
What Are Rare Earth Minerals And Why China's Grip Has Nations Racing For Alternatives
From missiles to smartphones, rare earth minerals power the modern world. But China's dominance has triggered a global race for alternatives
Why Are Rare Earth Minerals In The News?
In June 2025, rare earth minerals became a flashpoint in US-China relations once again. In early April, China suspended export licences for several key rare earth elements, including neodymium and dysprosium, citing national security and environmental concerns. These minerals are critical to technologies ranging from electric vehicle motors to advanced missile systems. The move drew sharp condemnation from US President Donald Trump, who labelled it a strategic weaponisation of essential materials.
Following weeks of negotiations, China in June agreed to temporarily resume exports to the United States under a six-month licensing arrangement.
This move reminded the world just how reliant major economies are on China for these seemingly obscure but critically important elements. That a handful of elements could hold such sway over global supply chains has sparked renewed attention on rare earths.
What Are Rare Earth Elements?
Rare earth elements (REEs), also commonly referred to as rare earth minerals (REMs) in industry contexts, comprise a group of 17 chemically similar metals: the 15 lanthanides on the periodic table, along with scandium and yttrium. Despite the misleading name, these elements are not especially rare in nature. What makes them 'rare" is the difficulty of finding them in concentrations high enough for economical extraction, and the complexity of separating them from each other.
Their value lies in their unique physical and chemical properties, such as high magnetic strength, conductivity, and luminescence, which make them indispensable in a wide range of modern technologies. Without REEs, the world would struggle to manufacture smartphones, power clean energy solutions, or advance military technologies.
Key Uses And Applications
Rare earths are embedded deep in our modern lives. They are essential for technologies ranging from the mundane to the cutting-edge. Smartphones and flat-screen TVs rely on europium and terbium for colour and brightness. Wind turbines and electric vehicles use neodymium and dysprosium in their permanent magnets. Military-grade night vision, radar systems, and precision-guided munitions all depend on rare earths to function reliably.
Even in medicine, these elements are crucial: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machines use gadolinium, and various REEs help in producing contrast agents and laser surgery equipment. Their versatility across industries has earned them the label of 'industrial vitamins"—used in small amounts but critical for end-product performance.
Global Distribution: Where Are They Found?
Although rare earths are scattered across the planet, few countries have succeeded in harnessing them at scale. China dominates the landscape, particularly with the Bayan Obo mine in Inner Mongolia, which is the largest rare earth deposit globally. Australia, through Lynas Rare Earths, has emerged as a significant non-China producer. The United States is home to the Mountain Pass mine in California, which has seen a revival in recent years, though it still depends on China for refining.
India, meanwhile, holds considerable untapped reserves, especially in monazite sands found along the coastal regions of Odisha, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu. Other countries with potential include Brazil, Vietnam, Russia, and Canada, but infrastructure and policy limitations have held back their development.
The China Factor: Monopolising The Supply Chain
China's dominance in rare earths isn't due to geology alone; it's the result of long-term strategic planning. Over the decades, China built a vertically integrated industry encompassing everything, from mining and refining to magnet manufacturing. By offering low costs and lax environmental regulations, it pushed competitors out of the market.
In addition to subsidising its domestic industry, China cornered the market by acquiring processing rights abroad and investing in foreign mines. Today, it controls about 85 to 90 per cent of global rare earth refining capacity. And when geopolitical tensions rise, Beijing does not hesitate to flex its mineral muscles, halting exports to Japan in 2010, and imposing restrictions on the US in 2025, as recent examples.
Ukraine's Untapped Potential
Ukraine, too, has become a focal point in rare earth geopolitics. The country holds promising deposits of rare earth elements, particularly in regions like Kirovohrad and Zhytomyr. Though these reserves remain largely undeveloped due to the ongoing war, they have caught the attention of the United States for one major reason: the minerals could provide a long-term hedge against dependence on China. In early 2025, US President Donald Trump proposed linking continued military and financial aid to long-term access to these mineral reserves. Arguing that rare earths were vital to US national security and worth hundreds of billions, Trump framed the deal as a necessary exchange for the billions already committed to Ukraine's defence.
