Sir Alan Bates slams 'kangaroo court' who offered only half his compensation claim
Sir Alan Bates slams 'kangaroo court' who offered only half his compensation claim
The 70-year-old, the subject of the ITV drama Mr Bates vs The Post Office revealed he has been told to 'take it or leave it'
The former postmaster has led a campaign for justice against the Post Office
(Image: Lucy North/PA Wire )
The former postmaster who led a campaign for justice against the Post Office amidst the Horizon scandal has revealed he has been offered compensation less than half of his original claim. Sir Alan Bates said the offer had been made on a "take it or leave it" basis.
The 70-year-old, who has been campaigning for 20 years in support of thousands of subpostmasters wrongly accused of dishonesty because of faulty software, says a 'quasi-kangaroo court' presided over by the UK Government has been responsible for the compensation scheme.
The scandal, dramatised in the award winning ITV programme Mr Bates vs The Post Office saw more than 900 post office staff members convicted of fraud, false accounting and theft as a result of the Horizon IT system falsely showing money was missing.
Convictions were overturned last year but many victims are still awaiting compensation.
Mr Bates has said he has been offered a "take it or leave it" compensation figure, amounting to 49.2% of his original claim, after making an appeal to independent reviewer Sir Ross Cranston.
(Image: ITV )
Article continues below
Speaking to The Sunday Times, Mr Bates has called for an independent body to be set up to deal with compensation schemes for scandals involving the public sector.
He added: "I can already hear the sharpening of goose quills across Whitehall as the civil service prepares to snow politicians under with reasons it would not work.
"The sub-postmaster compensation schemes have been turned into quasi-kangaroo courts in which the Department for Business and Trade sits in judgment of the claims and alters the goalposts as and when it chooses.
"Claims are, and have been, knocked back on the basis that legally you would not be able to make them, or that the parameters of the scheme do not extend to certain items.'
The 555 claimants who took the Post Office to the High Court between 2017 and 2019 are eligible to seek redress from the group litigation fund (GLO), with claimants able to take a fixed sum of £75,000 or seek their own settlements.
For individual disputes, referrals are made to an independent panel for review or seek a final view from former High Court judge Sir Cranston.
A spokesperson for the Department for Business and Trade said: "We pay tribute to all the postmasters who have suffered from this scandal, including Sir Alan for his tireless campaign for justice, and we have quadrupled the total amount paid to postmasters since entering government.
'We recognise there will be an absence of evidence given the length of time that has passed, and we therefore aim to give the benefit of the doubt to postmasters as far as possible.
"Anyone unhappy with their offer can have their case reviewed by a panel of experts, which is independent of the government.'
Article continues below
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Divorces delayed by disputes as quickie divorce search grows
But, there may be more to this interest than casual celebrity interest, with many who are looking to split concerned about financial disclosures and money disputes slowing down the process. The latest ONS figures show 80,057 divorces were granted within a year in the UK. But how long do these proceedings tend to take? How long should you expect to wait to finalise a divorce and what can speed up the process? Is there such a thing as a "quickie divorce"? DONT MISS IT. The 9 huge hidden financial benefits of marriage and how to take advantage of them A Martin Lewis Money Show Valentines special Tonight (Thur) 8pm ITV Oh & how to cut divorce costs too — Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) February 13, 2025 A divorce cannot be concluded in less than 26 weeks, and according to the average divorce in England and Wales takes at least seven months to process. Lucy Phipps, a family lawyer from Weightmans, says: "Different factors can influence the length of time it can take, including court delays, but mainly it can take longer because of the time needed to resolve disputes over finances. "It can be extremely important not to finalise your divorce until a financial settlement is reached. This also needs to be recorded in a court order, and so, however keen you are not to remain married, it is always worthwhile checking this point with a solicitor before you apply for the final order of divorce." It's important to be aware that whether you apply for a divorce on your own or as part of a joint application, the process will still be expected to take the same amount of time. The rise of the 'quickie divorce' - does it exist? With over 1,000 searches each month for the term 'quickie divorce' in the UK, popularised by mainstream media, the terminology is often synonymous with celebrity divorces. Although a 'quickie divorce' gives the impression of a fast turnaround, there is no way to hurry along proceedings within the boundaries of the law. The phrase arose years ago, when it was necessary to cite the fault of one of the parties if you wished to avoid waiting for at least 2 years post-separation before being allowed to apply for a divorce. What's a no-fault divorce? Since 2022, there has been a 'no fault' divorce system. All legal divorces are subject to the same minimum timeframe of 26 weeks. Lucy says: "There are also clear risks in proceeding without legal advice. Without proper representation, issues can arise that seriously jeopardise financial security, such