logo
Māori Party MPs receive record bans from NZ parliament over haka protest

Māori Party MPs receive record bans from NZ parliament over haka protest

New Zealand's parliament has handed record suspensions to three Indigenous Māori MPs after they performed a haka to protest a controversial bill last year.
Māori Party co-leaders Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer were banned from parliament for 21 days, the longest-ever suspension, while New Zealand's youngest MP Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke was suspended for seven days.
The three performed the haka last November ahead of a vote on a bill that would have reinterpreted the 185-year-old Treaty of Waitangi between the British and Indigenous Māori that still guides the country's policy and legislation.
In footage widely shared around the world, Ms Maipi-Clarke, 22, rose to her feet, ripped up the bill and started performing a protest haka.
She was joined by Mr Waititi and Ms Ngarewa-Packer, who strode on the chamber floor chanting the Ka Mate haka famously performed by the All Blacks rugby team.
Ms Ngarewa-Packer was also accused of pointing her fingers in the shape of a gun at the leader of the right-wing ACT Party, David Seymour, who had proposed the bill.
The trio were hauled before parliament's Privileges Committee, but refused to take part in the hearing.
Supported by New Zealand's three governing coalition parties, the bans were voted on and accepted on Thursday.
Ms Maipi-Clarke responded by saying Māori would not be silenced.
"A member can swear at another member, a member of cabinet can lay their hands on a staff member, a member can drive up the steps of parliament, a member can swear in parliament, and yet they weren't given five minutes of suspension," she said.
"Yet when we stand up for the country's foundational document, we get punished with the most severe consequences."
She told parliament ahead of the vote that the suspension was an effort to stop Māori from making themselves heard in parliament.
"Are our voices too loud for this house? Is that the reason why we are being silenced? Are our voices shaking the core foundation of this house? The house we had no voice in building … We will never be silenced and we will never be lost," she said.
Mr Waititi held up a noose as he rose to speak in defiance of the ban on Thursday.
"In my maiden speech, I talked about one of our [ancestors] who was hung in the gallows of Mt Eden Prison, wrongfully accused," he said.
"The silencing of us today is a reminder of the silencing of our ancestors of the past, and it continues to happen.
While the members are suspended, they will not be paid or be able to vote on legislation.
Suspending MPs is rare in New Zealand's parliament, and only three have been suspended in the past 10 years, according to New Zealand parliamentary services.
Before Thursday, the longest suspension was for three days, according to New Zealand representatives who spoke earlier in the day.
Judith Collins, who heads the Privileges Committee and serves as attorney-general, had previously told parliament that the haka forced the speaker to suspend proceedings for 30 minutes and that no permission had been sought to perform it.
The opposition Labour party called for a compromise and proposed censure instead of suspension.
Labour considers the suspension to be "inconsistent with the fundamental nature of this democracy", Labour parliamentarian Duncan Webb said on Thursday.
"This decision is wildly out of step with any other decision of the Privileges Committee," Mr Webb said.
The parliamentary committee panel members were sharply divided over the haka protest and the lengthy punishments were advanced only because the government has more MPs in the parliament than the opposition.
Inside and outside parliament, the haka has increasingly been welcomed as an important part of New Zealand life.
The sacred chant can be a challenge to the viewer but is not violent.
As Māori language and culture have become part of mainstream New Zealand in recent years, haka appear in a range of cultural, somber and celebratory settings.
They have also been performed in parliament to welcome the passage of high-profile laws.
Some who decried the protest haka in parliament cited its timing, with Ms Maipi-Clarke beginning the chant as votes were being tallied and causing a brief suspension of proceedings.
She has privately apologised for the disruption to parliament's speaker, she said on Thursday.
Some MPs urged their peers to consider rewriting rules about what members could do in parliament to recognise Māori cultural protocols as accepted forms of protest.
One cited changes to allow breastfeeding in the debating chamber as evidence the institution had amended rules before.
Thursday's debate capped a fraught episode for race relations in New Zealand, beginning with the controversial bill that the Māori Party MPs opposed.
The bill, which was defeated in parliament, sought to reinterpret the Treaty of Waitangi and put the new interpretation to a public vote.
It was widely seen as an attack on Māori because for more than five decades the treaty has been used to enshrine Māori rights into law.
The Treaty Principles Bill sparked massive protests across New Zealand, including in a hikoi — or march — of nearly 40,000 people arriving on the steps of parliament in late November.
The Māori Party, as well as other community members, have been central to organising those protests, as well as resisting the proposal inside parliament.
ABC/wires

