
James Paterson labels 1.2 million home building goal ‘delusional' as Treasury flags shortfall in leak
Speaking on ABC's RN Breakfast, Liberal senator James Paterson said that while it was 'a good thing' to have targets, they had to be achievable.
'It's certainly a good thing to have targets and it is a good thing to be ambitious, but the ambition has to be realistic and achievable and not delusional and I think we're now getting into that level of delusion because a target of 1.2 million homes by 2029 would require the government to be building about 250,000 homes a year when only about 170,000 are being constructed, which is a fall from under the previous Coalition government of about 180,000 a year.'
'So we're going backwards not forwards, and it's time for either radical policy change to deliver those houses or acceptance that target is not going to be said as Treasury says.'
Senator Paterson's statement comes after advice from the Treasury was accidentally given to the ABC in a partially unredacted freedom of information release.
The advice warned that the 1.2 million home target 'would not be met'.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers said on Monday the government would reach the target but acknowledged that it would need to 'do better'.
'Under current trajectories, we would fall short,' Mr Chalmers said.
'But that doesn't mean that between now and over the course of the next four years that we can't consider ways and work with the states and territories and others, local governments and others, on ways to build more homes.'
In the interview on RN, Senator Paterson was asked whether the Coalition needed to rethink its position on reducing net migration in order to bring in more skilled workers to help address housing shortages.
Senator Paterson said all of the party's policies were under review.
'Even in the last term, while we are arguing for overall reduced migration, we did say that one area that should be prioritised within the skilled migration program that would've continued was construction given the urgent national priority of building more homes,' he said.
Senator Patterson added that the Coalition had an 'ambitious' policy platform at the previous election on housing, including allowing first-home buyers to deduct mortgage payments against their income tax
Senator Paterson was also asked what areas the Coalition would look at to unlock land and increase development.
He said the party would explore supply on the boundaries of cities and within the existing 'footprint' of cities, which describes just about everywhere.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
ASX to rise, US bonds rally on rising US rate bets
Australian shares are poised to open modestly higher, with results pending from Telstra, Origin Energy, ASX and Suncorp among others. The Dow advanced while the S&P 500 hovered near its record high. US bonds rallied as traders further lifted their bets on a September rate cut. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he sees the potential for US rates to fall as much as 175 basis points, in a series of moves. The probability of a quarter point rate cut at the Fed's mid-September meeting reached 97.9 per cent according to the CME's FedWatch Tool, up from 93.9 per cent the previous day. Bessent also said he sees the agreements to allow Nvidia and AMD to sell semiconductor chips to Chinese customers, and paying the US Treasury 15 per cent of sales to do so, as a potential model for other sectors. The revenue would be used to pay down America's debt, he said. Get the daily Results Wrap newsletter during earnings season, with our Chanticleer columnists' analysis of the key results of the day. Sign up here. Market highlights ASX 200 futures are pointing up 37 points or 0.4 per cent to 8831. All US prices at 4pm New York time. Today's agenda Among the other results expected on Thursday: Temple & Webster, Abacus Storage King and Pro Medicus. Follow our reporting season coverage here. For a review of Wednesday's reporting news: Australia's July jobs report is scheduled for release at 11.30am. In a note, TD Securities said: 'We remain pessimistic on the jobs market and don't expect a strong rebound after two weak jobs report. We expect jobs growth at +12k in July. Unemployment rate is likely to stay at 4.3 per cent with the participation rate holding steady. Another weak job report may trigger speculation of consecutive rate cuts from the RBA.' Overseas, the UK and the EU are each set to report second-quarter GDP data. Policymakers meet in Norway and are expected to keep rates on hold. The US will release July PPI data and weekly initial claims: the strength, or weakness, of the labour market is seen as key to the Fed's next rate decision. Top stories Chalmers moves to phase in EV road user charge | The Albanese government is working on plans for a road user charge that would start with heavy electric vehicles. | In its final report before next week's roundtable, the Productivity Commission also urged the government to create uniform rules on AI in the care sector. | 'I think we could see it in other industries over time,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said, with the revenue going to pay down the national debt.

