Bomb Moscow? Trump Surely Couldn't Be That Reckless
Not knowing the identities or even nationalities of the unnamed officials cited in Tuesday's Financial Times article, one can only guess at the motivations for airing such an idea, or if accurate, whether Trump was serious. But given that he already boasted of threatening during his first term to 'bomb the sh*t out of Moscow' if Putin attacked Ukraine, it can't be dismissed out of hand, which is disturbing itself.
I'm going to guess that Trump's claim to have threatened Moscow — made on the campaign trail and recorded by CNN - was just one more among countless falsehoods that he's made for political ends. In this case, it would be to prove his otherwise ridiculous claim that Russia never would have invaded Ukraine had he remained in power after 2020. And if only to sleep soundly, let's likewise assume that whatever Trump asked of Zelenskiy on July 4, it won't result in the US handing over state-of-the-art missiles marked for Moscow.
Given its merciless pounding of Kyiv and other cities in Ukraine, Russia needs to suffer a cost that deters it from continuing its unprovoked invasion. But which cost? Trump shied away from applying much safer forms of pressure on Putin as recently as Monday, when he announced that all future US military transfers to Ukraine will have to be paid for by others (meaning that fewer weapons will be sent), and that he'd impose new sanctions to punish Putin's warmongering only after another 50-day reprieve.
And that's when he was supposedly getting tough. Since returning to office, Trump hasn't just refused to authorize any new aid for Ukraine, he at times interfered with the shipment of arms – including for air defense – already authorized by his predecessor and en route to Kyiv. He also gave away key Ukrainian negotiating cards before talks with Russia even began, including acceptance that the country would never join NATO.
These were at best acts of enormous naivete on Trump's part, requiring him to believe that if he made unilateral concessions to a career KGB officer who has mired himself in Europe's largest war since 1945, the favor would be returned. Like many others, I've been quick to point out these mistakes, often justified by Trump and his supporters as bids to avoid World War III.
In the same way, former President Joe Biden was correctly criticized for overestimating the risk that Putin would carry through with bluster about unleashing nuclear war in response to Ukraine getting supplied with conventional US weapons, from Himars multiple launch rocket systems to Abrams Tanks. All these US hesitations were misjudgments that cost Ukrainian lives.
But to offer American missiles to bomb Moscow would be an altogether different matter. A success would humiliate Putin, a man who measures himself by his imperial predecessors in the Kremlin. It would expose his inability to defend even his own capital in a war he has falsely cast as collective act of Western aggression.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump hikes tariffs on Canada to 35%, announces new rates from 15% to 40% for dozens of countries
The White House took a step forward with President Trump's plan to remake the trade landscape by releasing new details Thursday evening that included a raft of new tariff rates now formally authorized by executive order, which set new levels from 15% to 40% on over 70 countries. The move represents a giant shakeup in the US's trade order, with outlined rates that range from a 35% tariff on Canada (up from 25%) to rates above 30% on nations from Algeria to Switzerland. But there's a last minute catch, as these new rates will not go into effect for seven days, instead of a midnight Friday deadline as originally planned — according to the text of the order. "These modifications shall be effective ... on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time 7 days after the date of this order," reads the now signed order. India, after initial high hopes for a deal that have bogged down in recent weeks, is set to face a 25% rate but now appears to have another week to negotiate. Taiwan is another top US trading partner and is set to see a 20% rate. The White House documentation released Thursday also confirmed some of the parameters of recent deals including 19%-20% rates on a range of Southeast Asian nations and an unchanged 10% rate on the United Kingdom. Dozens of other nations also saw their tariff rates upped to 15% from 10% — in line with deals sketched out in recent days that included that headline 15% tariff rate on Europe, South Korea, and Japan. But some nations were not included in Tuesday's release — those omitted included many nations with which the US currently has a trade surplus — who therefore are set to see their rates remain at 10%, in a surprise relief for some after comments from Trump in recent days suggested 15% would be his new minimum. Thursday's announcement comes as previously announced 50% levies on copper are also set to go into effect at midnight tonight. The White House also has plans for 50% tariffs on Brazil which are set to be in fully in effect in a few days. Thursday's advancement did come after one significant delay, with a 90-day pause on new tariffs on Mexico, as the president decided to keep rates