as prematurely divorcing before a financial settlement is reached. "This potentially can cause hardship if a party passes away prior to that settlement being converted into a legally binding order, because spousal pension benefits are lost. "Other mistakes can include remarrying prior to a settlement being reached, which may prevent your seeking any settlement at all, or divorcing in the wrong divorce jurisdiction, resulting in your obtaining a settlement worth less than that you might have obtained if you were divorced somewhere else." Understanding your legal rights and responsibilities is essential to achieving the best possible outcome post-divorce. Financial and parental disputes can cause delays When preparing for a divorce, several factors can delay the process beyond the typical timeframe. "One common issue is incomplete paperwork. For example, the initial application for a divorce or dissolution, the D8 form, must be properly completed before proceedings can start," says Lucy. The most frequent delays involve disputes over finances or children. Although the divorce itself can proceed without resolving these matters, courts and expert family law solicitors recommend that financial arrangements are addressed first. Financial disclosure issues in divorce cases Disputes regarding property, pensions, or maintenance. Other potential delays may stem from court backlogs, a change of solicitors by either party, or particularly complex financial circumstances. How to prepare for the process - or get your 'ducks in a row' "The first step would be to get your documents in order to prepare for the divorce proceedings; this can include your marriage certificate, filling in the required D8 form, and starting to think about financial arrangements by gathering together information such as property agreements and bank statements," says Lucy. Recommended reading Beware destination weddings Couples who get divorced after tying the knot on a sandy beach in a far-flung location could face 'difficult delays' if important paperwork has been mislaid. James Brien, Founder of Easy Online Divorce says: 'Whether it's the sunshine or a better deal that makes a couple decide to go overseas for their wedding, it's an exciting and romantic experience. 'Like all relationships, things can go wrong and you might decide to separate. No matter where you get married, to start divorce proceedings in the UK, you need your marriage certificate. 'Things happen and marriage certificates can get lost, or a partner might withhold it if things have taken a bitter turn. 'In the UK, it can take four weeks to get a new certificate. But if you need a copy sent over from the authorities in another country, this can cause a difficult delay to proceedings.'
Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
Gino D'Acampo's restaurant empire 'owed seven-figure sum' before near-closure
Gino D'Acampo's restaurant chain was saved from the brink of collapse after falling into £7million worth of debt. The scandal-ridden TV chef was booted from ITV programming earlier this year after a series of allegations of sexually inappropriate and bullying behaviour from dozens over his career. It's not the only crisis the former presenter, who has firmly denied all allegations, has had to navigate with his culinary empire was almost forced to shut down due to amassing an eye-watering amount of debt. D'Acampo owns restaurants across London, Leeds, Liverpool, Newcastle and Manchester, totalling 11 locations, an Italian ingredients supplier Bonta Italia Ltd, as well as a line of Asda ready meals. The financial woes, however, became apparent last year when he was unable to pay his staff at his My Pasta Bar chain thanks to the business stacking up £5m worth of losses. It has now come to light that the controlling company Upmarket Leisure – of which the 48-year-old TV personality owns 10% – owed £5.3m to HMRC and almost £2m to creditors ahead of its near-closure. This included food suppliers who were owed almost £500,000, a wine dealer due £302,000 and a pasta company waiting for a £4,809 payment. The statement of affairs, publicly released on June 5, also outlined that Upmarket only had£117,000 in cash at the bank and £320,000 in other assets to cover the debt. In May, the chain was saved when Upmarket was bought out of administration in a whopping £5m deal which secured the jobs of all 400 staff members. It also ensured the payment of £4.2m to two major creditors. At the time, Dean Watson, an administrator Begbies Traynor, said: 'This very well-recognised group of restaurants will be able to continue, under their existing brand, and has the opportunity to thrive again. Meanwhile, D'Acampo is gearing up for an imminent TV comeback since his slew of travel and food shows, as well as his regular spot on This Morning, were stopped. He recently appeared on the radio where he made a series of innuendo-filled, sexually-charged comments towards the female presenter. Earlier this year, he also shared photos of himself on the set of a new project, both in front and behind the camera, with the promise of an upcoming release date. Meanwhile, Gino's official website promises great things ahead, including his career as a restaurateur. More Trending 'Gino is also one of the UK's most successful restaurateurs, with his restaurant empire growing by the day. Gino currently has 7 restaurants across the UK, plus has recently partnered with the global hotel giants to open restaurants both in the UK and overseas. 'Malta is the next international site to open in June 2025, in the 5* ME HOTEL, Mercury Towers,' the site reads. View More » Stars such as John Barrowman and Keith Lemon's Leigh Francis have shown their support for the controversial presenter. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you.
