logo
Gamblers will pay more taxes in 2026 and beyond when Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' hits

Gamblers will pay more taxes in 2026 and beyond when Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' hits

USA Today11-07-2025
Gamblers lost a bit of a tax break in the nearly 900-page mega tax-and-spending bill that President Donald Trump signed into law July 4.
If you won $1,000 betting on the Super Bowl in 2025, for example, you still could claim up to $1,000 in gambling losses if you itemize all your deductions when you file your federal income tax return next year. And you wouldn't be taxed on that win in this example.
But the game's over when tax rules for gambling change beginning in 2026.
What are the tax rules when it comes to gambling?
What remains true: You can claim gambling losses up to the amount of your winnings only if you itemize all your deductions. Most people don't itemize these days because they get a better tax break by taking the standard deduction.
The amount of losses you can deduct are limited by your winnings. Deductible losses still will not be able to exceed total winnings for the year.
How the new tax law changes things for legal gamblers
What's changed: Beginning in 2026, the tax law shifts just enough to irk plenty of people who dream big by heading to the casino, betting online or buying lottery tickets.
A $1,000 win in 2026 and afterward will mean that you can only deduct 90% of your losses — or $900 in this example. Someone who wins in this example would pay taxes on $100 in winnings in 2026 when they file that year's tax return.
Economic outcomes: Trump's mega tax and spending law will have small economic impact, forecasters say
"Instead of gambling losses being deductible to the full extent of gambling winnings, they're going to be limited to 90%," said Tom O'Saben, enrolled agent and director of tax content and government relations for the National Association of Tax Professionals, which has 23,000 members.
Make no mistake, the new 90% limit has no impact on the 2025 tax returns that will be filed early next year. It would only apply to winnings and losses that take place in 2026 and after.
Casual gamblers cannot deduct expenses related to their lodging, transportation, or food and other incidental expenses during their gambling, Mark Steber, chief tax information officer for Jackson Hewitt Tax Services, told the Detroit Free Press, part of the USA TODAY Network, earlier this year. And that's still true going forward.
Yet, he noted, someone who is a professional gambler and considered self-employed would be eligible to deduct travel and lodging expenses while working.
The new tax law, though, clarifies that any expense related to carrying on gambling activities — such as travel, admission fees and lodging related to professional gambling — would be treated as a gambling loss and then subject to that 90% cap, O'Saben explained in a presentation on July 9 to tax professionals.
As a result, everyone from professional poker players to young gamblers using an app to bet on football are screaming foul and viewing the change as a 10% penalty of sorts.
Some already want to see the new tax rule changed
On July 7, U.S. Rep. Dina Titus introduced legislation to restore the 100% deduction for gamblers. The Nevada Democrat calls her bill the My FAIR BET Act — which calls for "Fair Accounting for Income Realized from Betting Earnings Taxation."
"It gives everyone — from recreational gamblers to high-stakes gamblers — a fair shake," Titus said in a statement.
"We should be encouraging players to properly report their winnings and wager using legal operators. The Senate change will only push people to not report their winnings and to use unregulated platforms.'
The American Gaming Association applauds Titus for introducing the FAIR BET Act, as the group would like to see congressional leaders and the Trump administration restore the long-standing tax treatment of gaming losses, according to a group spokesperson.
The industry group — whose members include DraftKings, MGM Resorts International, Churchill Downs, FireKeepers Casino Hotel, Cherokee Nation Entertainment and other big names — earlier in the spring urged congressional leadership to not only "maintain the deduction for taxpayers who itemize, but — as a matter of fairness — Congress should consider allowing for non-itemizers to net their gambling wins and losses for purposes of reporting adjusted gross income."
"Under current policy," according to the letter sent in May to congressional leaders, "most taxpayers do not itemize and many gaming customers are subject to the mismatch of being taxed on the full amount of their gross gaming wins with no ability to net their losses."
"As a result, those who are in a losing position at the end of the year are in effect being taxed on income they have not received," according to the letter.
Others are speaking out on social media, too.
A Nevada-based tax preparer posted on X that high-stakes gamblers will be hurt if this law with the 90% limit stays in place and goes into effect in 2026.
"But so will the average gambler who 'gets lucky,' " said Russell Fox, whose profile also proclaims that he's a poker player.
"Vegas was built on the dream, and if that dream is removed (or drastically lessened) by a bad law, Vegas will be hurt."
I'd imagine the same would be true for casinos in a million other spots where many people choose to legally gamble.
Contact personal finance columnist Susan Tompor: stompor@freepress.com. Follow her on X @tompor.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

D.C. religious leaders blast Trump crackdown as 24/7 federal patrols ramp up
D.C. religious leaders blast Trump crackdown as 24/7 federal patrols ramp up