there at 25% after a 'very successful' meeting. The rapid-fire tariff moves also came as small business importers and the US Justice Department clashed Thursday over whether President Trump even has the authority to take these actions. Trump's team says the 1977 International Economic Emergency Powers Act authorizes the president to 'regulate' international commerce after declaring a national emergency. It's also the latest culmination of Trump's intense second term focus on tariffs. He declared "I am a tariff man" back in 2018 but has gone far further in his second term. The latest calculations from the Yale Budget Lab found that these new duties, before Thursday's tweaks, suggested consumers already face an overall effective tariff rate of 18.4%, which is the highest rate since 1933. That figure is sure to rise in the coming days as the new tariff levels are digested. The duties — as Trump himself notes almost every day — have also already set multiple new tariff revenues records even at the previous levels centered around a 10% floor for tariffs. As Trump put it on Thursday 'Tariffs are making America GREAT & RICH Again' adding that lower levels seen in previous decades were hurting America and 'now the tide has completely turned.' Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump hikes tariffs on Canada to 35%, announces rates from 10% to 40% for dozens of countries
The White House took a step forward with President Trump's plan to remake the trade landscape by releasing new details Thursday evening that included a raft of new tariff rates now formally authorized by executive order, which set levels from 10% to 40% on nearly every global trading partner. The move represents a giant shakeup in the US's trade order, with outlined rates that range from a 35% tariff on Canada (up from 25% currently) to rates above 30% on nations from South Africa to Switzerland. But there's a last minute catch, as nearly all these new rates (except for Canada's) will not go into effect for seven days, instead of a midnight Friday deadline Trump had previously said. "These modifications shall be effective ... on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time 7 days after the date of this order," reads the now signed order. The new tariff rate on Canada is under a different order focused on illicit drugs and and will take effect Friday, as originally planned. The order also allows for an additional delay, with lower, previous rates applied to goods that are loaded onto ships before Aug. 7 that then enter the United States before Oct. 5. But once the new tariffs are in effect, they will be far-reaching. India, after initial high hopes for a deal that have bogged down in recent weeks, is set to face a 25% rate though negotiators there now appears to have another week to make offers. Taiwan is another top US trading partner and is set to see a 20% rate. The White House documentation released Thursday also confirmed some of the parameters of recent deals including 19%-20% rates on a range of Southeast Asian nations and an unchanged 10% rate on the United Kingdom. Dozens of other nations also saw their tariff rates upped to 15% from 10% — in line with deals sketched out in recent days that included that headline 15% tariff rate on the European Union, South Korea, and Japan. The order states that some countries are on the verge of a deal but others have made insufficient offers "to align sufficiently with the United States on economic and national security matters" and will therefore be subject to the higher rates. But some nations were not included in Tuesday's release — those omitted included many nations with which the US currently has a trade surplus — who are set to see their rates remain at 10%, in a surprise relief for some after comments from Trump in recent days suggested 15% would be his new minimum. Thursday's order also includes a focus on the growing issue of transhipping, promising an additional tariff of 40 percent for any goods deemed 'to have been transshipped to evade applicable duties' without providing a further definition. Thursday's announcement comes as previously announced 50% levies on copper are also set to go into effect at midnight Friday. The White House also has plans for 50% tariffs on Brazil which are set to be in fully in effect in a few days. Thursday's advancement did come after one significant delay Thursday, with a 90-day pause on new tariffs on Mexico, as the president decided to keep rates there at 25% after a 'very successful' meeting. The rapid-fire tariff moves also came as small business importers and the US Justice Department clashed Thursday over whether President Trump even has the authority to take these actions. Trump's team says the 1977 International Economic Emergency Powers Act authorizes the president to 'regulate' international commerce after declaring a national emergency. It's also the latest culmination of Trump's intense second term focus on tariffs. He declared "I am a tariff man" back in 2018 but has gone much further in his second term. The latest calculations from the Yale Budget Lab found that these new duties, before Thursday's tweaks, suggested consumers already face an overall effective tariff rate of 18.4%, which is the highest rate since 1933. That figure is sure to rise in the coming days as the new tariff levels are digested. The duties — as Trump himself notes almost every day — have also already set multiple new tariff revenues records even at the previous levels centered around a 10% floor for tariffs. As Trump put it on Thursday, 'Tariffs are making America GREAT & RICH Again' adding that lower levels seen in previous decades were hurting America and 'now the tide has completely turned.' Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
