Only one in six back reducing or removing coursework to avoid AI misuse
Public support on whether students should use artificial intelligence (AI) to improve their writing style in coursework is divided, according to a poll.
A YouGov survey, commissioned by Cambridge University Press & Assessment, found 89% believed it was 'unacceptable' for pupils to use AI to entirely complete their school coursework.
But the poll, of 2,221 adults in the UK, found nearly half (46%) believe it is acceptable for school pupils to use AI to improve the punctuation and grammar in their coursework, while 44% did not.
Only 16% of UK adults believe reducing or removing coursework completed at home is the best way for schools to avoid student AI misuse.
The chief executive of exam board OCR is calling for a co-ordinated national strategy on AI.
It comes after the independent curriculum and assessment review said it would consider reducing the 'overall volume of assessment' at GCSE.
But the interim report, published in March, said the review had heard about the 'risks' to standards and fairness concerning AI in relation to coursework.
The review – chaired by education expert Professor Becky Francis – will publish its final recommendations in the autumn.
The YouGov survey, which was carried out in June, suggests more than three in five (62%) of UK adults oppose teachers using AI to mark coursework, while 27% support it.
But the majority (59%) support teachers using AI to complete their administrative tasks, such as lesson planning.
Jill Duffy, chief executive of OCR, said: 'AI is already in our schools and is not going away.
'A co-ordinated national strategy, with funding to ensure no schools are left behind, will build public confidence in its transformational potential.
'The public is clear that coursework is too important to lose, even in the age of AI.
'It enables us to test different skills, and to reduce the intense volume of exams taken at 16.
'These findings should be seen as a challenge to all of us in education: find a way to adapt coursework so it is fit for the AI century.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Doge reportedly using AI tool to create ‘delete list' of federal regulations
The 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) is using artificial intelligence to create a 'delete list' of federal regulations, according to a report, proposing to use the tool to cut 50% of regulations by the first anniversary of Donald Trump's second inauguration. The 'Doge AI Deregulation Decision Tool' will analyze 200,000 government regulations, according to internal documents obtained by the Washington Post, and select those which it deems to be no longer required by law. Doge, which was run by Elon Musk until May, claims that 100,000 of those regulations can then be eliminated, following some staff feedback. A PowerPoint presentation made public by the Post claims that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) used the AI tool to make 'decisions on 1,083 regulatory sections', while the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau used it to write '100% of deregulations'. The Post spoke to three HUD employees who told the newspaper AI had been 'recently used to review hundreds, if not more than 1,000, lines of regulations'. During his 2024 campaign, Donald Trump claimed that government regulations were 'driving up the cost of goods' and promised the 'most aggressive regulatory reduction' in history. He repeatedly criticized rules which aimed to tackle the climate crisis, and as president he ordered the heads of all government agencies to undertake a review of all regulations in coordination with Doge. Asked about the use of AI in deregulation by the Post, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said 'all options are being explored' to achieve the president's deregulation promises. Fields said that 'no single plan has been approved or green-lit', and the work is 'in its early stages and is being conducted in a creative way in consultation with the White House'. Fields added: 'The Doge experts creating these plans are the best and brightest in the business and are embarking on a never-before-attempted transformation of government systems and operations to enhance efficiency and effectiveness.' Musk appointed a slew of inexperienced staffers to Doge, including Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old who was previously known by the online handle 'Big Balls'. Earlier this year, Reuters reported that Coristine was one of two Doge associates promoting the use of AI across the federal bureaucracy.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Trump ally says AI could erase entire job categories
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has said that entire job categories could be wiped out by artificial intelligence, as he becomes the latest exec to forecast a seismic change in corporate America. The billionaire, who has recently developed a relationship with the President, spoke about the future of the US workforce during his latest trip to Washington this week. 'Some areas, again, I think just like totally, totally gone,' he said, specifically referencing customer support roles. 'That's a category where I just say, you know what, when you call customer support, you're on target and AI, and that's fine.' Altman, who has an estimated net worth of $1.8 billion, also suggested that AI could already diagnose a patient better than doctors, The Guardian reported. His comments come as an increasing number of Wall Street CEOs have warned about how the rise of AI will take a sledgehammer to jobs. 'Artificial intelligence is going to replace literally half of all white-collar workers in the U.S.,' Ford CEO Jim Farley said earlier this month. Altman said the transformation of customer services is already all but complete. 'Now you call one of these things and AI answers. It's like a super-smart, capable person. There's no phone tree, there's no transfers. It can do everything that any customer support agent at that company could do,' he said. 'It does not make mistakes. It's very quick. You call once, the thing just happens, it's done.' While he said AI's diagnostic capabilities had surpassed human doctors, he did not go so far as to say the technology would wipe out healthcare jobs. 'ChatGPT today, by the way, most of the time, can give you better – it's like, a better diagnostician than most doctors in the world,' he said. 'Yet people still go to doctors, and I am not, like, maybe I'm a dinosaur here, but I really do not want to, like, entrust my medical fate to ChatGPT with no human doctor in the loop.' Altman also opened up about his biggest concerns about AI technology, and how it could be a hotbed for fraud. He said he is concerned that the US is facing an 'impending fraud crisis' as AI could enable criminals to impersonate other people. 'A thing that terrifies me is apparently there are still some financial institutions that will accept a voice print as authentication for you to move a lot of money or do something else – you say a challenge phrase, and they just do it,' Altman said. 'That is a crazy thing to still be doing… AI has fully defeated most of the ways that people authenticate currently, other than passwords.' He also said that he worries about a hostile nation using these weapons to attack the US financial system, The Guardian reported. It comes as Altman, and OpenAI, ramp up their presence in Washington. Altman is increasingly taking the place of his estranged co-founder Elon Musk in the President's inner circle. Musk and Altman were once close collaborators in the founding of OpenAI, but are now engaged in a public feud, with Musk suing the company in November last year. He said the company was 'perverting' its original mission – maximizing profits rather than benefiting humanity. On Tuesday, Altman said OpenAI will open its first office in DC early next year. Despite Altman's warnings about the risks of the technology, there has been a marked change in the mood music around regulation in the last several years. Under the Biden administration, OpenAI and its rivals asked for AI regulation. Now they are urging the government to avoid regulation that could curb companies' ability to compete with foreign innovations, particularly in China. The White House released its 'AI action plan' on Wednesday, vowing to keep 'woke AI' models out of Washington and to win the 'AI race.' One executive order states that the federal government 'has the obligation not to procure models that sacrifice truthfulness and accuracy to ideological agendas.' The administration also signed an order to incite innovation and remove what it called 'onerous Federal regulations' that hamper development of the tech.