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Climate activists Jesse Noakes, Gerard Mazza fined after Woodside AGM stench gas media stunt
Climate activists Jesse Noakes, Gerard Mazza fined after Woodside AGM stench gas media stunt

ABC News

timea day ago

  • ABC News

Climate activists Jesse Noakes, Gerard Mazza fined after Woodside AGM stench gas media stunt

Climate activists who planned to release stench gas in an attempt to cause the evacuation of a Woodside annual general meeting in Perth's CBD have been fined $10,000 each. Gerard Mazza, Jesse Noakes and Tahlia Stolarski had planned to release the gas at the meeting at Perth's Convention Centre in April 2023, to force the room to be evacuated. The meeting, which was attended by a few hundred people, saw Woodside executives and investors discuss its controversial climate targets. The District Court heard Stolarski had ordered canisters of gas and had them delivered to her home. Mazza went into the Convention Centre to release the gas but, the court heard, was "stopped in his tracks" when police arrested him and seized the canister he had. An earlier attempt to enter failed when a security guard didn't believe Mazza's false claim he worked in IT for the venue. Mazza was the principal offender, the court was told, with Stolarski aiding him by obtaining the gas, and Noakes helping through reconnaissance. The court heard Noakes went to the convention centre days before the meeting was scheduled, and gathered footage. He'd also provided Mazza with a beanie and jacket to disguise himself when Mazza sought go back into the venue after he was initially ejected. Stolarski had planned to let off homemade smoke flares outside the building. Stolarski's lawyer had said the trio's aim was to get media attention. Judge Craig Astill described them as "misguided, in how they go about trying to achieve their goals" with a history of "nuisance type offending". He told the court they'd pursued their "good intentions" in an "unlawful way". The judge said they "were trying to drown out" the voices of those attending the AGM who may have wanted to speak. The prosecutor said the gas had a strong, easily detectable odour and was toxic to inhale in high concentrations. The prosecutor had said that while it wasn't suggested the trio set out to hurt people, there seemed to be a lack of acceptance that their plan "did pose risks". He said a "substantial number" of people aged over 70 were at the meeting. The trio had pleaded guilty to attempting to create a false belief that would call for action from police or emergency services. They were initially charged with aggravated burglary, which was downgraded to creating a false belief and downgraded further to attempting to create a false belief. In sentencing today, Judge Craig Astill said although the plan "clearly failed", they were trying to "create alarm" by making those at the AGM think there was a gas leak. "You were prepared to put the safety of others at risk," he told Mazza, Stolarski and Noakes. Speaking to Mazza, who's now 33, he said he'd "started to appreciate the way you have been doing things isn't the way to do it". But Judge Astill said he didn't think Mazza or the others were remorseful. And he said the differences in their contributions to the crime "were marginal".

Patterson reveals mushroom lies she cooked up after lunch
Patterson reveals mushroom lies she cooked up after lunch

