CloudPay debuts 'out-of-the-box' payroll system for mid-size businesses
0
The solution is easy to launch, easy to use, and ready for growth as businesses scale up into new countries or new entities.
This new powerful, fully cloud-based payroll solution is industry-leading, featuring:
• Fixed scope, fixed fee packages to provide clarity, certainty and control
• Fast, hassle-free implementation and onboarding within 60 days, with ready-to-go single country set-up to accelerate value generation
• Intuitive, easy-to-manage experience with a digitally-based platform to manage new hires, payroll, payments and changes, reducing operational dependency and shortening resolution time - with expert support on hand when required
• Built-in global compliance backed by deep local expertise and automated tax and labour rules, minimising legal risks and providing clarity on in-country regulations
• Integrations that work simply with HCMs and other data sources, eliminating rework and manual processing
Designed to operate in tandem with tailored HCM solutions, CloudPay's release demonstrates how a payroll solution can work seamlessly with HCM technology to create a simple and effective solution. This builds on the recent best-in-class integration with Workday's Global Payroll Connect (GPC) solution.
John Pearce, Chief Customer Officer at CloudPay, comments: 'We are excited to launch this new proposition specifically aimed at midsized businesses - it is utterly unique. A ready-to-go payroll solution that streamlines and simplifies payroll processes, keeps pace with changing regulatory frameworks worldwide, with the option to scale in line with business growth, is arguably the silver bullet many organisations have been looking for.
'We believe that global payroll shouldn't be complicated for midsize businesses so our solution is underpinned by intelligent automation, global expertise and best-in-class customer service. Furthermore, it's not rigid in its structure; we understand that customers need adaptable pay systems, and so we can tailor the solution accordingly.
'Whether companies are entering new markets or optimising existing operations, we look forward to supporting more customers on their payroll journeys, eliminating the manual strains of out-of-date payroll solutions.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
ATP players handed record £13.5m profit-sharing bonus
Men's tennis players will pocket a record $18.3m (£13.5m) in profit-sharing bonuses from the 2024 season as the ATP stepped up its efforts to forge a more sustainable and financially aligned future for the sport. The bonus amount, a 177 per cent increase on the previous season's payout, will be distributed to players based on performance at the nine ATP 1000 tournaments, which rank just below the four Grand Slams in prestige. "This is exactly what profit sharing was designed to do: ensure that players and tournaments share equally in the sport's financial upside," ATP Chairman Andrea Gaudenzi said on Thursday. "The $18.3m is a huge milestone. For us, it's proof that strengthening the premium product and aligning interests creates value. "We're proud to be strengthening our partnership and building a stronger, more sustainable ATP Tour." The profit-sharing plan, introduced in 2022, splits profits generated at ATP Masters 1000 events - above onsite base prize money - equally between players and tournaments and is a cornerstone of the tour's OneVision strategic plan. Profit-sharing helped push ATP player compensation to a record $261m (£192.7m) for the 2024 season for a total of $378m (£279.2m) when combined with Grand Slam prize money. The men's elite body added that it was on track to deliver more compensation records, including $28.5m (£21m) in Challenger Tour prize money and a $3m (£2.2m) ATP 500 bonus pool. The expansion of most of the Masters events to 96-player draws had increased earning opportunities for players, widening the number of those able to make a sustainable living from the sport, the ATP added. It said there was a "wave of infrastructure investment" as Madrid, Rome, Cincinnati, Shanghai and Paris, among other venues, had upgraded facilities to enhance the experience for players and spectators.
Geeky Gadgets
2 hours ago
- Geeky Gadgets
ChatGPT-5 vs CursorCLI vs Claude Code : Indepth Comparison & Surprising Results
What if the tools you choose for your next coding project could mean the difference between seamless success and hours of frustration? In the rapidly evolving world of AI-driven development, models like ChatGPT-5, CursorCLI, and Claude Code are transforming how developers approach complex tasks. But with so many promises of efficiency and innovation, how do these tools actually perform when put to the test? Whether you're building a innovative video-generation app or refining a simpler workflow, understanding the strengths and limitations of these technologies is critical. This exploration dives deep into their real-world capabilities, uncovering surprising insights that could reshape your approach to software development. In the sections ahead, All About AI explores how these tools stack up in key areas like instruction-following, tool-calling, and adaptability to complex workflows. From Claude Code's standout ability to execute intricate tasks with minimal intervention to the potential—and pitfalls—of pairing ChatGPT-5 with CursorCLI, this comparison offers a nuanced look at each tool's role in the AI coding landscape. Whether you're a seasoned developer or experimenting with AI for the first time, this analysis will help you identify the right tool for your needs. The stakes are high, but so is the potential—what could these tools unlock for your next project? AI Tools for Coding Comparison ChatGPT-5: A Promising Tool with Room for Growth ChatGPT-5 is designed to excel in tool-calling and instruction-following, making it a strong contender for coding and development tasks. Its quick response times and ability to handle debugging scenarios effectively have been praised by users. However, its performance can be inconsistent, particularly when addressing complex tasks such as building fully functional applications. For instance, when paired with CursorCLI, ChatGPT-5 struggled to generate a working video-generation application. This revealed gaps in its planning and execution capabilities, especially for intricate workflows that demand precision and adaptability. These challenges highlight areas where further refinement is necessary to improve its reliability for advanced use cases. Despite these limitations, ChatGPT-5 remains a valuable tool for casual users or developers working on simpler coding tasks. Its potential lies in its ability to integrate with other platforms, which could make it a more versatile option as it evolves. Developers seeking a tool for basic coding assistance or debugging support may find ChatGPT-5 to be a practical choice. Claude Code: A Standout Performer Claude Code distinguished itself as the most capable tool in this comparison, successfully creating a