Samsung is tapping some serious K-pop star power to sell its skinny phone
Samsung is bringing out the big guns to promote the launch of its slimmest phone to date.
The South Korean electronics company released the latest Galaxy S25 Edge on Monday — a $1,099 phone that is 5.8 millimeters thick and weighs 163 grams.
Samsung tapped Felix Lee, one of K-pop's biggest faces of the moment, to promote the phone.
Lee, an Australian-born singer from the South Korean boy band Stray Kids, made a joint Instagram post with Samsung Korea on Tuesday. The cinematic video shows Lee dressed in a black suit, his trademark blond hair slicked back.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Samsung Korea 삼성전자 (@samsungkorea)
Samsung's new phone is set to kick off a new era of skinny phones, with the iPhone 17 "Air" rumored to drop later this year. The Galaxy S25 Edge — advertised with the slogan "Beyond Slim" — is set to go on sale in the US on May 30. It has a 200-megapixel, wide-angle camera and is integrated with Samsung's AI suite, Galaxy AI.
Lee's fan base was quick to express excitement about the partnership. Reactions to the post included the comment "Who's getting this phone bcuz of Felix?" — which had been liked more than 1,500 times at press time.
Samsung first teased the partnership last week with a post showing the silhouette of Lee's face. It asked people to guess who the person might be and promised Starbucks gift cards to 25 people who guessed correctly.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Samsung Korea 삼성전자 (@samsungkorea)
The Samsung partnership comes in an exciting year for Lee, who walked the runway for Louis Vuitton's Fall-Winter 2025 show in Paris in March.
Lee was named the house's ambassador in 2023 and has become a personal muse of LV's artistic director, Nicolas Ghesquière.
Lee said in interviews with Vogue that Ghesquière personally invited him to walk the LV Fall-Winter 2024 show in Paris. Before the March show, the designer said it was a "big honor" to have Lee there.
This is not the first time Samsung has tapped K-pop talent to promote its products. In 2020, the brand released a special BTS Galaxy phone in collaboration with the Grammy-nominated band, and has featured members of the group in its ads too.
And in 2019, Samsung also released limited-edition black and pink products in collaboration with K-Pop girl group Blackpink.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Prediction: Meta Platforms Will Be a $3 Trillion Company in 5 Years
Meta Platforms has several initiatives to grow its business. Meta is currently doing quite well, despite the various growth segments it's working on. 10 stocks we like better than Meta Platforms › Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) is the parent company of the world's most widely used social media sites, like Facebook and Instagram. Its sprawling business has already allowed it to achieve a $1.67 trillion valuation, but I think there's much more in store. I could easily see it being worth $3 trillion in five years, which would provide market-beating returns for shareholders. Multiple factors influence this prediction, but Meta's various investments in artificial intelligence are the biggest. Few companies are diving into AI as deeply as Meta, which could pay off big time for them in the long term. CEO and founder Mark Zuckerberg often highlights five key ways AI can help Meta Platforms. They are: Improved advertising. More engaging experiences. Business messaging. Meta AI. AI devices. They've invested significant money into building and developing their AI model, Llama. One recent report found that Meta aims to fully automate ad creation by using AI as early as 2026. Essentially, a client could give Meta some information about the company and a budget, then Meta would generate images, videos, and text automatically. Because Meta has internal information about what ads do and don't work and which client base to target, this could be a huge cost savings for its potential clients because they could pay Meta instead of a brand agency to do their advertising. As a result, Meta could likely charge a premium for this ad experience, boosting its revenue. Meta could also become more efficient by deploying engineering AI agents. Mark Zuckerberg believes its AI model will be capable of coding at a level comparable to a mid-level engineer this year, with the technology scaling to widespread use by next year. This would make existing engineers far more productive and could reduce expenses in other areas by deploying AI agents rather than humans. While this is a grim outlook for those in that line of work, the reality is that Meta Platforms spends a lot of money on software engineers, and this is a field that could be ripe for disruption if AI can effectively do the job. Another area I want to highlight is AI devices. While Meta has sunk a significant amount of resources into developing AR and VR headsets that don't have much practical application, its work with its glasses could be. The