SOS — Save Our Shipping: Trump must break China's chokehold on global trade
A high-stakes deal that would give an American company a major role in running dozens of strategically crucial global ports is now in limbo — as China aggressively demands a stake. The United States cannot let that happen. US asset manager BlackRock and its partners are vying for 43 of the world's most important shipping ports, including the two that straddle the Panama Canal. The seller is C.K. Hutchison, a major Hong Kong operator that is one of China's 'big three' port giants — and the only one not owned outright by the Chinese government. Prying these ports from China's oversight is a critical move for both US national security and the global economy. Now the Chinese Communist Party is trying to block the deal, unless its state-owned COSCO joins the buyers' group and gains veto rights over port operations. Alarmingly, all three main parties are reportedly open to letting that happen, apparently thinking that a compromised deal is better than no deal at all. But with all that's at stake, President Donald Trump should use every tool available — starting with the ongoing US-China trade talks — to push the original deal through and keep COSCO out. The 43 ports that Hutchison seeks to sell would launch a global liberation from oppressive Chinese surveillance and control. If the plan falls through — or if it's altered to add COSCO to the ownership group — China could tighten its grip on the global shipping system, by replacing a Beijing-influenced company with a Beijing-controlled one. While the media has dubbed this the 'Panama Canal deal,' it's actually much bigger. The canal, a vital artery that runs through the center of the western hemisphere, is certainly critical — but many of the other ports involved in the deal are equally so. For example, this deal would include a port inside the Malacca Strait, the only direct maritime pathway between the Indian and Pacific Oceans. It sees 90,000 ships and $3.5 trillion worth of global trade every year. Hutchison is also looking to sell five ports that it owns on both sides of the Suez Canal, the preferred maritime commercial route between the Asian and European markets. About 12% of global trade, $1 trillion a year, passes through Suez. As China's purchases of sanctioned Iranian oil draw greater US scrutiny, Hutchison's four ports on the southern side of the Strait of Hormuz are also critical. Nearly all Iranian oil must pass through the strait, along with oil and gas from Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iraq, Kuwait and Qatar. In Europe, Hutchison controls 13 ports that act as a key entry point for Chinese goods into the European Union. The original deal would reduce China's port foothold on the continent — and the geopolitical influence that comes with it. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Like all major commercial deals, this one is complicated. Apart from the two Panama Canal ports, BlackRock would retain 20% ownership of the remaining facilities; its partner, Europe-based Mediterranean Shipping Corp., would control 70%, with Singapore's Sovereign Wealth Fund owning the rest. Meanwhile, China's power in global shipping is massive. China produces 95% of world shipping containers and all of the refrigerated ones. Ports around the world are plugged into China's logistical software platform, LOGINK, which tracks sensitive trade, market, maritime and passenger data. Huawei's 'Smart Port' 5G telecommunication towers provide Wi-Fi — and ready surveillance capacity — at ports worldwide. A Chinese state-owned company makes more than 70% of the world's ship-to-shore cranes (and 80% of the cranes used in America) — a major risk, according to the House Homeland Security Committee, which has alleged those cranes may be engaging in covert surveillance on behalf of the CCP. Adding state-owned COSCO to ports deal would give the CCP the power to veto any attempts to replace Huawei towers, LOGINK systems, Chinese cranes or other tools that may already be spying on behalf of the state. With BlackRock's minority interest in the vast bulk of these ports, replacing a private Chinese company with a state-owned one is even worse for the United States than the status quo. Breaking China's maritime monopoly is urgent. At the same time, America's economic leverage has never been higher. As Beijing trumps up patently absurd anti-monopoly investigations to stall or scuttle the BlackRock-MSC deal, the United States should Trump right back. He must make the choice clear: Access to American markets cannot continue unless Beijing releases its maritime monopoly. Elaine Dezenski heads the Center on Economic and Financial Power at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, where Susan Soh is a research associate.
