New Seat Belt Law To Impact 7 Million Americans
The legislation, signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin in March, requires everyone to wear a seat belts even if they are sat in the back seats of a motor vehicle from July 1.
Virginia previously only required passengers in the front two seats and children to buckle up.
Newsweek contacted Youngkin's office for comment by email outside of regular working hours.
Virginia ranked last for seat belt usage among U.S. states in a 2024 report by the U.S. Department of Transportation.
Only 73.2 percent of people in Virginia used seat belts in 2023, which was the state's lowest recorded percentage since 2016.
The new legislation states that any driver or passenger at least 18 years of age will have to wear the "appropriate safety belt system at all times while the motor vehicle is in motion on any public highway." The law affects around 6.9 million people in the state.
A few exemptions exist, including when a licensed physician determines that the use of a seat belt for a patient would be "impractical by reason of such person's physical condition or other medical reason."
Law-enforcement officers who are transporting people in custody or "traveling in circumstances which render the wearing of such safety belt system impractical" will also be exempt.
Rural mail carriers for the U.S. Postal Service will also be exempt when carrying out deliveries, as will taxi passengers.
Any person who violates the law will have to pay a fine of 25 dollars.
The new legislation, also known as the "Christopher King Seat Belt Law," was championed by Christy King, whose son was killed in a car crash shortly after graduating high school.
The Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles said on its website: "Effective July 1, 2025, Virginia law requires all occupants of motor vehicles to be restrained by a seat belt, regardless of where they are seated in the vehicle. Children under age 8 must be secured in a property child safety seat, and rear-facing child seats must still be placed in the back seat of a vehicle."
Christy King wrote in a post on X, formerly Twitter: "We are proud of our hard work in fighting for change and to see this law become a reality! The Christopher King Seat Belt Law will take effect on July 1, 2025. We love you, Christopher. Your memory & impact will live on through this important law. Buckle Up."
The law comes into force on July 1, and all adults over the age of 18 bar of few exceptions will be required to wear seat belts or risk facing penalty charges.
Related Articles
America's Second Largest Homebuilder Sees House Prices PlungeFlorida Tax Changes Explained As $115-Billion Budget PassedTexas Man Gets First US Robotic Heart Transplant
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
40 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Is Deploying the National Guard to D.C.—Power Grab or Public Safety? Newsweek Writers Debate
President Donald Trump announced he would deploy the National Guard to Washington, D.C., and assume control of the city's police force. Was this announcement a sign of creeping authoritarianism? A legitimate measure to combat crime in the nation's capital city? Or just a publicity stunt? Newsweek contributors David Faris and Mark Davis debate: David Faris: Deploying the National Guard to Washington D.C. is an unconscionable abuse of federal power and another worrisome signpost on our road to autocracy. Using the military to bring big, blue cities to heel, exactly as "alarmists" predicted during the 2024 campaign, isn't about a crisis in D.C.—violent crime is actually at a 30-year low. President Trump is, once again, testing the limits of his power, hoping to intimidate other cities into submission to his every vengeful whim by making the once unimaginable—an American tyrant ordering a military occupation of our own capital—a terrifying reality. Mark Davis: In another masterstroke of messaging and practicality, President Trump has taken aim at crime in America's capital city, vowing to use the resources under his control to "make Washington safe again." No big city is ever safe enough, and there are cities with worse crime problems than D.C., but this is the city where Trump lives, as do countless politicians and media types who will criticize him while quietly enjoying a city with less violent crime. Democratic mayors and governors have done too little; Trump will act, and residents of every political stripe will benefit. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Associated Press Faris: There is nothing practical about deploying an expensive military force when crime is already in freefall. If President Trump actually cared about the city he escapes every weekend to go golfing, he would empower it with statehood or voting representation in Congress, not occupy it with troops. Davis: Washington residents—and I know plenty—may beg to differ on the "crime in freefall" observation. Last year provided a momentary breather by some measures, but this decade's crime numbers have spiked over the 2010s. Whatever current levels are, they will decrease with Trump's D.C. strategy, a goal that should be appreciated by all. Faris: I doubt that even one in ten Washingtonians would approve of deploying the military to combat a fabricated crime crisis. Trump did not consult with residents and doesn't care what they think. This is about dictatorial pageantry, a strongman applying the boot to places he believes are full of domestic enemies. Davis: My kingdom for a reliable flash poll, which I believe would show surprising support. But even if D.C. is filed with voters with a taste for high-crime Democratic governance as in Chicago, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and elsewhere, that doesn't mean Trump has to agree. And perhaps viewing murderers and carjackers as domestic