Axios

time17 minutes ago

  • Axios

D.C. religious leaders blast Trump crackdown as 24/7 federal patrols ramp up

The Trump administration's D.C. crackdown was ramping up National Guard deployment and 24/7 federal patrols on Wednesday night, drawing a sharp rebuke from religious leaders in the U.S. capital. The big picture: President Trump's maintains his unprecedented action in declaring a " crime emergency" in D.C. was necessary, but the interfaith group said his " sweeping language" to justify it is "inaccurate and dehumanizing, increasing the risk of indiscriminate arrests and the use of excessive force." What they're saying:" Even one violent crime is one too many, and all Washingtonians deserve to live in safety. But safety cannot be achieved through political theatre and military force," per the statement from the group that includes Bishop Mariann Budde — who upset Trump at a January prayer service when she implored him to "have mercy" on immigrants and LGBTQ+ people. "It requires honesty and sustained collaboration between government, civic, and private partners — work now being sidelined," the statement reads. "Inflammatory rhetoric distracts from that work, even as the administration has cut more than $1 billion from programs proven to reduce crime, including law enforcement support, addiction and mental health treatment, youth programs, and affordable housing," the statement said. Of note: "The president has likened his intentions for Washington — and possibly other cities — to the harsh measures already used against migrants, tactics that have resulted in thousands detained in inhumane conditions and many deported without due process," they added. The group is calling on the city's political and civic leaders to "reject fear-based governance and work together in a spirit of dignity and respect — so that safety, justice, and compassion prevail in our city." For the record: The D.C. religious leaders involved in the statement, titled "Fear Is Not a Strategy for Safety," along with Budde are: Washington National Cathedral Dean Randy Hollerith; Rabbi Lauren Holtzblatt, co-senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation; Bishop LaTrelle Miller Easterling, episcopal leader of the Baltimore-Washington and Peninsula-Delaware and Rabbi Abbi Sharofsky director of Intergroup Relations and rabbi in residence at the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington; The Rev. John Molina-Moore, general presbyter for National Capital Presbytery; Bishop Leila Ortiz, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America; Rabbi Jonah Dov Pesner, director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism; Rabbi Jon Roos,Temple Sinai; and Rabbi Susan Shankman, Washington Hebrew Congregation also signed onto the statement. Scenes from D.C. as federal patrols stepped up

Appeals court allows Trump to cut $2 billion in foreign aid
Appeals court allows Trump to cut $2 billion in foreign aid

New York Post

time17 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Appeals court allows Trump to cut $2 billion in foreign aid

A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled that President Trump can withhold some $2 billion in foreign aid payments, overturning a lower-court order that had blocked the administration's plans to slash disbursements from the US Agency for International Development (USAID). In a 2-1 ruling, a panel of judges on the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia lifted Biden-appointed District Judge Amir Ali's temporary restraining order, which forced USAID to continue making billions of dollars in foreign assistance payments for work already done by organizations the agency contracted with. Ali issued the restraining order in February in response to a lawsuit filed by two nonprofit organizations, the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition and Journalism Development Network, after Trump ordered a 90-day pause on foreign aid funding on his first day in office. Advertisement 3 President Trump speaks to the press about deploying federal law enforcement agents in Washington to bolster the local police presence, in the Press Briefing Room at the White House, in Washington, DC, on Aug. 11, 2025. REUTERS Judge Karen Henderson, an appointee of former President George H.W. Bush, noted in the majority opinion Wednesday that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring a case against the Trump administration's funding freeze. 'The district court erred in granting that relief because the grantees lack a cause of action to press their claims,' Henderson wrote. Advertisement The nonprofits had argued that the president exceeded his authority by virtually abolishing USAID and cutting congressionally approved spending. Henderson, joined in the majority by Judge Gregory Katsas, a Trump appointee, ruled that under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, only the Government Accountability Office – a congressional watchdog agency – had standing to challenge the president's order to withhold foreign aid. Judge Florence Pan, a Biden appointee, slammed the funding freeze as 'unlawful' and warned it could lead to 'tyranny' in her dissenting opinion. 3 A federal appeals court on Wednesday cleared President Trump to withhold $2 billion in foreign aid, reversing a lower court's block on his plan to cut USAID disbursements. REUTERS Advertisement Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters 'The court's acquiescence in and facilitation of the Executive's unlawful behavior derails the carefully crafted system of checked and balanced power that serves as the greatest security against tyranny – the accumulation of excessive authority in a single Branch,' Pan wrote. A White House Office of Management and Budget spokesperson hailed the ruling, telling Reuters it would halt 'radical left dark money groups' from 'maliciously interfering with the president's ability to spend responsibly and to administer foreign aid in a lawful manner in alignment with his America First policies.' The Trump administration had previously petitioned the Supreme Court to lift Ali's restraining order, but in a 5-4 ruling, the high court rejected the bid. Advertisement 3 President Trump speaks during a visit to the Kennedy Center in Washington, DC, on Aug. 13, 2025. REUTERS In February, the State Department outlined plans to eliminate roughly $60 billion in foreign aid spending and terminate 92% of grants issued by USAID. The figures were included in a State Department memo detailing the results of a foreign aid audit ordered by Trump. The audit identified nearly 15,000 grants and targeted almost 10,000 for elimination — the majority of which were issued by USAID. USAID was one of the first federal agencies that Trump and the Department of Government Efficiency, formerly led by billionaire Elon Musk, targeted for massive cuts based on allegations of widespread waste, fraud and abuse within the agency. In July, Congress approved a White House recession request that clawed back about $8 billion earmarked for USAID.

Trump's friendly-to-frustrated relationship with Putin takes the spotlight at the Alaska summit
Trump's friendly-to-frustrated relationship with Putin takes the spotlight at the Alaska summit

Washington Post

time18 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Trump's friendly-to-frustrated relationship with Putin takes the spotlight at the Alaska summit

WASHINGTON — Donald Trump's summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday could be a decisive moment for both the war in Ukraine and the U.S. leader's anomalous relationship with his Russian counterpart. Trump has long boasted that he's gotten along well with Putin and spoken admiringly of him, even praising him as 'pretty smart' for invading Ukraine. But in recent months, he's expressed frustrations with Putin and threatened more sanctions on his country.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store