded technology competition policy at the National Security Council until April; and Matthew Pottinger, who served as deputy national security adviser in Trump's first term. The administration has made other moves to mollify China. On May 13, the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued guidance on certain chips made by Chinese tech giant Huawei. A press release warned companies that using specific versions of Huawei's Ascend semiconductor chips 'anywhere in the world violates'' U.S. export control laws. Beijing was angered by the move, coming just as it had agreed to resume rare-earth exports, according to Christopher Padilla, a former top export control official in the George W. Bush administration, now a senior adviser with the Brunswick Group consulting firm. Senior Trump administration officials became concerned the Commerce move would undermine ongoing trade negotiations. Shortly afterward, BIS removed the word 'violates' and replaced it with language stating that the agency was 'alerting industry to the risks of using' those chips, said three people familiar with the matter. The linguistic tweak did not affect the application of the rule, but it was a softer, more oblique warning. The Commerce Department did not reply to requests for comment. Shortly after the Huawei announcement, China froze approvals for rare-earth exports to the United States. In late May, BIS imposed export controls on chip design software, certain aircraft parts and ethane to China. In June, both sides met in London and said they had agreed to lift their mutual restrictions. Since then, there has been a de facto pause on new trade controls involving China, several people said. That pause comes in the wake of what some analysts say is the administration's undertaking of an ill-thought out trade war. They point to the president's April tariffs escalation of 145 percent, against which China retaliated with export controls on rare earth minerals. 'China found pain points in the United States that we could not withstand,' Sobolik said. The apparent willingness of the Trump administration to put technology export controls on the trade bargaining table is a troubling development, said Padilla, who also served as undersecretary of commerce for international trade in the George W. Bush administration. 'Since the Carter administration and normalization with China,' the policy has been to deny Beijing's request to lift export controls in return for, say, closing the trade deficit, Padilla said. Using them as leverage in trade talks sets 'a dangerous precedent,' he said, 'and it raises the real possibility that now China will demand relaxation of export controls in exchange for future trade concessions — or for an agreement if the president visits China later this year.' In July, Trump told reporters at the White House: 'President Xi has invited me to China, and we'll probably be doing that in the not-too-distant future.' On Tuesday, Trump posted on Truth Social that he was 'not SEEKING' a summit with Xi. 'I may go to China, but it would only be at the invitation of President Xi, which has been extended,' he wrote. 'Otherwise, no interest!' Eva Dou contributed to this report.