The Extraction And Refining Challenge
Processing rare earths is as much a chemical challenge as a logistical one. These elements are often found mixed together, requiring sophisticated techniques to separate and purify them. Moreover, the extraction process often generates toxic and radioactive waste, making it both environmentally hazardous and politically controversial.
Western nations once had thriving rare earth industries but gradually offshored them to China due to high costs and environmental opposition. Now, as geopolitical risks rise, there's renewed urgency to reshore these capabilities despite the regulatory and financial hurdles involved.
India faces similar challenges. Although rich in monazite sands, the country lacks large-scale refining units and downstream industries that can turn raw material into usable components like magnets or phosphors. Most of its output is processed abroad or remains untapped.
Supply Chain Risks And The Global Push For Diversification
The Covid-19 pandemic, the Russia–Ukraine war, and China's export restrictions in April 2025 on key rare earth elements have collectively underscored the vulnerability of global supply chains, bringing rare earths into sharper strategic focus. In response:
In March 2025, the United States invoked the Defence Production Act to support domestic mining, refining, and separation infrastructure for rare earths.
The European Union finalised the Critical Raw Materials Act in late 2024, setting 2030 targets of at least 10 per cent domestic extraction, 40 per cent processing, and 25 per cent recycling, while limiting reliance on any single country to 65 per cent.
Japan has expanded efforts to recycle rare earths from electronics and industrial waste, reflecting growing concerns over supply-chain security.
Private companies such as Apple (through its 'Daisy" disassembly robot) and Tesla (via rare-earth-free motor research and alternative sourcing strategies) are investing heavily in urban mining and material substitution.
Within the Indo-Pacific, Quad nations—India, Australia, Japan, and the United States—are collaborating on critical mineral development, sustainable sourcing, and end-to-end supply chain resilience.
India's Position: Potential Vs Preparedness
India has long held a geological advantage in rare earth elements, particularly through monazite-rich beach sands along its eastern and southern coasts. However, policy constraints and institutional bottlenecks have limited its ability to capitalise on this potential. The sector remains dominated by IREL (India) Limited, a public sector enterprise under the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), which oversees the exploration and processing of monazite due to its thorium content.
Under current regulations, monazite is classified as a 'prescribed substance" under the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, which effectively bars private players from mining it. In addition, restrictions on the export of unprocessed rare earths—requiring clearances from both the DAE and the Directorate General of Foreign Trade—further dampen commercial incentives.
Recognising the strategic urgency, the government introduced a Critical Minerals Strategy in 2023 and has accelerated exploration through the Geological Survey of India (GSI) and Mineral Exploration and Consultancy Limited (MECL). Production-linked incentive (PLI) schemes aimed at boosting electric vehicle and electronics manufacturing are indirectly creating demand for rare earth-based components such as magnets, batteries, and phosphors.
However, without reforming mining laws, enabling responsible private-sector participation, and investing in large-scale refining and magnet-making infrastructure, India risks remaining a supplier of raw material rather than a stakeholder in the rare earth value chain.
Environmental And Ethical Concerns
China's rare earth industry has caused severe environmental damage in regions such as Inner Mongolia, particularly around the Baotou area, where years of rare earth processing have produced toxic sludge ponds and radioactive tailings. The tailings dam near Baotou—often referred to as the 'rare earth lake"—has contaminated soil and water, exposing nearby communities to long-term environmental and health risks.
Additionally, human rights concerns have surfaced regarding the use of forced labour in China's Xinjiang region, with some allegations linked to industrial supply chains, including critical minerals. Meanwhile, illegal and unregulated rare earth mining in Myanmar, especially in the Kachin state, has raised alarms over deforestation, land degradation, and labour exploitation—much of it feeding into Chinese processing facilities.