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Martin Lewis helped me get £14k in council tax but I'm not happy
One of the consumer champion's fans shared a story on how he successfully challenged his council tax payment, only for there to be a sting in the tail Consumer champion Martin Lewis was heaped with praise online after his sage advice helped a man claim back more than £14,000 in excess council tax payments – yet the story took a bittersweet turn. One of his followers heeded the expert's advice and was over the moon to get tens of thousands of pounds back after discovering his property was placed in the wrong council tax band, only later to share there was a "sad" twist to the tale. Martin had initially uploaded a video on his X account encouraging the public to tune in to the latest instalment of his self-titled BBC Sounds podcast. In it, he complained about the council tax band system in England and Scotland. His message was paired with the caption: "Are you in one of 400,000 homes that are in the wrong council tax band? If so, you could be due £1,000s back!" He added: "It really is quite unbelievable that if you live in England and Scotland, the council tax band you are in today is still dictated by a stop-gap, drive-by valuation done back in 1991 that was only meant to last a couple of years. "And when I say drive-by, I'm literally talking a couple of estate agents in a car often, with a clipboard in second gear going, 'Band C, Band D, Band E' – and that is still in place today. So no surprise up to 400,000 homes are in the wrong band. If you're in the wrong band and if you challenge it, not only can you get it lowered, you can get a backdated payout back to when you moved in or 1993, whichever was sooner." The expert, who also hosts The Martin Lewis Money Show on ITV, later told people not to dispute their council tax band without doing their research first, adding: "However, don't just do this speculatively because then you could get it wrong and they put your band up or even your neighbour's band up. You need to follow my full, step-by-step check and challenge process that I go through in detail in the podcast." Taking this advice on board, one fan, Rob Dean, sought about correcting the council tax band for not only his mother's property but also that of his neighbours. He replied to Martin's video: "Did that for my mum following your guidance and got £6000+ back and then told the three neighbours who were also in the wrong band. Overall total was £14.5k. Only sad part is that we'd all overpaid the water rates too!" He made no suggestion that he had managed to claw back any of that money. Others also shared their experiences of challenging their council tax bands. One person said: "I've been waiting for a decision for more than six months," while another follower added: "Just checked mine as I've always thought it seemed too high – turns out I am in the right band, but right at the bottom of it!" A third person sought Martin's help, saying: "My sister challenged her band last October. VOA [Valuation Office Agency] said it can take up to a year before they decide!! Is this right??" Challenging your council tax band Martin's Money Saving Expert website offers a comprehensive guide on how to contest your council tax band, detailing the steps homeowners can take to secure a refund if they believe they've been incorrectly categorised. For an in-depth look at the procedure, click here. But in brief, he proposed two approaches for those looking to challenge their council tax band. The first step is to compare your band with that of neighbours in similar or identical properties, with resources available on his website for residents in England and Scotland to facilitate this comparison. The second step involves a valuation check, where individuals can use the Money Saving Expert site to estimate the value of their property back in 1991, which was when the current bands were established, despite the tax being introduced in 1993. Martin pointed out that anyone who purchased their home after 1991 can "use its price and date of sale" as a basis for valuation. However, he warned: "This can't be used as evidence if you challenge your band. But it enables you to check out various property prices on your street and is an important test that you're on the right track." If both criteria are met, Martin said that you can then present a challenge to the VOA, either formally or informally, recommending the formal route although acknowledging it's "available to fewer people". Those eligible to lodge a formal challenge must have "lived in the property for six months or less (it doesn't matter whether you own or rent, though if renting you should notify the landlord as a courtesy)". For individuals who can't make a formal challenge, Martin suggested: "Over the years we've heard feedback from people who've been told they can't challenge as they've lived in their property too long – yet the VOA has a statutory duty to uphold the integrity of Council Tax bands list. "This means you can still submit a request for an 'informal review' of your Council Tax band, though the burden is on you to provide compelling evidence that your band is wrong, to persuade the VOA to do the review."
