Sir Alan Bates slams 'kangaroo court' who offered only half his compensation claim
Sir Alan Bates slams 'kangaroo court' who offered only half his compensation claim
The 70-year-old, the subject of the ITV drama Mr Bates vs The Post Office revealed he has been told to 'take it or leave it'
The former postmaster has led a campaign for justice against the Post Office
(Image: Lucy North/PA Wire )
The former postmaster who led a campaign for justice against the Post Office amidst the Horizon scandal has revealed he has been offered compensation less than half of his original claim. Sir Alan Bates said the offer had been made on a "take it or leave it" basis.
The 70-year-old, who has been campaigning for 20 years in support of thousands of subpostmasters wrongly accused of dishonesty because of faulty software, says a 'quasi-kangaroo court' presided over by the UK Government has been responsible for the compensation scheme.
The scandal, dramatised in the award winning ITV programme Mr Bates vs The Post Office saw more than 900 post office staff members convicted of fraud, false accounting and theft as a result of the Horizon IT system falsely showing money was missing.
Convictions were overturned last year but many victims are still awaiting compensation.
Mr Bates has said he has been offered a "take it or leave it" compensation figure, amounting to 49.2% of his original claim, after making an appeal to independent reviewer Sir Ross Cranston.
(Image: ITV )
Article continues below
Speaking to The Sunday Times, Mr Bates has called for an independent body to be set up to deal with compensation schemes for scandals involving the public sector.
He added: "I can already hear the sharpening of goose quills across Whitehall as the civil service prepares to snow politicians under with reasons it would not work.
"The sub-postmaster compensation schemes have been turned into quasi-kangaroo courts in which the Department for Business and Trade sits in judgment of the claims and alters the goalposts as and when it chooses.
"Claims are, and have been, knocked back on the basis that legally you would not be able to make them, or that the parameters of the scheme do not extend to certain items.'
The 555 claimants who took the Post Office to the High Court between 2017 and 2019 are eligible to seek redress from the group litigation fund (GLO), with claimants able to take a fixed sum of £75,000 or seek their own settlements.
For individual disputes, referrals are made to an independent panel for review or seek a final view from former High Court judge Sir Cranston.
A spokesperson for the Department for Business and Trade said: "We pay tribute to all the postmasters who have suffered from this scandal, including Sir Alan for his tireless campaign for justice, and we have quadrupled the total amount paid to postmasters since entering government.
'We recognise there will be an absence of evidence given the length of time that has passed, and we therefore aim to give the benefit of the doubt to postmasters as far as possible.
"Anyone unhappy with their offer can have their case reviewed by a panel of experts, which is independent of the government.'
Article continues below
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
TV doctor Hilary Jones says he would help terminally ill to die if law changed
TV doctor Hilary Jones says he would help terminally ill to die if law changed The GP, often seen on ITV's Good Morning Britain and the Lorraine show, said medicine will go "back to the Dark Ages" if proposed legislation being considered at Westminster is voted down Dr Hilary Jones (Image: ITV ) TV doctor Hilary Jones has described assisted dying for the terminally ill as "kind and compassionate", adding that he would help a patient to end their life if the law was changed. The GP, often seen on ITV's Good Morning Britain and the Lorraine show, said medicine will go "back to the Dark Ages" if proposed legislation being considered at Westminster is voted down. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will return to the House of Commons for debate on Friday, with MPs expected to consider further amendments. In its current form the Bill, which applies only to England and Wales, would mean terminally ill adults with only six months left to live could apply for assistance to end their lives, with approval needed from two doctors and the expert panel. Last month, MPs approved a change in the Bill to ensure no medics would be obliged to take part in assisted dying. Doctors already had an opt-out but the new clause extends that to anyone, including pharmacists and social care workers. Article continues below Dr Jones, in an interview with the PA news agency, said medics are "looking over their shoulders because of the legal repercussions of the law" as it stands. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. Asked about the significance if the law does change, Dr Jones told PA: "It will relieve healthcare professionals who deal with terminal illness. "There are wonderful people who are caring and compassionate, who just live in fear of their actions being misinterpreted, of being accused of wrongdoing, and because of that fear, people at the end of life are often undertreated. "People are looking over their shoulder because of the medications they're using or the doses they're using, it means that patients aren't getting the best palliative care that they could have. "And I think the Bill, if it passes, will alleviate a great deal of that, and put people's minds at rest that they're not going to suffer unnecessarily at the end of life." Ahead of last month's Commons debate on the Bill, two royal medical colleges raised concerns over the proposed legislation. The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) said it believes there are "concerning deficiencies", while the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) said it has "serious concerns" and cannot support the Bill. Dr Jones, who has been practising medicine for more than 45 