current use cases for Meta's glasses that it has collaborated with Ray-Ban to make are quite niche, but within the next five to 10 years, Zuckerberg believes that most of the content we're browsing on our phones will be done with AI glasses. If AI glasses become a hit, this isn't accounted for in Meta's valuation and would be a massive growth wing for the business. Meta is experiencing many exciting innovations right now, but none of them have impacted its financials yet. Still, Meta is doing just fine without any of its upcoming innovations. In Q1, Meta posted impressive revenue growth of 16%, while diluted earnings per share (EPS) increased 37%. Those are fantastic numbers, and Q2 should see similar results. Management expects $44 billion in revenue at the midpoint, indicating about 13% growth. Meta is clearly doing quite well, and if it keeps this growth up, it's well on its way to becoming a $3 trillion company, especially if it sees its revenue rise thanks to its ad innovation or AI glasses. Shifting toward profitability, if Meta can significantly reduce its operating expenses through the deployment of AI agents throughout its workforce, that could push Meta into profitability levels that investors have seldom seen. This is a big deal, as operating efficiency improvements have an outsized effect on bottom-line profits. With that in mind, I think Meta Platforms is an excellent buy right now, especially because its growth and dominance have prompted it to trade at a reasonable valuation. Meta's stock is priced at 26 times forward earnings, which isn't a bad price to pay, and with the growth of its current business combined with its various initiatives, it could easily become a $5 trillion company in five years or less. Before you buy stock in Meta Platforms, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Meta Platforms wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Keithen Drury has positions in Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Prediction: Meta Platforms Will Be a $3 Trillion Company in 5 Years was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
AI search's user experience may be the best it'll ever get, says one founder
By day, Lily Clifford is the CEO and founder of Rime Labs. The startup creates the voice on the other end of the line when you call to order from restaurants like Domino's or Wingstop. Rime trains AI models to create voices with specific regional accents, tones, and other elements that make them easier to converse with. Clifford also uses AI in her daily life, especially in lieu of search engines, she told Business Insider. Instead of pulling up a search engine when she has a question, Clifford usually turns to generative AI chatbots like OpenAI's ChatGPT or Google's Gemini. She said the experience reminds her of using Google or other search engines in the late 1990s and early 2000s. That's when she thinks the user experience was at its prime. "My hot take here is these applications might be the best that they ever will be," she said. Search engines used to be simpler, Clifford said. There were far fewer ads and sponsored results. And optimizing webpages to get more clicks — a practice known as SEO — was in its infancy. Those developments spawned new businesses and became features of the modern internet. But Clifford said search results have also gotten worse for users. It's common to see multiple sponsored results above more relevant ones in a search, for instance. AI chatbots, meanwhile, haven't gone through the same evolution — yet. Companies and individuals are still experimenting with usinggenerative AI for lots of tasks, from writing emails to creating images for advertising campaigns. Many people, like Clifford, use AI as a replacement for search engines. Ask AI a question, and it will often give you an answer in just a few sentences. For some, that's more appealing than clicking through several results from a search engine until you find the information that you're looking for. AI search results can also give users contradictory or incorrect information, though, creating a potential downside to the quick-and-easy answers. Still, Clifford noticed the user experience gap between the chatbots and search engines during a recent trip to Milan, she said. While there, she used an AI chatbot to look for a local place to buy a silk blouse. The chatbot pointed her toward a local seamstress who sold custom blouses through Instagram. "It wasn't like 'Go to Forever 21,' which is probably what would've happened if I typed it into Google," she said. "It was totally wild and fun to use." But, Clifford thinks it's a matter of time before AI chatbots go the way of the search engines before them. Some companies with big investments in generative AI search tools are taking steps in that direction. Last month, Google said it would expand its use of ads in some of the AI Overviews that appear at the top of its search results, for example. And some marketing experts now offer help with " answer engine optimization," or AEO.