As countries like India and others work to scale up rare earth production, there is a growing international consensus that new supply chains must prioritise not just security and self-reliance, but also environmental and ethical sustainability. Ethical sourcing, community consultation, and cleaner refining technologies will need to become non-negotiable pillars of any responsible rare earth expansion.
The Future Of Rare Earths
The next chapter in rare earths will be shaped by innovation as much as geopolitics. Research is underway into synthetic substitutes for rare earth magnets, while recycling initiatives are gaining momentum under the banner of circular economy. Deep-sea mining, though highly controversial, also looms as a potential game-changer, with rich deposits found on the ocean floor.
India, the US, the EU, and others are now treating rare earths not just as resources but as strategic assets. Control over them could define technological sovereignty for decades to come.
The Geopolitics Of The Periodic Table
Rare earth minerals are no longer viewed merely as industrial inputs, they have become strategic commodities essential to national security, advanced manufacturing, and clean energy transitions. Their limited availability in extractable forms, complex processing requirements, and widespread applications have turned them into a focal point of global competition.
top videos
View all
China's long-standing dominance over refining and supply has exposed systemic vulnerabilities, prompting countries around the world to diversify their sources and invest in alternative supply chains.
For India, this global push presents both a challenge and a window of opportunity. With policy reforms, enhanced investment, and greater international cooperation, India could position itself as a meaningful player in the rare earth ecosystem. However, bridging the gap between potential and preparedness will require focused, time-bound efforts.
About the Author
Karishma Jain
Karishma Jain, Chief Sub Editor at News18.com, writes and edits opinion pieces on a variety of subjects, including Indian politics and policy, culture and the arts, technology and social change. Follow her @kar...Read More
Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
rare earth elements US-China ties
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 12, 2025, 11:20 IST
News explainers What Are Rare Earth Minerals And Why China's Grip Has Nations Racing For Alternatives | Explained

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Tariff Tracker, June 14: US-China talks restore May 12 status, World Bank forecasts slowdown
Dear reader, Washington will host a massive military parade commemorating 250 years of the US Army on Saturday (June 14), which also happens to be US President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. The event is estimated to cost between $25 million and $45 million, and feature over 6,000 soldiers, 128 army tanks, armoured personnel carriers and artillery, as well as an aerial display featuring 62 aircraft, according to AP reporting. Traditionally, US military parades have been conducted at the end of a war to celebrate victory or to welcome the returning troops. The last military parade took place in 1991 at the end of the Gulf War, and was a less contentious event than Saturday's festivities. The timing is significant as well. Over the last week, the Trump administration has initiated a new phase of its sweeping crackdown against illegal immigration. Raids by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in the garment district in Los Angeles resulted in a flurry of arrests, triggering protests by residents. As the standoff escalated, the US President fanned the fire further, deploying the National Guard and Marines in the city. These moves are unprecedented – the last time a US president deployed the National Guard bypassing a state governor's mandate, it was Lyndon B Johnson in 1958 (check year) seeking to protect Civil Rights activists marching from Selma to Montgomery in Alabama. The use of the National Guard, typically a decision exercised by the state, was challenged in court by California Governor Gavin Newsom, and a federal court ruled in his favour on Friday, ordering control of the troops to be restored to Newsom. However, this order was almost immediately stayed following an appeal by the Trump administration. The latest round of trade talks between the US and China this week reportedly resulted in a handshake agreement between the officials of the two countries on Wednesday (June 11) in London. In a social media post, Trump wrote, 'OUR DEAL WITH CHINA IS DONE, SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL WITH PRESIDENT XI (Jinping) AND ME.' While details of the agreement are still to be revealed, reports suggest a return to the terms agreed by both countries on May 12 in Geneva. You will