years and spent time working on cancer wards during his career, said he has "always supported it (assisted dying)". He added: "I've always felt it is the most humane, kind and compassionate thing that relatives and doctors can provide, knowing that that person's wishes are respected and known, that there is full mental capacity and that they're surrounded by love. "And for me, it's always been very clear." Asked if, were the law to change, he would be content to help someone who had chosen assisted dying at the end of their life, he said: "Absolutely, if I know the patient, I know what their wishes are, I see them suffering, and there's nothing more I can do to help their suffering then, absolutely, I would hold their hand and help them achieve what they want to achieve." Some of the Bill's opponents have urged MPs to focus on improving end-of-life care rather than legislating for assisted dying. But Dr Jones said his mother, who was a nurse and died "suffering unnecessarily" despite the "best possible palliative care" would be "proud of me speaking on this subject now, in the way I am". He told of his respect for people's "religious beliefs, cultural beliefs and personal feelings" in being opposed to assisted dying but insisted it should be an area of choice. He said: "The bottom line is that I think it's the patient's individual choice. I think we should respect the right of the individual to choose what they want. "This is not a mandatory thing. This is not being imposed on anybody. "And I think people should have the individual right to make a decision about how they end their life if they've got a terminal illness where there's no prospect of cure and they're suffering and they fear an undignified death." Asked about the prospect of the Bill being voted down by MPs, Dr Jones said: "We would be back to square one, back to the Dark Ages, in my opinion, medically, and that would be a shame. "I don't think we would be advancing medicine if the Bill is not passed." Our Duty Of Care, a group of healthcare professionals campaigning against a change in the law, said the question must be whether someone is making a "true choice" if they apply for assisted dying. Article continues below Dr Gillian Wright, a spokesperson for the group, said: "If someone has not had access to palliative care, psychological support or social care, then are they making a true choice?" "At a time when the NHS is on its knees, when palliative are social care are struggling and our amazing hospices are having to close beds and cut services because of lack of money, as someone who has cared for people at the end of life, I would urge MPs to vote against this Bill but instead invest in excellent specialist palliative care, social care and psychological support."
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Post Office Horizon IT scandal compensation hits £1bn
More than a billion pounds has now been paid out in compensation to victims of the Post Office Horizon IT scandal, according to new government figures.A total of £1.039bn has been awarded to just over 7,300 sub-postmasters across all four redress schemes, the latest monthly figures Office Minister Gareth Thomas said: "We are settling cases every day and getting compensation out more quickly for the most complex cases, but the job isn't done until every postmaster has received fair and just redress."More than 4,000 people have been told they are eligible for compensation. But the schemes they need to access to get it can be long-winded and broken down how they work. What are the main compensation schemes? There isn't a single compensation scheme for sub-postmasters to apply to, and individual eligibility will depend on the particular circumstances of an individual's four main schemes are aimed at groups of victims who had different experiences of the scandal. They are explained in more detail in the following sections. Which scheme is available to Alan Bates and others depicted in the ITV drama? Alan Bates led a group of 555 sub-postmasters in a landmark court case against the Post Office, which came to wider public attention after it was depicted in an ITV the cohort secured a £42.5m settlement in 2019, the huge costs of going to the High Court meant each claimant received a relatively low compensation pay-out at the end of Group Litigation Order (GLO) scheme was set up to ensure they received extra money to reflect the gravity of their situations. The scheme is funded and managed by the of January 2024, people eligible for this scheme "will receive at least £75,000 in compensation upfront".The government estimates around two thirds will turn that offer down and push for more. In those cases, the government will award postmasters 80% of the initial offer made to 9 September, Labour said it will set a target of making an offer to 90% of sub-postmasters who have submitted a full claim within 40 of 31 January, £128m has been paid under the scheme, including interim the 555 members of the GLO group, 63 had criminal convictions and therefore are not eligible for this scheme but they are eligible for other compensation - depending on how their convictions are they are quashed by the court, they can apply to the Overturned Convictions Scheme. If they are overturned under legislation - the Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Act 2024 which became law in May - they can go to the newer Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme. What compensation is there for people with overturned convictions? There have been 983 convictions - 700 of which were privately initiated by the Post Office - linked to the faulty Horizon IT whose convictions are quashed can apply to the Overturned Convictions Scheme, whether or not they are in the GLO group. It is this scheme that the government has taken over responsibility for from the Post Office.A total of 111 people have had their convictions overturned as of 31 when the government's promised law to overturn all convictions linked to the scandal