enemies will actually dissuade those behaviors. Faris: It's telling that the cities Republicans bring up in these conversations are always in blue states, as if there aren't problems in Dallas or St. Louis, both of which are ruled by Republican-dominated state governments and policies. Why isn't the president threatening to send the National Guard to these cities? Davis: There are problems in every large city. The worst are the ones saddled with unchecked Democratic governance. I'm sure the president would love to send the National Guard into Chicago, but cities in both blue and red states are not under his direct authority. Washington is, and its residents are about to benefit from it. Faris: The American far right fears and loathes cities, and President Trump has long publicly fantasized about unleashing the military on them. A sanitized, terrorized capital city, with uniformed soldiers brandishing assault rifles on street corners, has been a hallmark of every authoritarian society I've visited. The militarization of Washington will not have any lasting effects on violent crime. But it's not intended to. It will only clarify President Trump's contempt for American democracy and his endless need to humiliate people he sees not as equal citizens but as disloyal subjects. Our depressing slide into sclerotic autocracy continues. Davis: In the final analysis, this comes down to whether safer streets are good. It is hard to fathom an argument to the contrary. The objections seem ginned up from the usual complaint that "Trump wants it, so it's bad." Critics tried that with borders and it failed. They said tariffs would sink us into depression. Hasn't happened, and it won't. Is there an element of political theater to this D.C. crime strategy? Sure, but it's also sound policy of the type that shows a president in touch with a concern real people have, which is served him well, and also the nation. David Faris is a professor of political science at Roosevelt University and the author of It's Time to Fight Dirty: How Democrats Can Build a Lasting Majority in American Politics. His writing has appeared in Slate, The Week, The Washington Post, The New Republic, Washington Monthly, and more. You can find him on Twitter @davidmfaris and Bluesky @ Mark Davis is a syndicated talk show host for the Salem Media Group on 660AM The Answer in Dallas-Ft. Worth, and a columnist for the Dallas Morning News and Townhall. The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Trump Supporter Detained by ICE Agents Regrets Vote
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A California man who voted for President Donald Trump has spoken out after being detained by immigration agents. Brian Gavidia, a 29-year-old American citizen from Montebello, joined a lawsuit challenging immigration enforcement tactics after federal agents detained him on June 12, NBC 4 Los Angeles reported. "I truly believe I was targeted because of my race," Gavidia told the outlet. Newsweek has contacted the Department of Homeland Security for comment. An agent surveys migrants coming for their hearings at an immigration court in New York. An agent surveys migrants coming for their hearings at an immigration court in New York. Andrea Renault/STAR MAX/IPx Why It Matters Millions of Americans voted for Trump in support of his promise to carry out widespread deportations of migrants living in the U.S. illegally, particularly those with criminal records. As immigration enforcement efforts ramp up across the country, concerns are mounting that the Trump administration is not, as it pledged, targeting the "worst first." Newsweek has documented several cases of Trump supporters being affected by the immigration raids. What To Know Gavidia voted for Trump believing that his administration's immigration agenda would target criminals, not everyday citizens, NBC 4 Los Angeles reported. He told the outlet that during an immigration enforcement operation in the San Gabriel Valley, a federal agent pushed him against a wall and demanded proof of citizenship, asking him the name of the hospital where he was born. Footage circulating on social media shows Gavidia shouting, "I was born here in the states, East LA bro!" The video shows agents, who are wearing vests with "Border Patrol Federal Agent" on them, holding Gavidia's hands behind his back. Agents allegedly confiscated his Real ID and phone. Gavidia was later released and recovered his phone, but he said he never received his ID. Convinced he was targeted because of his Latino heritage, Gavidia now rejects his prior support for the president. "I believe it was a mistake because he ran on lies," Gavidia said. "He said criminals." "If this was going to happen, do you think we would have voted? We're humans. We're not going to destroy our community. We're not going to destroy our people," he continued. Gavidia is among seven plaintiffs in an American Civil Liberties Union lawsuit that resulted in a court order limiting when federal agents can initiate immigration enforcement. The filing requested that the court prohibit raids conducted without reasonable suspicion or probable cause. It also said agents concentrated operations in places where Latino workers were often found, such as local car washes and outside Home Depot locations. California has been a key battleground state for immigration enforcement operations after Trump ordered federal agents to ramp up arrests in Democratic cities. On August 1, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a temporary restraining order, originally issued by a federal judge, that placed limits on how the federal government could carry out immigration enforcement operations in Southern California. An attorney for the Trump administration argued before a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, seeking a stay of the temporary restraining