Tom's Guide
5 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I swapped my Apple Watch for the Galaxy Watch 7 — here's what I liked and disliked
Smartwatches have become an essential bit of kit for many, with features like fitness tracking, notifications, sleep monitoring, and heart-rate checking that were once novel and impressive. Now? They're expected. For years, I've been mostly in the Apple Watch camp. As my usual go-to everyday smartwatch, it's proven to be sleek, responsive, and — since it's tightly-knit with my iPhone and other Apple gear — it just works. Until now, I hadn't found a good enough reason to switch. But with Samsung's latest wearable, the Galaxy Watch 7, launching alongside the feature-rich Galaxy Watch Ultra and the much-hyped Galaxy Ring, I was curious. Was it time to try the other side? Could Samsung's circular contender pull me away from the Apple Watch Series 10? As someone who tests gadgets for a living, I decided it was time to find out. I've been wearing the Galaxy Watch 7 day in, day out — at the gym, pottering around the yard, walking around the block, shopping trips, in bed, and everywhere in between — to see how it stacks up against Apple's polished powerhouse. Here's everything I liked, and what I felt didn't quite hit the mark. Let's start with looks because, in my opinion, that's still what matters most on your wrist. Swapping from Apple's distinct rectangular slab to Samsung's traditional round face was — I have to say — a bit of a relief. I've never really been a fan of the Apple Watch's angular design, so it didn't take long to get used to, and prefer, the Watch's 7's more traditional circular face design. Samsung's latest wearable comes in 40mm and 44mm sizes, and the version I wore (the former) struck a great balance — not too chunky, not too delicate. The aluminium case keeps things lightweight, and I really liked the muted khaki finish of my review unit — it's subtle, modern, and goes with anything. The sapphire crystal glass is also a win, sporting a premium feel and a level of scratch resistance the aluminium Apple Watch 10 can't quite match without going up to the stainless steel model. Samsung's bezel is minimal and sleek, and the buttons are well integrated — I never once missed Apple's Digital Crown. If you're into traditional watch styling, Samsung's rounded aesthetic will feel more at home. The Apple Watch Series 10 features a bright and responsive touch screen, a comfortable and lightweight case and more smart functions than you'll know what to do with. Some of my favorites include on-wrist translations and global tide tracking. You also get useful safety tools and lots of holistic-tracking tech. The Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 provides in-depth, AI-backed, holistic insights into everything from sleep quality to fitness training and recovery. A handsome and easy-wearing watch, the touchscreen is bright and responsive, smart features and third-party apps are plentiful, and battery life is good for a full day. While the Galaxy Watch 7 does a decent job on the design front, its display doesn't quite dazzle in the same way the Apple Watch Series 10 does. Don't get me wrong, it's bright, colourful and sharp, and outdoors in the sun it's still clear and visible. But Apple's display just has the edge here — it feels more vibrant, especially when it comes to viewing angles and responsiveness. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. And then there's haptics. The Apple Watch is the gold standard here with crisp, tight vibrations that never miss a tap. The Galaxy Watch 7, in contrast, just isn't quite as responsive. It's by no means an issue, but it's just not as refined or as satisfying as on Apple's wearable. One of my unexpected highlights was the sheer joy of swapping bands on the Galaxy Watch 7. Sure, Apple's proprietary band system is clever, but it's also rather limiting — and not to mention expensive. Samsung's choice to use a quick-release system compatible with standard 20mm or 22mm bands means I could use all sorts of third-party straps without it putting a big dent in my wallet. From sporty silicone to classic leather, you could quite quickly build up a new mini collection of different styled straps for the Watch 7. And while Samsung's own bands are decent, it's the freedom to personalize without Apple's markup that does it for me. Lovely stuff! If only I had a dollar for every time a smartwatch brand promised 'all-day battery' and failed to deliver. Unfortunately, despite its promises, Samsung's