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Gods of Silicon Valley haven't done their history homework
If you were in any doubt quite how much planet-destroying energy is required to fuel AI, Mark Zuckerberg announced last week that Meta was building a couple of multi-gigawatt data centres. One, being built in Louisiana, is going to be nearly the size of Manhattan and will draw on 5 gigawatts (GW) of energy; the other in Ohio, due to be operational next year, will be at least 1GW. To put that in context, on a quiet day, the entire UK can run on as little as 15GW. But it was not so much the scale of these data centres fuelling 'superintelligence' that caught my eye, but what Zuckerberg had chosen to call them. The first to come on stream is Prometheus. The sound you hear is Mary Beard and other classical scholars rolling their eyes. Zuckerberg has named it after the titan in Greek mythology who stole fire from the gods to give to humanity, a heroic act that Meta's founder believes has powerful echoes for his own selfless giving to all of us the 'poke' on Facebook. But has he forgotten the second part of the tale? Prometheus was punished for this terrible deed by being tied to a rock and having his liver pecked out by an eagle — for eternity. The second data centre, the one the size of a city, is named after another titan: Hyperion. While he may not have come to such a sticky end, he did have sex with his sister in order to birth the sun, moon and dawn, a relationship possibly more problematic than that of the kiss cam couple caught at the Coldplay concert. Earlier this week my colleague James Marriott wrote about the utter weirdness of the past. It was, as usual, a wonderful column, but he accused Silicon Valley billionaires of being consumed with the present and suffering from 'historical incuriosity' in their belief they have discovered the solutions to humanity's eternal questions. I'm not sure that's true. If anything, Zuck and his fellow tech bros are overly obsessed with classical history. Growing up, Zuckerberg moved high schools specifically so he could indulge his passion for Latin; his sister is a respected classics scholar. He adores the Roman Empire so much so that he and his wife, Priscilla, have named their three children Maxima, Aurelia (after Marcus Aurelius) and August, after Augustus Caesar. Last year he unveiled a rather alarming 7ft green statue of his wife, explaining he was bringing 'back the Roman tradition of designing sculptures of people you love'. His man-crush on Augustus, he has explained, is because 'basically, through a really harsh approach, he established 200 years of world peace'. I'm not sure the Britons, Gauls or Germanic tribes would quite see it that way. As the Roman historian Tacitus said: 'They make a desert and call it peace.' Many pockets of the business world, but Silicon Valley in particular, revel in Roman and Greek history, showing their fondness for all things classical by giving their hedge funds or data centres grandiloquent names, an attempt to burnish their sometimes flaky ventures with a veneer of respectability. Nomura, the Japanese investment bank, back in 2021 launched Cassandra, 'an early warning model for financial crises', perhaps failing to realise that the fate of Cassandra was that she was never to be believed. In 2023, a defence company started in California developing 'solar powered birds', lightweight autonomous aircraft designed to fly up in the stratosphere. It has called itself Icarus. What?! Does it not know its namesake flew too close to the sun and plunged to a terrible, watery death? I have a theory — a sketchy one, admittedly — that the more desperately classical a business name is, the more likely it is to get into trouble. Nike and Oracle are clear exceptions to this rule, but it certainly holds true for Hermes, the parcel delivery company named after the messenger to the gods. It had such a terrible reputation for tardiness and losing customers' packages that it was compelled to rename itself Evri. Arcadia, Philip Green's clothing empire, ended up being not a rural idyll but a chain of empty urban shops. Any venture named after the titans is risky; not just, obviously, Titanic but also Titan, the ill-fated mini submarine that imploded in 2023. Clarium was the investment vehicle set up by Peter Thiel, the billionaire co-founder of PayPal and early investor in Facebook, who delights so much in playing a Marvel super-villain he has signed up to have his body cryogenically frozen after he dies. Clarium derives from the Latin for 'clear' or 'famous', but the only thing famous about Clarium was that it lost 90 per cent of its value. Since then, Thiel's ventures have referenced The Lord of the Rings, notably Palantir, named after Tolkien's all-seeing stones. When you are selling your highly secretive surveillance technology to government agencies around the world, I'm not sure it's wise to name it after a device which — when it fell into the hands of Sauron — became a tool of control and manipulation. This casual approach to nomenclature, however, is typical of a generation of business leaders who have read the classics widely but shallowly, who believe history and literature can be crunched down to a post on LinkedIn or, in Zuckerberg's case, a T-shirt slogan. He has been spotted wearing one saying 'Carthago delenda est' — Carthage must be destroyed. Perhaps he needs to spend more time with his sister, who can point him to Oedipus Rex, where a caution is given to any man hubristic enough to defy the gods: a 'rough doom' will tear him down, repaying 'his pride, breakneck, ruinous pride!'