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Information kept secret, despite senior Tasmanian official questioning why redactions made
A senior Tasmanian department official internally suggested some of the redactions to a Right to Information document did not "stack up", before the document was ultimately sent redacted to the ABC. The ABC had requested department correspondence on the issue of Tasmanian children being kept in watch houses, also known as reception prisons. An "issues register" document detailing staff concerns and Department of Justice responses to those concerns was accidentally sent unredacted to the ABC in July. It was followed minutes later by the properly redacted version, which blacked out most of the 14-page document. Having access to both versions of the same document has allowed the ABC to analyse what was redacted and scrutinise the reasons given for each redaction. The ABC has since used the Right to Information (RTI) process to ask for internal communications on the decision to redact the document. Newly obtained emails show one senior government employee had reservations about the reason for blacking out some of the information in the document, before its release. The director of the Justice Department's Office of the Secretary, which is the office that manages RTI requests, said she was unsure that a legal exemption for personally identifiable information could be used. In an email to the RTI officer, she wrote: "I've just had a look at the proposed redactions and my only additional comment for your consideration is in relation to page 2 and the s36 exemption. Doesn't that require the identity of the person to be ascertainable from the information? If so, I'm not sure the two dot points redacted stack up?" The correspondence in the emails ends there. The ABC has asked what the response was to the email. The two dot points suggested, and ultimately redacted for the reason of personally identifiable information, read: The dot points were examples prison staff gave for why the environment of a watch house may be unsuitable for young people. Section 36 is an exemption under Tasmanian RTI legislation that stops personally identifying information from being made public, as a protective measure. The legislation states: Information is exempt information if its disclosure under this act would involve the disclosure of the personal information of a person other than the person making an application under section 13. It defines personal information as being information in which an individual's identity is "apparent or reasonably ascertainable". Before obtaining these internal emails, the use of section 36 in this watch house document had already been slammed by an RTI expert. Johan Lidberg, an access to information researcher at Monash University, said the raw document, which ABC was sent by mistake, proved there were no names or personally identifying information contained in it, including the two points questioned in this email. The director at the Centre for Public Integrity, Geoffrey Watson SC, also said the law was clear. "Now the law on that is very clear, that there is a presumption in favour of granting access. "If there is a doubt about it, then the documents should be produced." The original decision to redact the dot points stated that: "The personal information of people who have been held at a watch-house in either the Hobart or Launceston Reception prisons is not in the public domain and those persons might suffer discrimination by reason of their having been in these facilities if disclosed." Asked why the redactions were made despite internal uncertainty over them, a Department of Justice spokesperson said responsibility sat with the "RTI delegated officers" who make decisions under the Right to Information Act 2009. "Although the department has in place a quality assurance process relating to RTI applications, which may involve feedback to the delegated officer, under section 50 of the act a delegate must not be unduly influenced in the exercise of the power to make decisions in accordance with the act," the spokesperson said. "As with any quality assurance feedback relating to RTI applications, the delegated officer will note any feedback, whether it be administrative, typographical or interpretive and then confirm and release their decision, in accordance with the act." In the "issues register", prison staff told the Department of Justice that children and young people endure trauma while in adult prison watch-houses, saying they are unable to access basic hygiene, health care or support. Children can also spend days in what is meant to be temporary detention, according to a report by Tasmania's Custodial Inspector. Staff reported "high anxiety levels" and stress, saying they struggled to manage risks to detainees and to themselves. They have urgently requested measures such as body-worn cameras to allay workplace risks — which the department said is expected to be operational by the end of October this year. The department said all staff in reception prisons would be required to activate the cameras for all interactions involving children and young people in watch houses. Watch house cells are where children and adults charged with offences await court appearance, police interview or bail. They are adult custodial facilities meant for temporary detention, and are not child-focused. Children as young as 10 years old can be held in watch houses. Since 2023, the longest period a child or young person was held in a watch-house was four days and seven hours, the Department of Justice disclosed in its response to a previous RTI request. Centre for Public Integrity's Geoffrey Watson said Right to Information systems were "aspirational stuff" and intended to improve society.

Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Completely unacceptable': Albanese govt ‘not prepared' to discuss with Australians the threat of regional conflict with China
The Coalition has said the Albanese government is "not prepared to have an upfront discussion" about the threats to our country, which were spelled out in a recent Sky News special event. Last week, Sky News aired the special event 'The War Cabinet' comprising of a panel of defence experts who warned a conflict looms in the Indo-Pacific region. During the discussion, former Labor Defence Minister Joel Fitzgibbon, who served in the first Rudd government, said Australia's strategic outlook in the Indo-Pacific region was 'deteriorating rather markedly' and that the warning time of an attack is much shorter. Additionally, CyberCX executive director Katherine Mansted said while Australia was not at war, 'we're certainly not at peace' and the Australian public had a 'huge stake' in defending its sovereignty. 'Chinese military cyber spies are actively probing our civilian critical infrastructure, looking for weaknesses and looking for ways to get in and hide and bide, potentially for high-impact sabotage, if relations deteriorate in the region,' she said. Speaking to Sky News on Wednesday, Shadow Defence Minister Angus Taylor said despite the clear warnings, the Albanese government was 'not prepared' to talk about a conflict with China. 'They're not prepared to have an upfront discussion with the Australian people about the risk of domination of the Indo-Pacific by the Chinese Communist Party,' he told Sky News host Chris Kenny. 'I mean live-fire exercises off the south coast of New South Wales and the government has nothing serious to say about it.' Mr Taylor said Australia had 'no choice' but to increase its defence spending from two to three per cent of GDP to ensure the Australian Defence Force (ADF) was prepared and capable to defend the nation. 'I know this is difficult at a time like this to find that money but we have no choice,' he said. 'We need to have an Australian Defence Force that is prepared, that is agile, that has the people it needs, that has this sovereign manufacturing capability it needs – missile manufacturing, drone and counter-drone manufacturing – the emerging technologies that we are seeing are playing such a critical role in conflicts around the world. 'The objective here of course is peace.' Mr Taylor said Australia must also have a 'strong alliance' and admonished the Prime Minister for not having had a meeting with President Donald Trump. 'That's completely unacceptable,' he said.