video-generation application on the first attempt. Its ability to plan and execute tasks with minimal adjustments underscores its strength in managing complex software development scenarios. Additionally, Claude Code suggested innovative features, such as AI voice narration and dynamic background music, which added significant value to the application's functionality. This model's seamless execution and advanced capabilities make it an excellent choice for developers seeking efficient and reliable tools. Its performance highlights the importance of robust planning and adaptability in AI-driven coding environments. By setting a high standard for competitors, Claude Code demonstrates how AI can streamline development processes and enhance creativity. For developers working on complex applications or requiring a tool that can handle multi-layered workflows, Claude Code offers a level of reliability and innovation that is difficult to match. Its ability to deliver results with minimal intervention makes it a standout option in the current landscape of AI coding tools. ChatGPT-5 vs CursorCLI vs Claude Code Watch this video on YouTube. Unlock more potential in AI coding by reading previous articles we have written. CursorCLI with ChatGPT-5: Potential Hampered by Limitations CursorCLI, when paired with ChatGPT-5, faced significant challenges during testing. The Cursor Agent, which is still in its beta phase, struggled with execution due to incomplete or flawed planning. While the Cursor IDE showed promise as a development environment, it requires further refinement to meet the practical needs of developers. These limitations highlight the need for continued development and rigorous testing to improve CursorCLI's usability and effectiveness. Despite its current shortcomings, CursorCLI holds potential as a tool for integrating AI into coding workflows. When paired with a more reliable model, it could become a valuable asset for developers seeking to streamline their processes. For now, CursorCLI may be best suited for experimental use or as a supplementary tool rather than a primary development platform. Developers interested in exploring its capabilities should be prepared to navigate its current limitations while keeping an eye on future updates that may enhance its functionality. User Feedback and Broader Insights Feedback on ChatGPT-5 has been mixed. While some users appreciate its tool-calling and debugging capabilities, others find it less reliable than Claude Code for complex coding tasks. This variability suggests that ChatGPT-5 may be better suited for casual users or simpler projects rather than advanced development scenarios. The competition between models like ChatGPT-5 and Claude Code benefits developers by driving innovation and improving performance. Platforms such as OpenCode further enrich this ecosystem by offering a versatile space to test various models, including GPT-5 Mini. These platforms allow developers to experiment with different tools, refine their prompts, and better understand the unique strengths of each model. Refining prompts and tailoring workflows to the specific strengths of each tool are critical factors that can significantly influence outcomes. Developers who invest time in understanding these nuances are more likely to achieve success, regardless of the tool they choose. Key Takeaways for Developers In this comparison, Claude Code emerged as the most capable tool, demonstrating its ability to handle complex tasks with ease and efficiency. Its performance underscores the importance of robust planning and adaptability in AI-driven development. However, ChatGPT-5 and CursorCLI also show promise, particularly for tool-calling and instruction-following in simpler or experimental projects. As these technologies continue to evolve, ongoing testing and refinement will be essential to unlocking their full potential. Developers should carefully assess their specific needs and the strengths of each tool to make informed decisions. Whether you're working on a simple project or tackling a multi-layered application, understanding the capabilities and limitations of these tools is key to achieving success. By using the unique strengths of each model and staying informed about updates and advancements, developers can maximize the benefits of AI in their workflows. The future of AI-driven software development holds immense potential, and tools like ChatGPT-5, CursorCLI, and Claude Code are paving the way for more efficient and innovative coding solutions. Media Credit: All About AI Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Firm apologises for saying it would not process LGBTQ+ payments
Stripe has apologised after staff wrongly said it would no longer process the payments of LGBTQ+ related content or firm, which millions of global businesses rely on for their online transactions, has come under fire for being one of several payment processors to not allow itself to be used for purchases of adult content online. But when some called to complain, they were told the ban in fact extended to all LGBTQ+ content - including material which wasn't adult or explicit in nature."The information given by our support team was totally wrong," a Stripe spokesperson told the BBC. "Stripe has no prohibitions on the sale of LGBTQ+ content or goods. "We're looking into this and making sure future inquiries are answered correctly."Stripe has not wanted to be associated with adult content for several on Wednesday, reports emerged on social media that some staff working for Stripe had told customers the sale of LGBTQ+ content in its entirety would not be allowed one widely-shared clip, a worker tells a caller the ban has been in place for around a month - before later backtracking and stating content is only banned when it is "abusive". Adult backlash Stripe's policies are in the spotlight after payment processors, including Visa and Mastercard, faced pressure from an Australian campaign group to play their part in stopping online video game distributors selling certain pornographic a letter to the firms' bosses, it claimed games were listed for sale online which included themes of "rape, incest and child sexual abuse".Soon after the letter was published, online game distributors Steam and removed games from their libraries and made others unavailable in searches - leading to a backlash from frustrated also updated its terms and conditions for sellers to add developers should not publish "content that may violate the rules and standards set forth by Steam's payment processors and related card networks and banks, or internet network providers". It also said games should not contain "certain kinds of adult only content".While the move has come as a shock to gamers, it is not unusual for payment processors to distance themselves from adult content 2020, Mastercard and Visa ended the use of their cards on Pornhub after a New York Times investigation accused the site of being "infested" with child abuse denied the claims. Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