becomes a reality, hundreds more people will be whose convictions are overturned can choose to take a fast-tracked £600,000 settlement. Or they can enter into negotiations if they feel they are entitled to eligible people are entitled to an "interim" payment while their final settlements are processed. The government has provided funding to the Post Office for these those people whose conviction is overturned through the new law, they can register for the Horizon Convictions Redress will entitle them to an initial £200,000 interim payment. They can then decide to accept £600,000 or have their case fully of 31 January, external, £65m has been paid out under this scheme including further interim latest figures show that out of 111 eligible claimants in the OCS scheme, 82 claims for full and final settlements have been made with 66 paid out.A further seven have received offers. The remaining nine are awaiting offers from Post Office Ltd. More on the Post Office scandal Why were hundreds of Post Office workers prosecuted?PM backs calls to knight Post Office campaignerPost Office paid Fujitsu £95m to extend HorizonCan scheme to quash Post Office convictions work? What about sub-postmasters who weren't convicted? The Post Office scandal goes far beyond the original GLO court case and the people who wound up with criminal prosecution, some sub-postmasters poured their own savings into their businesses to make up losses that were incorrectly calculated by the computer September, the Labour government announced a new independent appeals process system called the Horizon Shortfall Scheme intended for those sub-postmasters who weren't convicted or part of the GLO court means they can appeal if they feel their financial settlement did not reflect the true extent of their losses and is administered by the Post Office but the independent appeals process will be overseen by the Department for Business. Post Office Minister Gareth Thomas said he was still considering whether to transfer this scheme to the government as has received more than 4,665 eligible claims so far, according to data, external from the Department for Business and Trade. How many people are eligible for compensation overall? The number of people eligible for one of the three main schemes stands at over 4,000 - and the government has said new potential victims are still coming is unclear how many of them will end up receiving payments, and the processes - which have been criticised by campaigners for being too slow - can sometimes take several years. What about people who died before receiving compensation? On 10 January 2024, the then Post Office Minister Kevin Hollinrake told the Commons the families of the 60 people who died before receiving any compensation would be able to apply for it in their place. How much compensation has been paid out so far? As of 2 June 2025, approximately £1.039bn has been awarded to just over 7,300 sub-postmasters across all four redress schemes. That total breaks down as:Horizon Shortfall Scheme - £559mGroup Litigation Order Scheme - £167mOverturned Convictions Scheme -£68mHorizon Convictions Redress Scheme - £245mThe amount an individual sub-postmaster receives can vary greatly depending on the circumstances of their Chris Hodges, chair of the the independent Horizon Compensation Advisory Board, told the BBC compensation payments that have been made so far range from £10,000 to "well over £1m".The government has not provided an estimate for how much compensation will be paid out in total, but it will inevitably run into the hundreds of millions on top of what has already been paid.
Glasgow Times
2 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
More than £1 billion paid to those wronged by Horizon scandal, Government says
The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) said money has now been paid out to more than 7,300 subpostmasters across all Horizon-related redress schemes. The announcement comes just weeks after lead campaigner and former subpostmaster Sir Alan Bates said the schemes had 'turned into quasi-kangaroo courts'. Sir Alan told the Sunday Times last month that DBT 'sits in judgement of the claims and alters the goal posts as and when it chooses'. Between 1999 and 2015, more than 900 subpostmasters were prosecuted after faulty Horizon accounting software made it look as though money was missing from their accounts. Many are still awaiting compensation. In figures published on Monday, DBT said £559 million has been paid out to 6,337 claimants from the Horizon shortfall scheme. The data also says that of the 555 people who joined Sir Alan Bates in taking the Post Office to court between 2017 and 2019, also known as the Group Litigation Order Scheme (GLO), 488 have received £167 million between them. Elsewhere, £245 million has been paid out to 463 subpostmasters who had their convictions quashed by legislation put in place last summer, and £68 million has been paid to those who have had their convictions quashed in the courts, DBT said. Post Office minister Gareth Thomas said: 'Since entering Government, it has been our priority to speed up the delivery of compensation to victims of the Horizon scandal and today's milestone shows how much progress has been made. 'We are settling cases every day and getting compensation out more quickly for the most complex cases, but the job isn't done until every postmaster has received fair and just redress.' Post Office chief executive Neil Brocklehurst said: 'I welcome the news that over £1 billion has been paid to victims of the Horizon IT Scandal. 'Each week we are seeing more people receive their final settlements so they can begin to look beyond this painful chapter of their lives. 'However, I am also aware that more work remains to be done so that all victims receive full redress as quickly as possible and this is an absolute priority for the Post Office. 'And finally, to anyone else who thinks they may have been affected, I encourage you to come forward and apply for redress.'