Perth Now

timea day ago

  • Perth Now

Patterson reveals mushroom lies she cooked up after lunch

Ms Patterson says she was 'disappointed' that her ex said he wouldn't come to lunch. 'You wanted him to come to lunch so you could feed him part of a poisoned beef Wellington lunch,' the Crown prosecution said. 'No,' Ms Patterson replied. Ms Patterson then agreed she scraped the mushrooms and pastry off the sixth beef Wellington later into her rubbish bin. Erin Patterson has now agreed that she told her ex-partner on June 16 that she had 'medical issues' she wanted to discuss, but is still disputing that she said she wanted 'advice', including how to break it to the kids. When Mr Patterson told Ms Patterson he was 'too uncomfortable' to attend lunch, he said he was 'happy to talk about health' issues at another time. 'That's really disappointing. I have spent many hours preparing lunch,' Ms Patterson replied to Mr Patterson. 'I wanted it to be a special meal because I might not be able to host a lunch like this again. 'I hope to see you there.' Ms Patterson said the 'medical issues' were not 'why' she invited people. 'My memory is that I said to him something like, 'there's some medical stuff that I'll talk to you about then'.' She says, 'that wasn't a lie' as she had an appointment booked for a 'pre-surgery appointment' for a gastric bypass. Simon Patterson previously gave evidence claiming that the accused invited Don and Gail Patterson and Heather and Ian Wilkinson to lunch to discuss 'important medical news' and that she wanted advice on how to break it to the children. He has also given evidence claiming the accused wanted the children not to attend the lunch. Ms Patterson disputed that evidence, claiming she just invited everyone to lunch and has not asked guests to come to discuss 'medical news'. She accepted that she had invited Don, Gail, Heather and Ian before Simon. Ms Patterson 'disagreed' that she told the wider family before her ex-partner so that he would feel more inclined to come. Erin Patterson took to Facebook to 'vent' to her friends about her 'frustration' over Don and Gail Patterson. Her messages were read to the court, where she said she wanted 'nothing to do with' the Patterson family due to their lack of involvement in mediation. 'Nobody listens to me. At least I know they're a lost cause,' Ms Patterson wrote. 'So, f..k em',' the message continued. 'I wrote that. I was venting. I was frustrated,' Ms Patterson said, explaining her comments. Ms Patterson denied that she was telling her friends about her true feelings, claiming she was not angry, just 'frustrated'. Ms Patterson accepted that she also wrote a message ahead of lunch, where she called Simon Patterson a 'deadbeat'. 'Her (Gail) son is such a deadbeat.' Ms Patterson admitted to sending a message to her Facebook friends, where she vented about a 'dispute' over child support and school fees. 'Simon wants to walk away from his responsibilities,' she said. She went on to say that it might be a good thing as Ms Patterson could now put her children in whatever school she wanted. She added that if her ex-partner wanted the kids to attend a Christian school, he could pay half. 'A blessing in disguise,' she told her friends. Ms Patterson says she told her partner about changing which school her child attended, something the Crown disputes. Erin Patterson was asked to read a message she sent in a group chat that Don and Gail Patterson were in. In her message, she said: 'Simon needs accountability for the difficulty he is causing me.' The message continued, with Ms Patterson mentioning school fees and how much her ex-partner was paying. Ms Patterson denied she was trying to get Don and Gail to influence Simon's contribution to school fees but accepted that Don made clear he wasn't going to get involved. 'I wasn't angry,' Ms Patterson said. Erin Patterson, 50, stands accused of murdering her in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, as well as the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson by serving them beef Wellington containing poisonous mushrooms at a lunch at her Leongatha home on July 29, 2023. Alleged mushroom killer Erin Patterson is under intense cross examination at her triple murder trial, spilling confessions on the lies she told police and health authorities about mushrooms. She is returning to the witness box now.

Māori Party MPs receive record bans from NZ parliament over haka protest
Māori Party MPs receive record bans from NZ parliament over haka protest