recall that the US and China agreed to lower their tariffs on each other by 115%, reducing US tariffs on China to 30% and Chinese tariffs to 10%. The escalating trade war between the US and China began in February, with Trump announcing a 10% fentanyl tariff on China along with tariffs on Canada and Mexico, which was doubled to 20% in March. Unlike other nations, China did not immediately seek talks with the US president, and instead, announced countermeasures targeting Liquefied Natural Gas, coal, and farm machinery, among other products. Trump's Liberation Day tariff announcements singled out China, and in the days that followed, saw US tariffs on Chinese products reach 145%, while China charged 125% tariffs. China also decided to hit the US (and by extension the rest of the world) where it hurts most, by announcing an elaborate licensing system to restrict rare earths exports, citing a national security risk. We explained why this move is significant in the Tariff Tracker on June 2. The May 12 agreement had extracted an assurance from the Chinese side to resume rare earths exports. However, the Trump administration accused China of acting slowly in this regard and moved to retaliate, restricting access to a range of software, products, chemicals and technologies critical to the Chinese manufacture of advanced chips and jet engines. Ultimately the a detente became possible following a phone call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping last Thursday (June 5) to iron out the differences. For now, the talks have resulted in one certain outcome – that American restrictions on exports of tech and ethane gas to China, as well as visa restrictions targeting Chinese students, would be removed. In exchange, China has agreed to grant rare earths licences to US firms, according to US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. However, these licences would only be valid for 6 months, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal citing people familiar with the matter. On May 29, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit stayed an order by the US Court for International Trade, which had ruled Trump's tariffs were illegal under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 1977 (IEEPA). These pertained to two sets of tariffs – the Liberation Day tariffs, which stipulated a 10% baseline tariff for all countries and the country-specific tariffs, as well as the fentanyl tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China. On Tuesday (June 10), the appeals court ruled that the tariffs could continue even as legal challenges against them were being heard. However, the court allowed for the cases challenging the tariffs to be expedited, and that the case will be heard on a sped-up basis by the full panel of judges at the court. 'The court also concludes that these cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration of the merits in the first instance,' the order said. The May 29 ruling had said that Trump had exceeded his powers as president in using the emergency powers under the IEEPA to impose tariffs on all countries, using the US's trade deficit as a rationale. In the Tariff Tracker on May 29, we explained how emergency laws have been used in the US, and how the federal court ruled thus. In its biannual Global Economic Prospects report, the World Bank forecasted a global economic slowdown due to 'substantial headwinds, emanating largely from an increase in trade tensions and heightened global policy uncertainty.' However, this would likely stop short of a full-blown recession. The World Bank also announced that the fallout of Trump's tariffs could lead to the weakest decade of economic growth since the 1960s, with global output expected to slow to 2.3% in 2025 from 2.8% last year. The decline would be most acutely felt by the US, with growth estimated to decline to 1.4% from 2.8% last year. 'The rise in trade barriers, heightened uncertainty and the spike in financial market volatility are set to weigh on private consumption, international trade and investment,' the report said. It also anticipated a decline in investment 'due to record-high uncertainty, the rise in financing costs, and reduced domestic and external demand.' The World Bank also said that if the tariff rates were to be halved, global economic growth could rise by 0.2% over the next two years. Emerging markets and developing economies would continue to outperform developed nations this year too, but the extent of growth would not be sufficient to narrow income gaps with richer countries, boost job creation, and reduce extreme poverty. India is projected to grow by 6.3% over 2025-26, the fastest-growing large economy. In the face of global uncertainty, investments and exports would remain subdued. The number aligns with the IMF's forecast of 6.2% over the coming year in its World Economic Outlook report.