Galaxy Watch 7 also falls into that camp. It claims 'up to 40 hours of battery life' — and yes, in some cases it'll stretch a full second day — but in reality, with notifications on, GPS use, and a bit of music control, I was plugging it in nightly. Sigh. Still, it's still a little better than my Apple Watch 9, which Apple claims lasts 18 hours (and, in my experience, often hits that mark). Nevertheless, the Galaxy Watch 7's charging speed doesn't match up. It'll give you about 40% in 30 minutes, which is fine, but Apple's fast charge still has the edge, especially when you're in a rush to leave the house. This was the big one. Apple Watch is only focused on iPhone users. If you live in the Apple ecosystem, it's seamless. But it's also a walled garden with zero Android support, no Google Maps native app, and limited options for third-party customisation. The Galaxy Watch 7, on the other hand, is a Wear OS 5 device, and it plays nicely with a huge array of Android phones and also can be used by iPhone users (although more limited than on Android). The Google Play Store access on your wrist also works super well — I could download Spotify, Google Maps, WhatsApp, and even control my smart home with the Google Home app. The interface feels smoother than on past Galaxy Watches, and while Samsung's own One UI Watch skin adds a few quirks, it's generally very intuitive and responsive. The new Exynos W1000 chip seems to help, too, with everything from app launches to swiping around feeling faster and slicker than on older models. Okay, so it's time to talk money. The Samsung Galaxy Watch 7's prices start at $299 for the 40mm Bluetooth model and $329 for the 44mm version. If you want LTE connectivity, it's an extra $50 on top for either size, so you're looking at $349 and $379, respectively. Compare that to the Apple Watch Series 10, which starts at $399 for the 42mm GPS version and jumps to $499 if you want the same size with cellular. Opt for the larger 46mm model and you're looking at $429, or $529 if you want it fully connected. So, if we're comparing like for like, Samsung's pricing undercuts Apple at almost every level, and you're still getting very similar top-notch features. Add in the fact that Samsung often offers deals and trade-in offers, too, makes it even more tempting if you're already in the Android ecosystem. Annoyingly, you can't pair a Galaxy Watch with an iPhone in a way that gives you the full experience. While the Galaxy Watch 7 technically can work with iOS, some features and health metrics — like ECG, blood pressure monitoring, and Samsung Health's more advanced tools — are either stripped back or unavailable entirely. The same goes for certain third-party apps and watch face options, which are much more robust when used within Samsung's own ecosystem. To get the most out of the Galaxy Watch 7, you really need to pair it with a compatible Android phone, ideally, a Samsung one. I tested mine with the Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus, and it was a seamless, enjoyable experience. It boasted fast pairing, full feature access, and top-notch integration with Samsung Health, SmartThings, and the new Galaxy Ring ecosystem. On top of that, the Galaxy S25 Plus' big, bright AMOLED screen made it a joy to manage watch settings, workouts, notifications, etc and it felt like both devices were built to work with one another — probably because they are. Of course, it's not easy to move away from iMessage, but if you're fully onboard the Samsung train, the S25+ and Galaxy Watch 7 combo is as slick and functional as it gets on Android. After two weeks of using the Galaxy Watch 7, I can honestly say it's a strong rival to Apple's popular wearable. The design is smarter than I expected, the software is powerful and flexible, and the price is right. It's a great option for Android users — and for once, Apple fans may have something to be envious of. Still, it's not perfect. Battery life is still just okay, the screen's responsiveness isn't perfect, and the tighter integration of the Apple Watch with iPhone still can't be beaten if you're fully invested in that ecosystem. So, did I switch for good? Not yet, but I'm seriously considering it. I've gone back to my Apple Watch for now, mainly because I'm a creature of comfort (and you gotta love the seamless iOS experience), but the Galaxy Watch 7 did make a huge impression on me. If I were to move to a Samsung phone full-time (and after using the Galaxy S25+, I'm genuinely tempted) the Galaxy Watch 7 would be my go-to wrist wearable.