ABC News

timea day ago

  • ABC News

Māori Party MPs receive record bans from NZ parliament over haka protest

New Zealand's parliament has handed record suspensions to three Indigenous Māori MPs after they performed a haka to protest a controversial bill last year. Māori Party co-leaders Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer were banned from parliament for 21 days, the longest-ever suspension, while New Zealand's youngest MP Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke was suspended for seven days. The three performed the haka last November ahead of a vote on a bill that would have reinterpreted the 185-year-old Treaty of Waitangi between the British and Indigenous Māori that still guides the country's policy and legislation. In footage widely shared around the world, Ms Maipi-Clarke, 22, rose to her feet, ripped up the bill and started performing a protest haka. She was joined by Mr Waititi and Ms Ngarewa-Packer, who strode on the chamber floor chanting the Ka Mate haka famously performed by the All Blacks rugby team. Ms Ngarewa-Packer was also accused of pointing her fingers in the shape of a gun at the leader of the right-wing ACT Party, David Seymour, who had proposed the bill. The trio were hauled before parliament's Privileges Committee, but refused to take part in the hearing. Supported by New Zealand's three governing coalition parties, the bans were voted on and accepted on Thursday. Ms Maipi-Clarke responded by saying Māori would not be silenced. "A member can swear at another member, a member of cabinet can lay their hands on a staff member, a member can drive up the steps of parliament, a member can swear in parliament, and yet they weren't given five minutes of suspension," she said. "Yet when we stand up for the country's foundational document, we get punished with the most severe consequences." She told parliament ahead of the vote that the suspension was an effort to stop Māori from making themselves heard in parliament. "Are our voices too loud for this house? Is that the reason why we are being silenced? Are our voices shaking the core foundation of this house? The house we had no voice in building … We will never be silenced and we will never be lost," she said. Mr Waititi held up a noose as he rose to speak in defiance of the ban on Thursday. "In my maiden speech, I talked about one of our [ancestors] who was hung in the gallows of Mt Eden Prison, wrongfully accused," he said. "The silencing of us today is a reminder of the silencing of our ancestors of the past, and it continues to happen. While the members are suspended, they will not be paid or be able to vote on legislation. Suspending MPs is rare in New Zealand's parliament, and only three have been suspended in the past 10 years, according to New Zealand parliamentary services. Before Thursday, the longest suspension was for three days, according to New Zealand representatives who spoke earlier in the day. Judith Collins, who heads the Privileges Committee and serves as attorney-general, had previously told parliament that the haka forced the speaker to suspend proceedings for 30 minutes and that no permission had been sought to perform it. The opposition Labour party called for a compromise and proposed censure instead of suspension. Labour considers the suspension to be "inconsistent with the fundamental nature of this democracy", Labour parliamentarian Duncan Webb said on Thursday. "This decision is wildly out of step with any other decision of the Privileges Committee," Mr Webb said. The parliamentary committee panel members were sharply divided over the haka protest and the lengthy punishments were advanced only because the government has more MPs in the parliament than the opposition. Inside and outside parliament, the haka has increasingly been welcomed as an important part of New Zealand life. The sacred chant can be a challenge to the viewer but is not violent. As Māori language and culture have become part of mainstream New Zealand in recent years, haka appear in a range of cultural, somber and celebratory settings. They have also been performed in parliament to welcome the passage of high-profile laws. Some who decried the protest haka in parliament cited its timing, with Ms Maipi-Clarke beginning the chant as votes were being tallied and causing a brief suspension of proceedings. She has privately apologised for the disruption to parliament's speaker, she said on Thursday. Some MPs urged their peers to consider rewriting rules about what members could do in parliament to recognise Māori cultural protocols as accepted forms of protest. One cited changes to allow breastfeeding in the debating chamber as evidence the institution had amended rules before. Thursday's debate capped a fraught episode for race relations in New Zealand, beginning with the controversial bill that the Māori Party MPs opposed. The bill, which was defeated in parliament, sought to reinterpret the Treaty of Waitangi and put the new interpretation to a public vote. It was widely seen as an attack on Māori because for more than five decades the treaty has been used to enshrine Māori rights into law. The Treaty Principles Bill sparked massive protests across New Zealand, including in a hikoi — or march — of nearly 40,000 people arriving on the steps of parliament in late November. The Māori Party, as well as other community members, have been central to organising those protests, as well as resisting the proposal inside parliament. ABC/wires

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store