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
'No Kings' protests sweep US as Trump stages $45 million military parade
As tanks roll through Washington's streets in celebration of the US Army's 250th anniversary, millions across the country are expected to gather in protest against what they describe as the authoritarian excesses of Donald Trump's second term. The nationwide demonstrations, under the banner 'No Kings', are taking place in roughly 2,000 locations, from major cities to rural counties, in what may become the most significant mobilisation since Trump's re-election. The protests are timed to coincide with the President's birthday and the military parade. The parade features 6,000 Army troops, 49 aircraft, 128 military vehicles, and even 25 horses. The cost is projected between $25 million and $45 million. Though the Pentagon says the parade marks the Army's historic milestone, organisers claim it is being used as a 'vanity display' by Trump. The event, which Trump had wanted to stage during his first term after witnessing France's Bastille Day celebrations in 2017, had been cancelled earlier due to high cost. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now D.C. avoided, Philadelphia becomes focal point Despite the parade's location, 'No Kings' organisers have intentionally avoided holding protests in Washington DC. Instead, Philadelphia—home to the US Constitution—will host the flagship event. A local group is also organising a 'DC Joy Day' to celebrate the city's culture without inviting confrontation near the military spectacle. According to the protest website, the goal is to draw a 'clear contrast between our people-powered movement and the costly, wasteful, and un-American birthday parade in Washington'. Live Events The coalition includes over 200 organisations such as the American Civil Liberties Union , the American Federation of Teachers, and the Communications Workers of America. Their call: 'No thrones. No crowns. No kings.' Rising tensions and pre-emptive crackdowns In the days leading up to the protest, tensions have escalated. Trump ordered National Guard and US Marine deployments to Los Angeles earlier this week, aiming to suppress anti-deportation protests. It was a move many civil rights groups have likened to Cold War-era military interventions. Interest in 'No Kings' reportedly surged following this. Republican governors in several states have also taken action. Texas Governor Greg Abbott activated his state's National Guard ahead of the protest wave. In Florida, Governor Ron DeSantis publicly stated that drivers could legally hit protesters if surrounded by a crowd. 'You don't have to sit there and just be a sitting duck and let the mob grab you out of your car and drag you through the streets. You have a right to defend yourself in Florida,' he said. Trump responds: 'I don't feel like a King' On Thursday, Trump was asked directly about the 'No Kings' protests. 'I don't feel like a king. I have to go through hell to get things approved,' he said. Earlier in the week, he had warned that protesters would be 'met with very big force', though the White House later softened that message by claiming he supported peaceful demonstrations. Still, Trump also said Tuesday: 'By the way, for those people that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force. And I haven't even heard about a protest, but you know, this is people that hate our country.' A year of growing dissent The scale of anti-Trump demonstrations has grown since his second term began in February. According to the Harvard-based Crowd Counting Consortium, there were three times as many protests by March 2025 as during the same period in 2017. These actions have spanned causes, including mass deportations, federal budget cuts, and public opposition to Elon Musk's growing influence in federal contracts. The previous largest day of protest, the 'Hands Off' march in April, drew around 1.5 million people according to independent estimates. The consortium stated in a new analysis: 'Overall, 2017's numbers pale in comparison to the scale and scope of mobilisation in 2025 – a fact often unnoticed in the public discourse about the response to Trump's actions.' Protests stress non-violence Organisers of 'No Kings' have reiterated a commitment to nonviolence. Participant guides distributed ahead of Saturday's events urge attendees to de-escalate potential conflicts and avoid provocation. The organisers' statement reads: 'We're showing up everywhere he isn't—to say no thrones, no crowns, no kings.' Despite the tense atmosphere, the message from the streets remains clear. As Trump's display of force takes centre stage in Washington, much of the rest of America is choosing to show a different face—one of defiance, unity, and peaceful resistance.


India Today
25 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump military parade live updates: Army's $45 million celebration to be held under tight security, rain alert
Washington is set to host an extravagant military parade on Saturday marking the US Army's 250th anniversary, coinciding with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. The 90-minute spectacle will feature over 6,000 troops, 150 military vehicles-including Abrams tanks and HIMARS-and 62 aircraft such as Apache helicopters and vintage WWII bombers. Marching formations will chronicle the Army's history from the Revolutionary War to modern-day operations. The event concludes with a parachute jump by the Army's Golden Knights, a fireworks display, and the president swearing in new recruits.