order while the case was appealed. The panel denied the request. The decision upholds a July 11 ruling granting a restraining order sought by immigrant rights advocates to limit federal immigration enforcement in Los Angeles and other areas of Southern California. Under Judge Maame E. Frimpong's directive, officers and agents may not detain individuals unless they have reasonable suspicion that the person is in the United States in violation of immigration law. What People Are Saying Brian Gavidia told NBC 4 Los Angeles: "I believe I was racially profiled. I believe I was attacked because I was walking while brown. Where is the freedom? Where is the justice? We live in America. This is why I'm fighting today. This is why I'm protecting the Constitution." What Happens Next Despite the legal restrictions, immigration raids continue. The Trump administration has appealed the Ninth Circuit's decision that upheld the temporary restraining order. The case is now before the U.S. Supreme Court, which will decide whether to lift or uphold the restrictions limiting broad-based immigration enforcement in Los Angeles.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Austin Target Shooting Suspect Ethan Nieneker Shared Right-Wing Memes
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The man accused of fatally shooting three people outside a Target store in Austin, Texas, shared right-wing memes and posts on Facebook. Ethan Nieneker, 32, is charged with two counts of capital murder and one count of murder over Monday's shooting. Newsweek has contacted Republican Governor Greg Abbott's office for comment via email. The Context Police said the gunman killed an employee collecting shopping carts outside the store, then a man and his 4-year-old granddaughter in a sport utility vehicle. The suspect then fled in that vehicle, causing multiple crashes and stealing other cars before being subdued with a Taser and taken into custody. The victims were identified Tuesday by police as Hector Leopoldo Martinez Machuca, 24, Adam Chow, 65, and Chow's 4-year-old granddaughter, local news station KVUE reported. What To Know Nieneker has shared several posts attacking liberal politics and Democratic figures on Facebook over the years, according to a Newsweek review of his page. His social media history was first reported by MeidasTouch News. In June 2019, he shared a photo of a person wearing a makeshift hat with the words "2020 President Trump will be reelected," writing alongside it: "America AF." Ethan Nieneker, 32, is charged with two counts of capital murder and one count of murder over Monday's shooting in Austin. Ethan Nieneker, 32, is charged with two counts of capital murder and one count of murder over Monday's shooting in Austin. Austin Police Department In August that year, he shared a meme that depicted former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who lost the presidential election to Trump in 2016, shooting Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender who authorities said died by suicide while in prison. Two posts that Nieneker shared in June 2019 criticized prominent progressives—Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders and New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. One post criticized Sanders for flying in first class on a domestic flight, while the other mocked Ocasio-Cortez for crying near "an empty parking lot" at the U.S.-Mexico border. The photos of Ocasio-Cortez were taken in 2018 outside a facility housing migrant children during a protest against the first Trump admin's family separation policy. In June 2018, Nieneker shared a USA Today article on his page, about a billboard in Texas that urged "liberals" to continue driving until they had left the state. A month prior, he shared a meme showing a man holding two automatic rifles, one in each hand, that was captioned: "This is how I feel about gun control. Please unfriend me if you disagree." Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis said at a news conference that Nieneker had a history of mental health issues. Court documents reviewed by Newsweek show he has a lengthy criminal history, including at least 24 charges for offenses including assault causing bodily injury, criminal mischief and driving while intoxicated. He was convicted of a charge of assault causing bodily injury family violence in 2016 and briefly sentenced to jail. What People Are Saying Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis said at a press conference on Tuesday: "What happened yesterday was an unprovoked and deliberate attack, a deliberate act of violence. Innocent lives were taken in broad daylight in a place where people should feel safe to run their everyday errands and to live their everyday lives. "The actions of the suspect showed a complete disregard for human life and the pain caused will be felt by our community for years to come." Austin Mayor Kirk Watson, a Democrat, wrote on X, formerly Twitter: "Make no mistake—yesterday's [August 11] attack was a sickening act of gun violence that took the innocent lives of a 4-year-old child, her grandfather, and a Target employee. "I know that all Austinites join me in deep sympathy for the Martinez Machuca and Chow families. We grieve with them and lift them up in this time of need. Austin is heartbroken." Target said in a statement to Newsweek: "We are devastated by the violence that occurred today at our store in Austin, Texas. Our hearts are with the families and loved ones of those who lost their lives, our team in Austin and all those impacted by this tragedy." What's Next The investigation is ongoing. The Austin Police Department is urging anyone with information to contact them at 512-974-TIPS. Tips can also be submitted anonymously through the Capital Area Crime Stoppers Program by visiting or calling (512) 472-8477.
